Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths,Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruption

Autores
Fernandez, Dario Eduardo; Cichon, Liliana; Garrido, Silvina Alejandra; Ribes-Dasi, M.; Avilla, J.
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Studies were conducted in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen and pear, Pyrus communis L. (Rosales: Rosaceae), orchards to evaluate the attractiveness of grey halobutyl septa loaded with 1 (L2) and 10 (Mega) mg of codlemone, 8E,10E-dodecadien-1-ol, 3 mg of pear ester, ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (DA2313), and 3 mg of pear ester plus 3 mg of codlemone (Combo) to adult codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). All studies were conducted in orchards treated with pheromone mating disruption. All four lures were tested on diamond-shaped sticky traps placed in 60 plots of apple and 40 plots of pears in 2003/04, and in 62 plots of apples and 30 of pears in 2004-05. Combo lures attracted significantly more moths (males + females) than all the others in both years. Comparisons among flights showed significant differences mainly for flight 1 and 2, but not always for flight 3. Mega lures provided no significant improvement compared with L2 lures during both seasons regarding the total number of moths. Combo and DA2313 lures attracted fewer females than males during the whole season. For most sample dates, more virgin than mated females were attracted to Combo lures, except during the third flight, and the overall ratio was 60:40, although the difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that the Combo lures are better indicators of codling moth activity in pheromone treated orchards, regardless of pest population level, when compared with similar lures containing codlemone or pear ester alone.
EEA Alto Valle
Fil: Fernandez, Dario Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentina
Fil: Cichon, Liliana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentina
Fil: Garrido, Silvina Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentina
Fil: Ribes-Dasi, M. Universidad de Lleida. Centro UDL-IRTA de R+D; España
Fil: Avilla, J. Universidad de Lleida. Centro UDL-IRTA de R+D; España
Fuente
Journal of Insect Science 10 (1) : 139. (2010)
Materia
Plagas de Plantas
Cydia Pomonella
Manzana
Pera
Atrayentes
Confusión Sexual
Control de Plagas
Pests of Plants
Apples
Pears
Attractants
Mating Disruption
Pest Control
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5631
Acceder
id INTADig_c0e7c8394cb3b2b710e7dd408e37cf6f
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5631
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths,Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruptionFernandez, Dario EduardoCichon, LilianaGarrido, Silvina AlejandraRibes-Dasi, M.Avilla, J.Plagas de PlantasCydia PomonellaManzanaPeraAtrayentesConfusión SexualControl de PlagasPests of PlantsApplesPearsAttractantsMating DisruptionPest ControlStudies were conducted in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen and pear, Pyrus communis L. (Rosales: Rosaceae), orchards to evaluate the attractiveness of grey halobutyl septa loaded with 1 (L2) and 10 (Mega) mg of codlemone, 8E,10E-dodecadien-1-ol, 3 mg of pear ester, ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (DA2313), and 3 mg of pear ester plus 3 mg of codlemone (Combo) to adult codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). All studies were conducted in orchards treated with pheromone mating disruption. All four lures were tested on diamond-shaped sticky traps placed in 60 plots of apple and 40 plots of pears in 2003/04, and in 62 plots of apples and 30 of pears in 2004-05. Combo lures attracted significantly more moths (males + females) than all the others in both years. Comparisons among flights showed significant differences mainly for flight 1 and 2, but not always for flight 3. Mega lures provided no significant improvement compared with L2 lures during both seasons regarding the total number of moths. Combo and DA2313 lures attracted fewer females than males during the whole season. For most sample dates, more virgin than mated females were attracted to Combo lures, except during the third flight, and the overall ratio was 60:40, although the difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that the Combo lures are better indicators of codling moth activity in pheromone treated orchards, regardless of pest population level, when compared with similar lures containing codlemone or pear ester alone.EEA Alto ValleFil: Fernandez, Dario Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; ArgentinaFil: Cichon, Liliana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; ArgentinaFil: Garrido, Silvina Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; ArgentinaFil: Ribes-Dasi, M. Universidad de Lleida. Centro UDL-IRTA de R+D; EspañaFil: Avilla, J. Universidad de Lleida. Centro UDL-IRTA de R+D; EspañaOxford Academic Press2019-08-15T14:10:00Z2019-08-15T14:10:00Z2010-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/10/1/139/876740http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/56311536-2442https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.13901Journal of Insect Science 10 (1) : 139. (2010)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-04T09:48:08Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/5631instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:48:08.379INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths,Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruption
title Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths,Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruption
spellingShingle Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths,Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruption
Fernandez, Dario Eduardo
Plagas de Plantas
Cydia Pomonella
Manzana
Pera
Atrayentes
Confusión Sexual
Control de Plagas
Pests of Plants
Apples
Pears
Attractants
Mating Disruption
Pest Control
title_short Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths,Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruption
title_full Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths,Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruption
title_fullStr Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths,Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruption
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths,Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruption
title_sort Comparison of lures loaded with codlemone and pear ester for capturing codling moths,Cydia pomonella, in apple and pear orchards using mating disruption
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fernandez, Dario Eduardo
Cichon, Liliana
Garrido, Silvina Alejandra
Ribes-Dasi, M.
Avilla, J.
author Fernandez, Dario Eduardo
author_facet Fernandez, Dario Eduardo
Cichon, Liliana
Garrido, Silvina Alejandra
Ribes-Dasi, M.
Avilla, J.
author_role author
author2 Cichon, Liliana
Garrido, Silvina Alejandra
Ribes-Dasi, M.
Avilla, J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Plagas de Plantas
Cydia Pomonella
Manzana
Pera
Atrayentes
Confusión Sexual
Control de Plagas
Pests of Plants
Apples
Pears
Attractants
Mating Disruption
Pest Control
topic Plagas de Plantas
Cydia Pomonella
Manzana
Pera
Atrayentes
Confusión Sexual
Control de Plagas
Pests of Plants
Apples
Pears
Attractants
Mating Disruption
Pest Control
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Studies were conducted in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen and pear, Pyrus communis L. (Rosales: Rosaceae), orchards to evaluate the attractiveness of grey halobutyl septa loaded with 1 (L2) and 10 (Mega) mg of codlemone, 8E,10E-dodecadien-1-ol, 3 mg of pear ester, ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (DA2313), and 3 mg of pear ester plus 3 mg of codlemone (Combo) to adult codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). All studies were conducted in orchards treated with pheromone mating disruption. All four lures were tested on diamond-shaped sticky traps placed in 60 plots of apple and 40 plots of pears in 2003/04, and in 62 plots of apples and 30 of pears in 2004-05. Combo lures attracted significantly more moths (males + females) than all the others in both years. Comparisons among flights showed significant differences mainly for flight 1 and 2, but not always for flight 3. Mega lures provided no significant improvement compared with L2 lures during both seasons regarding the total number of moths. Combo and DA2313 lures attracted fewer females than males during the whole season. For most sample dates, more virgin than mated females were attracted to Combo lures, except during the third flight, and the overall ratio was 60:40, although the difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that the Combo lures are better indicators of codling moth activity in pheromone treated orchards, regardless of pest population level, when compared with similar lures containing codlemone or pear ester alone.
EEA Alto Valle
Fil: Fernandez, Dario Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentina
Fil: Cichon, Liliana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentina
Fil: Garrido, Silvina Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Alto Valle; Argentina
Fil: Ribes-Dasi, M. Universidad de Lleida. Centro UDL-IRTA de R+D; España
Fil: Avilla, J. Universidad de Lleida. Centro UDL-IRTA de R+D; España
description Studies were conducted in apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen and pear, Pyrus communis L. (Rosales: Rosaceae), orchards to evaluate the attractiveness of grey halobutyl septa loaded with 1 (L2) and 10 (Mega) mg of codlemone, 8E,10E-dodecadien-1-ol, 3 mg of pear ester, ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate (DA2313), and 3 mg of pear ester plus 3 mg of codlemone (Combo) to adult codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). All studies were conducted in orchards treated with pheromone mating disruption. All four lures were tested on diamond-shaped sticky traps placed in 60 plots of apple and 40 plots of pears in 2003/04, and in 62 plots of apples and 30 of pears in 2004-05. Combo lures attracted significantly more moths (males + females) than all the others in both years. Comparisons among flights showed significant differences mainly for flight 1 and 2, but not always for flight 3. Mega lures provided no significant improvement compared with L2 lures during both seasons regarding the total number of moths. Combo and DA2313 lures attracted fewer females than males during the whole season. For most sample dates, more virgin than mated females were attracted to Combo lures, except during the third flight, and the overall ratio was 60:40, although the difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that the Combo lures are better indicators of codling moth activity in pheromone treated orchards, regardless of pest population level, when compared with similar lures containing codlemone or pear ester alone.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01
2019-08-15T14:10:00Z
2019-08-15T14:10:00Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/10/1/139/876740
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5631
1536-2442
https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.13901
url https://academic.oup.com/jinsectscience/article/10/1/139/876740
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5631
https://doi.org/10.1673/031.010.13901
identifier_str_mv 1536-2442
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Academic Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford Academic Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Insect Science 10 (1) : 139. (2010)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341368631918592
score 12.623145

Publicaciones similares