Classifying software requirement prioritization approaches

Autores
Martínez Carod, Nadina; Cechich, Alejandra
Año de publicación
2005
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Defining software requirements is a complex and difficult process, which often leads to costly project failures. Requirements emerge from a collaborative and interactive negotiation process that involves heterogeneous stakeholders (people involved in an elicitation process such as users, analysts, developers, and customers). Practical experience shows that prioritizing requirements is not as straightforward task as the literature suggests. A process for prioritizing requirements must not only be simple and fast, but it must obtain trustworthy results. The objective of this paper is to provide a classification framework to characterize prioritization proposals. We highlight differences among eleven selected approaches by emphasizing their most important features
II Workshop de Ingeniería de Software y Bases de Datos (WISBD)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
Materia
Ciencias Informáticas
Software
Requirements/Specifications
Engineering
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
SEDICI (UNLP)
Institución
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
OAI Identificador
oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23059
Acceder
id SEDICI_30bbe9713d254d54fc9f5de3f103e633
oai_identifier_str oai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23059
network_acronym_str SEDICI
repository_id_str 1329
network_name_str SEDICI (UNLP)
spelling Classifying software requirement prioritization approachesMartínez Carod, NadinaCechich, AlejandraCiencias InformáticasSoftwareRequirements/SpecificationsEngineeringDefining software requirements is a complex and difficult process, which often leads to costly project failures. Requirements emerge from a collaborative and interactive negotiation process that involves heterogeneous stakeholders (people involved in an elicitation process such as users, analysts, developers, and customers). Practical experience shows that prioritizing requirements is not as straightforward task as the literature suggests. A process for prioritizing requirements must not only be simple and fast, but it must obtain trustworthy results. The objective of this paper is to provide a classification framework to characterize prioritization proposals. We highlight differences among eleven selected approaches by emphasizing their most important featuresII Workshop de Ingeniería de Software y Bases de Datos (WISBD)Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)2005-10info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionObjeto de conferenciahttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23059enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)instname:Universidad Nacional de La Platainstacron:UNLP2025-10-15T10:47:56Zoai:sedici.unlp.edu.ar:10915/23059Institucionalhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/oai/snrdalira@sedici.unlp.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:13292025-10-15 10:47:56.329SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Platafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Classifying software requirement prioritization approaches
title Classifying software requirement prioritization approaches
spellingShingle Classifying software requirement prioritization approaches
Martínez Carod, Nadina
Ciencias Informáticas
Software
Requirements/Specifications
Engineering
title_short Classifying software requirement prioritization approaches
title_full Classifying software requirement prioritization approaches
title_fullStr Classifying software requirement prioritization approaches
title_full_unstemmed Classifying software requirement prioritization approaches
title_sort Classifying software requirement prioritization approaches
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Martínez Carod, Nadina
Cechich, Alejandra
author Martínez Carod, Nadina
author_facet Martínez Carod, Nadina
Cechich, Alejandra
author_role author
author2 Cechich, Alejandra
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ciencias Informáticas
Software
Requirements/Specifications
Engineering
topic Ciencias Informáticas
Software
Requirements/Specifications
Engineering
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Defining software requirements is a complex and difficult process, which often leads to costly project failures. Requirements emerge from a collaborative and interactive negotiation process that involves heterogeneous stakeholders (people involved in an elicitation process such as users, analysts, developers, and customers). Practical experience shows that prioritizing requirements is not as straightforward task as the literature suggests. A process for prioritizing requirements must not only be simple and fast, but it must obtain trustworthy results. The objective of this paper is to provide a classification framework to characterize prioritization proposals. We highlight differences among eleven selected approaches by emphasizing their most important features
II Workshop de Ingeniería de Software y Bases de Datos (WISBD)
Red de Universidades con Carreras en Informática (RedUNCI)
description Defining software requirements is a complex and difficult process, which often leads to costly project failures. Requirements emerge from a collaborative and interactive negotiation process that involves heterogeneous stakeholders (people involved in an elicitation process such as users, analysts, developers, and customers). Practical experience shows that prioritizing requirements is not as straightforward task as the literature suggests. A process for prioritizing requirements must not only be simple and fast, but it must obtain trustworthy results. The objective of this paper is to provide a classification framework to characterize prioritization proposals. We highlight differences among eleven selected approaches by emphasizing their most important features
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Objeto de conferencia
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23059
url http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/23059
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Argentina (CC BY-NC-SA 2.5)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:SEDICI (UNLP)
instname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron:UNLP
reponame_str SEDICI (UNLP)
collection SEDICI (UNLP)
instname_str Universidad Nacional de La Plata
instacron_str UNLP
institution UNLP
repository.name.fl_str_mv SEDICI (UNLP) - Universidad Nacional de La Plata
repository.mail.fl_str_mv alira@sedici.unlp.edu.ar
_version_ 1846063905933099008
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares