Argument comparison criteria analysis

Autores
Martínez, Diego C.; García, Alejandro Javier
Año de publicación
2001
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this work we show a possible form of classification of comparison methods in argumentation systems [AG95,BV,Dung93,PRAK,Sim92]. The main idea in these systems is that any proposition will be accepted as true if there exists an argument that supports it, and this argument is acceptable according to an analysis between it and its counterarguments. This analysis requires a process of comparison of conflicting arguments, in order to decide which one is preferable. After this dialectical analysis in the set of arguments of the system, some of them will be acceptable or justified arguments, while others not. In this classification, the argument comparison method plays a very important role.
Eje: Inteligencia Artificial Distribuida, Aspectos Teóricos de la Inteligencia Artificial y Teoría de la Computación
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
Distributed systems
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Theory of Computation
Argument Comparison
Criteria Analysis
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21630
Acceder
id SEDICI_59e1c8e95251b91028cf30ab9e0a5c69
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21630
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Argument comparison criteria analysisMartínez, Diego C.García, Alejandro JavierCiencias InformáticasDistributed systemsARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCETheory of ComputationArgument ComparisonCriteria AnalysisIn this work we show a possible form of classification of comparison methods in argumentation systems [AG95,BV,Dung93,PRAK,Sim92]. The main idea in these systems is that any proposition will be accepted as true if there exists an argument that supports it, and this argument is acceptable according to an analysis between it and its counterarguments. This analysis requires a process of comparison of conflicting arguments, in order to decide which one is preferable. After this dialectical analysis in the set of arguments of the system, some of them will be acceptable or justified arguments, while others not. In this classification, the argument comparison method plays a very important role.Eje: Inteligencia Artificial Distribuida, Aspectos Teóricos de la Inteligencia Artificial y Teoría de la ComputaciónRed de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2001-05info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21630enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T10:54:43Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/21630Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 10:54:43.228SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Argument comparison criteria analysis
title Argument comparison criteria analysis
spellingShingle Argument comparison criteria analysis
Martínez, Diego C.
Ciencias Informáticas
Distributed systems
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Theory of Computation
Argument Comparison
Criteria Analysis
title_short Argument comparison criteria analysis
title_full Argument comparison criteria analysis
title_fullStr Argument comparison criteria analysis
title_full_unstemmed Argument comparison criteria analysis
title_sort Argument comparison criteria analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Martínez, Diego C.
García, Alejandro Javier
author Martínez, Diego C.
author_facet Martínez, Diego C.
García, Alejandro Javier
author_role author
author2 García, Alejandro Javier
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
Distributed systems
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Theory of Computation
Argument Comparison
Criteria Analysis
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Distributed systems
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Theory of Computation
Argument Comparison
Criteria Analysis
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this work we show a possible form of classification of comparison methods in argumentation systems [AG95,BV,Dung93,PRAK,Sim92]. The main idea in these systems is that any proposition will be accepted as true if there exists an argument that supports it, and this argument is acceptable according to an analysis between it and its counterarguments. This analysis requires a process of comparison of conflicting arguments, in order to decide which one is preferable. After this dialectical analysis in the set of arguments of the system, some of them will be acceptable or justified arguments, while others not. In this classification, the argument comparison method plays a very important role.
Eje: Inteligencia Artificial Distribuida, Aspectos Teóricos de la Inteligencia Artificial y Teoría de la Computación
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
description In this work we show a possible form of classification of comparison methods in argumentation systems [AG95,BV,Dung93,PRAK,Sim92]. The main idea in these systems is that any proposition will be accepted as true if there exists an argument that supports it, and this argument is acceptable according to an analysis between it and its counterarguments. This analysis requires a process of comparison of conflicting arguments, in order to decide which one is preferable. After this dialectical analysis in the set of arguments of the system, some of them will be acceptable or justified arguments, while others not. In this classification, the argument comparison method plays a very important role.
publishDate 2001
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2001-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21630
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/21630
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844615805093806080
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares