The Judicial Power as an Institutional Tool for Citizen Participation within the Framework of the Theory of Deliberative Democracy

Autores
Cabral, Pablo Octavio
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The goal of this work is to address, from the conceptual framework of theories on “deliberative democracy”, the role played by the Judicial Power, being an integral part of the State, as the institutionalized field of deliberation for making collective decisions. In order to do this I will start by analyzing, from a legal-institutional perspective, the way in which the National Constitution of Argentina distributes the functions of the State and how it divides the competences to decide on the Public Thing. Furthermore, I will analyze which are the degrees of deliberation and of citizen participation (direct or indirect) in each portion of the constituted power. Then, I will develop my intuition about the way Justice operates as an institutional form of citizen participation within a Social State of Law, comparing such proposal with the opinion of authors that highlight the countermajoritarian nature of the Judicial Power. I will present some representative cases of the intervention of the Judicial Power in the making of institutionalized public decisions, generated by the action of minorities with little or no political representation and in which, after a deliberative practice, government measures that gave a positive response to the proposals of the actors were ordered.
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
Materia
Ciencias Jurídicas
poder judicial
democracia
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/76298

id SEDICI_56b22e2157815ec69bc214ad9a471fb7
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/76298
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling The Judicial Power as an Institutional Tool for Citizen Participation within the Framework of the Theory of Deliberative DemocracyCabral, Pablo OctavioCiencias Jurídicaspoder judicialdemocraciaThe goal of this work is to address, from the conceptual framework of theories on “deliberative democracy”, the role played by the Judicial Power, being an integral part of the State, as the institutionalized field of deliberation for making collective decisions. In order to do this I will start by analyzing, from a legal-institutional perspective, the way in which the National Constitution of Argentina distributes the functions of the State and how it divides the competences to decide on the Public Thing. Furthermore, I will analyze which are the degrees of deliberation and of citizen participation (direct or indirect) in each portion of the constituted power. Then, I will develop my intuition about the way Justice operates as an institutional form of citizen participation within a Social State of Law, comparing such proposal with the opinion of authors that highlight the countermajoritarian nature of the Judicial Power. I will present some representative cases of the intervention of the Judicial Power in the making of institutionalized public decisions, generated by the action of minorities with little or no political representation and in which, after a deliberative practice, government measures that gave a positive response to the proposals of the actors were ordered.Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales2019-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf55-71http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/76298enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2581-7922info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-03T10:45:26Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/76298Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-03 10:45:27.237SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Judicial Power as an Institutional Tool for Citizen Participation within the Framework of the Theory of Deliberative Democracy
title The Judicial Power as an Institutional Tool for Citizen Participation within the Framework of the Theory of Deliberative Democracy
spellingShingle The Judicial Power as an Institutional Tool for Citizen Participation within the Framework of the Theory of Deliberative Democracy
Cabral, Pablo Octavio
Ciencias Jurídicas
poder judicial
democracia
title_short The Judicial Power as an Institutional Tool for Citizen Participation within the Framework of the Theory of Deliberative Democracy
title_full The Judicial Power as an Institutional Tool for Citizen Participation within the Framework of the Theory of Deliberative Democracy
title_fullStr The Judicial Power as an Institutional Tool for Citizen Participation within the Framework of the Theory of Deliberative Democracy
title_full_unstemmed The Judicial Power as an Institutional Tool for Citizen Participation within the Framework of the Theory of Deliberative Democracy
title_sort The Judicial Power as an Institutional Tool for Citizen Participation within the Framework of the Theory of Deliberative Democracy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cabral, Pablo Octavio
author Cabral, Pablo Octavio
author_facet Cabral, Pablo Octavio
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Jurídicas
poder judicial
democracia
topic Ciencias Jurídicas
poder judicial
democracia
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The goal of this work is to address, from the conceptual framework of theories on “deliberative democracy”, the role played by the Judicial Power, being an integral part of the State, as the institutionalized field of deliberation for making collective decisions. In order to do this I will start by analyzing, from a legal-institutional perspective, the way in which the National Constitution of Argentina distributes the functions of the State and how it divides the competences to decide on the Public Thing. Furthermore, I will analyze which are the degrees of deliberation and of citizen participation (direct or indirect) in each portion of the constituted power. Then, I will develop my intuition about the way Justice operates as an institutional form of citizen participation within a Social State of Law, comparing such proposal with the opinion of authors that highlight the countermajoritarian nature of the Judicial Power. I will present some representative cases of the intervention of the Judicial Power in the making of institutionalized public decisions, generated by the action of minorities with little or no political representation and in which, after a deliberative practice, government measures that gave a positive response to the proposals of the actors were ordered.
Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales
description The goal of this work is to address, from the conceptual framework of theories on “deliberative democracy”, the role played by the Judicial Power, being an integral part of the State, as the institutionalized field of deliberation for making collective decisions. In order to do this I will start by analyzing, from a legal-institutional perspective, the way in which the National Constitution of Argentina distributes the functions of the State and how it divides the competences to decide on the Public Thing. Furthermore, I will analyze which are the degrees of deliberation and of citizen participation (direct or indirect) in each portion of the constituted power. Then, I will develop my intuition about the way Justice operates as an institutional form of citizen participation within a Social State of Law, comparing such proposal with the opinion of authors that highlight the countermajoritarian nature of the Judicial Power. I will present some representative cases of the intervention of the Judicial Power in the making of institutionalized public decisions, generated by the action of minorities with little or no political representation and in which, after a deliberative practice, government measures that gave a positive response to the proposals of the actors were ordered.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-03-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/76298
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/76298
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2581-7922
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
55-71
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1842260327773765632
score 13.13397