Embedding abduction in nonmonotonic theories
- Autores
- Delrieux, Claudio
- Año de publicación
- 2002
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- An important ampliative inference schema that is commonly used is abduction. Abduction plays a central role in many applications, such as diagnosis, expert systems, and causal reasoning. In a very broad sense we can state that abduction is the inference process that goes from observations to explanations within a more general context or theoretical framework. That is to say, abductive inference looks for sentences (named explanations), which, added to the theory, enable deductions for the observations. Most of the times there are several such explanations for a given observation. For this reason, in a narrower sense, abduction is regarded as an inference to the best explanation. However, a problem that faces abduction is the explanation of anomalous observations, i. e., observations that are contradictory with the current theory. It is perhaps impossible to do such inferences in monotonic theories. For this reason, in this work we will consider the problem of characterizing abduction in nonmonotonic theories. Our inference system is based on a natural deduction presentation of the implicational segment of a relevant logic, much similar to the R! system of Anderson and Belnap. Then we will discuss some issues arising the pragmatic acceptance of abductive inferences in nonmonotonic theories.
Eje: Aspectos teóricos de inteligencia artificial
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) - Materia
-
Ciencias Informáticas
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
abduction
observation
inference system
inference process - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21801
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_abebae787cb37b48699bae257a6ea07b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21801 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Embedding abduction in nonmonotonic theoriesDelrieux, ClaudioCiencias InformáticasARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEabductionobservationinference systeminference processAn important ampliative inference schema that is commonly used is abduction. Abduction plays a central role in many applications, such as diagnosis, expert systems, and causal reasoning. In a very broad sense we can state that abduction is the inference process that goes from observations to explanations within a more general context or theoretical framework. That is to say, abductive inference looks for sentences (named explanations), which, added to the theory, enable deductions for the observations. Most of the times there are several such explanations for a given observation. For this reason, in a narrower sense, abduction is regarded as an inference to the best explanation. However, a problem that faces abduction is the explanation of anomalous observations, i. e., observations that are contradictory with the current theory. It is perhaps impossible to do such inferences in monotonic theories. For this reason, in this work we will consider the problem of characterizing abduction in nonmonotonic theories. Our inference system is based on a natural deduction presentation of the implicational segment of a relevant logic, much similar to the R! system of Anderson and Belnap. Then we will discuss some issues arising the pragmatic acceptance of abductive inferences in nonmonotonic theories.Eje: Aspectos teóricos de inteligencia artificialRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2002-05info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf24-28http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21801enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T10:27:37Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21801Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:27:37.646SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Embedding abduction in nonmonotonic theories |
title |
Embedding abduction in nonmonotonic theories |
spellingShingle |
Embedding abduction in nonmonotonic theories Delrieux, Claudio Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE abduction observation inference system inference process |
title_short |
Embedding abduction in nonmonotonic theories |
title_full |
Embedding abduction in nonmonotonic theories |
title_fullStr |
Embedding abduction in nonmonotonic theories |
title_full_unstemmed |
Embedding abduction in nonmonotonic theories |
title_sort |
Embedding abduction in nonmonotonic theories |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Delrieux, Claudio |
author |
Delrieux, Claudio |
author_facet |
Delrieux, Claudio |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE abduction observation inference system inference process |
topic |
Ciencias Informáticas ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE abduction observation inference system inference process |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
An important ampliative inference schema that is commonly used is abduction. Abduction plays a central role in many applications, such as diagnosis, expert systems, and causal reasoning. In a very broad sense we can state that abduction is the inference process that goes from observations to explanations within a more general context or theoretical framework. That is to say, abductive inference looks for sentences (named explanations), which, added to the theory, enable deductions for the observations. Most of the times there are several such explanations for a given observation. For this reason, in a narrower sense, abduction is regarded as an inference to the best explanation. However, a problem that faces abduction is the explanation of anomalous observations, i. e., observations that are contradictory with the current theory. It is perhaps impossible to do such inferences in monotonic theories. For this reason, in this work we will consider the problem of characterizing abduction in nonmonotonic theories. Our inference system is based on a natural deduction presentation of the implicational segment of a relevant logic, much similar to the R! system of Anderson and Belnap. Then we will discuss some issues arising the pragmatic acceptance of abductive inferences in nonmonotonic theories. Eje: Aspectos teóricos de inteligencia artificial Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI) |
description |
An important ampliative inference schema that is commonly used is abduction. Abduction plays a central role in many applications, such as diagnosis, expert systems, and causal reasoning. In a very broad sense we can state that abduction is the inference process that goes from observations to explanations within a more general context or theoretical framework. That is to say, abductive inference looks for sentences (named explanations), which, added to the theory, enable deductions for the observations. Most of the times there are several such explanations for a given observation. For this reason, in a narrower sense, abduction is regarded as an inference to the best explanation. However, a problem that faces abduction is the explanation of anomalous observations, i. e., observations that are contradictory with the current theory. It is perhaps impossible to do such inferences in monotonic theories. For this reason, in this work we will consider the problem of characterizing abduction in nonmonotonic theories. Our inference system is based on a natural deduction presentation of the implicational segment of a relevant logic, much similar to the R! system of Anderson and Belnap. Then we will discuss some issues arising the pragmatic acceptance of abductive inferences in nonmonotonic theories. |
publishDate |
2002 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2002-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Objeto de conferencia http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21801 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21801 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 24-28 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1842260114127454208 |
score |
13.13397 |