Frictional Pressure Drop in Three-phase Fixed-bed Columns with Upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Critical Revision of Experimental Data

Autores
Bressa, Sergio Patricio
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
conjunto de datos
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The technological relevance of packed-bed columns with simultaneous flow of gas and liquid is stressed in the literature, e. g. [ 1 ]. Packed-bed columns that process gas and liquid streams can operate in upward co-current flow, in downward co-current flow or in counter-current flow [ 1 ]. One major drawback of the co-current upward flow is that it develops a much higher pressure drop than that corresponding to the other two modes of operation [ 1 ]. Hence, reliable tools for predicting pressure drop are a must to size the column and to estimate the cost of impulsion. However, the disparities among the equations published for the prediction of pressure drop are remarkable, e. g. [ 2 ]. The observed disparity is derived from the experimental data that led to the formulation of those equations. A conclusive comparison of correlations is not possible without testing the data itself. However, information about experimental errors is almost absent in the revised literature. Reports of reproducibility levels, of test-runs performed under experimental conditions explored by other authors, of experimental variances or of relative error are lacking. To address this issue, experimental data on frictional pressure drop measured in packed columns with upward co-current of gas and liquid, published in twenty different sources, were collected and analyzed. The purpose was to build a databank devoid of untrendy data. Following the main experimental trends and with the aid of diagnostic plots along with “ high-order polynomials ” [ 3 ], data subsets from eleven sources were retained to ensemble a database comprising two hundred and thirty seven experimental observations. The selected experimental observations, together their respective references, are attached to be downloaded. The files contain all the experimental information necessary for the development of tools for predicting frictional pressure drop. Certain experimental works were not considered because they do not inform whether the data correspond to the frictional contribution or the total pressure drop. Most of the rejected data correspond to the lower values of the pressure drop. In most of the rejected data, the influence of the frictional pressure drop over the total pressure drop is significantly attenuated by the fluid static head. A brief comparison with the largest data bank [ 2 ] is pertinent. A comprehensive study of experimental information from various sources should involve data handling. However, Larachi et al. [ 2 ] do not report any data analysis. As mention above, the experimental database attached to this summary was thoroughly analyzed for identifying inconsistent data. In addition, the data bank available in this link contains data with packings not involved in [ 2 ] as Intallox saddles and Berl saddles. Columns packed with Intallox saddles are characterized by truly high bed porosities of about nine tenths. Therefore, Intallox saddles allowed to collect data that evidence frictional pressure drop values much lower than the lowest ones in [ 2 ]. [ 1 ] “ Multiphase Catalytic Reactors: A Perspective on Current Knowledge and Future Trends ”; M. P. Duduković, F. Larachi and P. Mills. Catalysis Reviews, volume 44, number 1, pages 123 – 246 ( 2002 ). [ 2 ] “ Two-phase Frictional Pressure Drop in Flooded Bed Reactors: A State-of-the-art Correlation ”; F. Larachi, Z. Bensetiti, B. P. A. Grandjean and G. Wild. Chemical Engineering & Technology, volume 21, number 11, pages 887 – 893 ( 1988 ). [ 3 ] “ External Liquid Saturation in Fixed Beds with Co-current upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Revisiting Experimental Data and Data Representation ”; S. P. Bressa. Trends in Chemical Engineering, volume 18, pages 29 – 45 ( 2020 ).
Fil: Bressa, Sergio Patricio. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas. Argentina
Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la provincia de Buenos Aires
Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de La Plata
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas
Materia
Ciencias Exactas
frictional pressure drop
three-phase packed beds
gas and liquid flow
cocurrent upward flow
experimental data
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/163435

id SEDICI_d0c5f7c29f707aa6eb8a4ffdc0e735ae
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/163435
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Frictional Pressure Drop in Three-phase Fixed-bed Columns with Upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Critical Revision of Experimental DataBressa, Sergio PatricioCiencias Exactashttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3frictional pressure dropthree-phase packed bedsgas and liquid flowcocurrent upward flowexperimental dataThe technological relevance of packed-bed columns with simultaneous flow of gas and liquid is stressed in the literature, e. g. [ 1 ]. Packed-bed columns that process gas and liquid streams can operate in upward co-current flow, in downward co-current flow or in counter-current flow [ 1 ]. One major drawback of the co-current upward flow is that it develops a much higher pressure drop than that corresponding to the other two modes of operation [ 1 ]. Hence, reliable tools for predicting pressure drop are a must to size the column and to estimate the cost of impulsion. However, the disparities among the equations published for the prediction of pressure drop are remarkable, e. g. [ 2 ]. The observed disparity is derived from the experimental data that led to the formulation of those equations. A conclusive comparison of correlations is not possible without testing the data itself. However, information about experimental errors is almost absent in the revised literature. Reports of reproducibility levels, of test-runs performed under experimental conditions explored by other authors, of experimental variances or of relative error are lacking. To address this issue, experimental data on frictional pressure drop measured in packed columns with upward co-current of gas and liquid, published in twenty different sources, were collected and analyzed. The purpose was to build a databank devoid of untrendy data. Following the main experimental trends and with the aid of diagnostic plots along with “ high-order polynomials ” [ 3 ], data subsets from eleven sources were retained to ensemble a database comprising two hundred and thirty seven experimental observations. The selected experimental observations, together their respective references, are attached to be downloaded. The files contain all the experimental information necessary for the development of tools for predicting frictional pressure drop. Certain experimental works were not considered because they do not inform whether the data correspond to the frictional contribution or the total pressure drop. Most of the rejected data correspond to the lower values of the pressure drop. In most of the rejected data, the influence of the frictional pressure drop over the total pressure drop is significantly attenuated by the fluid static head. A brief comparison with the largest data bank [ 2 ] is pertinent. A comprehensive study of experimental information from various sources should involve data handling. However, Larachi et al. [ 2 ] do not report any data analysis. As mention above, the experimental database attached to this summary was thoroughly analyzed for identifying inconsistent data. In addition, the data bank available in this link contains data with packings not involved in [ 2 ] as Intallox saddles and Berl saddles. Columns packed with Intallox saddles are characterized by truly high bed porosities of about nine tenths. Therefore, Intallox saddles allowed to collect data that evidence frictional pressure drop values much lower than the lowest ones in [ 2 ]. [ 1 ] “ Multiphase Catalytic Reactors: A Perspective on Current Knowledge and Future Trends ”; M. P. Duduković, F. Larachi and P. Mills. Catalysis Reviews, volume 44, number 1, pages 123 – 246 ( 2002 ). [ 2 ] “ Two-phase Frictional Pressure Drop in Flooded Bed Reactors: A State-of-the-art Correlation ”; F. Larachi, Z. Bensetiti, B. P. A. Grandjean and G. Wild. Chemical Engineering & Technology, volume 21, number 11, pages 887 – 893 ( 1988 ). [ 3 ] “ External Liquid Saturation in Fixed Beds with Co-current upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Revisiting Experimental Data and Data Representation ”; S. P. Bressa. Trends in Chemical Engineering, volume 18, pages 29 – 45 ( 2020 ).Fil: Bressa, Sergio Patricio. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas. ArgentinaComisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la provincia de Buenos AiresDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de La PlataCentro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas2024-03info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionConjunto de datoshttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_ddb1info:ar-repo/semantics/conjuntoDeDatosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/dataSetapplication/zipExperimental database collected from the open literature.http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/163435https://doi.org/10.35537/10915/163435spainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:43:00Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/163435Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:43:01.174SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Frictional Pressure Drop in Three-phase Fixed-bed Columns with Upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Critical Revision of Experimental Data
title Frictional Pressure Drop in Three-phase Fixed-bed Columns with Upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Critical Revision of Experimental Data
spellingShingle Frictional Pressure Drop in Three-phase Fixed-bed Columns with Upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Critical Revision of Experimental Data
Bressa, Sergio Patricio
Ciencias Exactas
frictional pressure drop
three-phase packed beds
gas and liquid flow
cocurrent upward flow
experimental data
title_short Frictional Pressure Drop in Three-phase Fixed-bed Columns with Upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Critical Revision of Experimental Data
title_full Frictional Pressure Drop in Three-phase Fixed-bed Columns with Upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Critical Revision of Experimental Data
title_fullStr Frictional Pressure Drop in Three-phase Fixed-bed Columns with Upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Critical Revision of Experimental Data
title_full_unstemmed Frictional Pressure Drop in Three-phase Fixed-bed Columns with Upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Critical Revision of Experimental Data
title_sort Frictional Pressure Drop in Three-phase Fixed-bed Columns with Upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Critical Revision of Experimental Data
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bressa, Sergio Patricio
author Bressa, Sergio Patricio
author_facet Bressa, Sergio Patricio
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Exactas
frictional pressure drop
three-phase packed beds
gas and liquid flow
cocurrent upward flow
experimental data
topic Ciencias Exactas
frictional pressure drop
three-phase packed beds
gas and liquid flow
cocurrent upward flow
experimental data
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The technological relevance of packed-bed columns with simultaneous flow of gas and liquid is stressed in the literature, e. g. [ 1 ]. Packed-bed columns that process gas and liquid streams can operate in upward co-current flow, in downward co-current flow or in counter-current flow [ 1 ]. One major drawback of the co-current upward flow is that it develops a much higher pressure drop than that corresponding to the other two modes of operation [ 1 ]. Hence, reliable tools for predicting pressure drop are a must to size the column and to estimate the cost of impulsion. However, the disparities among the equations published for the prediction of pressure drop are remarkable, e. g. [ 2 ]. The observed disparity is derived from the experimental data that led to the formulation of those equations. A conclusive comparison of correlations is not possible without testing the data itself. However, information about experimental errors is almost absent in the revised literature. Reports of reproducibility levels, of test-runs performed under experimental conditions explored by other authors, of experimental variances or of relative error are lacking. To address this issue, experimental data on frictional pressure drop measured in packed columns with upward co-current of gas and liquid, published in twenty different sources, were collected and analyzed. The purpose was to build a databank devoid of untrendy data. Following the main experimental trends and with the aid of diagnostic plots along with “ high-order polynomials ” [ 3 ], data subsets from eleven sources were retained to ensemble a database comprising two hundred and thirty seven experimental observations. The selected experimental observations, together their respective references, are attached to be downloaded. The files contain all the experimental information necessary for the development of tools for predicting frictional pressure drop. Certain experimental works were not considered because they do not inform whether the data correspond to the frictional contribution or the total pressure drop. Most of the rejected data correspond to the lower values of the pressure drop. In most of the rejected data, the influence of the frictional pressure drop over the total pressure drop is significantly attenuated by the fluid static head. A brief comparison with the largest data bank [ 2 ] is pertinent. A comprehensive study of experimental information from various sources should involve data handling. However, Larachi et al. [ 2 ] do not report any data analysis. As mention above, the experimental database attached to this summary was thoroughly analyzed for identifying inconsistent data. In addition, the data bank available in this link contains data with packings not involved in [ 2 ] as Intallox saddles and Berl saddles. Columns packed with Intallox saddles are characterized by truly high bed porosities of about nine tenths. Therefore, Intallox saddles allowed to collect data that evidence frictional pressure drop values much lower than the lowest ones in [ 2 ]. [ 1 ] “ Multiphase Catalytic Reactors: A Perspective on Current Knowledge and Future Trends ”; M. P. Duduković, F. Larachi and P. Mills. Catalysis Reviews, volume 44, number 1, pages 123 – 246 ( 2002 ). [ 2 ] “ Two-phase Frictional Pressure Drop in Flooded Bed Reactors: A State-of-the-art Correlation ”; F. Larachi, Z. Bensetiti, B. P. A. Grandjean and G. Wild. Chemical Engineering & Technology, volume 21, number 11, pages 887 – 893 ( 1988 ). [ 3 ] “ External Liquid Saturation in Fixed Beds with Co-current upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Revisiting Experimental Data and Data Representation ”; S. P. Bressa. Trends in Chemical Engineering, volume 18, pages 29 – 45 ( 2020 ).
Fil: Bressa, Sergio Patricio. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas. Argentina
Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la provincia de Buenos Aires
Departamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de La Plata
Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencias Aplicadas
description The technological relevance of packed-bed columns with simultaneous flow of gas and liquid is stressed in the literature, e. g. [ 1 ]. Packed-bed columns that process gas and liquid streams can operate in upward co-current flow, in downward co-current flow or in counter-current flow [ 1 ]. One major drawback of the co-current upward flow is that it develops a much higher pressure drop than that corresponding to the other two modes of operation [ 1 ]. Hence, reliable tools for predicting pressure drop are a must to size the column and to estimate the cost of impulsion. However, the disparities among the equations published for the prediction of pressure drop are remarkable, e. g. [ 2 ]. The observed disparity is derived from the experimental data that led to the formulation of those equations. A conclusive comparison of correlations is not possible without testing the data itself. However, information about experimental errors is almost absent in the revised literature. Reports of reproducibility levels, of test-runs performed under experimental conditions explored by other authors, of experimental variances or of relative error are lacking. To address this issue, experimental data on frictional pressure drop measured in packed columns with upward co-current of gas and liquid, published in twenty different sources, were collected and analyzed. The purpose was to build a databank devoid of untrendy data. Following the main experimental trends and with the aid of diagnostic plots along with “ high-order polynomials ” [ 3 ], data subsets from eleven sources were retained to ensemble a database comprising two hundred and thirty seven experimental observations. The selected experimental observations, together their respective references, are attached to be downloaded. The files contain all the experimental information necessary for the development of tools for predicting frictional pressure drop. Certain experimental works were not considered because they do not inform whether the data correspond to the frictional contribution or the total pressure drop. Most of the rejected data correspond to the lower values of the pressure drop. In most of the rejected data, the influence of the frictional pressure drop over the total pressure drop is significantly attenuated by the fluid static head. A brief comparison with the largest data bank [ 2 ] is pertinent. A comprehensive study of experimental information from various sources should involve data handling. However, Larachi et al. [ 2 ] do not report any data analysis. As mention above, the experimental database attached to this summary was thoroughly analyzed for identifying inconsistent data. In addition, the data bank available in this link contains data with packings not involved in [ 2 ] as Intallox saddles and Berl saddles. Columns packed with Intallox saddles are characterized by truly high bed porosities of about nine tenths. Therefore, Intallox saddles allowed to collect data that evidence frictional pressure drop values much lower than the lowest ones in [ 2 ]. [ 1 ] “ Multiphase Catalytic Reactors: A Perspective on Current Knowledge and Future Trends ”; M. P. Duduković, F. Larachi and P. Mills. Catalysis Reviews, volume 44, number 1, pages 123 – 246 ( 2002 ). [ 2 ] “ Two-phase Frictional Pressure Drop in Flooded Bed Reactors: A State-of-the-art Correlation ”; F. Larachi, Z. Bensetiti, B. P. A. Grandjean and G. Wild. Chemical Engineering & Technology, volume 21, number 11, pages 887 – 893 ( 1988 ). [ 3 ] “ External Liquid Saturation in Fixed Beds with Co-current upward Flow of Gas and Liquid: Revisiting Experimental Data and Data Representation ”; S. P. Bressa. Trends in Chemical Engineering, volume 18, pages 29 – 45 ( 2020 ).
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Conjunto de datos
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_ddb1
info:ar-repo/semantics/conjuntoDeDatos
info:eu-repo/semantics/dataSet
status_str publishedVersion
format dataSet
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/163435
https://doi.org/10.35537/10915/163435
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/163435
https://doi.org/10.35537/10915/163435
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/zip
Experimental database collected from the open literature.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844616299141922816
score 13.070432