A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms

Autores
Delladio, Telma; Rotstein, Nicolás D.; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Año de publicación
2006
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
It is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to make a sensible use of them. As a part of this main task, we present a comparison between Normal Default Theory and Defeasible Logic Programming. This comparison is achieved introducing a DELP variant, called DELP;, which allows to associate the answers of a DELP interpreter to the consequences, credulous and skeptical, of a Normal Default Theory.
Eje: Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
Knowledge Representation
Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Default Logic
Defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/20748

id SEDICI_f607b0971693502597c7db9bfdfe22bf
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/20748
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling A comparison between non-monotonic formalismsDelladio, TelmaRotstein, Nicolás D.Simari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias InformáticasKnowledge RepresentationNonmonotonic ReasoningDefault LogicDefeasible logic programmingIntelligent agentsIt is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to make a sensible use of them. As a part of this main task, we present a comparison between Normal Default Theory and Defeasible Logic Programming. This comparison is achieved introducing a DELP variant, called DELP;, which allows to associate the answers of a DELP interpreter to the consequences, credulous and skeptical, of a Normal Default Theory.Eje: Agentes y Sistemas InteligentesRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2006-06info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20748enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/950-9474-35-5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T10:27:13Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/20748Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:27:14.18SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
spellingShingle A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
Delladio, Telma
Ciencias Informáticas
Knowledge Representation
Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Default Logic
Defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
title_short A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_full A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_fullStr A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
title_sort A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Delladio, Telma
Rotstein, Nicolás D.
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author Delladio, Telma
author_facet Delladio, Telma
Rotstein, Nicolás D.
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Rotstein, Nicolás D.
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
Knowledge Representation
Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Default Logic
Defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Knowledge Representation
Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Default Logic
Defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv It is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to make a sensible use of them. As a part of this main task, we present a comparison between Normal Default Theory and Defeasible Logic Programming. This comparison is achieved introducing a DELP variant, called DELP;, which allows to associate the answers of a DELP interpreter to the consequences, credulous and skeptical, of a Normal Default Theory.
Eje: Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
description It is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to make a sensible use of them. As a part of this main task, we present a comparison between Normal Default Theory and Defeasible Logic Programming. This comparison is achieved introducing a DELP variant, called DELP;, which allows to associate the answers of a DELP interpreter to the consequences, credulous and skeptical, of a Normal Default Theory.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20748
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20748
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/950-9474-35-5
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842260108875137024
score 13.13397