Terms of trade and economic growth in Argentina

Autores
Artana, Daniel; Bour, Enrique; Bour, Juan Luis; Susmel, Nuria
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We define the terms of trade (of both goods and services) as an index of Price of Imports (PM) divided by the Index of Export Prices (PX). Then, following the usual approach, foreign trade is a sort of technology in which inputs of the country are exports (X) and products are imports (M). Inputs are processed into products at a rate determined by the relationship between the price of exports and imports, which is the inverse of the terms of trade. From such a point of view, declining terms of trade, as experienced by Argentina in recent years, act exactly as a technological shock, since a given quantity of exports can produce a greater volume of imports. Becker and Mauro (2005) have computed for a sample of several countries that the costlier shocks correspond to the terms of trade. Easterly and others (1993) express that "shocks, especially those to terms of trade, play a large role in explaining the variance in growth," thereby contributing to its unstable character. There is some evidence that the correlation between changes in the terms of trade and real GDP is significant. Kehoe and Ruhl (2007), for example, have pointed that this number ranges between -0.30 for the U.S. and -0.73 for Mexico. It seems that the correlation with changes in the TFP has been even stronger (amounting to -0.54 and -0.71, respectively). However, the same authors have stressed that this effect is not a first order effect when the product is measured as a chained index, because if the GDP is measured using a fixed base year (as in Argentina) the effects are ambiguous, even when they may have an impact on consumption and welfare. Kehoe and Ruhl identify here a puzzle: the increase in the terms of trade is frequently accompanied by declines in productivity, so that, “If there is a causal mechanism that links shocks to the terms of trade to movements in productivity, researchers need to identify it.” In this article we will measure the magnitude of the potential gains associated with the decrease in the terms of trade in terms of productivity, and seek to find a theory compatible with the observed facts that could be used to explain a first-order effect on GDP measured, as in Argentina, according to a fixed basket of goods and services.
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas
Materia
Ciencias Económicas
potential gains
GDP measured
Argentina
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/170317

id SEDICI_4b029b9eace0090f0c8e5d5d478420b7
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/170317
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Terms of trade and economic growth in ArgentinaArtana, DanielBour, EnriqueBour, Juan LuisSusmel, NuriaCiencias Económicaspotential gainsGDP measuredArgentinaWe define the terms of trade (of both goods and services) as an index of Price of Imports (PM) divided by the Index of Export Prices (PX). Then, following the usual approach, foreign trade is a sort of technology in which inputs of the country are exports (X) and products are imports (M). Inputs are processed into products at a rate determined by the relationship between the price of exports and imports, which is the inverse of the terms of trade. From such a point of view, declining terms of trade, as experienced by Argentina in recent years, act exactly as a technological shock, since a given quantity of exports can produce a greater volume of imports. Becker and Mauro (2005) have computed for a sample of several countries that the costlier shocks correspond to the terms of trade. Easterly and others (1993) express that "shocks, especially those to terms of trade, play a large role in explaining the variance in growth," thereby contributing to its unstable character. There is some evidence that the correlation between changes in the terms of trade and real GDP is significant. Kehoe and Ruhl (2007), for example, have pointed that this number ranges between -0.30 for the U.S. and -0.73 for Mexico. It seems that the correlation with changes in the TFP has been even stronger (amounting to -0.54 and -0.71, respectively). However, the same authors have stressed that this effect is not a first order effect when the product is measured as a chained index, because if the GDP is measured using a fixed base year (as in Argentina) the effects are ambiguous, even when they may have an impact on consumption and welfare. Kehoe and Ruhl identify here a puzzle: the increase in the terms of trade is frequently accompanied by declines in productivity, so that, “If there is a causal mechanism that links shocks to the terms of trade to movements in productivity, researchers need to identify it.” In this article we will measure the magnitude of the potential gains associated with the decrease in the terms of trade in terms of productivity, and seek to find a theory compatible with the observed facts that could be used to explain a first-order effect on GDP measured, as in Argentina, according to a fixed basket of goods and services.Facultad de Ciencias Económicas2011-11info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/170317enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-987-99570-9-7info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bd.aaep.org.ar/anales/works/works2011/Artana.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1852-0022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-09-29T11:43:16Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/170317Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-09-29 11:43:17.268SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Terms of trade and economic growth in Argentina
title Terms of trade and economic growth in Argentina
spellingShingle Terms of trade and economic growth in Argentina
Artana, Daniel
Ciencias Económicas
potential gains
GDP measured
Argentina
title_short Terms of trade and economic growth in Argentina
title_full Terms of trade and economic growth in Argentina
title_fullStr Terms of trade and economic growth in Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Terms of trade and economic growth in Argentina
title_sort Terms of trade and economic growth in Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Artana, Daniel
Bour, Enrique
Bour, Juan Luis
Susmel, Nuria
author Artana, Daniel
author_facet Artana, Daniel
Bour, Enrique
Bour, Juan Luis
Susmel, Nuria
author_role author
author2 Bour, Enrique
Bour, Juan Luis
Susmel, Nuria
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Económicas
potential gains
GDP measured
Argentina
topic Ciencias Económicas
potential gains
GDP measured
Argentina
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We define the terms of trade (of both goods and services) as an index of Price of Imports (PM) divided by the Index of Export Prices (PX). Then, following the usual approach, foreign trade is a sort of technology in which inputs of the country are exports (X) and products are imports (M). Inputs are processed into products at a rate determined by the relationship between the price of exports and imports, which is the inverse of the terms of trade. From such a point of view, declining terms of trade, as experienced by Argentina in recent years, act exactly as a technological shock, since a given quantity of exports can produce a greater volume of imports. Becker and Mauro (2005) have computed for a sample of several countries that the costlier shocks correspond to the terms of trade. Easterly and others (1993) express that "shocks, especially those to terms of trade, play a large role in explaining the variance in growth," thereby contributing to its unstable character. There is some evidence that the correlation between changes in the terms of trade and real GDP is significant. Kehoe and Ruhl (2007), for example, have pointed that this number ranges between -0.30 for the U.S. and -0.73 for Mexico. It seems that the correlation with changes in the TFP has been even stronger (amounting to -0.54 and -0.71, respectively). However, the same authors have stressed that this effect is not a first order effect when the product is measured as a chained index, because if the GDP is measured using a fixed base year (as in Argentina) the effects are ambiguous, even when they may have an impact on consumption and welfare. Kehoe and Ruhl identify here a puzzle: the increase in the terms of trade is frequently accompanied by declines in productivity, so that, “If there is a causal mechanism that links shocks to the terms of trade to movements in productivity, researchers need to identify it.” In this article we will measure the magnitude of the potential gains associated with the decrease in the terms of trade in terms of productivity, and seek to find a theory compatible with the observed facts that could be used to explain a first-order effect on GDP measured, as in Argentina, according to a fixed basket of goods and services.
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas
description We define the terms of trade (of both goods and services) as an index of Price of Imports (PM) divided by the Index of Export Prices (PX). Then, following the usual approach, foreign trade is a sort of technology in which inputs of the country are exports (X) and products are imports (M). Inputs are processed into products at a rate determined by the relationship between the price of exports and imports, which is the inverse of the terms of trade. From such a point of view, declining terms of trade, as experienced by Argentina in recent years, act exactly as a technological shock, since a given quantity of exports can produce a greater volume of imports. Becker and Mauro (2005) have computed for a sample of several countries that the costlier shocks correspond to the terms of trade. Easterly and others (1993) express that "shocks, especially those to terms of trade, play a large role in explaining the variance in growth," thereby contributing to its unstable character. There is some evidence that the correlation between changes in the terms of trade and real GDP is significant. Kehoe and Ruhl (2007), for example, have pointed that this number ranges between -0.30 for the U.S. and -0.73 for Mexico. It seems that the correlation with changes in the TFP has been even stronger (amounting to -0.54 and -0.71, respectively). However, the same authors have stressed that this effect is not a first order effect when the product is measured as a chained index, because if the GDP is measured using a fixed base year (as in Argentina) the effects are ambiguous, even when they may have an impact on consumption and welfare. Kehoe and Ruhl identify here a puzzle: the increase in the terms of trade is frequently accompanied by declines in productivity, so that, “If there is a causal mechanism that links shocks to the terms of trade to movements in productivity, researchers need to identify it.” In this article we will measure the magnitude of the potential gains associated with the decrease in the terms of trade in terms of productivity, and seek to find a theory compatible with the observed facts that could be used to explain a first-order effect on GDP measured, as in Argentina, according to a fixed basket of goods and services.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/170317
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/170317
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/isbn/978-987-99570-9-7
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://bd.aaep.org.ar/anales/works/works2011/Artana.pdf
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1852-0022
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1844616301908066304
score 13.070432