Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice
- Autores
- Kleijn, David; Bommarco, Riccardo; Fijen, Thijs P.; Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro; Potts, Simon G.; van der Putten, Wim H.
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión aceptada
- Descripción
- Fil: Kleijn, David. Wageningen University; The Netherlands.
Fil: Bommarco, Riccardo. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Sweden
Fil: Fijen, Thijs P. Wageningen University; The Netherlands.
Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Sede Andina; Argentina.
Fil: Potts, Simon G. University of Reading; UK
Fil: van der Putten, Wim H. Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW) y Wageningen University and Research; The Netherlands.
There is worldwide concern about the environmental costs of conventional intensification of agriculture. Growing evidence suggests that ecological intensification of mainstream farming can safeguard food production, with accompanying environmental benefits; however, the approach is rarely adopted by farmers. Our review of the evidence for replacing external inputs with ecosystem services shows that scientists tend to focus on processes (e.g., pollination) rather than outcomes (e.g., profits), and express benefits at spatio-temporal scales that are not always relevant to farmers. This results in mismatches in perceived benefits of ecological intensification between scientists and farmers, which hinders its uptake. We provide recommendations for overcoming these mismatches and highlight important additional factors driving uptake of naturebased management practices, such as social acceptability of farming. - Materia
-
Ciencias Agrarias (general)
Ecological Intensification
Social Acceptability of Farming
Management Practices
Farming
Ciencias Agrarias (general) - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro
- OAI Identificador
- oai:rid.unrn.edu.ar:20.500.12049/2324
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
RIDUNRN_90e89a89ba003dba873f5990034678ea |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:rid.unrn.edu.ar:20.500.12049/2324 |
network_acronym_str |
RIDUNRN |
repository_id_str |
4369 |
network_name_str |
RID-UNRN (UNRN) |
spelling |
Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practiceKleijn, DavidBommarco, RiccardoFijen, Thijs P.Garibaldi, Lucas AlejandroPotts, Simon G.van der Putten, Wim H.Ciencias Agrarias (general)Ecological IntensificationSocial Acceptability of FarmingManagement PracticesFarmingCiencias Agrarias (general)Fil: Kleijn, David. Wageningen University; The Netherlands.Fil: Bommarco, Riccardo. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; SwedenFil: Fijen, Thijs P. Wageningen University; The Netherlands.Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Sede Andina; Argentina.Fil: Potts, Simon G. University of Reading; UKFil: van der Putten, Wim H. Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW) y Wageningen University and Research; The Netherlands.There is worldwide concern about the environmental costs of conventional intensification of agriculture. Growing evidence suggests that ecological intensification of mainstream farming can safeguard food production, with accompanying environmental benefits; however, the approach is rarely adopted by farmers. Our review of the evidence for replacing external inputs with ecosystem services shows that scientists tend to focus on processes (e.g., pollination) rather than outcomes (e.g., profits), and express benefits at spatio-temporal scales that are not always relevant to farmers. This results in mismatches in perceived benefits of ecological intensification between scientists and farmers, which hinders its uptake. We provide recommendations for overcoming these mismatches and highlight important additional factors driving uptake of naturebased management practices, such as social acceptability of farming.2018-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfKleijn, D., Bommarco, R., Fijen, T. P., Garibaldi, L. A., Potts, S. G., & van der Putten, W. H. (2018). Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice. Trends in ecology & evolution; 34 (2); 154-166.0169-5347http://rid.unrn.edu.ar/jspui/handle/20.500.12049/2324https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534718302738https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002eng34Trends in Ecology and Evolutioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/reponame:RID-UNRN (UNRN)instname:Universidad Nacional de Río Negro2025-09-29T14:29:28Zoai:rid.unrn.edu.ar:20.500.12049/2324instacron:UNRNInstitucionalhttps://rid.unrn.edu.ar/jspui/Universidad públicaNo correspondehttps://rid.unrn.edu.ar/oai/snrdrid@unrn.edu.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:43692025-09-29 14:29:28.619RID-UNRN (UNRN) - Universidad Nacional de Río Negrofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice |
title |
Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice |
spellingShingle |
Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice Kleijn, David Ciencias Agrarias (general) Ecological Intensification Social Acceptability of Farming Management Practices Farming Ciencias Agrarias (general) |
title_short |
Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice |
title_full |
Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice |
title_fullStr |
Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice |
title_sort |
Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Kleijn, David Bommarco, Riccardo Fijen, Thijs P. Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro Potts, Simon G. van der Putten, Wim H. |
author |
Kleijn, David |
author_facet |
Kleijn, David Bommarco, Riccardo Fijen, Thijs P. Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro Potts, Simon G. van der Putten, Wim H. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bommarco, Riccardo Fijen, Thijs P. Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro Potts, Simon G. van der Putten, Wim H. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciencias Agrarias (general) Ecological Intensification Social Acceptability of Farming Management Practices Farming Ciencias Agrarias (general) |
topic |
Ciencias Agrarias (general) Ecological Intensification Social Acceptability of Farming Management Practices Farming Ciencias Agrarias (general) |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Fil: Kleijn, David. Wageningen University; The Netherlands. Fil: Bommarco, Riccardo. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Sweden Fil: Fijen, Thijs P. Wageningen University; The Netherlands. Fil: Garibaldi, Lucas Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de Río Negro. Sede Andina; Argentina. Fil: Potts, Simon G. University of Reading; UK Fil: van der Putten, Wim H. Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW) y Wageningen University and Research; The Netherlands. There is worldwide concern about the environmental costs of conventional intensification of agriculture. Growing evidence suggests that ecological intensification of mainstream farming can safeguard food production, with accompanying environmental benefits; however, the approach is rarely adopted by farmers. Our review of the evidence for replacing external inputs with ecosystem services shows that scientists tend to focus on processes (e.g., pollination) rather than outcomes (e.g., profits), and express benefits at spatio-temporal scales that are not always relevant to farmers. This results in mismatches in perceived benefits of ecological intensification between scientists and farmers, which hinders its uptake. We provide recommendations for overcoming these mismatches and highlight important additional factors driving uptake of naturebased management practices, such as social acceptability of farming. |
description |
Fil: Kleijn, David. Wageningen University; The Netherlands. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-11 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
acceptedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
Kleijn, D., Bommarco, R., Fijen, T. P., Garibaldi, L. A., Potts, S. G., & van der Putten, W. H. (2018). Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice. Trends in ecology & evolution; 34 (2); 154-166. 0169-5347 http://rid.unrn.edu.ar/jspui/handle/20.500.12049/2324 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534718302738 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002 |
identifier_str_mv |
Kleijn, D., Bommarco, R., Fijen, T. P., Garibaldi, L. A., Potts, S. G., & van der Putten, W. H. (2018). Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice. Trends in ecology & evolution; 34 (2); 154-166. 0169-5347 |
url |
http://rid.unrn.edu.ar/jspui/handle/20.500.12049/2324 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534718302738 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.002 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
34 Trends in Ecology and Evolution |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:RID-UNRN (UNRN) instname:Universidad Nacional de Río Negro |
reponame_str |
RID-UNRN (UNRN) |
collection |
RID-UNRN (UNRN) |
instname_str |
Universidad Nacional de Río Negro |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RID-UNRN (UNRN) - Universidad Nacional de Río Negro |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rid@unrn.edu.ar |
_version_ |
1844621625126813696 |
score |
12.559606 |