Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory
- Autores
- Badagnani, Daniel Omar; Petrucci, Diego; Cappannini, Osvaldo
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- We use force concept inventory (FCI) data to probe the consistency of commonsense physics as a knowledge system. The source of this data is the administration of the FCI to first-year science university students. Data quality was checked using item response theory and studying answer distributions for each question. We find apparently paradoxical results: depending on how the data is analysed, answers seem highly systematic or almost random-like. These results are compatible with others found in the literature and can be construed as arising either from a coherent knowledge system or from knowledge in pieces. We hypothesise as a possible source of this apparent contradiction that predictions and explanations use different resources: the former would use reflex, low-cost cognitive resources while the latter would involve conceptualisations. We show that the articulation of both resources may be crucial for expert thinking productivity (the ability to apply a theory to novel situations). We sketch some consequences of the proposed structure of commonsense thinking for teaching and further research.
Instituto de Física de Líquidos y Sistemas Biológicos - Materia
-
Física
Educación
Explanations in commonsense physics
Knowledge system
Predictions in commonsense physics - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de La Plata
- OAI Identificador
- oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99336
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
SEDICI_55c67a87e8a7f88ef5b21fcf86b17e64 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99336 |
network_acronym_str |
SEDICI |
repository_id_str |
1329 |
network_name_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
spelling |
Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventoryBadagnani, Daniel OmarPetrucci, DiegoCappannini, OsvaldoFísicaEducaciónExplanations in commonsense physicsKnowledge systemPredictions in commonsense physicsWe use force concept inventory (FCI) data to probe the consistency of commonsense physics as a knowledge system. The source of this data is the administration of the FCI to first-year science university students. Data quality was checked using item response theory and studying answer distributions for each question. We find apparently paradoxical results: depending on how the data is analysed, answers seem highly systematic or almost random-like. These results are compatible with others found in the literature and can be construed as arising either from a coherent knowledge system or from knowledge in pieces. We hypothesise as a possible source of this apparent contradiction that predictions and explanations use different resources: the former would use reflex, low-cost cognitive resources while the latter would involve conceptualisations. We show that the articulation of both resources may be crucial for expert thinking productivity (the ability to apply a theory to novel situations). We sketch some consequences of the proposed structure of commonsense thinking for teaching and further research.Instituto de Física de Líquidos y Sistemas Biológicos2018-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf1-12http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99336enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/93653info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6404/aa940finfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0143-0807info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1088/1361-6404/aa940finfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/93653info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:20:35Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99336Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:20:36.124SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory |
title |
Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory |
spellingShingle |
Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory Badagnani, Daniel Omar Física Educación Explanations in commonsense physics Knowledge system Predictions in commonsense physics |
title_short |
Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory |
title_full |
Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory |
title_fullStr |
Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory |
title_sort |
Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Badagnani, Daniel Omar Petrucci, Diego Cappannini, Osvaldo |
author |
Badagnani, Daniel Omar |
author_facet |
Badagnani, Daniel Omar Petrucci, Diego Cappannini, Osvaldo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Petrucci, Diego Cappannini, Osvaldo |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Física Educación Explanations in commonsense physics Knowledge system Predictions in commonsense physics |
topic |
Física Educación Explanations in commonsense physics Knowledge system Predictions in commonsense physics |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
We use force concept inventory (FCI) data to probe the consistency of commonsense physics as a knowledge system. The source of this data is the administration of the FCI to first-year science university students. Data quality was checked using item response theory and studying answer distributions for each question. We find apparently paradoxical results: depending on how the data is analysed, answers seem highly systematic or almost random-like. These results are compatible with others found in the literature and can be construed as arising either from a coherent knowledge system or from knowledge in pieces. We hypothesise as a possible source of this apparent contradiction that predictions and explanations use different resources: the former would use reflex, low-cost cognitive resources while the latter would involve conceptualisations. We show that the articulation of both resources may be crucial for expert thinking productivity (the ability to apply a theory to novel situations). We sketch some consequences of the proposed structure of commonsense thinking for teaching and further research. Instituto de Física de Líquidos y Sistemas Biológicos |
description |
We use force concept inventory (FCI) data to probe the consistency of commonsense physics as a knowledge system. The source of this data is the administration of the FCI to first-year science university students. Data quality was checked using item response theory and studying answer distributions for each question. We find apparently paradoxical results: depending on how the data is analysed, answers seem highly systematic or almost random-like. These results are compatible with others found in the literature and can be construed as arising either from a coherent knowledge system or from knowledge in pieces. We hypothesise as a possible source of this apparent contradiction that predictions and explanations use different resources: the former would use reflex, low-cost cognitive resources while the latter would involve conceptualisations. We show that the articulation of both resources may be crucial for expert thinking productivity (the ability to apply a theory to novel situations). We sketch some consequences of the proposed structure of commonsense thinking for teaching and further research. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articulo http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99336 |
url |
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99336 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/93653 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6404/aa940f info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0143-0807 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1088/1361-6404/aa940f info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/93653 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf 1-12 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SEDICI (UNLP) instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata instacron:UNLP |
reponame_str |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
collection |
SEDICI (UNLP) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
instacron_str |
UNLP |
institution |
UNLP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844616080563109888 |
score |
13.070432 |