Comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants

Autores
Rossetti, Carlos Alberto; Maurizio, Estefanía; Rossi, Ursula Amaranta
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Brucella melitensis and Brucella ovis are the primary etiological agents of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants. B. melitensis was first isolated in 1887 by David Bruce in Malta Island from spleens of four soldiers, while B. ovis was originally isolated in Australia and New Zealand in early 1950's from ovine abortion and rams epididymitis. Today, both agents are distributed worldwide: B. melitensis remains endemic and associated with an extensive negative impact on the productivity of flocks in -some regions, and B. ovis is still present in most sheep-raising regions in the world. Despite being species of the same bacterial genus, B. melitensis and B. ovis have extensive differences in their cultural and biochemical characteristics (smooth vs. rough colonial phases, serum and CO2 dependence for in vitro growth, carbohydrate metabolism), host preference (female goat and sheep vs. rams), the outcome of infection (abortion vs. epididymitis), and their zoonotic potential. Some of these differences can be explained at the bacterial genomic level, but the role of the host genome in promoting or preventing interaction with pathogens is largely unknown. Diagnostic techniques and measures to prevent and control brucellosis in small ruminants vary, with B. melitensis having more available tools for detection and prevention than B. ovis. This review summarizes and analyzes current available information on: (1) the similarities and differences between these two etiological agents of brucellosis in small ruminants, (2) the outcomes after their interaction with different preferred hosts and current diagnostic methodologies, (3) the prevention and control measures, and (4) alerting animal producers about the disease and raise awareness in the research community for future innovative activities.
Instituto de Patobiología
Fil: Rossetti, Carlos Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patobiología Veterinaria; Argentina
Fil: Rossetti, Carlos Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Maurizio, Estefanía. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patobiología Veterinaria; Argentina
Fil: Maurizio, Estefanía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Rossi, Ursula Amaranta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patobiología Veterinaria; Argentina
Fil: Rossi, Ursula Amaranta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fuente
Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9 : 887671 (Mayo 2022)
Materia
Brucella melitensis
Brucella ovis
Genómica
Caprinos
Ovinos
Patogénesis
Pequeños Rumiantes
Genomics
Goats
Sheep
Pathogenesis
Small Ruminants
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/12029
Acceder
id INTADig_a80bb59d260193e9b703e58b4cd81f99
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/12029
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminantsRossetti, Carlos AlbertoMaurizio, EstefaníaRossi, Ursula AmarantaBrucella melitensisBrucella ovisGenómicaCaprinosOvinosPatogénesisPequeños RumiantesGenomicsGoatsSheepPathogenesisSmall RuminantsBrucella melitensis and Brucella ovis are the primary etiological agents of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants. B. melitensis was first isolated in 1887 by David Bruce in Malta Island from spleens of four soldiers, while B. ovis was originally isolated in Australia and New Zealand in early 1950's from ovine abortion and rams epididymitis. Today, both agents are distributed worldwide: B. melitensis remains endemic and associated with an extensive negative impact on the productivity of flocks in -some regions, and B. ovis is still present in most sheep-raising regions in the world. Despite being species of the same bacterial genus, B. melitensis and B. ovis have extensive differences in their cultural and biochemical characteristics (smooth vs. rough colonial phases, serum and CO2 dependence for in vitro growth, carbohydrate metabolism), host preference (female goat and sheep vs. rams), the outcome of infection (abortion vs. epididymitis), and their zoonotic potential. Some of these differences can be explained at the bacterial genomic level, but the role of the host genome in promoting or preventing interaction with pathogens is largely unknown. Diagnostic techniques and measures to prevent and control brucellosis in small ruminants vary, with B. melitensis having more available tools for detection and prevention than B. ovis. This review summarizes and analyzes current available information on: (1) the similarities and differences between these two etiological agents of brucellosis in small ruminants, (2) the outcomes after their interaction with different preferred hosts and current diagnostic methodologies, (3) the prevention and control measures, and (4) alerting animal producers about the disease and raise awareness in the research community for future innovative activities.Instituto de PatobiologíaFil: Rossetti, Carlos Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patobiología Veterinaria; ArgentinaFil: Rossetti, Carlos Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Maurizio, Estefanía. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patobiología Veterinaria; ArgentinaFil: Maurizio, Estefanía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Rossi, Ursula Amaranta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patobiología Veterinaria; ArgentinaFil: Rossi, Ursula Amaranta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFrontiers Media2022-06-06T17:27:57Z2022-06-06T17:27:57Z2022-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12029https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671/full2297-1769https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9 : 887671 (Mayo 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E5-I105-001/2019-PD-E5-I105-001/AR./Patógenos animales: su interacción con el hospedador y el medio ambiente. Impacto en productividad, ecosistemas, sanidad animal y salud pública en el marco “Una Salud”info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-04T09:49:23Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/12029instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:49:24.811INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants
title Comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants
spellingShingle Comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants
Rossetti, Carlos Alberto
Brucella melitensis
Brucella ovis
Genómica
Caprinos
Ovinos
Patogénesis
Pequeños Rumiantes
Genomics
Goats
Sheep
Pathogenesis
Small Ruminants
title_short Comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants
title_full Comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants
title_fullStr Comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants
title_full_unstemmed Comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants
title_sort Comparative review of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rossetti, Carlos Alberto
Maurizio, Estefanía
Rossi, Ursula Amaranta
author Rossetti, Carlos Alberto
author_facet Rossetti, Carlos Alberto
Maurizio, Estefanía
Rossi, Ursula Amaranta
author_role author
author2 Maurizio, Estefanía
Rossi, Ursula Amaranta
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Brucella melitensis
Brucella ovis
Genómica
Caprinos
Ovinos
Patogénesis
Pequeños Rumiantes
Genomics
Goats
Sheep
Pathogenesis
Small Ruminants
topic Brucella melitensis
Brucella ovis
Genómica
Caprinos
Ovinos
Patogénesis
Pequeños Rumiantes
Genomics
Goats
Sheep
Pathogenesis
Small Ruminants
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Brucella melitensis and Brucella ovis are the primary etiological agents of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants. B. melitensis was first isolated in 1887 by David Bruce in Malta Island from spleens of four soldiers, while B. ovis was originally isolated in Australia and New Zealand in early 1950's from ovine abortion and rams epididymitis. Today, both agents are distributed worldwide: B. melitensis remains endemic and associated with an extensive negative impact on the productivity of flocks in -some regions, and B. ovis is still present in most sheep-raising regions in the world. Despite being species of the same bacterial genus, B. melitensis and B. ovis have extensive differences in their cultural and biochemical characteristics (smooth vs. rough colonial phases, serum and CO2 dependence for in vitro growth, carbohydrate metabolism), host preference (female goat and sheep vs. rams), the outcome of infection (abortion vs. epididymitis), and their zoonotic potential. Some of these differences can be explained at the bacterial genomic level, but the role of the host genome in promoting or preventing interaction with pathogens is largely unknown. Diagnostic techniques and measures to prevent and control brucellosis in small ruminants vary, with B. melitensis having more available tools for detection and prevention than B. ovis. This review summarizes and analyzes current available information on: (1) the similarities and differences between these two etiological agents of brucellosis in small ruminants, (2) the outcomes after their interaction with different preferred hosts and current diagnostic methodologies, (3) the prevention and control measures, and (4) alerting animal producers about the disease and raise awareness in the research community for future innovative activities.
Instituto de Patobiología
Fil: Rossetti, Carlos Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patobiología Veterinaria; Argentina
Fil: Rossetti, Carlos Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Maurizio, Estefanía. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patobiología Veterinaria; Argentina
Fil: Maurizio, Estefanía. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Rossi, Ursula Amaranta. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patobiología Veterinaria; Argentina
Fil: Rossi, Ursula Amaranta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Brucella melitensis and Brucella ovis are the primary etiological agents of brucellosis in small domestic ruminants. B. melitensis was first isolated in 1887 by David Bruce in Malta Island from spleens of four soldiers, while B. ovis was originally isolated in Australia and New Zealand in early 1950's from ovine abortion and rams epididymitis. Today, both agents are distributed worldwide: B. melitensis remains endemic and associated with an extensive negative impact on the productivity of flocks in -some regions, and B. ovis is still present in most sheep-raising regions in the world. Despite being species of the same bacterial genus, B. melitensis and B. ovis have extensive differences in their cultural and biochemical characteristics (smooth vs. rough colonial phases, serum and CO2 dependence for in vitro growth, carbohydrate metabolism), host preference (female goat and sheep vs. rams), the outcome of infection (abortion vs. epididymitis), and their zoonotic potential. Some of these differences can be explained at the bacterial genomic level, but the role of the host genome in promoting or preventing interaction with pathogens is largely unknown. Diagnostic techniques and measures to prevent and control brucellosis in small ruminants vary, with B. melitensis having more available tools for detection and prevention than B. ovis. This review summarizes and analyzes current available information on: (1) the similarities and differences between these two etiological agents of brucellosis in small ruminants, (2) the outcomes after their interaction with different preferred hosts and current diagnostic methodologies, (3) the prevention and control measures, and (4) alerting animal producers about the disease and raise awareness in the research community for future innovative activities.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-06T17:27:57Z
2022-06-06T17:27:57Z
2022-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12029
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671/full
2297-1769
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12029
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671/full
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.887671
identifier_str_mv 2297-1769
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E5-I105-001/2019-PD-E5-I105-001/AR./Patógenos animales: su interacción con el hospedador y el medio ambiente. Impacto en productividad, ecosistemas, sanidad animal y salud pública en el marco “Una Salud”
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9 : 887671 (Mayo 2022)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341397229731840
score 12.623145

Publicaciones similares