The debate between Janet and Freud revisited: trauma and memory (1892-1895/1913-1914)

Autores
Sanfelippo, Luis César; Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The relationship between trauma and memory disorders is not an essential one; in fact, its origins can be traced back to the 1890s, to the works of Janet and Freud. In this article, we focus on two brief but fundamental periods in the works of both of these authors (1892-1895 and 1913-1914). Against most contemporary literature on the subject, we argue that Freud’s works gave much more importance than Janet’s to the relationship between trauma, memory, and pathology. Furthermore, we recon- struct two essential parts of their debate: the discussion about the relevance of hereditary and accidental factors and the one about the function of memory within the framework of treatment. As bibliographic sources, we use theoretical and clinical works— allowing for a better appreciation of the relationship between trauma and memory in both authors’ theories and practices.
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Facultad de Psicología
Materia
Psicología
Freud
Janet
trauma
heredity
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/162561

id SEDICI_d0fdf357d4f6b6129c6e2b9e9278e476
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/162561
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling The debate between Janet and Freud revisited: trauma and memory (1892-1895/1913-1914)Sanfelippo, Luis CésarDagfal, Alejandro AntonioPsicologíaFreudJanettraumaheredityThe relationship between trauma and memory disorders is not an essential one; in fact, its origins can be traced back to the 1890s, to the works of Janet and Freud. In this article, we focus on two brief but fundamental periods in the works of both of these authors (1892-1895 and 1913-1914). Against most contemporary literature on the subject, we argue that Freud’s works gave much more importance than Janet’s to the relationship between trauma, memory, and pathology. Furthermore, we recon- struct two essential parts of their debate: the discussion about the relevance of hereditary and accidental factors and the one about the function of memory within the framework of treatment. As bibliographic sources, we use theoretical and clinical works— allowing for a better appreciation of the relationship between trauma and memory in both authors’ theories and practices.Universidad de Buenos AiresFacultad de Psicología2020-01-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf119-141http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/162561enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2167-4086info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/00332828.2020.1688549info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-11-12T11:07:07Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/162561Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-11-12 11:07:08.21SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The debate between Janet and Freud revisited: trauma and memory (1892-1895/1913-1914)
title The debate between Janet and Freud revisited: trauma and memory (1892-1895/1913-1914)
spellingShingle The debate between Janet and Freud revisited: trauma and memory (1892-1895/1913-1914)
Sanfelippo, Luis César
Psicología
Freud
Janet
trauma
heredity
title_short The debate between Janet and Freud revisited: trauma and memory (1892-1895/1913-1914)
title_full The debate between Janet and Freud revisited: trauma and memory (1892-1895/1913-1914)
title_fullStr The debate between Janet and Freud revisited: trauma and memory (1892-1895/1913-1914)
title_full_unstemmed The debate between Janet and Freud revisited: trauma and memory (1892-1895/1913-1914)
title_sort The debate between Janet and Freud revisited: trauma and memory (1892-1895/1913-1914)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sanfelippo, Luis César
Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio
author Sanfelippo, Luis César
author_facet Sanfelippo, Luis César
Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio
author_role author
author2 Dagfal, Alejandro Antonio
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Psicología
Freud
Janet
trauma
heredity
topic Psicología
Freud
Janet
trauma
heredity
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The relationship between trauma and memory disorders is not an essential one; in fact, its origins can be traced back to the 1890s, to the works of Janet and Freud. In this article, we focus on two brief but fundamental periods in the works of both of these authors (1892-1895 and 1913-1914). Against most contemporary literature on the subject, we argue that Freud’s works gave much more importance than Janet’s to the relationship between trauma, memory, and pathology. Furthermore, we recon- struct two essential parts of their debate: the discussion about the relevance of hereditary and accidental factors and the one about the function of memory within the framework of treatment. As bibliographic sources, we use theoretical and clinical works— allowing for a better appreciation of the relationship between trauma and memory in both authors’ theories and practices.
Universidad de Buenos Aires
Facultad de Psicología
description The relationship between trauma and memory disorders is not an essential one; in fact, its origins can be traced back to the 1890s, to the works of Janet and Freud. In this article, we focus on two brief but fundamental periods in the works of both of these authors (1892-1895 and 1913-1914). Against most contemporary literature on the subject, we argue that Freud’s works gave much more importance than Janet’s to the relationship between trauma, memory, and pathology. Furthermore, we recon- struct two essential parts of their debate: the discussion about the relevance of hereditary and accidental factors and the one about the function of memory within the framework of treatment. As bibliographic sources, we use theoretical and clinical works— allowing for a better appreciation of the relationship between trauma and memory in both authors’ theories and practices.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/162561
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/162561
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2167-4086
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/00332828.2020.1688549
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
119-141
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1848605783002972160
score 12.976206