Sorne theoretical considerations on resource-bounded defeasible argurnentation

Autores
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Año de publicación
1996
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
During the last decade, defeasible argumentation has proven to be a fruitful formalization for modelling commonsense reasorúng. In this respect, the MTDR framework has come to be a fairly standard approach, because of its simplicity and expressive power. Recently, the framework has been enriched through a number of dialectical considerations, resulting in a new ontology, based on Rescher's model of theory formation through dispute. The current trend is that dispute is the most fair and effective way to investigate the tenability of claims. However, dispute is usually resource-bounded, so that the notion of u1timately supported claims (or justifications) cannot be separated from this issue. This paper discusses sorne theoretical considerations for an extension of MTDR where bounds on resources are taken into account.
Eje: 3er Workshop sobre Aspectos teóricos de la inteligencia artificial
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
defeasible argumentation
defeasible reasoning
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/24237
Acceder
id SEDICI_5ca2ed765f71e9d44aeeb0066adba1e7
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/24237
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Sorne theoretical considerations on resource-bounded defeasible argurnentationChesñevar, Carlos IvánSimari, Guillermo RicardoCiencias Informáticasdefeasible argumentationdefeasible reasoningARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEDuring the last decade, defeasible argumentation has proven to be a fruitful formalization for modelling commonsense reasorúng. In this respect, the MTDR framework has come to be a fairly standard approach, because of its simplicity and expressive power. Recently, the framework has been enriched through a number of dialectical considerations, resulting in a new ontology, based on Rescher's model of theory formation through dispute. The current trend is that dispute is the most fair and effective way to investigate the tenability of claims. However, dispute is usually resource-bounded, so that the notion of u1timately supported claims (or justifications) cannot be separated from this issue. This paper discusses sorne theoretical considerations for an extension of MTDR where bounds on resources are taken into account.Eje: 3er Workshop sobre Aspectos teóricos de la inteligencia artificialRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)1996-11info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdf616-628http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/24237enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T10:55:46Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/24237Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 10:55:46.354SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sorne theoretical considerations on resource-bounded defeasible argurnentation
title Sorne theoretical considerations on resource-bounded defeasible argurnentation
spellingShingle Sorne theoretical considerations on resource-bounded defeasible argurnentation
Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
Ciencias Informáticas
defeasible argumentation
defeasible reasoning
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
title_short Sorne theoretical considerations on resource-bounded defeasible argurnentation
title_full Sorne theoretical considerations on resource-bounded defeasible argurnentation
title_fullStr Sorne theoretical considerations on resource-bounded defeasible argurnentation
title_full_unstemmed Sorne theoretical considerations on resource-bounded defeasible argurnentation
title_sort Sorne theoretical considerations on resource-bounded defeasible argurnentation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
author_facet Chesñevar, Carlos Iván
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
defeasible argumentation
defeasible reasoning
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
topic Ciencias Informáticas
defeasible argumentation
defeasible reasoning
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv During the last decade, defeasible argumentation has proven to be a fruitful formalization for modelling commonsense reasorúng. In this respect, the MTDR framework has come to be a fairly standard approach, because of its simplicity and expressive power. Recently, the framework has been enriched through a number of dialectical considerations, resulting in a new ontology, based on Rescher's model of theory formation through dispute. The current trend is that dispute is the most fair and effective way to investigate the tenability of claims. However, dispute is usually resource-bounded, so that the notion of u1timately supported claims (or justifications) cannot be separated from this issue. This paper discusses sorne theoretical considerations for an extension of MTDR where bounds on resources are taken into account.
Eje: 3er Workshop sobre Aspectos teóricos de la inteligencia artificial
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
description During the last decade, defeasible argumentation has proven to be a fruitful formalization for modelling commonsense reasorúng. In this respect, the MTDR framework has come to be a fairly standard approach, because of its simplicity and expressive power. Recently, the framework has been enriched through a number of dialectical considerations, resulting in a new ontology, based on Rescher's model of theory formation through dispute. The current trend is that dispute is the most fair and effective way to investigate the tenability of claims. However, dispute is usually resource-bounded, so that the notion of u1timately supported claims (or justifications) cannot be separated from this issue. This paper discusses sorne theoretical considerations for an extension of MTDR where bounds on resources are taken into account.
publishDate 1996
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1996-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/24237
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/24237
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
616-628
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844615817525723136
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares