Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects

Autores
Parola, Franco; García Niebla, Javier
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: High-pass and low-pass fi lters applied to 12-lead Electrocardiograms (ECG) are fundamental to avoid artifacts, but an inappropriate use may lead to misdiagnosis. Our goal is to evaluate cutoff points for these fi lters used as routine by cardiology professionals from different countries, and to determine to what extent they adjust to the established guidelines. Methods: We designed a descriptive study where 12-lead ECGs were included, both from adults and teenagers, distributed between August 2016 and February 2017 within the Ibero-American Forum on Arrhythmias on the Internet (FIAI) through the instant messaging apps WhatsApp and Telegram. Results: 48% of ECGs had at least one of the two fi lter cutoff points printed. The bandwidth recommended by different scientifi c societies (≤ 0.05 Hz and ≥ 150 Hz) was present in 2%. The most frequent low frequency cutoff value was 0.5 Hz (47%) and the high frequency one was between 25 Hz and 40 Hz (74%). As to the last consensus guidelines, we registered that 32% of ECGs met the low frequency cutoff point and just 5% the high frequency cutoff point. Conclusions: There is a high ratio of tracings lacking printed information on the fi lter used, and those that do have it, use inappropriate cutoff points in a high percentage, which may have significant diagnostic consequences.
Facultad de Ciencias Médicas
Materia
Ciencias Médicas
Electrocardiography
Low-Pass Filter
High-Pass Filter
Artifacts
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/118090

id SEDICI_91825588ff8a67a06e0bd6790d1d230c
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/118090
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical EffectsParola, FrancoGarcía Niebla, JavierCiencias MédicasElectrocardiographyLow-Pass FilterHigh-Pass FilterArtifactsBackground: High-pass and low-pass fi lters applied to 12-lead Electrocardiograms (ECG) are fundamental to avoid artifacts, but an inappropriate use may lead to misdiagnosis. Our goal is to evaluate cutoff points for these fi lters used as routine by cardiology professionals from different countries, and to determine to what extent they adjust to the established guidelines. Methods: We designed a descriptive study where 12-lead ECGs were included, both from adults and teenagers, distributed between August 2016 and February 2017 within the Ibero-American Forum on Arrhythmias on the Internet (FIAI) through the instant messaging apps WhatsApp and Telegram. Results: 48% of ECGs had at least one of the two fi lter cutoff points printed. The bandwidth recommended by different scientifi c societies (≤ 0.05 Hz and ≥ 150 Hz) was present in 2%. The most frequent low frequency cutoff value was 0.5 Hz (47%) and the high frequency one was between 25 Hz and 40 Hz (74%). As to the last consensus guidelines, we registered that 32% of ECGs met the low frequency cutoff point and just 5% the high frequency cutoff point. Conclusions: There is a high ratio of tracings lacking printed information on the fi lter used, and those that do have it, use inappropriate cutoff points in a high percentage, which may have significant diagnostic consequences.Facultad de Ciencias Médicas2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf034-038http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/118090enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2640-5601info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:27:45Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/118090Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:27:45.755SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
title Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
spellingShingle Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
Parola, Franco
Ciencias Médicas
Electrocardiography
Low-Pass Filter
High-Pass Filter
Artifacts
title_short Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
title_full Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
title_fullStr Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
title_full_unstemmed Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
title_sort Use of High-Pass and Low-Pass Electrocardiographic Filters in an International Cardiological Community and Possible Clinical Effects
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Parola, Franco
García Niebla, Javier
author Parola, Franco
author_facet Parola, Franco
García Niebla, Javier
author_role author
author2 García Niebla, Javier
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Médicas
Electrocardiography
Low-Pass Filter
High-Pass Filter
Artifacts
topic Ciencias Médicas
Electrocardiography
Low-Pass Filter
High-Pass Filter
Artifacts
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: High-pass and low-pass fi lters applied to 12-lead Electrocardiograms (ECG) are fundamental to avoid artifacts, but an inappropriate use may lead to misdiagnosis. Our goal is to evaluate cutoff points for these fi lters used as routine by cardiology professionals from different countries, and to determine to what extent they adjust to the established guidelines. Methods: We designed a descriptive study where 12-lead ECGs were included, both from adults and teenagers, distributed between August 2016 and February 2017 within the Ibero-American Forum on Arrhythmias on the Internet (FIAI) through the instant messaging apps WhatsApp and Telegram. Results: 48% of ECGs had at least one of the two fi lter cutoff points printed. The bandwidth recommended by different scientifi c societies (≤ 0.05 Hz and ≥ 150 Hz) was present in 2%. The most frequent low frequency cutoff value was 0.5 Hz (47%) and the high frequency one was between 25 Hz and 40 Hz (74%). As to the last consensus guidelines, we registered that 32% of ECGs met the low frequency cutoff point and just 5% the high frequency cutoff point. Conclusions: There is a high ratio of tracings lacking printed information on the fi lter used, and those that do have it, use inappropriate cutoff points in a high percentage, which may have significant diagnostic consequences.
Facultad de Ciencias Médicas
description Background: High-pass and low-pass fi lters applied to 12-lead Electrocardiograms (ECG) are fundamental to avoid artifacts, but an inappropriate use may lead to misdiagnosis. Our goal is to evaluate cutoff points for these fi lters used as routine by cardiology professionals from different countries, and to determine to what extent they adjust to the established guidelines. Methods: We designed a descriptive study where 12-lead ECGs were included, both from adults and teenagers, distributed between August 2016 and February 2017 within the Ibero-American Forum on Arrhythmias on the Internet (FIAI) through the instant messaging apps WhatsApp and Telegram. Results: 48% of ECGs had at least one of the two fi lter cutoff points printed. The bandwidth recommended by different scientifi c societies (≤ 0.05 Hz and ≥ 150 Hz) was present in 2%. The most frequent low frequency cutoff value was 0.5 Hz (47%) and the high frequency one was between 25 Hz and 40 Hz (74%). As to the last consensus guidelines, we registered that 32% of ECGs met the low frequency cutoff point and just 5% the high frequency cutoff point. Conclusions: There is a high ratio of tracings lacking printed information on the fi lter used, and those that do have it, use inappropriate cutoff points in a high percentage, which may have significant diagnostic consequences.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/118090
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/118090
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2640-5601
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
034-038
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844616155687288832
score 13.070432