Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation
- Autores
- Dasso, Aristides; Funes, Ana; Peralta, Mario; Salgado, Carlos Humberto
- Año de publicación
- 2005
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The Unified Modelling Language (UML) has become a defacto standard for software development practitioners. There are several tools that help the use of UML. Users of those tools must evaluate and compare different versions of the tools they intend to use or are using to assess the possibility of changing or acquiring one. There are several ways to perform this evaluation from the simple rule-of-thumb to numeric or quantitative methods. We present an ongoing project that evaluates UML tools using the Logic Scoring of Preference (LSP) method. This method is very briefly presented and also some of the ongoing work in building a model directed to UML tool evaluation is explained.
Eje: Ingeniería en Software
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Metrics
Tools
Metrics Development
UML
Tools evaluation - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21123
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
SEDICI_e1b851dc75bbf0e2a3df4c79f4c8dc1e |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21123 |
| network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
| repository_id_str |
1329 |
| network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| spelling |
Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluationDasso, AristidesFunes, AnaPeralta, MarioSalgado, Carlos HumbertoCiencias InformáticasSOFTWARE ENGINEERINGMetricsToolsMetrics DevelopmentUMLTools evaluationThe Unified Modelling Language (UML) has become a defacto standard for software development practitioners. There are several tools that help the use of UML. Users of those tools must evaluate and compare different versions of the tools they intend to use or are using to assess the possibility of changing or acquiring one. There are several ways to perform this evaluation from the simple rule-of-thumb to numeric or quantitative methods. We present an ongoing project that evaluates UML tools using the Logic Scoring of Preference (LSP) method. This method is very briefly presented and also some of the ongoing work in building a model directed to UML tool evaluation is explained.Eje: Ingeniería en SoftwareRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2005-05info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf286-290http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21123enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/950-665-337-2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-10T11:57:53Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21123Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-10 11:57:53.768SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation |
| title |
Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation |
| spellingShingle |
Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation Dasso, Aristides Ciencias Informáticas SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Metrics Tools Metrics Development UML Tools evaluation |
| title_short |
Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation |
| title_full |
Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation |
| title_fullStr |
Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation |
| title_sort |
Metrics Development for UML Tools evaluation |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Dasso, Aristides Funes, Ana Peralta, Mario Salgado, Carlos Humberto |
| author |
Dasso, Aristides |
| author_facet |
Dasso, Aristides Funes, Ana Peralta, Mario Salgado, Carlos Humberto |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Funes, Ana Peralta, Mario Salgado, Carlos Humberto |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Metrics Tools Metrics Development UML Tools evaluation |
| topic |
Ciencias Informáticas SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Metrics Tools Metrics Development UML Tools evaluation |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The Unified Modelling Language (UML) has become a defacto standard for software development practitioners. There are several tools that help the use of UML. Users of those tools must evaluate and compare different versions of the tools they intend to use or are using to assess the possibility of changing or acquiring one. There are several ways to perform this evaluation from the simple rule-of-thumb to numeric or quantitative methods. We present an ongoing project that evaluates UML tools using the Logic Scoring of Preference (LSP) method. This method is very briefly presented and also some of the ongoing work in building a model directed to UML tool evaluation is explained. Eje: Ingeniería en Software Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
| description |
The Unified Modelling Language (UML) has become a defacto standard for software development practitioners. There are several tools that help the use of UML. Users of those tools must evaluate and compare different versions of the tools they intend to use or are using to assess the possibility of changing or acquiring one. There are several ways to perform this evaluation from the simple rule-of-thumb to numeric or quantitative methods. We present an ongoing project that evaluates UML tools using the Logic Scoring of Preference (LSP) method. This method is very briefly presented and also some of the ongoing work in building a model directed to UML tool evaluation is explained. |
| publishDate |
2005 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-05 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
| format |
conferenceObject |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21123 |
| url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21123 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/950-665-337-2 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 286-290 |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
| reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
| instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| instacron_str |
UNLP |
| institution |
UNLP |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
| _version_ |
1842903764491567105 |
| score |
12.993085 |