Análisis comparativo de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual para la provincia de La Pampa
- Autores
- Echevarria, Daniela Carola; Vazquez, Pablo Mauricio; Carreño, Lorena Veronica
- Año de publicación
- 2025
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Este estudio tuvo como propósito evaluar el desempeño de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual—CHIRPS, ERA5, GPM y JAXA GSMaP—en la provincia de La Pampa, Argentina, mediante su comparación con registros de pluviómetros. Se utilizaron datos de 26 estaciones meteorológicas con series completas o casi completas entre 2000 y 2025.
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of four satellite-based monthly precipitation products—CHIRPS, ERA5, GPM, and JAXA GSMaP—over La Pampa Province, Argentina, by comparing them with ground-based rain gauge records. A dataset of 26 meteorological stations with complete or near-complete records from 2000 to 2025 was used as a reference. Satellite estimates were extracted with Google Earth Engine and averaged within an 11 km buffer around each station. Simple linear regression models were trained (2000-2020) and validated (2021-2025). Model accuracy was assessed using R2 , RMSE, standard error, and bias, complemented with monthly and regional analyses. At the provincial scale, all products showed moderate agreement with observations (R2 =0.58-0.69). Most products underestimated precipitation, except GPM which initially overestimated but significantly improved in the validation stage, reducing its bias from >60 % to <10 % and achieving the lowest RMSE (<30 mm). Seasonal analysis revealed systematic winter overestimations, especially for JAXA. Regionally, better performance was observed in the humid East compared to the arid West, where isolated convective events were poorly detected. Among the evaluated products, GPM showed the most robust and consistent performance, particularly in the eastern sector of La Pampa. However, in arid areas with scarce rainfall and weak station coverage, satellite data should be complemented with local observations, with CHIRPS and ERA5 serving as auxiliary sources.
EEA INTA Anguil
Fil: Echevarria, Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina
Fil: Vazquez, Pablo Mauricio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina
Fil: Carreño, Lorena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina - Fuente
- Metereologica 50 : e040. (2025)
- Materia
-
Pluviosidad
La Pampa
Rainfall
Precipitation
Precipitación Atmosférica
Productos Satelitales - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/24916
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
INTADig_d5cb42d272f4fee14efe7d57ed06184d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/24916 |
| network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
| repository_id_str |
l |
| network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| spelling |
Análisis comparativo de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual para la provincia de La PampaEchevarria, Daniela CarolaVazquez, Pablo MauricioCarreño, Lorena VeronicaPluviosidadLa PampaRainfallPrecipitationPrecipitación AtmosféricaProductos SatelitalesEste estudio tuvo como propósito evaluar el desempeño de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual—CHIRPS, ERA5, GPM y JAXA GSMaP—en la provincia de La Pampa, Argentina, mediante su comparación con registros de pluviómetros. Se utilizaron datos de 26 estaciones meteorológicas con series completas o casi completas entre 2000 y 2025.This study aimed to evaluate the performance of four satellite-based monthly precipitation products—CHIRPS, ERA5, GPM, and JAXA GSMaP—over La Pampa Province, Argentina, by comparing them with ground-based rain gauge records. A dataset of 26 meteorological stations with complete or near-complete records from 2000 to 2025 was used as a reference. Satellite estimates were extracted with Google Earth Engine and averaged within an 11 km buffer around each station. Simple linear regression models were trained (2000-2020) and validated (2021-2025). Model accuracy was assessed using R2 , RMSE, standard error, and bias, complemented with monthly and regional analyses. At the provincial scale, all products showed moderate agreement with observations (R2 =0.58-0.69). Most products underestimated precipitation, except GPM which initially overestimated but significantly improved in the validation stage, reducing its bias from >60 % to <10 % and achieving the lowest RMSE (<30 mm). Seasonal analysis revealed systematic winter overestimations, especially for JAXA. Regionally, better performance was observed in the humid East compared to the arid West, where isolated convective events were poorly detected. Among the evaluated products, GPM showed the most robust and consistent performance, particularly in the eastern sector of La Pampa. However, in arid areas with scarce rainfall and weak station coverage, satellite data should be complemented with local observations, with CHIRPS and ERA5 serving as auxiliary sources.EEA INTA AnguilFil: Echevarria, Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; ArgentinaFil: Vazquez, Pablo Mauricio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; ArgentinaFil: Carreño, Lorena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; ArgentinaCentro Argentino de Meteorólogos2026-01-07T12:27:39Z2026-01-07T12:27:39Z2025-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/24916https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/meteorologica/article/view/191291850-468Xhttps://doi.org/10.24215/1850468Xe040Metereologica 50 : e040. (2025)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2026-01-08T10:41:02Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/24916instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2026-01-08 10:41:03.099INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Análisis comparativo de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual para la provincia de La Pampa |
| title |
Análisis comparativo de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual para la provincia de La Pampa |
| spellingShingle |
Análisis comparativo de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual para la provincia de La Pampa Echevarria, Daniela Carola Pluviosidad La Pampa Rainfall Precipitation Precipitación Atmosférica Productos Satelitales |
| title_short |
Análisis comparativo de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual para la provincia de La Pampa |
| title_full |
Análisis comparativo de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual para la provincia de La Pampa |
| title_fullStr |
Análisis comparativo de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual para la provincia de La Pampa |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Análisis comparativo de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual para la provincia de La Pampa |
| title_sort |
Análisis comparativo de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual para la provincia de La Pampa |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Echevarria, Daniela Carola Vazquez, Pablo Mauricio Carreño, Lorena Veronica |
| author |
Echevarria, Daniela Carola |
| author_facet |
Echevarria, Daniela Carola Vazquez, Pablo Mauricio Carreño, Lorena Veronica |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Vazquez, Pablo Mauricio Carreño, Lorena Veronica |
| author2_role |
author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Pluviosidad La Pampa Rainfall Precipitation Precipitación Atmosférica Productos Satelitales |
| topic |
Pluviosidad La Pampa Rainfall Precipitation Precipitación Atmosférica Productos Satelitales |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Este estudio tuvo como propósito evaluar el desempeño de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual—CHIRPS, ERA5, GPM y JAXA GSMaP—en la provincia de La Pampa, Argentina, mediante su comparación con registros de pluviómetros. Se utilizaron datos de 26 estaciones meteorológicas con series completas o casi completas entre 2000 y 2025. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of four satellite-based monthly precipitation products—CHIRPS, ERA5, GPM, and JAXA GSMaP—over La Pampa Province, Argentina, by comparing them with ground-based rain gauge records. A dataset of 26 meteorological stations with complete or near-complete records from 2000 to 2025 was used as a reference. Satellite estimates were extracted with Google Earth Engine and averaged within an 11 km buffer around each station. Simple linear regression models were trained (2000-2020) and validated (2021-2025). Model accuracy was assessed using R2 , RMSE, standard error, and bias, complemented with monthly and regional analyses. At the provincial scale, all products showed moderate agreement with observations (R2 =0.58-0.69). Most products underestimated precipitation, except GPM which initially overestimated but significantly improved in the validation stage, reducing its bias from >60 % to <10 % and achieving the lowest RMSE (<30 mm). Seasonal analysis revealed systematic winter overestimations, especially for JAXA. Regionally, better performance was observed in the humid East compared to the arid West, where isolated convective events were poorly detected. Among the evaluated products, GPM showed the most robust and consistent performance, particularly in the eastern sector of La Pampa. However, in arid areas with scarce rainfall and weak station coverage, satellite data should be complemented with local observations, with CHIRPS and ERA5 serving as auxiliary sources. EEA INTA Anguil Fil: Echevarria, Daniela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina Fil: Vazquez, Pablo Mauricio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina Fil: Carreño, Lorena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Anguil; Argentina |
| description |
Este estudio tuvo como propósito evaluar el desempeño de cuatro productos satelitales de precipitación mensual—CHIRPS, ERA5, GPM y JAXA GSMaP—en la provincia de La Pampa, Argentina, mediante su comparación con registros de pluviómetros. Se utilizaron datos de 26 estaciones meteorológicas con series completas o casi completas entre 2000 y 2025. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025-11 2026-01-07T12:27:39Z 2026-01-07T12:27:39Z |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/24916 https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/meteorologica/article/view/19129 1850-468X https://doi.org/10.24215/1850468Xe040 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/24916 https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/meteorologica/article/view/19129 https://doi.org/10.24215/1850468Xe040 |
| identifier_str_mv |
1850-468X |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
| language |
spa |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Argentino de Meteorólogos |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Centro Argentino de Meteorólogos |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Metereologica 50 : e040. (2025) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
| _version_ |
1853758529501921280 |
| score |
13.25844 |