Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina

Autores
Suarez, Romina Paula; Zaccagnini, Maria Elena; Babbitt, Kimberly J.; Calamari, Noelia Cecilia; Natale, Guillermo Sebastian; Cerezo, Alexis; Codugnello, Nadia; Boca, Rosa Teresa; Damonte, María Jimena; Vera Candioti, Josefina; Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio Ignacio
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Context: Amphibians are declining worldwide and land use change to agriculture is recognized as a leading cause. Argentina is undergoing an agriculturalization process with rapid changes in landscape structure. Objectives: We evaluated anuran response to landscape composition and configuration in two landscapes of east-central Argentina with different degrees of agriculturalization. We identified sensitive species and evaluated landscape influence on communities and individual species at two spatial scales. Methods: We compared anuran richness, frequency of occurrence, and activity between landscapes using call surveys data from 120 sampling points from 2007 to 2009. We evaluated anuran responses to landscape structure variables estimated within 250 and 500-m radius buffers using canonical correspondence analysis and multimodel inference from a set of candidate models. Results: Anuran richness was lower in the landscape with greater level of agriculturalization with reduced amount of forest cover and stream length. This pattern was driven by the lower occurrence and calling activity of seven out of the sixteen recorded species. Four species responded positively to the amount of forest cover and stream habitat. Three species responded positively to forest cohesion and negatively to rural housing. Two responded negatively to crop area and diversity of cover classes. Conclusions: Anurans within agricultural landscapes of east-central Argentina are responding to landscape structure. Responses varied depending on species and study scale. Life-history traits contribute to responses differences. Our study offers a better understanding of landscape effects on anurans and can be used for land management in other areas experiencing a similar agriculturalization process.
Instituto de Recursos Biológicos
Fil: Suarez, Romina Paula. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Zaccagnini, Maria Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Babbitt, Kimberly J. University of New Hampshire. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment; Estados Unidos
Fil: Calamari, Noelia Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina
Fil: Natale, Guillermo S. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Departamento de Química. Centro de Investigaciones del Medio Ambiente; Argentina
Fil: Cerezo, Alexis. Asociación Aves Argentinas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos; Argentina
Fil: Codugnello, Nadia. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Laboratorio de Ecología; Argentina
Fil: Boca, Rosa Teresa. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Damonte, María Jimena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Vera Candioti, Josefina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros. Agencia De Extensión Rural Venado Tuerto; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio Ignacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fuente
Landscape Ecology 31 (10) : 2485–2505. (December 2016)
Materia
Anura
Anfibios
Conservación del Paisaje
Agricultura
Intensificación
Amphibians
Landscape Conservation
Agriculture
Intensification
Argentina
Anuros
Agriculturización
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3505
Acceder
id INTADig_e2e4210dc4ba0eb92880107d3d0249f4
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3505
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in ArgentinaSuarez, Romina PaulaZaccagnini, Maria ElenaBabbitt, Kimberly J.Calamari, Noelia CeciliaNatale, Guillermo SebastianCerezo, AlexisCodugnello, NadiaBoca, Rosa TeresaDamonte, María JimenaVera Candioti, JosefinaGavier Pizarro, Gregorio IgnacioAnuraAnfibiosConservación del PaisajeAgriculturaIntensificaciónAmphibiansLandscape ConservationAgricultureIntensificationArgentinaAnurosAgriculturizaciónContext: Amphibians are declining worldwide and land use change to agriculture is recognized as a leading cause. Argentina is undergoing an agriculturalization process with rapid changes in landscape structure. Objectives: We evaluated anuran response to landscape composition and configuration in two landscapes of east-central Argentina with different degrees of agriculturalization. We identified sensitive species and evaluated landscape influence on communities and individual species at two spatial scales. Methods: We compared anuran richness, frequency of occurrence, and activity between landscapes using call surveys data from 120 sampling points from 2007 to 2009. We evaluated anuran responses to landscape structure variables estimated within 250 and 500-m radius buffers using canonical correspondence analysis and multimodel inference from a set of candidate models. Results: Anuran richness was lower in the landscape with greater level of agriculturalization with reduced amount of forest cover and stream length. This pattern was driven by the lower occurrence and calling activity of seven out of the sixteen recorded species. Four species responded positively to the amount of forest cover and stream habitat. Three species responded positively to forest cohesion and negatively to rural housing. Two responded negatively to crop area and diversity of cover classes. Conclusions: Anurans within agricultural landscapes of east-central Argentina are responding to landscape structure. Responses varied depending on species and study scale. Life-history traits contribute to responses differences. Our study offers a better understanding of landscape effects on anurans and can be used for land management in other areas experiencing a similar agriculturalization process.Instituto de Recursos BiológicosFil: Suarez, Romina Paula. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; ArgentinaFil: Zaccagnini, Maria Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; ArgentinaFil: Babbitt, Kimberly J. University of New Hampshire. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment; Estados UnidosFil: Calamari, Noelia Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; ArgentinaFil: Natale, Guillermo S. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Departamento de Química. Centro de Investigaciones del Medio Ambiente; ArgentinaFil: Cerezo, Alexis. Asociación Aves Argentinas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos; ArgentinaFil: Codugnello, Nadia. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Laboratorio de Ecología; ArgentinaFil: Boca, Rosa Teresa. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; ArgentinaFil: Damonte, María Jimena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; ArgentinaFil: Vera Candioti, Josefina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros. Agencia De Extensión Rural Venado Tuerto; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio Ignacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina2018-09-28T14:08:51Z2018-09-28T14:08:51Z2016-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10980-016-0426-2http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/35050921-29731572-9761https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0426-2Landscape Ecology 31 (10) : 2485–2505. (December 2016)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-04T09:47:35Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/3505instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:47:36.27INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina
title Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina
spellingShingle Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina
Suarez, Romina Paula
Anura
Anfibios
Conservación del Paisaje
Agricultura
Intensificación
Amphibians
Landscape Conservation
Agriculture
Intensification
Argentina
Anuros
Agriculturización
title_short Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina
title_full Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina
title_fullStr Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina
title_sort Anuran responses to spatial patterns of agricultural landscapes in Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Suarez, Romina Paula
Zaccagnini, Maria Elena
Babbitt, Kimberly J.
Calamari, Noelia Cecilia
Natale, Guillermo Sebastian
Cerezo, Alexis
Codugnello, Nadia
Boca, Rosa Teresa
Damonte, María Jimena
Vera Candioti, Josefina
Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio Ignacio
author Suarez, Romina Paula
author_facet Suarez, Romina Paula
Zaccagnini, Maria Elena
Babbitt, Kimberly J.
Calamari, Noelia Cecilia
Natale, Guillermo Sebastian
Cerezo, Alexis
Codugnello, Nadia
Boca, Rosa Teresa
Damonte, María Jimena
Vera Candioti, Josefina
Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio Ignacio
author_role author
author2 Zaccagnini, Maria Elena
Babbitt, Kimberly J.
Calamari, Noelia Cecilia
Natale, Guillermo Sebastian
Cerezo, Alexis
Codugnello, Nadia
Boca, Rosa Teresa
Damonte, María Jimena
Vera Candioti, Josefina
Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio Ignacio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Anura
Anfibios
Conservación del Paisaje
Agricultura
Intensificación
Amphibians
Landscape Conservation
Agriculture
Intensification
Argentina
Anuros
Agriculturización
topic Anura
Anfibios
Conservación del Paisaje
Agricultura
Intensificación
Amphibians
Landscape Conservation
Agriculture
Intensification
Argentina
Anuros
Agriculturización
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Context: Amphibians are declining worldwide and land use change to agriculture is recognized as a leading cause. Argentina is undergoing an agriculturalization process with rapid changes in landscape structure. Objectives: We evaluated anuran response to landscape composition and configuration in two landscapes of east-central Argentina with different degrees of agriculturalization. We identified sensitive species and evaluated landscape influence on communities and individual species at two spatial scales. Methods: We compared anuran richness, frequency of occurrence, and activity between landscapes using call surveys data from 120 sampling points from 2007 to 2009. We evaluated anuran responses to landscape structure variables estimated within 250 and 500-m radius buffers using canonical correspondence analysis and multimodel inference from a set of candidate models. Results: Anuran richness was lower in the landscape with greater level of agriculturalization with reduced amount of forest cover and stream length. This pattern was driven by the lower occurrence and calling activity of seven out of the sixteen recorded species. Four species responded positively to the amount of forest cover and stream habitat. Three species responded positively to forest cohesion and negatively to rural housing. Two responded negatively to crop area and diversity of cover classes. Conclusions: Anurans within agricultural landscapes of east-central Argentina are responding to landscape structure. Responses varied depending on species and study scale. Life-history traits contribute to responses differences. Our study offers a better understanding of landscape effects on anurans and can be used for land management in other areas experiencing a similar agriculturalization process.
Instituto de Recursos Biológicos
Fil: Suarez, Romina Paula. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Zaccagnini, Maria Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Babbitt, Kimberly J. University of New Hampshire. Department of Natural Resources and the Environment; Estados Unidos
Fil: Calamari, Noelia Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina
Fil: Natale, Guillermo S. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas. Departamento de Química. Centro de Investigaciones del Medio Ambiente; Argentina
Fil: Cerezo, Alexis. Asociación Aves Argentinas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos; Argentina
Fil: Codugnello, Nadia. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Laboratorio de Ecología; Argentina
Fil: Boca, Rosa Teresa. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Clima y Agua; Argentina
Fil: Damonte, María Jimena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
Fil: Vera Candioti, Josefina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros. Agencia De Extensión Rural Venado Tuerto; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Gavier Pizarro, Gregorio Ignacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Recursos Biológicos; Argentina
description Context: Amphibians are declining worldwide and land use change to agriculture is recognized as a leading cause. Argentina is undergoing an agriculturalization process with rapid changes in landscape structure. Objectives: We evaluated anuran response to landscape composition and configuration in two landscapes of east-central Argentina with different degrees of agriculturalization. We identified sensitive species and evaluated landscape influence on communities and individual species at two spatial scales. Methods: We compared anuran richness, frequency of occurrence, and activity between landscapes using call surveys data from 120 sampling points from 2007 to 2009. We evaluated anuran responses to landscape structure variables estimated within 250 and 500-m radius buffers using canonical correspondence analysis and multimodel inference from a set of candidate models. Results: Anuran richness was lower in the landscape with greater level of agriculturalization with reduced amount of forest cover and stream length. This pattern was driven by the lower occurrence and calling activity of seven out of the sixteen recorded species. Four species responded positively to the amount of forest cover and stream habitat. Three species responded positively to forest cohesion and negatively to rural housing. Two responded negatively to crop area and diversity of cover classes. Conclusions: Anurans within agricultural landscapes of east-central Argentina are responding to landscape structure. Responses varied depending on species and study scale. Life-history traits contribute to responses differences. Our study offers a better understanding of landscape effects on anurans and can be used for land management in other areas experiencing a similar agriculturalization process.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12
2018-09-28T14:08:51Z
2018-09-28T14:08:51Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10980-016-0426-2
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3505
0921-2973
1572-9761
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0426-2
url https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10980-016-0426-2
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3505
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0426-2
identifier_str_mv 0921-2973
1572-9761
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Landscape Ecology 31 (10) : 2485–2505. (December 2016)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341359010185216
score 12.623145

Publicaciones similares