The structure of the bulk and the (001) surface of V2O5: a DFT+U study

Autores
Ranea, Víctor Alejandro; Dammig Quiña, Pablo Leandro
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
GGA(PW91)+U is applied to the calculation of the structure (lattice parameters) and the electronic structure of theV2O5 bulk and its (001) surface for different values of U eff used in the literature (0.0, 3.0 and 6.6 eV). Similar surface lattice parameters are calculated for the (001) surface and for the bulk, as well as similar electronic structures. The calculated lattice parameters (a and b for the surface and a, b and c for the bulk) are in good agreement with experimental results. It seems that there is no strong correlation between the calculated lattice parameters and the value of Ueff. The calculated width of the valence band keeps the value of 5 eVfor the three studied Ueff. However, the energy gap between the valence and the conduction bands increases with the value of Ueff. Ueff=3.0 eV seems to be the most adequate value to describe the energy gap after comparison with experimental results. Electronic density contour plots indicate that for a larger (smaller) Ueff the accumulated charge in the V-O(1) bond is overestimated (underestimated). The contour plots (in the a direction) show that the charge distribution V-O(3) is less correlated with Ueff than the charge distribution V-O(1), where as charge distribution V-O(2) seems not to be corretaled with Ueff. The energy gap between the valence and the conduction bands seems to be strongly related with the charge distribution in the V-O(1) bond. The V-O(1) bond stability seems to be correlated with U eff. However, the stability of the V-O(2) and V-O (3) bonds seems not to be strongly affected by U eff.
Instituto de Investigaciones Fisicoquímicas Teóricas y Aplicadas
Materia
Química
Density functional theory
Divanadium pentoxide surface
Electronic structure
Energy gap
Lattice constants
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/100417

id SEDICI_a47ea6d4f81f08e2c902cc4501d531c4
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/100417
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling The structure of the bulk and the (001) surface of V2O5: a DFT+U studyRanea, Víctor AlejandroDammig Quiña, Pablo LeandroQuímicaDensity functional theoryDivanadium pentoxide surfaceElectronic structureEnergy gapLattice constantsGGA(PW91)+U is applied to the calculation of the structure (lattice parameters) and the electronic structure of theV<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> bulk and its (001) surface for different values of U <sub>eff</sub> used in the literature (0.0, 3.0 and 6.6 eV). Similar surface lattice parameters are calculated for the (001) surface and for the bulk, as well as similar electronic structures. The calculated lattice parameters (a and b for the surface and a, b and c for the bulk) are in good agreement with experimental results. It seems that there is no strong correlation between the calculated lattice parameters and the value of U<sub>eff</sub>. The calculated width of the valence band keeps the value of 5 eVfor the three studied U<sub>eff</sub>. However, the energy gap between the valence and the conduction bands increases with the value of U<sub>eff</sub>. U<sub>eff</sub>=3.0 eV seems to be the most adequate value to describe the energy gap after comparison with experimental results. Electronic density contour plots indicate that for a larger (smaller) U<sub>eff</sub> the accumulated charge in the V-O(1) bond is overestimated (underestimated). The contour plots (in the a direction) show that the charge distribution V-O(3) is less correlated with U<sub>eff</sub> than the charge distribution V-O(1), where as charge distribution V-O(2) seems not to be corretaled with U<sub>eff</sub>. The energy gap between the valence and the conduction bands seems to be strongly related with the charge distribution in the V-O(1) bond. The V-O(1) bond stability seems to be correlated with U <sub>eff</sub>. However, the stability of the V-O(2) and V-O (3) bonds seems not to be strongly affected by U <sub>eff</sub>.Instituto de Investigaciones Fisicoquímicas Teóricas y Aplicadas2016-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf8500501-8500511http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/100417enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/62297info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2053-1591/3/8/085005/metainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2053-1591info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1088/2053-1591/3/8/085005info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/62297info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-10-15T11:12:10Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/100417Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-10-15 11:12:10.417SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The structure of the bulk and the (001) surface of V2O5: a DFT+U study
title The structure of the bulk and the (001) surface of V2O5: a DFT+U study
spellingShingle The structure of the bulk and the (001) surface of V2O5: a DFT+U study
Ranea, Víctor Alejandro
Química
Density functional theory
Divanadium pentoxide surface
Electronic structure
Energy gap
Lattice constants
title_short The structure of the bulk and the (001) surface of V2O5: a DFT+U study
title_full The structure of the bulk and the (001) surface of V2O5: a DFT+U study
title_fullStr The structure of the bulk and the (001) surface of V2O5: a DFT+U study
title_full_unstemmed The structure of the bulk and the (001) surface of V2O5: a DFT+U study
title_sort The structure of the bulk and the (001) surface of V2O5: a DFT+U study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ranea, Víctor Alejandro
Dammig Quiña, Pablo Leandro
author Ranea, Víctor Alejandro
author_facet Ranea, Víctor Alejandro
Dammig Quiña, Pablo Leandro
author_role author
author2 Dammig Quiña, Pablo Leandro
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Química
Density functional theory
Divanadium pentoxide surface
Electronic structure
Energy gap
Lattice constants
topic Química
Density functional theory
Divanadium pentoxide surface
Electronic structure
Energy gap
Lattice constants
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv GGA(PW91)+U is applied to the calculation of the structure (lattice parameters) and the electronic structure of theV<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> bulk and its (001) surface for different values of U <sub>eff</sub> used in the literature (0.0, 3.0 and 6.6 eV). Similar surface lattice parameters are calculated for the (001) surface and for the bulk, as well as similar electronic structures. The calculated lattice parameters (a and b for the surface and a, b and c for the bulk) are in good agreement with experimental results. It seems that there is no strong correlation between the calculated lattice parameters and the value of U<sub>eff</sub>. The calculated width of the valence band keeps the value of 5 eVfor the three studied U<sub>eff</sub>. However, the energy gap between the valence and the conduction bands increases with the value of U<sub>eff</sub>. U<sub>eff</sub>=3.0 eV seems to be the most adequate value to describe the energy gap after comparison with experimental results. Electronic density contour plots indicate that for a larger (smaller) U<sub>eff</sub> the accumulated charge in the V-O(1) bond is overestimated (underestimated). The contour plots (in the a direction) show that the charge distribution V-O(3) is less correlated with U<sub>eff</sub> than the charge distribution V-O(1), where as charge distribution V-O(2) seems not to be corretaled with U<sub>eff</sub>. The energy gap between the valence and the conduction bands seems to be strongly related with the charge distribution in the V-O(1) bond. The V-O(1) bond stability seems to be correlated with U <sub>eff</sub>. However, the stability of the V-O(2) and V-O (3) bonds seems not to be strongly affected by U <sub>eff</sub>.
Instituto de Investigaciones Fisicoquímicas Teóricas y Aplicadas
description GGA(PW91)+U is applied to the calculation of the structure (lattice parameters) and the electronic structure of theV<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> bulk and its (001) surface for different values of U <sub>eff</sub> used in the literature (0.0, 3.0 and 6.6 eV). Similar surface lattice parameters are calculated for the (001) surface and for the bulk, as well as similar electronic structures. The calculated lattice parameters (a and b for the surface and a, b and c for the bulk) are in good agreement with experimental results. It seems that there is no strong correlation between the calculated lattice parameters and the value of U<sub>eff</sub>. The calculated width of the valence band keeps the value of 5 eVfor the three studied U<sub>eff</sub>. However, the energy gap between the valence and the conduction bands increases with the value of U<sub>eff</sub>. U<sub>eff</sub>=3.0 eV seems to be the most adequate value to describe the energy gap after comparison with experimental results. Electronic density contour plots indicate that for a larger (smaller) U<sub>eff</sub> the accumulated charge in the V-O(1) bond is overestimated (underestimated). The contour plots (in the a direction) show that the charge distribution V-O(3) is less correlated with U<sub>eff</sub> than the charge distribution V-O(1), where as charge distribution V-O(2) seems not to be corretaled with U<sub>eff</sub>. The energy gap between the valence and the conduction bands seems to be strongly related with the charge distribution in the V-O(1) bond. The V-O(1) bond stability seems to be correlated with U <sub>eff</sub>. However, the stability of the V-O(2) and V-O (3) bonds seems not to be strongly affected by U <sub>eff</sub>.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/100417
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/100417
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/62297
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2053-1591/3/8/085005/meta
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2053-1591
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1088/2053-1591/3/8/085005
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/62297
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
8500501-8500511
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1846064179311542272
score 13.22299