Balance or imbalance? Paleoecology of the Pleistocene of North and South America

Autores
Di Giacomo, Mariana; Fariña, Richard A.
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In recent years, the validity of the model proposed by Damuth about the paleoecology of past and present mammalian faunas has been addressed. In previous works such model had been applied to the fauna of Rancho La Brea (North American late Pleistocene), Venta Micena (European early Pleistocene) and to other faunas in South America. In the case of Rancho La Brea, the model had shown that it behaved as expected, i.e., keeping the balance between number of herbivorous species and primary productivity, and between number of carnivore species and secondary productivity. In other words, that the primary productivity was enough to feed the herbivores in the community, and that the secondary productivity (which is the meat available for carnivores to eat) was fully consumed by the carnivores, as in modern, actualistic examples of communities with large mammals. In the South American Lujanian Age (late Pleistocene-early Holocene), an imbalance was proposed, namely that the herbivores did not have enough food to eat according to reconstructions of their environment, and, on the other hand, that the carnivores had too much. In this work twenty six faunas from North America were studied, as well as fifteen from South America. For their study the same model and equations were applied. The results showed that those North American faunas that had number of mammalian species large enough to infer that the community was well represented were balanced, while those with few species or a low number of carnivores were not. In addition, all the Pleistocene South American faunas from diverse origins in the subcontinent were imbalanced. A possible explanation already stated was that in South America there was a great diversity of xenarthrans. In the North American faunas, such diversity was not high, and also not higher than that of any other order of mammals.
Sesiones libres
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo
Materia
Ciencias Naturales
Paleontología
Paleoecology
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/16858

id SEDICI_b1f33205c2290474efc7c63e2f7ac770
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/16858
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Balance or imbalance? Paleoecology of the Pleistocene of North and South AmericaDi Giacomo, MarianaFariña, Richard A.Ciencias NaturalesPaleontologíaPaleoecologyIn recent years, the validity of the model proposed by Damuth about the paleoecology of past and present mammalian faunas has been addressed. In previous works such model had been applied to the fauna of Rancho La Brea (North American late Pleistocene), Venta Micena (European early Pleistocene) and to other faunas in South America. In the case of Rancho La Brea, the model had shown that it behaved as expected, i.e., keeping the balance between number of herbivorous species and primary productivity, and between number of carnivore species and secondary productivity. In other words, that the primary productivity was enough to feed the herbivores in the community, and that the secondary productivity (which is the meat available for carnivores to eat) was fully consumed by the carnivores, as in modern, actualistic examples of communities with large mammals. In the South American Lujanian Age (late Pleistocene-early Holocene), an imbalance was proposed, namely that the herbivores did not have enough food to eat according to reconstructions of their environment, and, on the other hand, that the carnivores had too much. In this work twenty six faunas from North America were studied, as well as fifteen from South America. For their study the same model and equations were applied. The results showed that those North American faunas that had number of mammalian species large enough to infer that the community was well represented were balanced, while those with few species or a low number of carnivores were not. In addition, all the Pleistocene South American faunas from diverse origins in the subcontinent were imbalanced. A possible explanation already stated was that in South America there was a great diversity of xenarthrans. In the North American faunas, such diversity was not high, and also not higher than that of any other order of mammals.Sesiones libresFacultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo2010info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionResumenhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/16858enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-987-95849-7-2info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/hdl/10915/25738info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-10-15T10:45:41Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/16858Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-10-15 10:45:41.59SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Balance or imbalance? Paleoecology of the Pleistocene of North and South America
title Balance or imbalance? Paleoecology of the Pleistocene of North and South America
spellingShingle Balance or imbalance? Paleoecology of the Pleistocene of North and South America
Di Giacomo, Mariana
Ciencias Naturales
Paleontología
Paleoecology
title_short Balance or imbalance? Paleoecology of the Pleistocene of North and South America
title_full Balance or imbalance? Paleoecology of the Pleistocene of North and South America
title_fullStr Balance or imbalance? Paleoecology of the Pleistocene of North and South America
title_full_unstemmed Balance or imbalance? Paleoecology of the Pleistocene of North and South America
title_sort Balance or imbalance? Paleoecology of the Pleistocene of North and South America
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Di Giacomo, Mariana
Fariña, Richard A.
author Di Giacomo, Mariana
author_facet Di Giacomo, Mariana
Fariña, Richard A.
author_role author
author2 Fariña, Richard A.
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Naturales
Paleontología
Paleoecology
topic Ciencias Naturales
Paleontología
Paleoecology
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In recent years, the validity of the model proposed by Damuth about the paleoecology of past and present mammalian faunas has been addressed. In previous works such model had been applied to the fauna of Rancho La Brea (North American late Pleistocene), Venta Micena (European early Pleistocene) and to other faunas in South America. In the case of Rancho La Brea, the model had shown that it behaved as expected, i.e., keeping the balance between number of herbivorous species and primary productivity, and between number of carnivore species and secondary productivity. In other words, that the primary productivity was enough to feed the herbivores in the community, and that the secondary productivity (which is the meat available for carnivores to eat) was fully consumed by the carnivores, as in modern, actualistic examples of communities with large mammals. In the South American Lujanian Age (late Pleistocene-early Holocene), an imbalance was proposed, namely that the herbivores did not have enough food to eat according to reconstructions of their environment, and, on the other hand, that the carnivores had too much. In this work twenty six faunas from North America were studied, as well as fifteen from South America. For their study the same model and equations were applied. The results showed that those North American faunas that had number of mammalian species large enough to infer that the community was well represented were balanced, while those with few species or a low number of carnivores were not. In addition, all the Pleistocene South American faunas from diverse origins in the subcontinent were imbalanced. A possible explanation already stated was that in South America there was a great diversity of xenarthrans. In the North American faunas, such diversity was not high, and also not higher than that of any other order of mammals.
Sesiones libres
Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo
description In recent years, the validity of the model proposed by Damuth about the paleoecology of past and present mammalian faunas has been addressed. In previous works such model had been applied to the fauna of Rancho La Brea (North American late Pleistocene), Venta Micena (European early Pleistocene) and to other faunas in South America. In the case of Rancho La Brea, the model had shown that it behaved as expected, i.e., keeping the balance between number of herbivorous species and primary productivity, and between number of carnivore species and secondary productivity. In other words, that the primary productivity was enough to feed the herbivores in the community, and that the secondary productivity (which is the meat available for carnivores to eat) was fully consumed by the carnivores, as in modern, actualistic examples of communities with large mammals. In the South American Lujanian Age (late Pleistocene-early Holocene), an imbalance was proposed, namely that the herbivores did not have enough food to eat according to reconstructions of their environment, and, on the other hand, that the carnivores had too much. In this work twenty six faunas from North America were studied, as well as fifteen from South America. For their study the same model and equations were applied. The results showed that those North American faunas that had number of mammalian species large enough to infer that the community was well represented were balanced, while those with few species or a low number of carnivores were not. In addition, all the Pleistocene South American faunas from diverse origins in the subcontinent were imbalanced. A possible explanation already stated was that in South America there was a great diversity of xenarthrans. In the North American faunas, such diversity was not high, and also not higher than that of any other order of mammals.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Resumen
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/16858
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/16858
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-987-95849-7-2
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/hdl/10915/25738
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1846063877743181824
score 13.22299