A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms
- Autores
- Delladio, Telma; Rotstein, Nicolás D.; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
- Año de publicación
- 2006
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- It is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to make a sensible use of them. As a part of this main task, we present a comparison between Normal Default Theory and Defeasible Logic Programming. This comparison is achieved introducing a DELP variant, called DELP;, which allows to associate the answers of a DELP interpreter to the consequences, credulous and skeptical, of a Normal Default Theory.
Eje: Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
Knowledge Representation
Nonmonotonic Reasoning
Default Logic
Defeasible logic programming
Intelligent agents - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/20748
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_f607b0971693502597c7db9bfdfe22bf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/20748 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
A comparison between non-monotonic formalismsDelladio, TelmaRotstein, Nicolás D.Simari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias InformáticasKnowledge RepresentationNonmonotonic ReasoningDefault LogicDefeasible logic programmingIntelligent agentsIt is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to make a sensible use of them. As a part of this main task, we present a comparison between Normal Default Theory and Defeasible Logic Programming. This comparison is achieved introducing a DELP variant, called DELP;, which allows to associate the answers of a DELP interpreter to the consequences, credulous and skeptical, of a Normal Default Theory.Eje: Agentes y Sistemas InteligentesRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2006-06info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20748enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/950-9474-35-5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T10:27:13Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/20748Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:27:14.18SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms |
title |
A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms |
spellingShingle |
A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms Delladio, Telma Ciencias Informáticas Knowledge Representation Nonmonotonic Reasoning Default Logic Defeasible logic programming Intelligent agents |
title_short |
A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms |
title_full |
A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms |
title_fullStr |
A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms |
title_sort |
A comparison between non-monotonic formalisms |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Delladio, Telma Rotstein, Nicolás D. Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author |
Delladio, Telma |
author_facet |
Delladio, Telma Rotstein, Nicolás D. Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rotstein, Nicolás D. Simari, Guillermo Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas Knowledge Representation Nonmonotonic Reasoning Default Logic Defeasible logic programming Intelligent agents |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas Knowledge Representation Nonmonotonic Reasoning Default Logic Defeasible logic programming Intelligent agents |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
It is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to make a sensible use of them. As a part of this main task, we present a comparison between Normal Default Theory and Defeasible Logic Programming. This comparison is achieved introducing a DELP variant, called DELP;, which allows to associate the answers of a DELP interpreter to the consequences, credulous and skeptical, of a Normal Default Theory. Eje: Agentes y Sistemas Inteligentes Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
description |
It is interesting and important to compare, analyze and assess the alternative tools that could be used in the area of Knowledge Representation. In this paper we present a reasearch line associated to this goal: to formally establish the relation among Knowledge Representation formalisms in order to make a sensible use of them. As a part of this main task, we present a comparison between Normal Default Theory and Defeasible Logic Programming. This comparison is achieved introducing a DELP variant, called DELP;, which allows to associate the answers of a DELP interpreter to the consequences, credulous and skeptical, of a Normal Default Theory. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20748 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/20748 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/950-9474-35-5 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1842260108875137024 |
score |
13.13397 |