Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory

Autores
Badagnani, Daniel Omar; Petrucci, Diego; Cappannini, Osvaldo
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We use force concept inventory (FCI) data to probe the consistency of commonsense physics as a knowledge system. The source of this data is the administration of the FCI to first-year science university students. Data quality was checked using item response theory and studying answer distributions for each question. We find apparently paradoxical results: depending on how the data is analysed, answers seem highly systematic or almost random-like. These results are compatible with others found in the literature and can be construed as arising either from a coherent knowledge system or from knowledge in pieces. We hypothesise as a possible source of this apparent contradiction that predictions and explanations use different resources: the former would use reflex, low-cost cognitive resources while the latter would involve conceptualisations. We show that the articulation of both resources may be crucial for expert thinking productivity (the ability to apply a theory to novel situations). We sketch some consequences of the proposed structure of commonsense thinking for teaching and further research.
Instituto de Física de Líquidos y Sistemas Biológicos
Materia
Física
Educación
Explanations in commonsense physics
Knowledge system
Predictions in commonsense physics
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99336

id SEDICI_55c67a87e8a7f88ef5b21fcf86b17e64
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99336
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventoryBadagnani, Daniel OmarPetrucci, DiegoCappannini, OsvaldoFísicaEducaciónExplanations in commonsense physicsKnowledge systemPredictions in commonsense physicsWe use force concept inventory (FCI) data to probe the consistency of commonsense physics as a knowledge system. The source of this data is the administration of the FCI to first-year science university students. Data quality was checked using item response theory and studying answer distributions for each question. We find apparently paradoxical results: depending on how the data is analysed, answers seem highly systematic or almost random-like. These results are compatible with others found in the literature and can be construed as arising either from a coherent knowledge system or from knowledge in pieces. We hypothesise as a possible source of this apparent contradiction that predictions and explanations use different resources: the former would use reflex, low-cost cognitive resources while the latter would involve conceptualisations. We show that the articulation of both resources may be crucial for expert thinking productivity (the ability to apply a theory to novel situations). We sketch some consequences of the proposed structure of commonsense thinking for teaching and further research.Instituto de Física de Líquidos y Sistemas Biológicos2018-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf1-12http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99336enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/93653info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6404/aa940finfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0143-0807info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1088/1361-6404/aa940finfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/93653info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:20:35Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/99336Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:20:36.124SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory
title Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory
spellingShingle Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory
Badagnani, Daniel Omar
Física
Educación
Explanations in commonsense physics
Knowledge system
Predictions in commonsense physics
title_short Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory
title_full Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory
title_fullStr Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory
title_full_unstemmed Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory
title_sort Evidence on the coherence-pieces debate from the force concept inventory
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Badagnani, Daniel Omar
Petrucci, Diego
Cappannini, Osvaldo
author Badagnani, Daniel Omar
author_facet Badagnani, Daniel Omar
Petrucci, Diego
Cappannini, Osvaldo
author_role author
author2 Petrucci, Diego
Cappannini, Osvaldo
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Física
Educación
Explanations in commonsense physics
Knowledge system
Predictions in commonsense physics
topic Física
Educación
Explanations in commonsense physics
Knowledge system
Predictions in commonsense physics
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We use force concept inventory (FCI) data to probe the consistency of commonsense physics as a knowledge system. The source of this data is the administration of the FCI to first-year science university students. Data quality was checked using item response theory and studying answer distributions for each question. We find apparently paradoxical results: depending on how the data is analysed, answers seem highly systematic or almost random-like. These results are compatible with others found in the literature and can be construed as arising either from a coherent knowledge system or from knowledge in pieces. We hypothesise as a possible source of this apparent contradiction that predictions and explanations use different resources: the former would use reflex, low-cost cognitive resources while the latter would involve conceptualisations. We show that the articulation of both resources may be crucial for expert thinking productivity (the ability to apply a theory to novel situations). We sketch some consequences of the proposed structure of commonsense thinking for teaching and further research.
Instituto de Física de Líquidos y Sistemas Biológicos
description We use force concept inventory (FCI) data to probe the consistency of commonsense physics as a knowledge system. The source of this data is the administration of the FCI to first-year science university students. Data quality was checked using item response theory and studying answer distributions for each question. We find apparently paradoxical results: depending on how the data is analysed, answers seem highly systematic or almost random-like. These results are compatible with others found in the literature and can be construed as arising either from a coherent knowledge system or from knowledge in pieces. We hypothesise as a possible source of this apparent contradiction that predictions and explanations use different resources: the former would use reflex, low-cost cognitive resources while the latter would involve conceptualisations. We show that the articulation of both resources may be crucial for expert thinking productivity (the ability to apply a theory to novel situations). We sketch some consequences of the proposed structure of commonsense thinking for teaching and further research.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99336
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/99336
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/11336/93653
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6404/aa940f
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/0143-0807
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1088/1361-6404/aa940f
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/hdl/11336/93653
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
1-12
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844616080563109888
score 13.070432