An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)

Autores
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David; Gómez Lucero, Mauro Javier; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In the last decade, several argument-based formalisms have emerged, with application in many areas, such as legal reasoning, autonomous agents and multi-agent systems; many are based on Dung’s seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AF). Recent research in the area has led to Temporal Argumentation Frameworks (TAF), that extend AF by considering the temporal availability of arguments. On the other hand, different more concrete argumentation systems exists, such as Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), specifying a knowledge representation language, and how arguments are built. In this work we combine time representation capabilities of TAF with the representation language and argument structure of DeLP, defining a rule-based argumentation framework that considers time at the object language level. In order to do this, we use an extension of DeLP, called Labeled DeLP (l-DeLP) to establish, for each program clause, the set of time intervals in which it is available, and to determine from this information the temporal availability of arguments. Acceptability semantics for TAF can then be applied to determine argument acceptability on time
Facultad de Informática
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
Logic Programming
argumentation
temporal availability
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/19697

id SEDICI_f26a09ea56b7246428c309d57db7c115
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/19697
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)Budán, Maximiliano Celmo DavidGómez Lucero, Mauro JavierSimari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias InformáticasLogic Programmingargumentationtemporal availabilityIn the last decade, several argument-based formalisms have emerged, with application in many areas, such as legal reasoning, autonomous agents and multi-agent systems; many are based on Dung’s seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AF). Recent research in the area has led to Temporal Argumentation Frameworks (TAF), that extend AF by considering the temporal availability of arguments. On the other hand, different more concrete argumentation systems exists, such as Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), specifying a knowledge representation language, and how arguments are built. In this work we combine time representation capabilities of TAF with the representation language and argument structure of DeLP, defining a rule-based argumentation framework that considers time at the object language level. In order to do this, we use an extension of DeLP, called Labeled DeLP (l-DeLP) to establish, for each program clause, the set of time intervals in which it is available, and to determine from this information the temporal availability of arguments. Acceptability semantics for TAF can then be applied to determine argument acceptability on timeFacultad de Informática2012-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf56-63http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/19697enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journal.info.unlp.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/JCST-Aug12-2.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1666-6038info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T10:26:50Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/19697Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:26:51.21SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)
title An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)
spellingShingle An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)
Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Ciencias Informáticas
Logic Programming
argumentation
temporal availability
title_short An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)
title_full An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)
title_fullStr An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)
title_full_unstemmed An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)
title_sort An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Gómez Lucero, Mauro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
author_facet Budán, Maximiliano Celmo David
Gómez Lucero, Mauro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Gómez Lucero, Mauro Javier
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
Logic Programming
argumentation
temporal availability
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Logic Programming
argumentation
temporal availability
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In the last decade, several argument-based formalisms have emerged, with application in many areas, such as legal reasoning, autonomous agents and multi-agent systems; many are based on Dung’s seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AF). Recent research in the area has led to Temporal Argumentation Frameworks (TAF), that extend AF by considering the temporal availability of arguments. On the other hand, different more concrete argumentation systems exists, such as Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), specifying a knowledge representation language, and how arguments are built. In this work we combine time representation capabilities of TAF with the representation language and argument structure of DeLP, defining a rule-based argumentation framework that considers time at the object language level. In order to do this, we use an extension of DeLP, called Labeled DeLP (l-DeLP) to establish, for each program clause, the set of time intervals in which it is available, and to determine from this information the temporal availability of arguments. Acceptability semantics for TAF can then be applied to determine argument acceptability on time
Facultad de Informática
description In the last decade, several argument-based formalisms have emerged, with application in many areas, such as legal reasoning, autonomous agents and multi-agent systems; many are based on Dung’s seminal work characterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AF). Recent research in the area has led to Temporal Argumentation Frameworks (TAF), that extend AF by considering the temporal availability of arguments. On the other hand, different more concrete argumentation systems exists, such as Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP), specifying a knowledge representation language, and how arguments are built. In this work we combine time representation capabilities of TAF with the representation language and argument structure of DeLP, defining a rule-based argumentation framework that considers time at the object language level. In order to do this, we use an extension of DeLP, called Labeled DeLP (l-DeLP) to establish, for each program clause, the set of time intervals in which it is available, and to determine from this information the temporal availability of arguments. Acceptability semantics for TAF can then be applied to determine argument acceptability on time
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/19697
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/19697
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://journal.info.unlp.edu.ar/wp-content/uploads/JCST-Aug12-2.pdf
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1666-6038
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
56-63
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842260102084558848
score 13.13397