Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework

Autores
Stankevicius, Alejandro G.; García, Alejandro Javier
Año de publicación
1999
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
It has been shown elsewhere that in order to overcome the limitations identified in monotonic reasoning we require a kind of defeasible reasoning. Moreover, defeasible argumentation is one of several approaches that address the problems faced when we attempt to reason defeasibly. Its main goal is to model the kind of reasoning that a single intelligent agent may need. Despite of the fact that defeasible argumentation has been conceived for the single agent scenario, it is possible to consider certain argumentation process (the dialectical analysis) as a dispute or debate between two parties. The two parties view can lead us to an attractive type of negotiation protocol which is based on a formal theory. In this paper, we exploit this approach by defining a dialectical framework capable of modelling a set of negotiation protocols of this kind. We also discuss how these protocols are affected by the design decisions taken inside the framework.
Eje: Aspectos teóricos de la inteligencia artificial
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Frameworks
Defeasible Argumentation
Negotiation protocols
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22247

id SEDICI_bee248a2070f68a3262555cda39e6255
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22247
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical frameworkStankevicius, Alejandro G.García, Alejandro JavierCiencias InformáticasARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEFrameworksDefeasible ArgumentationNegotiation protocolsIt has been shown elsewhere that in order to overcome the limitations identified in monotonic reasoning we require a kind of defeasible reasoning. Moreover, defeasible argumentation is one of several approaches that address the problems faced when we attempt to reason defeasibly. Its main goal is to model the kind of reasoning that a single intelligent agent may need. Despite of the fact that defeasible argumentation has been conceived for the single agent scenario, it is possible to consider certain argumentation process (the dialectical analysis) as a dispute or debate between two parties. The two parties view can lead us to an attractive type of negotiation protocol which is based on a formal theory. In this paper, we exploit this approach by defining a dialectical framework capable of modelling a set of negotiation protocols of this kind. We also discuss how these protocols are affected by the design decisions taken inside the framework.Eje: Aspectos teóricos de la inteligencia artificialRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)1999-05info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22247spainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T10:54:57Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22247Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 10:54:58.105SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework
title Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework
spellingShingle Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework
Stankevicius, Alejandro G.
Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Frameworks
Defeasible Argumentation
Negotiation protocols
title_short Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework
title_full Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework
title_fullStr Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework
title_full_unstemmed Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework
title_sort Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Stankevicius, Alejandro G.
García, Alejandro Javier
author Stankevicius, Alejandro G.
author_facet Stankevicius, Alejandro G.
García, Alejandro Javier
author_role author
author2 García, Alejandro Javier
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Frameworks
Defeasible Argumentation
Negotiation protocols
topic Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Frameworks
Defeasible Argumentation
Negotiation protocols
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv It has been shown elsewhere that in order to overcome the limitations identified in monotonic reasoning we require a kind of defeasible reasoning. Moreover, defeasible argumentation is one of several approaches that address the problems faced when we attempt to reason defeasibly. Its main goal is to model the kind of reasoning that a single intelligent agent may need. Despite of the fact that defeasible argumentation has been conceived for the single agent scenario, it is possible to consider certain argumentation process (the dialectical analysis) as a dispute or debate between two parties. The two parties view can lead us to an attractive type of negotiation protocol which is based on a formal theory. In this paper, we exploit this approach by defining a dialectical framework capable of modelling a set of negotiation protocols of this kind. We also discuss how these protocols are affected by the design decisions taken inside the framework.
Eje: Aspectos teóricos de la inteligencia artificial
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
description It has been shown elsewhere that in order to overcome the limitations identified in monotonic reasoning we require a kind of defeasible reasoning. Moreover, defeasible argumentation is one of several approaches that address the problems faced when we attempt to reason defeasibly. Its main goal is to model the kind of reasoning that a single intelligent agent may need. Despite of the fact that defeasible argumentation has been conceived for the single agent scenario, it is possible to consider certain argumentation process (the dialectical analysis) as a dispute or debate between two parties. The two parties view can lead us to an attractive type of negotiation protocol which is based on a formal theory. In this paper, we exploit this approach by defining a dialectical framework capable of modelling a set of negotiation protocols of this kind. We also discuss how these protocols are affected by the design decisions taken inside the framework.
publishDate 1999
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1999-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22247
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22247
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844615807901892608
score 13.069144