Systems implantation: a comparative study and identification of gaps in usual methodologies
- Autores
- Panizzi, Marisa D.; Hossian, Alejandro; García-Martínez, Ramón
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Systems implantation is one the phases of the software process where the human interaction dimension becomes relevant. However, weakness in the supervision of this dimension is a factor that in many cases leads to the failure of the Project. In this work, systematization and control of the implantation activities in the following methodologies is reported: IEEE 1074, Métrica V3, Rational Unified Process, and SCRUM. An instrument for their comparison is proposed, including the rationale for the analytical dimensions used, and a preliminary interpretation of results is presented emphasizing gaps.
Universidad Nacional de La Plata - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
Comparative analysis of processes
Component
Human aspects
Software processes
Systems implantation - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/87418
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_f7db35430f89fd63ffc9e4a6a049e51f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/87418 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Systems implantation: a comparative study and identification of gaps in usual methodologiesPanizzi, Marisa D.Hossian, AlejandroGarcía-Martínez, RamónCiencias InformáticasComparative analysis of processesComponentHuman aspectsSoftware processesSystems implantationSystems implantation is one the phases of the software process where the human interaction dimension becomes relevant. However, weakness in the supervision of this dimension is a factor that in many cases leads to the failure of the Project. In this work, systematization and control of the implantation activities in the following methodologies is reported: IEEE 1074, Métrica V3, Rational Unified Process, and SCRUM. An instrument for their comparison is proposed, including the rationale for the analytical dimensions used, and a preliminary interpretation of results is presented emphasizing gaps.Universidad Nacional de La Plata2017-07info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf619-621http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/87418enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/1891706411info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2325-9000info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.18293/SEKE2017-012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:17:19Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/87418Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:17:19.413SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Systems implantation: a comparative study and identification of gaps in usual methodologies |
title |
Systems implantation: a comparative study and identification of gaps in usual methodologies |
spellingShingle |
Systems implantation: a comparative study and identification of gaps in usual methodologies Panizzi, Marisa D. Ciencias Informáticas Comparative analysis of processes Component Human aspects Software processes Systems implantation |
title_short |
Systems implantation: a comparative study and identification of gaps in usual methodologies |
title_full |
Systems implantation: a comparative study and identification of gaps in usual methodologies |
title_fullStr |
Systems implantation: a comparative study and identification of gaps in usual methodologies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systems implantation: a comparative study and identification of gaps in usual methodologies |
title_sort |
Systems implantation: a comparative study and identification of gaps in usual methodologies |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Panizzi, Marisa D. Hossian, Alejandro García-Martínez, Ramón |
author |
Panizzi, Marisa D. |
author_facet |
Panizzi, Marisa D. Hossian, Alejandro García-Martínez, Ramón |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hossian, Alejandro García-Martínez, Ramón |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas Comparative analysis of processes Component Human aspects Software processes Systems implantation |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas Comparative analysis of processes Component Human aspects Software processes Systems implantation |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Systems implantation is one the phases of the software process where the human interaction dimension becomes relevant. However, weakness in the supervision of this dimension is a factor that in many cases leads to the failure of the Project. In this work, systematization and control of the implantation activities in the following methodologies is reported: IEEE 1074, Métrica V3, Rational Unified Process, and SCRUM. An instrument for their comparison is proposed, including the rationale for the analytical dimensions used, and a preliminary interpretation of results is presented emphasizing gaps. Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
description |
Systems implantation is one the phases of the software process where the human interaction dimension becomes relevant. However, weakness in the supervision of this dimension is a factor that in many cases leads to the failure of the Project. In this work, systematization and control of the implantation activities in the following methodologies is reported: IEEE 1074, Métrica V3, Rational Unified Process, and SCRUM. An instrument for their comparison is proposed, including the rationale for the analytical dimensions used, and a preliminary interpretation of results is presented emphasizing gaps. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/87418 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/87418 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/1891706411 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2325-9000 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.18293/SEKE2017-012 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 619-621 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844616046156185600 |
score |
13.070432 |