Bird Community, Forest Structure and Landscape Affects the Susceptibility to Open-Cup Nest Predation in Austral Forests

Autores
Benítez, Julieta; Peri, Pablo Luis; Barrera, Marcelo Daniel; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Lencinas, María Vanessa
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Nest predation is a major factor limiting avian reproductive success. It depends on factors such as bird community, land use, vegetation structure and landscape. Anthropogenic disturbances in native forests, such as logging and livestock grazing, alter forest structure and understory, potentially affecting nest predation rates. In this study, we analysed the susceptibility of open-cup nests to predation in Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina), comparing 15–50 years ago thinned—T and unthinned forests, the latter classified as open—O, closed—C or very closed—VC. We also identified nest predators through camera traps and the main variables influencing predation using a Generalized Lineal Model. Data were collected from 32 sites representing the four studied categories of canopy cover across two years (256 artificial nests per year). Artificial nest predation rates varied between year (9.4% in 2018 and 40.2% in 2022) and among forest types. In 2018, the O forests had the highest predation rate (50%, 12 in total), whereas in 2022, VC forests showed the greatest predation (38%, 39 in total). Camera traps identified three nest predators: Milvago chimango, Campephilus magellanicus and Xolmis pyrope. In 2018, canopy cover was the only variable that influenced artificial nest predation, while in 2022, tree sapling cover, patch shape, open-cup nester density and tree basal area were the most influential (in that order). We found annual variations driven by different ecological factors in N. antarctica forest of southern Patagonia. Although thinning showed no significant long-term effects on artificial nest predation on this study, more research is needed to understand the influence of low impact forest management in austral bird communities.
Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales
Materia
Ingeniería Forestal
Nothofagus forests
thinning
artificial nest
canopy cover
Patagonia
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/189247

id SEDICI_d10a651a64f0e45d2cc566d1ab72db98
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/189247
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Bird Community, Forest Structure and Landscape Affects the Susceptibility to Open-Cup Nest Predation in Austral ForestsBenítez, JulietaPeri, Pablo LuisBarrera, Marcelo DanielMartínez Pastur, Guillermo JoséLencinas, María VanessaIngeniería ForestalNothofagus foreststhinningartificial nestcanopy coverPatagoniaNest predation is a major factor limiting avian reproductive success. It depends on factors such as bird community, land use, vegetation structure and landscape. Anthropogenic disturbances in native forests, such as logging and livestock grazing, alter forest structure and understory, potentially affecting nest predation rates. In this study, we analysed the susceptibility of open-cup nests to predation in Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina), comparing 15–50 years ago thinned—T and unthinned forests, the latter classified as open—O, closed—C or very closed—VC. We also identified nest predators through camera traps and the main variables influencing predation using a Generalized Lineal Model. Data were collected from 32 sites representing the four studied categories of canopy cover across two years (256 artificial nests per year). Artificial nest predation rates varied between year (9.4% in 2018 and 40.2% in 2022) and among forest types. In 2018, the O forests had the highest predation rate (50%, 12 in total), whereas in 2022, VC forests showed the greatest predation (38%, 39 in total). Camera traps identified three nest predators: Milvago chimango, Campephilus magellanicus and Xolmis pyrope. In 2018, canopy cover was the only variable that influenced artificial nest predation, while in 2022, tree sapling cover, patch shape, open-cup nester density and tree basal area were the most influential (in that order). We found annual variations driven by different ecological factors in N. antarctica forest of southern Patagonia. Although thinning showed no significant long-term effects on artificial nest predation on this study, more research is needed to understand the influence of low impact forest management in austral bird communities.Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales2025-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/189247enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1999-4907info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/f16111741info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-12-23T11:54:13Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/189247Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-12-23 11:54:14.06SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bird Community, Forest Structure and Landscape Affects the Susceptibility to Open-Cup Nest Predation in Austral Forests
title Bird Community, Forest Structure and Landscape Affects the Susceptibility to Open-Cup Nest Predation in Austral Forests
spellingShingle Bird Community, Forest Structure and Landscape Affects the Susceptibility to Open-Cup Nest Predation in Austral Forests
Benítez, Julieta
Ingeniería Forestal
Nothofagus forests
thinning
artificial nest
canopy cover
Patagonia
title_short Bird Community, Forest Structure and Landscape Affects the Susceptibility to Open-Cup Nest Predation in Austral Forests
title_full Bird Community, Forest Structure and Landscape Affects the Susceptibility to Open-Cup Nest Predation in Austral Forests
title_fullStr Bird Community, Forest Structure and Landscape Affects the Susceptibility to Open-Cup Nest Predation in Austral Forests
title_full_unstemmed Bird Community, Forest Structure and Landscape Affects the Susceptibility to Open-Cup Nest Predation in Austral Forests
title_sort Bird Community, Forest Structure and Landscape Affects the Susceptibility to Open-Cup Nest Predation in Austral Forests
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Benítez, Julieta
Peri, Pablo Luis
Barrera, Marcelo Daniel
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Lencinas, María Vanessa
author Benítez, Julieta
author_facet Benítez, Julieta
Peri, Pablo Luis
Barrera, Marcelo Daniel
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Lencinas, María Vanessa
author_role author
author2 Peri, Pablo Luis
Barrera, Marcelo Daniel
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Lencinas, María Vanessa
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ingeniería Forestal
Nothofagus forests
thinning
artificial nest
canopy cover
Patagonia
topic Ingeniería Forestal
Nothofagus forests
thinning
artificial nest
canopy cover
Patagonia
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Nest predation is a major factor limiting avian reproductive success. It depends on factors such as bird community, land use, vegetation structure and landscape. Anthropogenic disturbances in native forests, such as logging and livestock grazing, alter forest structure and understory, potentially affecting nest predation rates. In this study, we analysed the susceptibility of open-cup nests to predation in Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina), comparing 15–50 years ago thinned—T and unthinned forests, the latter classified as open—O, closed—C or very closed—VC. We also identified nest predators through camera traps and the main variables influencing predation using a Generalized Lineal Model. Data were collected from 32 sites representing the four studied categories of canopy cover across two years (256 artificial nests per year). Artificial nest predation rates varied between year (9.4% in 2018 and 40.2% in 2022) and among forest types. In 2018, the O forests had the highest predation rate (50%, 12 in total), whereas in 2022, VC forests showed the greatest predation (38%, 39 in total). Camera traps identified three nest predators: Milvago chimango, Campephilus magellanicus and Xolmis pyrope. In 2018, canopy cover was the only variable that influenced artificial nest predation, while in 2022, tree sapling cover, patch shape, open-cup nester density and tree basal area were the most influential (in that order). We found annual variations driven by different ecological factors in N. antarctica forest of southern Patagonia. Although thinning showed no significant long-term effects on artificial nest predation on this study, more research is needed to understand the influence of low impact forest management in austral bird communities.
Laboratorio de Investigación de Sistemas Ecológicos y Ambientales
description Nest predation is a major factor limiting avian reproductive success. It depends on factors such as bird community, land use, vegetation structure and landscape. Anthropogenic disturbances in native forests, such as logging and livestock grazing, alter forest structure and understory, potentially affecting nest predation rates. In this study, we analysed the susceptibility of open-cup nests to predation in Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina), comparing 15–50 years ago thinned—T and unthinned forests, the latter classified as open—O, closed—C or very closed—VC. We also identified nest predators through camera traps and the main variables influencing predation using a Generalized Lineal Model. Data were collected from 32 sites representing the four studied categories of canopy cover across two years (256 artificial nests per year). Artificial nest predation rates varied between year (9.4% in 2018 and 40.2% in 2022) and among forest types. In 2018, the O forests had the highest predation rate (50%, 12 in total), whereas in 2022, VC forests showed the greatest predation (38%, 39 in total). Camera traps identified three nest predators: Milvago chimango, Campephilus magellanicus and Xolmis pyrope. In 2018, canopy cover was the only variable that influenced artificial nest predation, while in 2022, tree sapling cover, patch shape, open-cup nester density and tree basal area were the most influential (in that order). We found annual variations driven by different ecological factors in N. antarctica forest of southern Patagonia. Although thinning showed no significant long-term effects on artificial nest predation on this study, more research is needed to understand the influence of low impact forest management in austral bird communities.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/189247
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/189247
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1999-4907
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3390/f16111741
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1852334854110183424
score 13.075124