Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories

Autores
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián; Rosas, Yamina Micaela; Politi, Natalia; Rivera, Luis; Silveira, Eduarda M.O.; Olah, Ashley; Pidgeon, Anna Michle; Lencinas, María Vanessa; Peri, Pablo Luis
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Traditional approaches of forest classifications were based on tree species composition, but recently combine phenology and climate to characterise functional (cyclic and seasonal greenness) rather than structural or compositional components (phenoclusters). The objective was to compare the conservation value (capacity to support more native biodiversity) and provision of ecosystem services (ES) in different phenocluster categories of Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). We used available models (ES, potential biodiversity) and ground-truth data of 145 stands, comparing phenocluster values using uni- and multivariate analyses. Conservation value and capacity to supply ES significantly varied among phenocluster categories: (i) cultural, regulating, and provisioning ES and potential biodiversity at landscape level, (ii) soil carbon and nitrogen, (iii) dominant height, crown cover, basal area, total volume, and domestic animal stock, and (iv) understory plant richness and cover at stand level. These differences are linked to the forest capacity to support more native biodiversity and ES. Besides, multivariate analyses supporting the split of this forest type into four phenocluster subtypes (coast, highland, ecotone with other types, and degraded or secondary forests). Our findings suggest the needs of specific management and conservation proposals, based on phenoclusters rather than forest types defined by tree canopy-cover composition.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Rosas, Yamina Micaela. University of Copenhagen. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management; Dinamarca.
Fil: Politi, Natalia. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Politi, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas (INECOA); Argentina.
Fil: Rivera, Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas (INECOA); Argentina.
Fil: Silveira, Eduarda M.O. University of Wisconsin. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology. SILVIS Lab.; Estados Unidos
Fil: Olah, Ashley. University of Wisconsin. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology. SILVIS Lab; Estados Unidos
Fil: Pidgeon, Anna Michle. University of Wisconsin. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology. SILVIS Lab; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
Fuente
Discover Conservation 2 : article number 2. (January 2025)
Materia
Primary Forests
Ecosystem Services
Phenology
Biodiversity
Bosques Primarios
Nothofagus
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Fenología
Biodiversidad
Nothofagus antarctica
Ñire
Región Patagónica
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21429
Acceder
id INTADig_94d0db42d54db6f9eeb2c59f26921bed
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21429
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categoriesMartínez Pastur, Guillermo JoséRodríguez‑Souilla, JuliánRosas, Yamina MicaelaPoliti, NataliaRivera, LuisSilveira, Eduarda M.O.Olah, AshleyPidgeon, Anna MichleLencinas, María VanessaPeri, Pablo LuisPrimary ForestsEcosystem ServicesPhenologyBiodiversityBosques PrimariosNothofagusServicios de los EcosistemasFenologíaBiodiversidadNothofagus antarcticaÑireRegión PatagónicaTraditional approaches of forest classifications were based on tree species composition, but recently combine phenology and climate to characterise functional (cyclic and seasonal greenness) rather than structural or compositional components (phenoclusters). The objective was to compare the conservation value (capacity to support more native biodiversity) and provision of ecosystem services (ES) in different phenocluster categories of Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). We used available models (ES, potential biodiversity) and ground-truth data of 145 stands, comparing phenocluster values using uni- and multivariate analyses. Conservation value and capacity to supply ES significantly varied among phenocluster categories: (i) cultural, regulating, and provisioning ES and potential biodiversity at landscape level, (ii) soil carbon and nitrogen, (iii) dominant height, crown cover, basal area, total volume, and domestic animal stock, and (iv) understory plant richness and cover at stand level. These differences are linked to the forest capacity to support more native biodiversity and ES. Besides, multivariate analyses supporting the split of this forest type into four phenocluster subtypes (coast, highland, ecotone with other types, and degraded or secondary forests). Our findings suggest the needs of specific management and conservation proposals, based on phenoclusters rather than forest types defined by tree canopy-cover composition.EEA Santa CruzFil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.Fil: Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.Fil: Rosas, Yamina Micaela. University of Copenhagen. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management; Dinamarca.Fil: Politi, Natalia. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Politi, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas (INECOA); Argentina.Fil: Rivera, Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas (INECOA); Argentina.Fil: Silveira, Eduarda M.O. University of Wisconsin. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology. SILVIS Lab.; Estados UnidosFil: Olah, Ashley. University of Wisconsin. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology. SILVIS Lab; Estados UnidosFil: Pidgeon, Anna Michle. University of Wisconsin. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology. SILVIS Lab; Estados UnidosFil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.Springer Nature2025-02-25T10:03:36Z2025-02-25T10:03:36Z2025-01-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21429https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44353-024-00020-0Martínez Pastur G.; Rodríguez-Souilla J.; Rosas Y.M.; Politi N.; Rivera L.; Silveira E.M.O.; Olah A.M.; Pidgeon A.M.; Lencinas M.V.; Peri P.L. (2025) Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories. Discover Conservation 2: 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-024-00020-03004-9784https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-024-00020-0Discover Conservation 2 : article number 2. (January 2025)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-11T10:25:37Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/21429instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-11 10:25:37.913INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories
title Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories
spellingShingle Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories
Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Primary Forests
Ecosystem Services
Phenology
Biodiversity
Bosques Primarios
Nothofagus
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Fenología
Biodiversidad
Nothofagus antarctica
Ñire
Región Patagónica
title_short Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories
title_full Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories
title_fullStr Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories
title_full_unstemmed Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories
title_sort Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián
Rosas, Yamina Micaela
Politi, Natalia
Rivera, Luis
Silveira, Eduarda M.O.
Olah, Ashley
Pidgeon, Anna Michle
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Peri, Pablo Luis
author Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
author_facet Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián
Rosas, Yamina Micaela
Politi, Natalia
Rivera, Luis
Silveira, Eduarda M.O.
Olah, Ashley
Pidgeon, Anna Michle
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Peri, Pablo Luis
author_role author
author2 Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián
Rosas, Yamina Micaela
Politi, Natalia
Rivera, Luis
Silveira, Eduarda M.O.
Olah, Ashley
Pidgeon, Anna Michle
Lencinas, María Vanessa
Peri, Pablo Luis
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Primary Forests
Ecosystem Services
Phenology
Biodiversity
Bosques Primarios
Nothofagus
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Fenología
Biodiversidad
Nothofagus antarctica
Ñire
Región Patagónica
topic Primary Forests
Ecosystem Services
Phenology
Biodiversity
Bosques Primarios
Nothofagus
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Fenología
Biodiversidad
Nothofagus antarctica
Ñire
Región Patagónica
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Traditional approaches of forest classifications were based on tree species composition, but recently combine phenology and climate to characterise functional (cyclic and seasonal greenness) rather than structural or compositional components (phenoclusters). The objective was to compare the conservation value (capacity to support more native biodiversity) and provision of ecosystem services (ES) in different phenocluster categories of Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). We used available models (ES, potential biodiversity) and ground-truth data of 145 stands, comparing phenocluster values using uni- and multivariate analyses. Conservation value and capacity to supply ES significantly varied among phenocluster categories: (i) cultural, regulating, and provisioning ES and potential biodiversity at landscape level, (ii) soil carbon and nitrogen, (iii) dominant height, crown cover, basal area, total volume, and domestic animal stock, and (iv) understory plant richness and cover at stand level. These differences are linked to the forest capacity to support more native biodiversity and ES. Besides, multivariate analyses supporting the split of this forest type into four phenocluster subtypes (coast, highland, ecotone with other types, and degraded or secondary forests). Our findings suggest the needs of specific management and conservation proposals, based on phenoclusters rather than forest types defined by tree canopy-cover composition.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Rodríguez‑Souilla, Julián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Rosas, Yamina Micaela. University of Copenhagen. Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management; Dinamarca.
Fil: Politi, Natalia. Universidad Nacional de Jujuy. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Politi, Natalia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas (INECOA); Argentina.
Fil: Rivera, Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas (INECOA); Argentina.
Fil: Silveira, Eduarda M.O. University of Wisconsin. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology. SILVIS Lab.; Estados Unidos
Fil: Olah, Ashley. University of Wisconsin. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology. SILVIS Lab; Estados Unidos
Fil: Pidgeon, Anna Michle. University of Wisconsin. Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology. SILVIS Lab; Estados Unidos
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CADIC); Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
description Traditional approaches of forest classifications were based on tree species composition, but recently combine phenology and climate to characterise functional (cyclic and seasonal greenness) rather than structural or compositional components (phenoclusters). The objective was to compare the conservation value (capacity to support more native biodiversity) and provision of ecosystem services (ES) in different phenocluster categories of Nothofagus antarctica forests in Tierra del Fuego (Argentina). We used available models (ES, potential biodiversity) and ground-truth data of 145 stands, comparing phenocluster values using uni- and multivariate analyses. Conservation value and capacity to supply ES significantly varied among phenocluster categories: (i) cultural, regulating, and provisioning ES and potential biodiversity at landscape level, (ii) soil carbon and nitrogen, (iii) dominant height, crown cover, basal area, total volume, and domestic animal stock, and (iv) understory plant richness and cover at stand level. These differences are linked to the forest capacity to support more native biodiversity and ES. Besides, multivariate analyses supporting the split of this forest type into four phenocluster subtypes (coast, highland, ecotone with other types, and degraded or secondary forests). Our findings suggest the needs of specific management and conservation proposals, based on phenoclusters rather than forest types defined by tree canopy-cover composition.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-02-25T10:03:36Z
2025-02-25T10:03:36Z
2025-01-20
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21429
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44353-024-00020-0
Martínez Pastur G.; Rodríguez-Souilla J.; Rosas Y.M.; Politi N.; Rivera L.; Silveira E.M.O.; Olah A.M.; Pidgeon A.M.; Lencinas M.V.; Peri P.L. (2025) Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories. Discover Conservation 2: 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-024-00020-0
3004-9784
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-024-00020-0
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21429
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44353-024-00020-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-024-00020-0
identifier_str_mv Martínez Pastur G.; Rodríguez-Souilla J.; Rosas Y.M.; Politi N.; Rivera L.; Silveira E.M.O.; Olah A.M.; Pidgeon A.M.; Lencinas M.V.; Peri P.L. (2025) Conservation value and ecosystem service provision of Nothofagus antarctica forests based on phenocluster categories. Discover Conservation 2: 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-024-00020-0
3004-9784
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Discover Conservation 2 : article number 2. (January 2025)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842975540074512384
score 12.993085

Publicaciones similares