Impacts of honey bee density on crop yield: A meta-analysis.
- Autores
- Rollin, Orianne; Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- documento de conferencia
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Fil: Rollin, Orianne. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina.
Fil: Rollin, Orianne. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina.
Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas A. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina.
Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas A. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina.
There is increasing recognition that pollination deficits are limiting crop yields worldwide. However, management strategies for optimal pollination are still unclear for most crops. Current management focuses on providing high densities of honey bees, but recommended densities are highly variable, even within single crops and varieties. We performed an extensive literature search to record honey-bee densities (colony density and/or flower visitation rates) and crop productivity (fruit set, seed set, fruit weight, and/or yield). Effect sizes represented the difference in crop productivity between the two most extreme levels of honey-bee densities. Surprisingly, out of 795 reviewed studies, only 22 analyzed the effect of at least two levels of honey-bee densities on crop productivity (reporting 60 effect sizes in total). Thus, most recommendations for crop pollination management are not based on proper experimental designs. We found that both colony density and visitation rates increased all the productivity variables. However, effects were non-linear for visitation rates, suggesting that there is an optimum (mean of 8-10 visits per flower) beyond which more honey bees are not beneficial (or even detrimental) for crop productivity. Effect sizes for visitation rates were greater than those for colony densities, suggesting that visitation rates are a more direct measure of the pollination process. Data on the relation between colony density and visitation rates are lacking. Interestingly, effect sizes of visitation rates were greater for crops with separate sexes than those with hermaphrodite flowers; therefore, the benefits from honey-bee pollination varies according to the crop biology. Synthesis and applications. Current practices for crop pollination assume that more honey bees are always better for crop yield. However, our analyses suggest that there is an optimum of honey-bee densities. Despite the importance of honey bees and pollinator-dependent crops worldwide, there is a lack of studies designed for finding such an optimum level of crop pollination. Our analyses further suggest that visitation rates could be used as a proxy to guide management recommendations such as colony density and spatial arrangement. - Materia
-
Agricultura (General)
Biodiversidad y Conservación
Ecología
Abejas
Mieliferas
Análisis
Agricultura (General)
Biodiversidad y Conservación
Ecología - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro
- OAI Identificador
- oai:rid.unrn.edu.ar:20.500.12049/5844
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
RIDUNRN_d49e68f705872125e07df8c5a7c2071b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:rid.unrn.edu.ar:20.500.12049/5844 |
network_acronym_str |
RIDUNRN |
repository_id_str |
4369 |
network_name_str |
RID-UNRN (UNRN) |
spelling |
Impacts of honey bee density on crop yield: A meta-analysis.Rollin, OrianneGaribaldi, Lucas AlejandroAgricultura (General)Biodiversidad y ConservaciónEcologíaAbejasMieliferasAnálisisAgricultura (General)Biodiversidad y ConservaciónEcologíaFil: Rollin, Orianne. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina.Fil: Rollin, Orianne. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina.Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas A. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina.Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas A. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina.There is increasing recognition that pollination deficits are limiting crop yields worldwide. However, management strategies for optimal pollination are still unclear for most crops. Current management focuses on providing high densities of honey bees, but recommended densities are highly variable, even within single crops and varieties. We performed an extensive literature search to record honey-bee densities (colony density and/or flower visitation rates) and crop productivity (fruit set, seed set, fruit weight, and/or yield). Effect sizes represented the difference in crop productivity between the two most extreme levels of honey-bee densities. Surprisingly, out of 795 reviewed studies, only 22 analyzed the effect of at least two levels of honey-bee densities on crop productivity (reporting 60 effect sizes in total). Thus, most recommendations for crop pollination management are not based on proper experimental designs. We found that both colony density and visitation rates increased all the productivity variables. However, effects were non-linear for visitation rates, suggesting that there is an optimum (mean of 8-10 visits per flower) beyond which more honey bees are not beneficial (or even detrimental) for crop productivity. Effect sizes for visitation rates were greater than those for colony densities, suggesting that visitation rates are a more direct measure of the pollination process. Data on the relation between colony density and visitation rates are lacking. Interestingly, effect sizes of visitation rates were greater for crops with separate sexes than those with hermaphrodite flowers; therefore, the benefits from honey-bee pollination varies according to the crop biology. Synthesis and applications. Current practices for crop pollination assume that more honey bees are always better for crop yield. However, our analyses suggest that there is an optimum of honey-bee densities. Despite the importance of honey bees and pollinator-dependent crops worldwide, there is a lack of studies designed for finding such an optimum level of crop pollination. Our analyses further suggest that visitation rates could be used as a proxy to guide management recommendations such as colony density and spatial arrangement.2018-09info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://semicomedia.be/eurbee2018/program.pdfhttp://rid.unrn.edu.ar/handle/20.500.12049/5844engEurbee 8: 8th Congress of Apidologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/reponame:RID-UNRN (UNRN)instname:Universidad Nacional de Río Negro2025-09-04T11:13:02Zoai:rid.unrn.edu.ar:20.500.12049/5844instacron:UNRNInstitucionalhttps://rid.unrn.edu.ar/jspui/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttps://rid.unrn.edu.ar/oai/snrdrid@unrn.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:43692025-09-04 11:13:02.401RID-UNRN (UNRN) - Universidad Nacional de Río Negrofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impacts of honey bee density on crop yield: A meta-analysis. |
title |
Impacts of honey bee density on crop yield: A meta-analysis. |
spellingShingle |
Impacts of honey bee density on crop yield: A meta-analysis. Rollin, Orianne Agricultura (General) Biodiversidad y Conservación Ecología Abejas Mieliferas Análisis Agricultura (General) Biodiversidad y Conservación Ecología |
title_short |
Impacts of honey bee density on crop yield: A meta-analysis. |
title_full |
Impacts of honey bee density on crop yield: A meta-analysis. |
title_fullStr |
Impacts of honey bee density on crop yield: A meta-analysis. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impacts of honey bee density on crop yield: A meta-analysis. |
title_sort |
Impacts of honey bee density on crop yield: A meta-analysis. |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Rollin, Orianne Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro |
author |
Rollin, Orianne |
author_facet |
Rollin, Orianne Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Agricultura (General) Biodiversidad y Conservación Ecología Abejas Mieliferas Análisis Agricultura (General) Biodiversidad y Conservación Ecología |
topic |
Agricultura (General) Biodiversidad y Conservación Ecología Abejas Mieliferas Análisis Agricultura (General) Biodiversidad y Conservación Ecología |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Fil: Rollin, Orianne. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina. Fil: Rollin, Orianne. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina. Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas A. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina. Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas A. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina. There is increasing recognition that pollination deficits are limiting crop yields worldwide. However, management strategies for optimal pollination are still unclear for most crops. Current management focuses on providing high densities of honey bees, but recommended densities are highly variable, even within single crops and varieties. We performed an extensive literature search to record honey-bee densities (colony density and/or flower visitation rates) and crop productivity (fruit set, seed set, fruit weight, and/or yield). Effect sizes represented the difference in crop productivity between the two most extreme levels of honey-bee densities. Surprisingly, out of 795 reviewed studies, only 22 analyzed the effect of at least two levels of honey-bee densities on crop productivity (reporting 60 effect sizes in total). Thus, most recommendations for crop pollination management are not based on proper experimental designs. We found that both colony density and visitation rates increased all the productivity variables. However, effects were non-linear for visitation rates, suggesting that there is an optimum (mean of 8-10 visits per flower) beyond which more honey bees are not beneficial (or even detrimental) for crop productivity. Effect sizes for visitation rates were greater than those for colony densities, suggesting that visitation rates are a more direct measure of the pollination process. Data on the relation between colony density and visitation rates are lacking. Interestingly, effect sizes of visitation rates were greater for crops with separate sexes than those with hermaphrodite flowers; therefore, the benefits from honey-bee pollination varies according to the crop biology. Synthesis and applications. Current practices for crop pollination assume that more honey bees are always better for crop yield. However, our analyses suggest that there is an optimum of honey-bee densities. Despite the importance of honey bees and pollinator-dependent crops worldwide, there is a lack of studies designed for finding such an optimum level of crop pollination. Our analyses further suggest that visitation rates could be used as a proxy to guide management recommendations such as colony density and spatial arrangement. |
description |
Fil: Rollin, Orianne. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo Rural. Río Negro, Argentina. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794 info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://semicomedia.be/eurbee2018/program.pdf http://rid.unrn.edu.ar/handle/20.500.12049/5844 |
url |
http://semicomedia.be/eurbee2018/program.pdf http://rid.unrn.edu.ar/handle/20.500.12049/5844 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Eurbee 8: 8th Congress of Apidology |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:RID-UNRN (UNRN) instname:Universidad Nacional de Río Negro |
reponame_str |
RID-UNRN (UNRN) |
collection |
RID-UNRN (UNRN) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de Río Negro |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RID-UNRN (UNRN) - Universidad Nacional de Río Negro |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rid@unrn.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1842344117366947840 |
score |
12.623145 |