Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment committees: who is free from conflicts of interest?

Autores
Marín, Gustavo Horacio; Hasdeu, Santiago
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Scientific and technological advances have increased the capacity to prevent diseases, perform diagnoses, and develop innovative treatments. To analyze whether these technologies should be incorporated into healthcare systems, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Committees were created. There is a debate about who should be part of such committees. Typically, committee members are scientific experts, agents of funding entities (Ministries of Health), and patients as representatives of the community. It is important to reflect on the conflicts of interest that each member may have. Those who come from the scientific sector (universities, research centers) have fewer conflicts of interest and more independence for decision-making. The agents designated as members by the Ministries of Health of each country are usually qualified professionals, but still employees of those who will later have to pay for the technology. The third type of members are patients representing the community. This participation is considered a guarantee of neutrality, however, since patients are affected by the same health problem that is being analyzed, it exists a personal interest in expecting that a new medicine could be accepted to benefit other patients with the same condition (horizontal equity); with a potential risk of not showing the same empathy in recognizing the impact of this decision on other health problems (vertical equity). This text discusses the composition of HTA Committees, the conflicts of interest of its members, and the potential impact of these decisions on equity in access to the population to essential goods.
Facultad de Ciencias Médicas
Materia
Salud
Biomedical
Citizen participation in science and technology
Conflict of interest
Health equity
Technology assessment
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/193482

id SEDICI_4963ebe5593ed05797150688fbef08e4
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/193482
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment committees: who is free from conflicts of interest?Marín, Gustavo HoracioHasdeu, SantiagoSaludBiomedicalCitizen participation in science and technologyConflict of interestHealth equityTechnology assessmentScientific and technological advances have increased the capacity to prevent diseases, perform diagnoses, and develop innovative treatments. To analyze whether these technologies should be incorporated into healthcare systems, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Committees were created. There is a debate about who should be part of such committees. Typically, committee members are scientific experts, agents of funding entities (Ministries of Health), and patients as representatives of the community. It is important to reflect on the conflicts of interest that each member may have. Those who come from the scientific sector (universities, research centers) have fewer conflicts of interest and more independence for decision-making. The agents designated as members by the Ministries of Health of each country are usually qualified professionals, but still employees of those who will later have to pay for the technology. The third type of members are patients representing the community. This participation is considered a guarantee of neutrality, however, since patients are affected by the same health problem that is being analyzed, it exists a personal interest in expecting that a new medicine could be accepted to benefit other patients with the same condition (horizontal equity); with a potential risk of not showing the same empathy in recognizing the impact of this decision on other health problems (vertical equity). This text discusses the composition of HTA Committees, the conflicts of interest of its members, and the potential impact of these decisions on equity in access to the population to essential goods.Facultad de Ciencias Médicas2025-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArticulohttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdf242-244https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2025.3623http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/193482enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/download/3623/4130info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2283-5733info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2284-2403info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2026-05-27T11:47:46Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/193482Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292026-05-27 11:47:46.903SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment committees: who is free from conflicts of interest?
title Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment committees: who is free from conflicts of interest?
spellingShingle Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment committees: who is free from conflicts of interest?
Marín, Gustavo Horacio
Salud
Biomedical
Citizen participation in science and technology
Conflict of interest
Health equity
Technology assessment
title_short Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment committees: who is free from conflicts of interest?
title_full Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment committees: who is free from conflicts of interest?
title_fullStr Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment committees: who is free from conflicts of interest?
title_full_unstemmed Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment committees: who is free from conflicts of interest?
title_sort Patient and public involvement in health technology assessment committees: who is free from conflicts of interest?
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Marín, Gustavo Horacio
Hasdeu, Santiago
author Marín, Gustavo Horacio
author_facet Marín, Gustavo Horacio
Hasdeu, Santiago
author_role author
author2 Hasdeu, Santiago
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Salud
Biomedical
Citizen participation in science and technology
Conflict of interest
Health equity
Technology assessment
topic Salud
Biomedical
Citizen participation in science and technology
Conflict of interest
Health equity
Technology assessment
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Scientific and technological advances have increased the capacity to prevent diseases, perform diagnoses, and develop innovative treatments. To analyze whether these technologies should be incorporated into healthcare systems, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Committees were created. There is a debate about who should be part of such committees. Typically, committee members are scientific experts, agents of funding entities (Ministries of Health), and patients as representatives of the community. It is important to reflect on the conflicts of interest that each member may have. Those who come from the scientific sector (universities, research centers) have fewer conflicts of interest and more independence for decision-making. The agents designated as members by the Ministries of Health of each country are usually qualified professionals, but still employees of those who will later have to pay for the technology. The third type of members are patients representing the community. This participation is considered a guarantee of neutrality, however, since patients are affected by the same health problem that is being analyzed, it exists a personal interest in expecting that a new medicine could be accepted to benefit other patients with the same condition (horizontal equity); with a potential risk of not showing the same empathy in recognizing the impact of this decision on other health problems (vertical equity). This text discusses the composition of HTA Committees, the conflicts of interest of its members, and the potential impact of these decisions on equity in access to the population to essential goods.
Facultad de Ciencias Médicas
description Scientific and technological advances have increased the capacity to prevent diseases, perform diagnoses, and develop innovative treatments. To analyze whether these technologies should be incorporated into healthcare systems, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Committees were created. There is a debate about who should be part of such committees. Typically, committee members are scientific experts, agents of funding entities (Ministries of Health), and patients as representatives of the community. It is important to reflect on the conflicts of interest that each member may have. Those who come from the scientific sector (universities, research centers) have fewer conflicts of interest and more independence for decision-making. The agents designated as members by the Ministries of Health of each country are usually qualified professionals, but still employees of those who will later have to pay for the technology. The third type of members are patients representing the community. This participation is considered a guarantee of neutrality, however, since patients are affected by the same health problem that is being analyzed, it exists a personal interest in expecting that a new medicine could be accepted to benefit other patients with the same condition (horizontal equity); with a potential risk of not showing the same empathy in recognizing the impact of this decision on other health problems (vertical equity). This text discusses the composition of HTA Committees, the conflicts of interest of its members, and the potential impact of these decisions on equity in access to the population to essential goods.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-10-27
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Articulo
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2025.3623
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/193482
url https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2025.3623
http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/193482
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.aboutscience.eu/index.php/grhta/article/download/3623/4130
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2283-5733
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/2284-2403
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
242-244
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1866372208964665344
score 13.040872