Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework
- Autores
- Stankevicius, Alejandro G.; García, Alejandro Javier
- Año de publicación
- 1999
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- It has been shown elsewhere that in order to overcome the limitations identified in monotonic reasoning we require a kind of defeasible reasoning. Moreover, defeasible argumentation is one of several approaches that address the problems faced when we attempt to reason defeasibly. Its main goal is to model the kind of reasoning that a single intelligent agent may need. Despite of the fact that defeasible argumentation has been conceived for the single agent scenario, it is possible to consider certain argumentation process (the dialectical analysis) as a dispute or debate between two parties. The two parties view can lead us to an attractive type of negotiation protocol which is based on a formal theory. In this paper, we exploit this approach by defining a dialectical framework capable of modelling a set of negotiation protocols of this kind. We also discuss how these protocols are affected by the design decisions taken inside the framework.
Eje: Aspectos teóricos de la inteligencia artificial
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Frameworks
Defeasible Argumentation
Negotiation protocols - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22247
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_bee248a2070f68a3262555cda39e6255 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22247 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical frameworkStankevicius, Alejandro G.García, Alejandro JavierCiencias InformáticasARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEFrameworksDefeasible ArgumentationNegotiation protocolsIt has been shown elsewhere that in order to overcome the limitations identified in monotonic reasoning we require a kind of defeasible reasoning. Moreover, defeasible argumentation is one of several approaches that address the problems faced when we attempt to reason defeasibly. Its main goal is to model the kind of reasoning that a single intelligent agent may need. Despite of the fact that defeasible argumentation has been conceived for the single agent scenario, it is possible to consider certain argumentation process (the dialectical analysis) as a dispute or debate between two parties. The two parties view can lead us to an attractive type of negotiation protocol which is based on a formal theory. In this paper, we exploit this approach by defining a dialectical framework capable of modelling a set of negotiation protocols of this kind. We also discuss how these protocols are affected by the design decisions taken inside the framework.Eje: Aspectos teóricos de la inteligencia artificialRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)1999-05info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22247spainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T10:54:57Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/22247Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 10:54:58.105SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework |
title |
Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework |
spellingShingle |
Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework Stankevicius, Alejandro G. Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frameworks Defeasible Argumentation Negotiation protocols |
title_short |
Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework |
title_full |
Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework |
title_fullStr |
Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework |
title_sort |
Modelling negotiation protocols in a dialectical framework |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Stankevicius, Alejandro G. García, Alejandro Javier |
author |
Stankevicius, Alejandro G. |
author_facet |
Stankevicius, Alejandro G. García, Alejandro Javier |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
García, Alejandro Javier |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frameworks Defeasible Argumentation Negotiation protocols |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Frameworks Defeasible Argumentation Negotiation protocols |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
It has been shown elsewhere that in order to overcome the limitations identified in monotonic reasoning we require a kind of defeasible reasoning. Moreover, defeasible argumentation is one of several approaches that address the problems faced when we attempt to reason defeasibly. Its main goal is to model the kind of reasoning that a single intelligent agent may need. Despite of the fact that defeasible argumentation has been conceived for the single agent scenario, it is possible to consider certain argumentation process (the dialectical analysis) as a dispute or debate between two parties. The two parties view can lead us to an attractive type of negotiation protocol which is based on a formal theory. In this paper, we exploit this approach by defining a dialectical framework capable of modelling a set of negotiation protocols of this kind. We also discuss how these protocols are affected by the design decisions taken inside the framework. Eje: Aspectos teóricos de la inteligencia artificial Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
description |
It has been shown elsewhere that in order to overcome the limitations identified in monotonic reasoning we require a kind of defeasible reasoning. Moreover, defeasible argumentation is one of several approaches that address the problems faced when we attempt to reason defeasibly. Its main goal is to model the kind of reasoning that a single intelligent agent may need. Despite of the fact that defeasible argumentation has been conceived for the single agent scenario, it is possible to consider certain argumentation process (the dialectical analysis) as a dispute or debate between two parties. The two parties view can lead us to an attractive type of negotiation protocol which is based on a formal theory. In this paper, we exploit this approach by defining a dialectical framework capable of modelling a set of negotiation protocols of this kind. We also discuss how these protocols are affected by the design decisions taken inside the framework. |
publishDate |
1999 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1999-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22247 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/22247 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844615807901892608 |
score |
13.069144 |