Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake

Autores
De Bernardi, María; Priano, María Eugenia; Fernandez, María Elena; Gyenge, Javier; Juliarena, Maria Paula
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Upland soils are the only known biological sink for methane (CH4) by methanotrophic bacteria consumption. This process is mainly limited by the diffusion processes related to the soil's physical characteristics, which can be modified because of changes in land use depending on the soil type, the original system and the new land use converted. Our study focused on determining the differences in soil CH4 uptake because of changes in land use (from natural grassland to agricultural land and two Pinus radiata afforestation, differing in thinning management) and on determining which are the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in the studied soil type (Hapludoll), with focus on the diffusion process. CH4 fluxes were measured 12 times with the static chamber technique between October 2015 and April 2019. Also, CH4 gradient concentration in the soil profile and physical and chemical variables were measured on the same dates. All land uses studied acted as net CH4 sinks. Land-use change from grassland to agriculture decreased soil CH4 uptake (~37% ± 19), whereas afforestation increased (~85% ± 73) this environmental service related to natural grassland. We found that the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in this soil are water and air-filled pore space, variables that govern soil CH4 diffusion; they are mostly related to differences in bulk density (compaction) among land uses. Organic matter was also an important driver, mainly related to soil structure. Land-use change affected all of these drivers. CH4 concentration presented differences at deeper soil layers only in the two afforestations, which differed in management (pruning and thinning vs. no management). However, CH4 uptake did not present significant differences between them, suggesting that there is no need for a high tree cover to increase the CH4 sink of the soil. This mixed tree and herbaceous cover may result in a similar environmental service output, increasing the options of land uses.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: De Bernardi, María. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.
Fil: Priano, Maria Eugenia. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.
Fil: Fernández, María Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.
Fil: Gyenge, Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.
Fil: Juliarena, Maria Paula. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.
Fuente
Soil Use and Management 40 (1) : e13017 (January 2024)
Materia
Pastizal Natural
Suelos Agrícolas
Plantación Forestal
Metano
Suelo
Natural Pastures
Agricultural Soils
Forest Plantations
Methane
Soil
Pinus
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/16916

id INTADig_a9b50e26b19108534cbbdb6353cc3af0
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/16916
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptakeDe Bernardi, MaríaPriano, María EugeniaFernandez, María ElenaGyenge, JavierJuliarena, Maria PaulaPastizal NaturalSuelos AgrícolasPlantación ForestalMetanoSueloNatural PasturesAgricultural SoilsForest PlantationsMethaneSoilPinusUpland soils are the only known biological sink for methane (CH4) by methanotrophic bacteria consumption. This process is mainly limited by the diffusion processes related to the soil's physical characteristics, which can be modified because of changes in land use depending on the soil type, the original system and the new land use converted. Our study focused on determining the differences in soil CH4 uptake because of changes in land use (from natural grassland to agricultural land and two Pinus radiata afforestation, differing in thinning management) and on determining which are the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in the studied soil type (Hapludoll), with focus on the diffusion process. CH4 fluxes were measured 12 times with the static chamber technique between October 2015 and April 2019. Also, CH4 gradient concentration in the soil profile and physical and chemical variables were measured on the same dates. All land uses studied acted as net CH4 sinks. Land-use change from grassland to agriculture decreased soil CH4 uptake (~37% ± 19), whereas afforestation increased (~85% ± 73) this environmental service related to natural grassland. We found that the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in this soil are water and air-filled pore space, variables that govern soil CH4 diffusion; they are mostly related to differences in bulk density (compaction) among land uses. Organic matter was also an important driver, mainly related to soil structure. Land-use change affected all of these drivers. CH4 concentration presented differences at deeper soil layers only in the two afforestations, which differed in management (pruning and thinning vs. no management). However, CH4 uptake did not present significant differences between them, suggesting that there is no need for a high tree cover to increase the CH4 sink of the soil. This mixed tree and herbaceous cover may result in a similar environmental service output, increasing the options of land uses.EEA BalcarceFil: De Bernardi, María. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.Fil: Priano, Maria Eugenia. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.Fil: Fernández, María Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.Fil: Gyenge, Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.Fil: Juliarena, Maria Paula. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.Wiley2024-03-04T17:29:35Z2024-03-04T17:29:35Z2024-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16916https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.130171475-2743 (Online)0266-0032 (Print)https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13017Soil Use and Management 40 (1) : e13017 (January 2024)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:46:23Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/16916instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:46:23.613INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
title Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
spellingShingle Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
De Bernardi, María
Pastizal Natural
Suelos Agrícolas
Plantación Forestal
Metano
Suelo
Natural Pastures
Agricultural Soils
Forest Plantations
Methane
Soil
Pinus
title_short Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
title_full Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
title_fullStr Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
title_full_unstemmed Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
title_sort Natural grassland conversion to agriculture or pine plantations: Effects on soil methane uptake
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv De Bernardi, María
Priano, María Eugenia
Fernandez, María Elena
Gyenge, Javier
Juliarena, Maria Paula
author De Bernardi, María
author_facet De Bernardi, María
Priano, María Eugenia
Fernandez, María Elena
Gyenge, Javier
Juliarena, Maria Paula
author_role author
author2 Priano, María Eugenia
Fernandez, María Elena
Gyenge, Javier
Juliarena, Maria Paula
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Pastizal Natural
Suelos Agrícolas
Plantación Forestal
Metano
Suelo
Natural Pastures
Agricultural Soils
Forest Plantations
Methane
Soil
Pinus
topic Pastizal Natural
Suelos Agrícolas
Plantación Forestal
Metano
Suelo
Natural Pastures
Agricultural Soils
Forest Plantations
Methane
Soil
Pinus
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Upland soils are the only known biological sink for methane (CH4) by methanotrophic bacteria consumption. This process is mainly limited by the diffusion processes related to the soil's physical characteristics, which can be modified because of changes in land use depending on the soil type, the original system and the new land use converted. Our study focused on determining the differences in soil CH4 uptake because of changes in land use (from natural grassland to agricultural land and two Pinus radiata afforestation, differing in thinning management) and on determining which are the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in the studied soil type (Hapludoll), with focus on the diffusion process. CH4 fluxes were measured 12 times with the static chamber technique between October 2015 and April 2019. Also, CH4 gradient concentration in the soil profile and physical and chemical variables were measured on the same dates. All land uses studied acted as net CH4 sinks. Land-use change from grassland to agriculture decreased soil CH4 uptake (~37% ± 19), whereas afforestation increased (~85% ± 73) this environmental service related to natural grassland. We found that the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in this soil are water and air-filled pore space, variables that govern soil CH4 diffusion; they are mostly related to differences in bulk density (compaction) among land uses. Organic matter was also an important driver, mainly related to soil structure. Land-use change affected all of these drivers. CH4 concentration presented differences at deeper soil layers only in the two afforestations, which differed in management (pruning and thinning vs. no management). However, CH4 uptake did not present significant differences between them, suggesting that there is no need for a high tree cover to increase the CH4 sink of the soil. This mixed tree and herbaceous cover may result in a similar environmental service output, increasing the options of land uses.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: De Bernardi, María. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.
Fil: Priano, Maria Eugenia. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.
Fil: Fernández, María Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.
Fil: Gyenge, Javier. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina.
Fil: Juliarena, Maria Paula. Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones en Física e Ingeniería del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires; Argentina.
description Upland soils are the only known biological sink for methane (CH4) by methanotrophic bacteria consumption. This process is mainly limited by the diffusion processes related to the soil's physical characteristics, which can be modified because of changes in land use depending on the soil type, the original system and the new land use converted. Our study focused on determining the differences in soil CH4 uptake because of changes in land use (from natural grassland to agricultural land and two Pinus radiata afforestation, differing in thinning management) and on determining which are the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in the studied soil type (Hapludoll), with focus on the diffusion process. CH4 fluxes were measured 12 times with the static chamber technique between October 2015 and April 2019. Also, CH4 gradient concentration in the soil profile and physical and chemical variables were measured on the same dates. All land uses studied acted as net CH4 sinks. Land-use change from grassland to agriculture decreased soil CH4 uptake (~37% ± 19), whereas afforestation increased (~85% ± 73) this environmental service related to natural grassland. We found that the main drivers that control CH4 uptake in this soil are water and air-filled pore space, variables that govern soil CH4 diffusion; they are mostly related to differences in bulk density (compaction) among land uses. Organic matter was also an important driver, mainly related to soil structure. Land-use change affected all of these drivers. CH4 concentration presented differences at deeper soil layers only in the two afforestations, which differed in management (pruning and thinning vs. no management). However, CH4 uptake did not present significant differences between them, suggesting that there is no need for a high tree cover to increase the CH4 sink of the soil. This mixed tree and herbaceous cover may result in a similar environmental service output, increasing the options of land uses.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-03-04T17:29:35Z
2024-03-04T17:29:35Z
2024-01-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16916
https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.13017
1475-2743 (Online)
0266-0032 (Print)
https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13017
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/16916
https://bsssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sum.13017
https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.13017
identifier_str_mv 1475-2743 (Online)
0266-0032 (Print)
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Soil Use and Management 40 (1) : e13017 (January 2024)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619185288642560
score 12.559606