Unidirectional Optomotor Responses and Eye Dominance in Two Species of Crabs

Autores
Barnatan, Yair; Tomsic, Daniel; Sztarker, Julieta
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Animals, from invertebrates to humans, stabilize the panoramic optic flow through compensatory movements of the eyes, the head or the whole body, a behavior known as optomotor response (OR). The same optic flow moved clockwise or anticlockwise elicits equivalent compensatory right or left turning movements, respectively. However, if stimulated monocularly, many animals show a unique effective direction of motion, i.e., a unidirectional OR. This phenomenon has been reported in various species from mammals to birds, reptiles, and amphibious, but among invertebrates, it has only been tested in flies, where the directional sensitivity is opposite to that found in vertebrates. Although OR has been extensively investigated in crabs, directional sensitivity has never been analyzed. Here, we present results of behavioral experiments aimed at exploring the directional sensitivity of the OR in two crab species belonging to different families: the varunid mud crab Neohelice granulata and the ocypode fiddler crab Uca uruguayensis. By using different conditions of visual perception (binocular, left or right monocular) and direction of flow field motion (clockwise, anticlockwise), we found in both species that in monocular conditions, OR is effectively displayed only with progressive (front-to-back) motion stimulation. Binocularly elicited responses were directional insensitive and significantly weaker than monocular responses. These results are coincident with those described in flies and suggest a commonality in the circuit underlying this behavior among arthropods. Additionally, we found the existence of a remarkable eye dominance for the OR, which is associated to the size of the larger claw. This is more evident in the fiddler crab where the difference between the two claws is huge. Copyright © 2019 Barnatan, Tomsic and Sztarker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Fil: Tomsic, Daniel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.
Fil: Sztarker, Julieta. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.
Fuente
Front. Physiol. 2019;586
Materia
Adult
Animal behavior
Animal experiment
Arthropod
Crab
Eye dominance
Eye movement
Male
Motor performance
Neohelice granulata
Nonhuman
Uca uruguayensis
Vision
Visual stimulation
Eye dominance
Lateralization
Monocular vision
Optic flow
Semiterrestrial crabs
Unidirectional optomotor response
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar
Repositorio
Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
OAI Identificador
paperaa:paper_1664042X_v10_n_p1_Barnatan

id BDUBAFCEN_67f2973074c9986b66b28a13036d28f4
oai_identifier_str paperaa:paper_1664042X_v10_n_p1_Barnatan
network_acronym_str BDUBAFCEN
repository_id_str 1896
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
spelling Unidirectional Optomotor Responses and Eye Dominance in Two Species of CrabsBarnatan, YairTomsic, DanielSztarker, JulietaAdultAnimal behaviorAnimal experimentArthropodCrabEye dominanceEye movementMaleMotor performanceNeohelice granulataNonhumanUca uruguayensisVisionVisual stimulationEye dominanceLateralizationMonocular visionOptic flowSemiterrestrial crabsUnidirectional optomotor responseAnimals, from invertebrates to humans, stabilize the panoramic optic flow through compensatory movements of the eyes, the head or the whole body, a behavior known as optomotor response (OR). The same optic flow moved clockwise or anticlockwise elicits equivalent compensatory right or left turning movements, respectively. However, if stimulated monocularly, many animals show a unique effective direction of motion, i.e., a unidirectional OR. This phenomenon has been reported in various species from mammals to birds, reptiles, and amphibious, but among invertebrates, it has only been tested in flies, where the directional sensitivity is opposite to that found in vertebrates. Although OR has been extensively investigated in crabs, directional sensitivity has never been analyzed. Here, we present results of behavioral experiments aimed at exploring the directional sensitivity of the OR in two crab species belonging to different families: the varunid mud crab Neohelice granulata and the ocypode fiddler crab Uca uruguayensis. By using different conditions of visual perception (binocular, left or right monocular) and direction of flow field motion (clockwise, anticlockwise), we found in both species that in monocular conditions, OR is effectively displayed only with progressive (front-to-back) motion stimulation. Binocularly elicited responses were directional insensitive and significantly weaker than monocular responses. These results are coincident with those described in flies and suggest a commonality in the circuit underlying this behavior among arthropods. Additionally, we found the existence of a remarkable eye dominance for the OR, which is associated to the size of the larger claw. This is more evident in the fiddler crab where the difference between the two claws is huge. Copyright © 2019 Barnatan, Tomsic and Sztarker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.Fil: Tomsic, Daniel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.Fil: Sztarker, Julieta. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.2019info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_1664042X_v10_n_p1_BarnatanFront. Physiol. 2019;586reponame:Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)instname:Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturalesinstacron:UBA-FCENenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar2025-11-27T08:37:05Zpaperaa:paper_1664042X_v10_n_p1_BarnatanInstitucionalhttps://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttps://digital.bl.fcen.uba.ar/cgi-bin/oaiserver.cgiana@bl.fcen.uba.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:18962025-11-27 08:37:07.061Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) - Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturalesfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Unidirectional Optomotor Responses and Eye Dominance in Two Species of Crabs
title Unidirectional Optomotor Responses and Eye Dominance in Two Species of Crabs
spellingShingle Unidirectional Optomotor Responses and Eye Dominance in Two Species of Crabs
Barnatan, Yair
Adult
Animal behavior
Animal experiment
Arthropod
Crab
Eye dominance
Eye movement
Male
Motor performance
Neohelice granulata
Nonhuman
Uca uruguayensis
Vision
Visual stimulation
Eye dominance
Lateralization
Monocular vision
Optic flow
Semiterrestrial crabs
Unidirectional optomotor response
title_short Unidirectional Optomotor Responses and Eye Dominance in Two Species of Crabs
title_full Unidirectional Optomotor Responses and Eye Dominance in Two Species of Crabs
title_fullStr Unidirectional Optomotor Responses and Eye Dominance in Two Species of Crabs
title_full_unstemmed Unidirectional Optomotor Responses and Eye Dominance in Two Species of Crabs
title_sort Unidirectional Optomotor Responses and Eye Dominance in Two Species of Crabs
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Barnatan, Yair
Tomsic, Daniel
Sztarker, Julieta
author Barnatan, Yair
author_facet Barnatan, Yair
Tomsic, Daniel
Sztarker, Julieta
author_role author
author2 Tomsic, Daniel
Sztarker, Julieta
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Adult
Animal behavior
Animal experiment
Arthropod
Crab
Eye dominance
Eye movement
Male
Motor performance
Neohelice granulata
Nonhuman
Uca uruguayensis
Vision
Visual stimulation
Eye dominance
Lateralization
Monocular vision
Optic flow
Semiterrestrial crabs
Unidirectional optomotor response
topic Adult
Animal behavior
Animal experiment
Arthropod
Crab
Eye dominance
Eye movement
Male
Motor performance
Neohelice granulata
Nonhuman
Uca uruguayensis
Vision
Visual stimulation
Eye dominance
Lateralization
Monocular vision
Optic flow
Semiterrestrial crabs
Unidirectional optomotor response
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Animals, from invertebrates to humans, stabilize the panoramic optic flow through compensatory movements of the eyes, the head or the whole body, a behavior known as optomotor response (OR). The same optic flow moved clockwise or anticlockwise elicits equivalent compensatory right or left turning movements, respectively. However, if stimulated monocularly, many animals show a unique effective direction of motion, i.e., a unidirectional OR. This phenomenon has been reported in various species from mammals to birds, reptiles, and amphibious, but among invertebrates, it has only been tested in flies, where the directional sensitivity is opposite to that found in vertebrates. Although OR has been extensively investigated in crabs, directional sensitivity has never been analyzed. Here, we present results of behavioral experiments aimed at exploring the directional sensitivity of the OR in two crab species belonging to different families: the varunid mud crab Neohelice granulata and the ocypode fiddler crab Uca uruguayensis. By using different conditions of visual perception (binocular, left or right monocular) and direction of flow field motion (clockwise, anticlockwise), we found in both species that in monocular conditions, OR is effectively displayed only with progressive (front-to-back) motion stimulation. Binocularly elicited responses were directional insensitive and significantly weaker than monocular responses. These results are coincident with those described in flies and suggest a commonality in the circuit underlying this behavior among arthropods. Additionally, we found the existence of a remarkable eye dominance for the OR, which is associated to the size of the larger claw. This is more evident in the fiddler crab where the difference between the two claws is huge. Copyright © 2019 Barnatan, Tomsic and Sztarker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Fil: Tomsic, Daniel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.
Fil: Sztarker, Julieta. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina.
description Animals, from invertebrates to humans, stabilize the panoramic optic flow through compensatory movements of the eyes, the head or the whole body, a behavior known as optomotor response (OR). The same optic flow moved clockwise or anticlockwise elicits equivalent compensatory right or left turning movements, respectively. However, if stimulated monocularly, many animals show a unique effective direction of motion, i.e., a unidirectional OR. This phenomenon has been reported in various species from mammals to birds, reptiles, and amphibious, but among invertebrates, it has only been tested in flies, where the directional sensitivity is opposite to that found in vertebrates. Although OR has been extensively investigated in crabs, directional sensitivity has never been analyzed. Here, we present results of behavioral experiments aimed at exploring the directional sensitivity of the OR in two crab species belonging to different families: the varunid mud crab Neohelice granulata and the ocypode fiddler crab Uca uruguayensis. By using different conditions of visual perception (binocular, left or right monocular) and direction of flow field motion (clockwise, anticlockwise), we found in both species that in monocular conditions, OR is effectively displayed only with progressive (front-to-back) motion stimulation. Binocularly elicited responses were directional insensitive and significantly weaker than monocular responses. These results are coincident with those described in flies and suggest a commonality in the circuit underlying this behavior among arthropods. Additionally, we found the existence of a remarkable eye dominance for the OR, which is associated to the size of the larger claw. This is more evident in the fiddler crab where the difference between the two claws is huge. Copyright © 2019 Barnatan, Tomsic and Sztarker. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_1664042X_v10_n_p1_Barnatan
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12110/paper_1664042X_v10_n_p1_Barnatan
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Front. Physiol. 2019;586
reponame:Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
instname:Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
instacron:UBA-FCEN
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
collection Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
instacron_str UBA-FCEN
institution UBA-FCEN
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital (UBA-FCEN) - Universidad Nacional de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ana@bl.fcen.uba.ar
_version_ 1849948828929622016
score 13.011256