Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes.

Autores
Rosas, Yamina Micaela; Peri, Pablo Luis; Lencinas, María Vanessa; Lizarraga, Leonidas; Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In the last years, different spatial analyses were developed to support multi-taxon biodiversity conservation strategies. In fact, the use of species distribution models as input allowed to create spatial decision-support maps. Of special interest are maps of potential biodiversity (MPB), which define distribution and ecological requirements of relevant species and maps of priority conservation areas (MPCA), which define priority areas considering endemism and richness. The objective of this paper was to assess multi-taxon biodiversity based on two different spatial analyses and to test their efficiency to support conservation decision at Patagonia. We computed 119 potential habitat suitability maps (one deer, birds, lizards, darkling-beetles, plants) with ENFA (Environmental Niche Factor Analysis) and 15 environmental variables, using Biomapper software. ENFA calculate two ecological indexes (marginality and specialization) which describe the narrowness of species niches and how extreme are the optimum environmental conditions related to the whole study area. These maps were combined obtaining a MPB and MPCA using Zonation software. Multivariate analyses were performed to compare methodologies, analysing environmental variables, ecological areas, forest types and protected areas. Multivariate and ecological indexes showed that deer, lizards and darkling-beetles presented a narrow range, while birds and plants presented a large range of marginality and specialization mainly related to vegetation and climate. At provincial level, highest potential biodiversity and conservation priority values were related to shrublands and humid steppes. However, MPCA showed higher values related to forests and alpine vegetation due to endemism, while MPB showed differences among forest types. These analyses showed that the most valuable areas were not represented in the protected areas, however, many higher conservation priority values were found inside the protected compared with unprotected areas. Different spatial decision-support maps presented similar outputs at provincial scale, but differed in the forest landscape matrix. Both methodologies can be used to plan conservation strategies depending on the specific objectives (e.g. highlighting richness or endemism).
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Rosas, Yamina Micaela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Lizárraga, Leonidas. Administración De Parques Nacionales. Dirección Regional Noroeste. Salta; Argentina.
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fuente
Journal of Environmental Management 307 : 114578. (April 2022)
Materia
Biodiversity
Landscape Conservation
Protected Areas
Models
Endemic Species
Habitat Suitability
Biodiversidad
Conservación de Paisaje
Áreas Protegidas
Modelos
Especies Endémicas
Idoneidad del Hábitat
Santa Cruz (Argentina)
Environmental Niche Factor Analysis
Biomapper
PEBANPA Network
Maps of Potential Biodiversity
Análisis Factorial de Nicho Ambiental
Biomapeador
Red PEBANPA
Mapas de Biodiversidad Potencial
Región Patagónica
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11136

id INTADig_da261dd47c5c85b771ad8773f62ddb26
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11136
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes.Rosas, Yamina MicaelaPeri, Pablo LuisLencinas, María VanessaLizarraga, LeonidasMartinez Pastur, Guillermo JoséBiodiversityLandscape ConservationProtected AreasModelsEndemic SpeciesHabitat SuitabilityBiodiversidadConservación de PaisajeÁreas ProtegidasModelosEspecies EndémicasIdoneidad del HábitatSanta Cruz (Argentina)Environmental Niche Factor AnalysisBiomapperPEBANPA NetworkMaps of Potential BiodiversityAnálisis Factorial de Nicho AmbientalBiomapeadorRed PEBANPAMapas de Biodiversidad PotencialRegión PatagónicaIn the last years, different spatial analyses were developed to support multi-taxon biodiversity conservation strategies. In fact, the use of species distribution models as input allowed to create spatial decision-support maps. Of special interest are maps of potential biodiversity (MPB), which define distribution and ecological requirements of relevant species and maps of priority conservation areas (MPCA), which define priority areas considering endemism and richness. The objective of this paper was to assess multi-taxon biodiversity based on two different spatial analyses and to test their efficiency to support conservation decision at Patagonia. We computed 119 potential habitat suitability maps (one deer, birds, lizards, darkling-beetles, plants) with ENFA (Environmental Niche Factor Analysis) and 15 environmental variables, using Biomapper software. ENFA calculate two ecological indexes (marginality and specialization) which describe the narrowness of species niches and how extreme are the optimum environmental conditions related to the whole study area. These maps were combined obtaining a MPB and MPCA using Zonation software. Multivariate analyses were performed to compare methodologies, analysing environmental variables, ecological areas, forest types and protected areas. Multivariate and ecological indexes showed that deer, lizards and darkling-beetles presented a narrow range, while birds and plants presented a large range of marginality and specialization mainly related to vegetation and climate. At provincial level, highest potential biodiversity and conservation priority values were related to shrublands and humid steppes. However, MPCA showed higher values related to forests and alpine vegetation due to endemism, while MPB showed differences among forest types. These analyses showed that the most valuable areas were not represented in the protected areas, however, many higher conservation priority values were found inside the protected compared with unprotected areas. Different spatial decision-support maps presented similar outputs at provincial scale, but differed in the forest landscape matrix. Both methodologies can be used to plan conservation strategies depending on the specific objectives (e.g. highlighting richness or endemism).EEA Santa CruzFil: Rosas, Yamina Micaela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.Fil: Lizárraga, Leonidas. Administración De Parques Nacionales. Dirección Regional Noroeste. Salta; Argentina.Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.Elsevier2022-02-14T12:06:12Z2022-02-14T12:06:12Z2022-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11136https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722001517Rosas Y.M.; Peri P.L.; Lencina M.V.; Lizarraga L.; Martínez Pastur G. (2022) Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management 307: 114578. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114578.0301-4797https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114578Journal of Environmental Management 307 : 114578. (April 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-11-06T09:41:06Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/11136instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-11-06 09:41:06.795INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes.
title Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes.
spellingShingle Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes.
Rosas, Yamina Micaela
Biodiversity
Landscape Conservation
Protected Areas
Models
Endemic Species
Habitat Suitability
Biodiversidad
Conservación de Paisaje
Áreas Protegidas
Modelos
Especies Endémicas
Idoneidad del Hábitat
Santa Cruz (Argentina)
Environmental Niche Factor Analysis
Biomapper
PEBANPA Network
Maps of Potential Biodiversity
Análisis Factorial de Nicho Ambiental
Biomapeador
Red PEBANPA
Mapas de Biodiversidad Potencial
Región Patagónica
title_short Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes.
title_full Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes.
title_fullStr Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes.
title_full_unstemmed Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes.
title_sort Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rosas, Yamina Micaela
Peri, Pablo Luis
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Lizarraga, Leonidas
Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José
author Rosas, Yamina Micaela
author_facet Rosas, Yamina Micaela
Peri, Pablo Luis
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Lizarraga, Leonidas
Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José
author_role author
author2 Peri, Pablo Luis
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Lizarraga, Leonidas
Martinez Pastur, Guillermo José
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biodiversity
Landscape Conservation
Protected Areas
Models
Endemic Species
Habitat Suitability
Biodiversidad
Conservación de Paisaje
Áreas Protegidas
Modelos
Especies Endémicas
Idoneidad del Hábitat
Santa Cruz (Argentina)
Environmental Niche Factor Analysis
Biomapper
PEBANPA Network
Maps of Potential Biodiversity
Análisis Factorial de Nicho Ambiental
Biomapeador
Red PEBANPA
Mapas de Biodiversidad Potencial
Región Patagónica
topic Biodiversity
Landscape Conservation
Protected Areas
Models
Endemic Species
Habitat Suitability
Biodiversidad
Conservación de Paisaje
Áreas Protegidas
Modelos
Especies Endémicas
Idoneidad del Hábitat
Santa Cruz (Argentina)
Environmental Niche Factor Analysis
Biomapper
PEBANPA Network
Maps of Potential Biodiversity
Análisis Factorial de Nicho Ambiental
Biomapeador
Red PEBANPA
Mapas de Biodiversidad Potencial
Región Patagónica
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In the last years, different spatial analyses were developed to support multi-taxon biodiversity conservation strategies. In fact, the use of species distribution models as input allowed to create spatial decision-support maps. Of special interest are maps of potential biodiversity (MPB), which define distribution and ecological requirements of relevant species and maps of priority conservation areas (MPCA), which define priority areas considering endemism and richness. The objective of this paper was to assess multi-taxon biodiversity based on two different spatial analyses and to test their efficiency to support conservation decision at Patagonia. We computed 119 potential habitat suitability maps (one deer, birds, lizards, darkling-beetles, plants) with ENFA (Environmental Niche Factor Analysis) and 15 environmental variables, using Biomapper software. ENFA calculate two ecological indexes (marginality and specialization) which describe the narrowness of species niches and how extreme are the optimum environmental conditions related to the whole study area. These maps were combined obtaining a MPB and MPCA using Zonation software. Multivariate analyses were performed to compare methodologies, analysing environmental variables, ecological areas, forest types and protected areas. Multivariate and ecological indexes showed that deer, lizards and darkling-beetles presented a narrow range, while birds and plants presented a large range of marginality and specialization mainly related to vegetation and climate. At provincial level, highest potential biodiversity and conservation priority values were related to shrublands and humid steppes. However, MPCA showed higher values related to forests and alpine vegetation due to endemism, while MPB showed differences among forest types. These analyses showed that the most valuable areas were not represented in the protected areas, however, many higher conservation priority values were found inside the protected compared with unprotected areas. Different spatial decision-support maps presented similar outputs at provincial scale, but differed in the forest landscape matrix. Both methodologies can be used to plan conservation strategies depending on the specific objectives (e.g. highlighting richness or endemism).
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Rosas, Yamina Micaela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Lizárraga, Leonidas. Administración De Parques Nacionales. Dirección Regional Noroeste. Salta; Argentina.
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
description In the last years, different spatial analyses were developed to support multi-taxon biodiversity conservation strategies. In fact, the use of species distribution models as input allowed to create spatial decision-support maps. Of special interest are maps of potential biodiversity (MPB), which define distribution and ecological requirements of relevant species and maps of priority conservation areas (MPCA), which define priority areas considering endemism and richness. The objective of this paper was to assess multi-taxon biodiversity based on two different spatial analyses and to test their efficiency to support conservation decision at Patagonia. We computed 119 potential habitat suitability maps (one deer, birds, lizards, darkling-beetles, plants) with ENFA (Environmental Niche Factor Analysis) and 15 environmental variables, using Biomapper software. ENFA calculate two ecological indexes (marginality and specialization) which describe the narrowness of species niches and how extreme are the optimum environmental conditions related to the whole study area. These maps were combined obtaining a MPB and MPCA using Zonation software. Multivariate analyses were performed to compare methodologies, analysing environmental variables, ecological areas, forest types and protected areas. Multivariate and ecological indexes showed that deer, lizards and darkling-beetles presented a narrow range, while birds and plants presented a large range of marginality and specialization mainly related to vegetation and climate. At provincial level, highest potential biodiversity and conservation priority values were related to shrublands and humid steppes. However, MPCA showed higher values related to forests and alpine vegetation due to endemism, while MPB showed differences among forest types. These analyses showed that the most valuable areas were not represented in the protected areas, however, many higher conservation priority values were found inside the protected compared with unprotected areas. Different spatial decision-support maps presented similar outputs at provincial scale, but differed in the forest landscape matrix. Both methodologies can be used to plan conservation strategies depending on the specific objectives (e.g. highlighting richness or endemism).
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-14T12:06:12Z
2022-02-14T12:06:12Z
2022-04-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11136
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722001517
Rosas Y.M.; Peri P.L.; Lencina M.V.; Lizarraga L.; Martínez Pastur G. (2022) Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management 307: 114578. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114578.
0301-4797
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114578
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11136
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479722001517
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114578
identifier_str_mv Rosas Y.M.; Peri P.L.; Lencina M.V.; Lizarraga L.; Martínez Pastur G. (2022) Multi-taxon biodiversity assessment of Southern Patagonia: Supporting conservation strategies at different landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management 307: 114578. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114578.
0301-4797
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Environmental Management 307 : 114578. (April 2022)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1848045948548153344
score 13.087074