When Matthew met Matilda. Gender discrimination in Public Funding of Scientific Activity in Argentina

Autores
Fiorentin, Florencia; Pereira, Mariano; Suárez, Diana; Tcach, Alexis
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Identifying gender discrimination in the allocations of public grants is a matter of key importance. The objective of this article is to explore the presence of gender bias in the allocation of public funds to support scientific activity by studying the Fund for Scientific and Technological Research (FONCYT) in Argentina. In order to identifying gender discrimination in the allocations of grants, we test the presence of Matthew and Matilda effects. The former is related to the positive feedbacks between previous access to public funds and present possibilities of accessing. The latter, in turn, refers to lower level of probabilities of accessing and remaining for women. Research questions are about the existence and verification of Matthew and Matilda effects. The database consist of all the researchers that applied to FONCYT between 2003 and 2015, whether they were granted or not. Available information includes participation into the program together with their scientific production, academic achievements, and demographic information -such as date of birth, gender, place of residence, academic affiliation, years of experience, and other relevant data is considered. The period under analysis coincides with a period of significant expansion of the fund given by an increase in the level of financial resources. Additionally, the information related to academic productivity was validated with bibliometric information retrieved from SCOPUS database. Results provide evidence that confirms multiple forms of the Matilda effect, and verifies the Matthew one in the scientific research subsidy program. This seems to verify that female researchers suffer a strong disadvantage in the allocation of public funds to finance their research projects.
Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
PROBIT model
Public funds
Gender bias
Matilda effect
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/87823

id SEDICI_b2962012ad4fdade0e269f8dc9178088
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/87823
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling When Matthew met Matilda. Gender discrimination in Public Funding of Scientific Activity in ArgentinaFiorentin, FlorenciaPereira, MarianoSuárez, DianaTcach, AlexisCiencias InformáticasPROBIT modelPublic fundsGender biasMatilda effectIdentifying gender discrimination in the allocations of public grants is a matter of key importance. The objective of this article is to explore the presence of gender bias in the allocation of public funds to support scientific activity by studying the Fund for Scientific and Technological Research (FONCYT) in Argentina. In order to identifying gender discrimination in the allocations of grants, we test the presence of Matthew and Matilda effects. The former is related to the positive feedbacks between previous access to public funds and present possibilities of accessing. The latter, in turn, refers to lower level of probabilities of accessing and remaining for women. Research questions are about the existence and verification of Matthew and Matilda effects. The database consist of all the researchers that applied to FONCYT between 2003 and 2015, whether they were granted or not. Available information includes participation into the program together with their scientific production, academic achievements, and demographic information -such as date of birth, gender, place of residence, academic affiliation, years of experience, and other relevant data is considered. The period under analysis coincides with a period of significant expansion of the fund given by an increase in the level of financial resources. Additionally, the information related to academic productivity was validated with bibliometric information retrieved from SCOPUS database. Results provide evidence that confirms multiple forms of the Matilda effect, and verifies the Matthew one in the scientific research subsidy program. This seems to verify that female researchers suffer a strong disadvantage in the allocation of public funds to finance their research projects.Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa2019-09info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf66-77http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/87823enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2683-8966info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2026-02-26T11:04:39Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/87823Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292026-02-26 11:04:39.558SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv When Matthew met Matilda. Gender discrimination in Public Funding of Scientific Activity in Argentina
title When Matthew met Matilda. Gender discrimination in Public Funding of Scientific Activity in Argentina
spellingShingle When Matthew met Matilda. Gender discrimination in Public Funding of Scientific Activity in Argentina
Fiorentin, Florencia
Ciencias Informáticas
PROBIT model
Public funds
Gender bias
Matilda effect
title_short When Matthew met Matilda. Gender discrimination in Public Funding of Scientific Activity in Argentina
title_full When Matthew met Matilda. Gender discrimination in Public Funding of Scientific Activity in Argentina
title_fullStr When Matthew met Matilda. Gender discrimination in Public Funding of Scientific Activity in Argentina
title_full_unstemmed When Matthew met Matilda. Gender discrimination in Public Funding of Scientific Activity in Argentina
title_sort When Matthew met Matilda. Gender discrimination in Public Funding of Scientific Activity in Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fiorentin, Florencia
Pereira, Mariano
Suárez, Diana
Tcach, Alexis
author Fiorentin, Florencia
author_facet Fiorentin, Florencia
Pereira, Mariano
Suárez, Diana
Tcach, Alexis
author_role author
author2 Pereira, Mariano
Suárez, Diana
Tcach, Alexis
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
PROBIT model
Public funds
Gender bias
Matilda effect
topic Ciencias Informáticas
PROBIT model
Public funds
Gender bias
Matilda effect
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Identifying gender discrimination in the allocations of public grants is a matter of key importance. The objective of this article is to explore the presence of gender bias in the allocation of public funds to support scientific activity by studying the Fund for Scientific and Technological Research (FONCYT) in Argentina. In order to identifying gender discrimination in the allocations of grants, we test the presence of Matthew and Matilda effects. The former is related to the positive feedbacks between previous access to public funds and present possibilities of accessing. The latter, in turn, refers to lower level of probabilities of accessing and remaining for women. Research questions are about the existence and verification of Matthew and Matilda effects. The database consist of all the researchers that applied to FONCYT between 2003 and 2015, whether they were granted or not. Available information includes participation into the program together with their scientific production, academic achievements, and demographic information -such as date of birth, gender, place of residence, academic affiliation, years of experience, and other relevant data is considered. The period under analysis coincides with a period of significant expansion of the fund given by an increase in the level of financial resources. Additionally, the information related to academic productivity was validated with bibliometric information retrieved from SCOPUS database. Results provide evidence that confirms multiple forms of the Matilda effect, and verifies the Matthew one in the scientific research subsidy program. This seems to verify that female researchers suffer a strong disadvantage in the allocation of public funds to finance their research projects.
Sociedad Argentina de Informática e Investigación Operativa
description Identifying gender discrimination in the allocations of public grants is a matter of key importance. The objective of this article is to explore the presence of gender bias in the allocation of public funds to support scientific activity by studying the Fund for Scientific and Technological Research (FONCYT) in Argentina. In order to identifying gender discrimination in the allocations of grants, we test the presence of Matthew and Matilda effects. The former is related to the positive feedbacks between previous access to public funds and present possibilities of accessing. The latter, in turn, refers to lower level of probabilities of accessing and remaining for women. Research questions are about the existence and verification of Matthew and Matilda effects. The database consist of all the researchers that applied to FONCYT between 2003 and 2015, whether they were granted or not. Available information includes participation into the program together with their scientific production, academic achievements, and demographic information -such as date of birth, gender, place of residence, academic affiliation, years of experience, and other relevant data is considered. The period under analysis coincides with a period of significant expansion of the fund given by an increase in the level of financial resources. Additionally, the information related to academic productivity was validated with bibliometric information retrieved from SCOPUS database. Results provide evidence that confirms multiple forms of the Matilda effect, and verifies the Matthew one in the scientific research subsidy program. This seems to verify that female researchers suffer a strong disadvantage in the allocation of public funds to finance their research projects.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/87823
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/87823
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2683-8966
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
66-77
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1858281924552818688
score 12.665996