Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia
- Autores
- Keane, Adrienne
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Despite its international status as a world heritage area, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under threat from development. Activities relating to primary resource extraction and increasing urbanization along the adjoining coastal lands not only threaten its status but illustrate the profound dilemma of development and the conservation of natural values. Criticisms of world heritage as a protective mechanism lie in the ambiguity in its operations particularly as there are no direct controls over the signatories (Evans, 2002) with the only leverage to exact compliance being the delisting or threat of delisting a property (Hazen, 2008; Maswood, 2000). Commentary suggests a lack of connection between the international intent of world heritage and the operationalization of it into national and local management regimes (Fowler, 2007; Lennon, 2006; Pendlebury, Short and While, 2009). Under the UNESCO consideration to put the GBR on the “in-danger” list, Australia has embarked on revising its development assessment process. This paper examines the newly devised strategic environmental assessment. While UNESCO is complementary to Australia’s policy shift, it remains watchful over the management of the GBR and the port development that threatens its integrity. This paper outlines the planning frameworks and Australia’s response to UNESCO, concluding that proactive measures have been taken but there is conflicting evidence to demonstrate that these will not protect an internationally important place from development.
Eje 1: Dilemas del desarrollo socio-territorial y la planificación urbano-regional frente a los retos de la sustentabilidad.
Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo - Materia
-
Arquitectura
Urbanismo
explotación de recursos
conservación
Australia
Urbanización
patrimonio mundial - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/53507
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_b142c54984aff71e4742d65e4091f870 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/53507 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in AustraliaKeane, AdrienneArquitecturaUrbanismoexplotación de recursosconservaciónAustraliaUrbanizaciónpatrimonio mundialDespite its international status as a world heritage area, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under threat from development. Activities relating to primary resource extraction and increasing urbanization along the adjoining coastal lands not only threaten its status but illustrate the profound dilemma of development and the conservation of natural values. Criticisms of world heritage as a protective mechanism lie in the ambiguity in its operations particularly as there are no direct controls over the signatories (Evans, 2002) with the only leverage to exact compliance being the delisting or threat of delisting a property (Hazen, 2008; Maswood, 2000). Commentary suggests a lack of connection between the international intent of world heritage and the operationalization of it into national and local management regimes (Fowler, 2007; Lennon, 2006; Pendlebury, Short and While, 2009). Under the UNESCO consideration to put the GBR on the “in-danger” list, Australia has embarked on revising its development assessment process. This paper examines the newly devised strategic environmental assessment. While UNESCO is complementary to Australia’s policy shift, it remains watchful over the management of the GBR and the port development that threatens its integrity. This paper outlines the planning frameworks and Australia’s response to UNESCO, concluding that proactive measures have been taken but there is conflicting evidence to demonstrate that these will not protect an internationally important place from development.Eje 1: Dilemas del desarrollo socio-territorial y la planificación urbano-regional frente a los retos de la sustentabilidad.Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo2014-09info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf207-217http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/53507enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-950-34-1133-9info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/hdl/10915/52977info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-17T09:48:28Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/53507Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-17 09:48:28.322SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia |
title |
Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia |
spellingShingle |
Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia Keane, Adrienne Arquitectura Urbanismo explotación de recursos conservación Australia Urbanización patrimonio mundial |
title_short |
Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia |
title_full |
Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia |
title_fullStr |
Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia |
title_sort |
Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Keane, Adrienne |
author |
Keane, Adrienne |
author_facet |
Keane, Adrienne |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquitectura Urbanismo explotación de recursos conservación Australia Urbanización patrimonio mundial |
topic |
Arquitectura Urbanismo explotación de recursos conservación Australia Urbanización patrimonio mundial |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Despite its international status as a world heritage area, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under threat from development. Activities relating to primary resource extraction and increasing urbanization along the adjoining coastal lands not only threaten its status but illustrate the profound dilemma of development and the conservation of natural values. Criticisms of world heritage as a protective mechanism lie in the ambiguity in its operations particularly as there are no direct controls over the signatories (Evans, 2002) with the only leverage to exact compliance being the delisting or threat of delisting a property (Hazen, 2008; Maswood, 2000). Commentary suggests a lack of connection between the international intent of world heritage and the operationalization of it into national and local management regimes (Fowler, 2007; Lennon, 2006; Pendlebury, Short and While, 2009). Under the UNESCO consideration to put the GBR on the “in-danger” list, Australia has embarked on revising its development assessment process. This paper examines the newly devised strategic environmental assessment. While UNESCO is complementary to Australia’s policy shift, it remains watchful over the management of the GBR and the port development that threatens its integrity. This paper outlines the planning frameworks and Australia’s response to UNESCO, concluding that proactive measures have been taken but there is conflicting evidence to demonstrate that these will not protect an internationally important place from development. Eje 1: Dilemas del desarrollo socio-territorial y la planificación urbano-regional frente a los retos de la sustentabilidad. Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo |
description |
Despite its international status as a world heritage area, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under threat from development. Activities relating to primary resource extraction and increasing urbanization along the adjoining coastal lands not only threaten its status but illustrate the profound dilemma of development and the conservation of natural values. Criticisms of world heritage as a protective mechanism lie in the ambiguity in its operations particularly as there are no direct controls over the signatories (Evans, 2002) with the only leverage to exact compliance being the delisting or threat of delisting a property (Hazen, 2008; Maswood, 2000). Commentary suggests a lack of connection between the international intent of world heritage and the operationalization of it into national and local management regimes (Fowler, 2007; Lennon, 2006; Pendlebury, Short and While, 2009). Under the UNESCO consideration to put the GBR on the “in-danger” list, Australia has embarked on revising its development assessment process. This paper examines the newly devised strategic environmental assessment. While UNESCO is complementary to Australia’s policy shift, it remains watchful over the management of the GBR and the port development that threatens its integrity. This paper outlines the planning frameworks and Australia’s response to UNESCO, concluding that proactive measures have been taken but there is conflicting evidence to demonstrate that these will not protect an internationally important place from development. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/53507 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/53507 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-950-34-1133-9 info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/hdl/10915/52977 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 207-217 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1843532249388023808 |
score |
13.000565 |