Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest China

Autores
Zhao, Guangxing; Zhang, Zhihao; Tariq, Akash; Sabit, Rapkat; Sardans, Jordi; Graciano, Corina; Li, Xiangyi; Zhu, Yuhe; Peñuelas, Josep; Al-Bakre, Dhafer A.; Zeng, Fanjiang
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Grazing exclusion is a crucial management practice impacting carbon sequestration and ecosystem stability. However, the effects and key factors of long-term grazing exclusion on soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS) and soil inorganic carbon stocks (SICS) in the desert steppe remain unexplored. To address this gap, we evaluated the impacts of different grazing exclusion periods (0, 6, 11, 16 years, GE0, GE6, GE11, GE16) on SOCS, SICS and soil total carbon stocks (STCS). Grazing exclusion reduced SOCS and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) stocks but promoted SICS and STCS. GE6 exerted the most detrimental impact on the STCS in this region. SICS increased by 9.34 %, while SOCS decreased by 32.86 % after GE16. Specifically, SICS in the region were 9.36 to 12.26 times higher than SOCS. Overall, grazing exclusion led to an increasing in STCS by 3.27 Mg·ha−1, with SOCS decreasing by 1.04 Mg·ha−1 and SICS increasing by 4.31 Mg·ha−1. These findings suggested that SICS were substantially higher in arid zones and should be given special consideration in studies assessing environmental impacts on ecosystem C sequestration. Grazing exclusion was not effective in enhancing SOC stocks; instead, MAOC played a critical role in reducing SOC stocks. Mean annual precipitation (MAP) and aboveground biomass (AGB) were significant factors modulating SICS, while SOC and SIC directly influenced STCS, with environmental factors affecting STCS primarily through indirect pathways. This study highlights that grazing exclusion significantly reduced SOC stocks, elevated SIC stocks and explores the mechanisms impacting soil C sequestration.
Instituto de Fisiología Vegetal
Materia
Ciencias Agrarias
Ecología
Enclosure age
Sustainable Management Practice
Soil Inorganic Carbon
Sustainable Practices
Restoration Measure
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/181595

id SEDICI_6c3934ed3c8c650b0cb0267fcfb5b8f5
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/181595
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest ChinaZhao, GuangxingZhang, ZhihaoTariq, AkashSabit, RapkatSardans, JordiGraciano, CorinaLi, XiangyiZhu, YuhePeñuelas, JosepAl-Bakre, Dhafer A.Zeng, FanjiangCiencias AgrariasEcologíaEnclosure ageSustainable Management PracticeSoil Inorganic CarbonSustainable PracticesRestoration MeasureGrazing exclusion is a crucial management practice impacting carbon sequestration and ecosystem stability. However, the effects and key factors of long-term grazing exclusion on soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS) and soil inorganic carbon stocks (SICS) in the desert steppe remain unexplored. To address this gap, we evaluated the impacts of different grazing exclusion periods (0, 6, 11, 16 years, GE0, GE6, GE11, GE16) on SOCS, SICS and soil total carbon stocks (STCS). Grazing exclusion reduced SOCS and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) stocks but promoted SICS and STCS. GE6 exerted the most detrimental impact on the STCS in this region. SICS increased by 9.34 %, while SOCS decreased by 32.86 % after GE16. Specifically, SICS in the region were 9.36 to 12.26 times higher than SOCS. Overall, grazing exclusion led to an increasing in STCS by 3.27 Mg·ha−1, with SOCS decreasing by 1.04 Mg·ha−1 and SICS increasing by 4.31 Mg·ha−1. These findings suggested that SICS were substantially higher in arid zones and should be given special consideration in studies assessing environmental impacts on ecosystem C sequestration. Grazing exclusion was not effective in enhancing SOC stocks; instead, MAOC played a critical role in reducing SOC stocks. Mean annual precipitation (MAP) and aboveground biomass (AGB) were significant factors modulating SICS, while SOC and SIC directly influenced STCS, with environmental factors affecting STCS primarily through indirect pathways. This study highlights that grazing exclusion significantly reduced SOC stocks, elevated SIC stocks and explores the mechanisms impacting soil C sequestration.Instituto de Fisiología Vegetal2025-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/181595enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1872-7034info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113341info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T11:21:22Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/181595Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 11:21:23.64SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest China
title Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest China
spellingShingle Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest China
Zhao, Guangxing
Ciencias Agrarias
Ecología
Enclosure age
Sustainable Management Practice
Soil Inorganic Carbon
Sustainable Practices
Restoration Measure
title_short Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest China
title_full Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest China
title_fullStr Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest China
title_full_unstemmed Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest China
title_sort Grazing exclusion significantly reduced soil organic carbon stocks but enhanced soil inorganic carbon stocks in desert steppe of northwest China
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Zhao, Guangxing
Zhang, Zhihao
Tariq, Akash
Sabit, Rapkat
Sardans, Jordi
Graciano, Corina
Li, Xiangyi
Zhu, Yuhe
Peñuelas, Josep
Al-Bakre, Dhafer A.
Zeng, Fanjiang
author Zhao, Guangxing
author_facet Zhao, Guangxing
Zhang, Zhihao
Tariq, Akash
Sabit, Rapkat
Sardans, Jordi
Graciano, Corina
Li, Xiangyi
Zhu, Yuhe
Peñuelas, Josep
Al-Bakre, Dhafer A.
Zeng, Fanjiang
author_role author
author2 Zhang, Zhihao
Tariq, Akash
Sabit, Rapkat
Sardans, Jordi
Graciano, Corina
Li, Xiangyi
Zhu, Yuhe
Peñuelas, Josep
Al-Bakre, Dhafer A.
Zeng, Fanjiang
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Agrarias
Ecología
Enclosure age
Sustainable Management Practice
Soil Inorganic Carbon
Sustainable Practices
Restoration Measure
topic Ciencias Agrarias
Ecología
Enclosure age
Sustainable Management Practice
Soil Inorganic Carbon
Sustainable Practices
Restoration Measure
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Grazing exclusion is a crucial management practice impacting carbon sequestration and ecosystem stability. However, the effects and key factors of long-term grazing exclusion on soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS) and soil inorganic carbon stocks (SICS) in the desert steppe remain unexplored. To address this gap, we evaluated the impacts of different grazing exclusion periods (0, 6, 11, 16 years, GE0, GE6, GE11, GE16) on SOCS, SICS and soil total carbon stocks (STCS). Grazing exclusion reduced SOCS and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) stocks but promoted SICS and STCS. GE6 exerted the most detrimental impact on the STCS in this region. SICS increased by 9.34 %, while SOCS decreased by 32.86 % after GE16. Specifically, SICS in the region were 9.36 to 12.26 times higher than SOCS. Overall, grazing exclusion led to an increasing in STCS by 3.27 Mg·ha−1, with SOCS decreasing by 1.04 Mg·ha−1 and SICS increasing by 4.31 Mg·ha−1. These findings suggested that SICS were substantially higher in arid zones and should be given special consideration in studies assessing environmental impacts on ecosystem C sequestration. Grazing exclusion was not effective in enhancing SOC stocks; instead, MAOC played a critical role in reducing SOC stocks. Mean annual precipitation (MAP) and aboveground biomass (AGB) were significant factors modulating SICS, while SOC and SIC directly influenced STCS, with environmental factors affecting STCS primarily through indirect pathways. This study highlights that grazing exclusion significantly reduced SOC stocks, elevated SIC stocks and explores the mechanisms impacting soil C sequestration.
Instituto de Fisiología Vegetal
description Grazing exclusion is a crucial management practice impacting carbon sequestration and ecosystem stability. However, the effects and key factors of long-term grazing exclusion on soil organic carbon stocks (SOCS) and soil inorganic carbon stocks (SICS) in the desert steppe remain unexplored. To address this gap, we evaluated the impacts of different grazing exclusion periods (0, 6, 11, 16 years, GE0, GE6, GE11, GE16) on SOCS, SICS and soil total carbon stocks (STCS). Grazing exclusion reduced SOCS and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC) stocks but promoted SICS and STCS. GE6 exerted the most detrimental impact on the STCS in this region. SICS increased by 9.34 %, while SOCS decreased by 32.86 % after GE16. Specifically, SICS in the region were 9.36 to 12.26 times higher than SOCS. Overall, grazing exclusion led to an increasing in STCS by 3.27 Mg·ha−1, with SOCS decreasing by 1.04 Mg·ha−1 and SICS increasing by 4.31 Mg·ha−1. These findings suggested that SICS were substantially higher in arid zones and should be given special consideration in studies assessing environmental impacts on ecosystem C sequestration. Grazing exclusion was not effective in enhancing SOC stocks; instead, MAOC played a critical role in reducing SOC stocks. Mean annual precipitation (MAP) and aboveground biomass (AGB) were significant factors modulating SICS, while SOC and SIC directly influenced STCS, with environmental factors affecting STCS primarily through indirect pathways. This study highlights that grazing exclusion significantly reduced SOC stocks, elevated SIC stocks and explores the mechanisms impacting soil C sequestration.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/181595
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/181595
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1872-7034
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113341
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842260718769930240
score 13.13397