Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia.

Autores
Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro; Fernández, Victoria; Mattenet, Francisco Javier; Peri, Pablo Luis
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
documento de conferencia
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Nutrient resorption understood as the “movement” of nutrients from leaves prior to abscission towards other tissues or internal stores has been suggested to be a key component of nutrient conservation in deciduous forest species (Ares and Gleason 2007). This strategy allows plants to use these nutrients for new growth or store, hence decreasing their dependence on soil nutrient availability. Native forests in southern Argentine Patagonia cover approximately 1.2 million ha, corresponding more than 95% of these forests to the southern beeches Nothofagus pumilio (lenga) and Nothofagus antarctica (ñire) (Peri et al. 2016). In general, both deciduous species occupy places with different environmental conditions. N. pumilio forest are mostly found as pure stands in well drained soils, while N. antarctica, a more plastic and rustic species, is displaced to more unfavourable site conditions including rocky or poorly drained soils, and more xeric zones in the limit with the Patagonian steppe. Nevertheless, there are small transitional areas where both species can coͲexist using the same sources of resources. The objective of this study was to compare nutrient resorption of both species growing together in two contrasting situations of environmental conditions and forest productivity.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.
Fil: Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
Fil: Fernández, Victoria. Technological University of Madrid. School of Forest Engineering. Forest Genetics and Ecophysiology Research; España
Fil: Mattenet, Francisco Javier. Consejo Agrario Provincial de Santa Cruz. Dirección Provincial de Bosques; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fuente
Proceedings XVIII International Plant Nutrition Colloquium - IPNC 2017, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-24 August 2017. p. 875-876.
Materia
Nutrients
Broadleaved Forests
Soil
Primary Forest
Environmental Factors
Nutrientes
Nothofagus
Bosques Latifoliados
Suelo
Bosque Primario
Santa Cruz (Argentina)
Factores Ambientales
Bosque Nativo
Región Patagónica
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/9680
Acceder
id INTADig_8655016c297c74edd04b6b8c51507c9f
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/9680
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia.Bahamonde, Héctor AlejandroFernández, VictoriaMattenet, Francisco JavierPeri, Pablo LuisNutrientsBroadleaved ForestsSoilPrimary ForestEnvironmental FactorsNutrientesNothofagusBosques LatifoliadosSueloBosque PrimarioSanta Cruz (Argentina)Factores AmbientalesBosque NativoRegión PatagónicaNutrient resorption understood as the “movement” of nutrients from leaves prior to abscission towards other tissues or internal stores has been suggested to be a key component of nutrient conservation in deciduous forest species (Ares and Gleason 2007). This strategy allows plants to use these nutrients for new growth or store, hence decreasing their dependence on soil nutrient availability. Native forests in southern Argentine Patagonia cover approximately 1.2 million ha, corresponding more than 95% of these forests to the southern beeches Nothofagus pumilio (lenga) and Nothofagus antarctica (ñire) (Peri et al. 2016). In general, both deciduous species occupy places with different environmental conditions. N. pumilio forest are mostly found as pure stands in well drained soils, while N. antarctica, a more plastic and rustic species, is displaced to more unfavourable site conditions including rocky or poorly drained soils, and more xeric zones in the limit with the Patagonian steppe. Nevertheless, there are small transitional areas where both species can coͲexist using the same sources of resources. The objective of this study was to compare nutrient resorption of both species growing together in two contrasting situations of environmental conditions and forest productivity.EEA Santa CruzFil: Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.Fil: Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.Fil: Fernández, Victoria. Technological University of Madrid. School of Forest Engineering. Forest Genetics and Ecophysiology Research; EspañaFil: Mattenet, Francisco Javier. Consejo Agrario Provincial de Santa Cruz. Dirección Provincial de Bosques; Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.University of Copenhagen2021-06-29T11:21:04Z2021-06-29T11:21:04Z2017-08-21info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferenciaapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9680http://www.ipnc2017.org/the-proceedings-bookBAHAMONDE H.; FERNANDEZ V.; MATTENET F.; PERI P.L. (2017) Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia. Proceedings XVIII International Plant Nutrition Colloquium - IPNC 2017, pp. 875-876. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-24 August 2017.978-87-996274-0-0Proceedings XVIII International Plant Nutrition Colloquium - IPNC 2017, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-24 August 2017. p. 875-876.reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:45:15Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/9680instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:15.999INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia.
title Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia.
spellingShingle Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia.
Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro
Nutrients
Broadleaved Forests
Soil
Primary Forest
Environmental Factors
Nutrientes
Nothofagus
Bosques Latifoliados
Suelo
Bosque Primario
Santa Cruz (Argentina)
Factores Ambientales
Bosque Nativo
Región Patagónica
title_short Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia.
title_full Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia.
title_fullStr Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia.
title_full_unstemmed Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia.
title_sort Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro
Fernández, Victoria
Mattenet, Francisco Javier
Peri, Pablo Luis
author Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro
author_facet Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro
Fernández, Victoria
Mattenet, Francisco Javier
Peri, Pablo Luis
author_role author
author2 Fernández, Victoria
Mattenet, Francisco Javier
Peri, Pablo Luis
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Nutrients
Broadleaved Forests
Soil
Primary Forest
Environmental Factors
Nutrientes
Nothofagus
Bosques Latifoliados
Suelo
Bosque Primario
Santa Cruz (Argentina)
Factores Ambientales
Bosque Nativo
Región Patagónica
topic Nutrients
Broadleaved Forests
Soil
Primary Forest
Environmental Factors
Nutrientes
Nothofagus
Bosques Latifoliados
Suelo
Bosque Primario
Santa Cruz (Argentina)
Factores Ambientales
Bosque Nativo
Región Patagónica
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Nutrient resorption understood as the “movement” of nutrients from leaves prior to abscission towards other tissues or internal stores has been suggested to be a key component of nutrient conservation in deciduous forest species (Ares and Gleason 2007). This strategy allows plants to use these nutrients for new growth or store, hence decreasing their dependence on soil nutrient availability. Native forests in southern Argentine Patagonia cover approximately 1.2 million ha, corresponding more than 95% of these forests to the southern beeches Nothofagus pumilio (lenga) and Nothofagus antarctica (ñire) (Peri et al. 2016). In general, both deciduous species occupy places with different environmental conditions. N. pumilio forest are mostly found as pure stands in well drained soils, while N. antarctica, a more plastic and rustic species, is displaced to more unfavourable site conditions including rocky or poorly drained soils, and more xeric zones in the limit with the Patagonian steppe. Nevertheless, there are small transitional areas where both species can coͲexist using the same sources of resources. The objective of this study was to compare nutrient resorption of both species growing together in two contrasting situations of environmental conditions and forest productivity.
EEA Santa Cruz
Fil: Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.
Fil: Bahamonde, Héctor Alejandro. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
Fil: Fernández, Victoria. Technological University of Madrid. School of Forest Engineering. Forest Genetics and Ecophysiology Research; España
Fil: Mattenet, Francisco Javier. Consejo Agrario Provincial de Santa Cruz. Dirección Provincial de Bosques; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina.
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
description Nutrient resorption understood as the “movement” of nutrients from leaves prior to abscission towards other tissues or internal stores has been suggested to be a key component of nutrient conservation in deciduous forest species (Ares and Gleason 2007). This strategy allows plants to use these nutrients for new growth or store, hence decreasing their dependence on soil nutrient availability. Native forests in southern Argentine Patagonia cover approximately 1.2 million ha, corresponding more than 95% of these forests to the southern beeches Nothofagus pumilio (lenga) and Nothofagus antarctica (ñire) (Peri et al. 2016). In general, both deciduous species occupy places with different environmental conditions. N. pumilio forest are mostly found as pure stands in well drained soils, while N. antarctica, a more plastic and rustic species, is displaced to more unfavourable site conditions including rocky or poorly drained soils, and more xeric zones in the limit with the Patagonian steppe. Nevertheless, there are small transitional areas where both species can coͲexist using the same sources of resources. The objective of this study was to compare nutrient resorption of both species growing together in two contrasting situations of environmental conditions and forest productivity.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-08-21
2021-06-29T11:21:04Z
2021-06-29T11:21:04Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
info:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeConferencia
format conferenceObject
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9680
http://www.ipnc2017.org/the-proceedings-book
BAHAMONDE H.; FERNANDEZ V.; MATTENET F.; PERI P.L. (2017) Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia. Proceedings XVIII International Plant Nutrition Colloquium - IPNC 2017, pp. 875-876. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-24 August 2017.
978-87-996274-0-0
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/9680
http://www.ipnc2017.org/the-proceedings-book
identifier_str_mv BAHAMONDE H.; FERNANDEZ V.; MATTENET F.; PERI P.L. (2017) Nutrient resorption in two co existing Nothofagus species in southern Patagonia. Proceedings XVIII International Plant Nutrition Colloquium - IPNC 2017, pp. 875-876. University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-24 August 2017.
978-87-996274-0-0
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Copenhagen
publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Copenhagen
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Proceedings XVIII International Plant Nutrition Colloquium - IPNC 2017, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-24 August 2017. p. 875-876.
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619155009961984
score 12.559606

Publicaciones similares