Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia

Autores
Keane, Adrienne
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Despite its international status as a world heritage area, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under threat from development. Activities relating to primary resource extraction and increasing urbanization along the adjoining coastal lands not only threaten its status but illustrate the profound dilemma of development and the conservation of natural values. Criticisms of world heritage as a protective mechanism lie in the ambiguity in its operations particularly as there are no direct controls over the signatories (Evans, 2002) with the only leverage to exact compliance being the delisting or threat of delisting a property (Hazen, 2008; Maswood, 2000). Commentary suggests a lack of connection between the international intent of world heritage and the operationalization of it into national and local management regimes (Fowler, 2007; Lennon, 2006; Pendlebury, Short and While, 2009). Under the UNESCO consideration to put the GBR on the “in-danger” list, Australia has embarked on revising its development assessment process. This paper examines the newly devised strategic environmental assessment. While UNESCO is complementary to Australia’s policy shift, it remains watchful over the management of the GBR and the port development that threatens its integrity. This paper outlines the planning frameworks and Australia’s response to UNESCO, concluding that proactive measures have been taken but there is conflicting evidence to demonstrate that these will not protect an internationally important place from development.
Eje 1: Dilemas del desarrollo socio-territorial y la planificación urbano-regional frente a los retos de la sustentabilidad.
Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo
Materia
Arquitectura
Urbanismo
explotación de recursos
conservación
Australia
Urbanización
patrimonio mundial
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/53507

id SEDICI_b142c54984aff71e4742d65e4091f870
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/53507
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in AustraliaKeane, AdrienneArquitecturaUrbanismoexplotación de recursosconservaciónAustraliaUrbanizaciónpatrimonio mundialDespite its international status as a world heritage area, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under threat from development. Activities relating to primary resource extraction and increasing urbanization along the adjoining coastal lands not only threaten its status but illustrate the profound dilemma of development and the conservation of natural values. Criticisms of world heritage as a protective mechanism lie in the ambiguity in its operations particularly as there are no direct controls over the signatories (Evans, 2002) with the only leverage to exact compliance being the delisting or threat of delisting a property (Hazen, 2008; Maswood, 2000). Commentary suggests a lack of connection between the international intent of world heritage and the operationalization of it into national and local management regimes (Fowler, 2007; Lennon, 2006; Pendlebury, Short and While, 2009). Under the UNESCO consideration to put the GBR on the “in-danger” list, Australia has embarked on revising its development assessment process. This paper examines the newly devised strategic environmental assessment. While UNESCO is complementary to Australia’s policy shift, it remains watchful over the management of the GBR and the port development that threatens its integrity. This paper outlines the planning frameworks and Australia’s response to UNESCO, concluding that proactive measures have been taken but there is conflicting evidence to demonstrate that these will not protect an internationally important place from development.Eje 1: Dilemas del desarrollo socio-territorial y la planificación urbano-regional frente a los retos de la sustentabilidad.Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo2014-09info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf207-217http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/53507enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-950-34-1133-9info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/hdl/10915/52977info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-17T09:48:28Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/53507Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-17 09:48:28.322SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia
title Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia
spellingShingle Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia
Keane, Adrienne
Arquitectura
Urbanismo
explotación de recursos
conservación
Australia
Urbanización
patrimonio mundial
title_short Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia
title_full Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia
title_fullStr Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia
title_full_unstemmed Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia
title_sort Land use planning conflicts with world heritage convention in Australia
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Keane, Adrienne
author Keane, Adrienne
author_facet Keane, Adrienne
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Arquitectura
Urbanismo
explotación de recursos
conservación
Australia
Urbanización
patrimonio mundial
topic Arquitectura
Urbanismo
explotación de recursos
conservación
Australia
Urbanización
patrimonio mundial
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Despite its international status as a world heritage area, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under threat from development. Activities relating to primary resource extraction and increasing urbanization along the adjoining coastal lands not only threaten its status but illustrate the profound dilemma of development and the conservation of natural values. Criticisms of world heritage as a protective mechanism lie in the ambiguity in its operations particularly as there are no direct controls over the signatories (Evans, 2002) with the only leverage to exact compliance being the delisting or threat of delisting a property (Hazen, 2008; Maswood, 2000). Commentary suggests a lack of connection between the international intent of world heritage and the operationalization of it into national and local management regimes (Fowler, 2007; Lennon, 2006; Pendlebury, Short and While, 2009). Under the UNESCO consideration to put the GBR on the “in-danger” list, Australia has embarked on revising its development assessment process. This paper examines the newly devised strategic environmental assessment. While UNESCO is complementary to Australia’s policy shift, it remains watchful over the management of the GBR and the port development that threatens its integrity. This paper outlines the planning frameworks and Australia’s response to UNESCO, concluding that proactive measures have been taken but there is conflicting evidence to demonstrate that these will not protect an internationally important place from development.
Eje 1: Dilemas del desarrollo socio-territorial y la planificación urbano-regional frente a los retos de la sustentabilidad.
Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo
description Despite its international status as a world heritage area, Australia’s Great Barrier Reef (GBR) is under threat from development. Activities relating to primary resource extraction and increasing urbanization along the adjoining coastal lands not only threaten its status but illustrate the profound dilemma of development and the conservation of natural values. Criticisms of world heritage as a protective mechanism lie in the ambiguity in its operations particularly as there are no direct controls over the signatories (Evans, 2002) with the only leverage to exact compliance being the delisting or threat of delisting a property (Hazen, 2008; Maswood, 2000). Commentary suggests a lack of connection between the international intent of world heritage and the operationalization of it into national and local management regimes (Fowler, 2007; Lennon, 2006; Pendlebury, Short and While, 2009). Under the UNESCO consideration to put the GBR on the “in-danger” list, Australia has embarked on revising its development assessment process. This paper examines the newly devised strategic environmental assessment. While UNESCO is complementary to Australia’s policy shift, it remains watchful over the management of the GBR and the port development that threatens its integrity. This paper outlines the planning frameworks and Australia’s response to UNESCO, concluding that proactive measures have been taken but there is conflicting evidence to demonstrate that these will not protect an internationally important place from development.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/53507
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/53507
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-950-34-1133-9
info:eu-repo/semantics/reference/hdl/10915/52977
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
207-217
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1843532249388023808
score 13.000565