Crop intensification with sustainable practices did not increase N2O emissions

Autores
Casanave Ponti, Sheila Mailén; Videla, Cecilia; Monterubbianesi, María Gloria; Andrade, Fernando Hector; Rizzalli, Roberto Héctor
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is the most important greenhouse gas produced by agricultural soils and is a byproduct of microbial nitrification and denitrification processes. The N2O emission rates depend on soil, climatic and management factors. The objectives of this study were i) to evaluate N2O emissions during a barley crop period and its subsequent barley-maize interperiod, under two management systems, and ii) to relate the N2O flux rates with soil mineral N content, waterfilled pore space (WFPS) and soil temperature. These periods are part of threeyear crop sequence (barley - maize - soybean) of a long-term experiment under two management systems, ecological intensification (EI) and farmer current practices (FP). For the analyzed period, the EI system included a cover crop after barley and higher N rates, with split application, compared to FP. N2O emissions were monitored weekly using a static chambers method. Simultaneously, the mineral N content (NO3–N and NH4+- N), WFPS and soil temperature at 10 cm depth were determined. The flux of N2O-N ranged from 6 to 61 μg of N2O-N m2 h-1 during the barley crop and between 1.5 and 47 μg of N2O-N m2 h-1 during the barley-maize interperiod, without significant differences between management systems. N2O emissions were controlled by soil temperature and %WFPS according to a multiple regression analysis. NH4+-N and NO3–N soil content did not enter into any model as a regulator of N2O flux. During the barley period there was a significant effect of the WFPS×soil temperature interaction since N2O emissions increased with soil temperature only at WFPS > 40 %. During the barley-maize interperiod, there were significant positive effects of WFPS and temperature on N2O emissions with no significant WFPS x temperature interaction. The cumulative emissions of N2O-N were not different between management systems during the barley crop (IE=646 and FP=757 g N2O-N ha-1) or during barley-maize interperiod (IE=816 and FP=754 g N2O-N ha-1). Throughout the study period, the combination of management practices in EI increased barley yield and did not increase N2O emissions with respect to FP, despite higher N rates and the inclusion of cover crop in EI. The intensification of crops does not necessarily increase N2O emissions from agricultural soils as long as the crops are conducted with appropriate management practices.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Casanave Ponti, Sheila Mailén. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Videla, Cecilia C. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Monterubbianesi, María Gloria. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Andrade, Fernando Héctor. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Rizzalli, Roberto Héctor. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fuente
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 292 : 106828 (2020)
Materia
Emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Óxido Nitroso
Cebada
Plantas de Cobertura
Factores Ambientales
Suelos Agrícolas
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Nitrous Oxide
Barley
Cover Plants
Evironmental Factors
Agricultural Soils
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/7788

id INTADig_7870b7e192a9617a79f47c043ff2a30c
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/7788
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Crop intensification with sustainable practices did not increase N2O emissionsCasanave Ponti, Sheila MailénVidela, CeciliaMonterubbianesi, María GloriaAndrade, Fernando HectorRizzalli, Roberto HéctorEmisiones de Gases de Efecto InvernaderoÓxido NitrosoCebadaPlantas de CoberturaFactores AmbientalesSuelos AgrícolasGreenhouse Gas EmissionsNitrous OxideBarleyCover PlantsEvironmental FactorsAgricultural SoilsNitrous oxide (N2O) is the most important greenhouse gas produced by agricultural soils and is a byproduct of microbial nitrification and denitrification processes. The N2O emission rates depend on soil, climatic and management factors. The objectives of this study were i) to evaluate N2O emissions during a barley crop period and its subsequent barley-maize interperiod, under two management systems, and ii) to relate the N2O flux rates with soil mineral N content, waterfilled pore space (WFPS) and soil temperature. These periods are part of threeyear crop sequence (barley - maize - soybean) of a long-term experiment under two management systems, ecological intensification (EI) and farmer current practices (FP). For the analyzed period, the EI system included a cover crop after barley and higher N rates, with split application, compared to FP. N2O emissions were monitored weekly using a static chambers method. Simultaneously, the mineral N content (NO3–N and NH4+- N), WFPS and soil temperature at 10 cm depth were determined. The flux of N2O-N ranged from 6 to 61 μg of N2O-N m2 h-1 during the barley crop and between 1.5 and 47 μg of N2O-N m2 h-1 during the barley-maize interperiod, without significant differences between management systems. N2O emissions were controlled by soil temperature and %WFPS according to a multiple regression analysis. NH4+-N and NO3–N soil content did not enter into any model as a regulator of N2O flux. During the barley period there was a significant effect of the WFPS×soil temperature interaction since N2O emissions increased with soil temperature only at WFPS > 40 %. During the barley-maize interperiod, there were significant positive effects of WFPS and temperature on N2O emissions with no significant WFPS x temperature interaction. The cumulative emissions of N2O-N were not different between management systems during the barley crop (IE=646 and FP=757 g N2O-N ha-1) or during barley-maize interperiod (IE=816 and FP=754 g N2O-N ha-1). Throughout the study period, the combination of management practices in EI increased barley yield and did not increase N2O emissions with respect to FP, despite higher N rates and the inclusion of cover crop in EI. The intensification of crops does not necessarily increase N2O emissions from agricultural soils as long as the crops are conducted with appropriate management practices.EEA BalcarceFil: Casanave Ponti, Sheila Mailén. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Videla, Cecilia C. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Monterubbianesi, María Gloria. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Andrade, Fernando Héctor. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Rizzalli, Roberto Héctor. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Elsevier2020-08-28T18:39:14Z2020-08-28T18:39:14Z2020-04-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7788https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016788092030013X0167-8809https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106828Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 292 : 106828 (2020)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-16T09:29:52Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/7788instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:29:53.147INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Crop intensification with sustainable practices did not increase N2O emissions
title Crop intensification with sustainable practices did not increase N2O emissions
spellingShingle Crop intensification with sustainable practices did not increase N2O emissions
Casanave Ponti, Sheila Mailén
Emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Óxido Nitroso
Cebada
Plantas de Cobertura
Factores Ambientales
Suelos Agrícolas
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Nitrous Oxide
Barley
Cover Plants
Evironmental Factors
Agricultural Soils
title_short Crop intensification with sustainable practices did not increase N2O emissions
title_full Crop intensification with sustainable practices did not increase N2O emissions
title_fullStr Crop intensification with sustainable practices did not increase N2O emissions
title_full_unstemmed Crop intensification with sustainable practices did not increase N2O emissions
title_sort Crop intensification with sustainable practices did not increase N2O emissions
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Casanave Ponti, Sheila Mailén
Videla, Cecilia
Monterubbianesi, María Gloria
Andrade, Fernando Hector
Rizzalli, Roberto Héctor
author Casanave Ponti, Sheila Mailén
author_facet Casanave Ponti, Sheila Mailén
Videla, Cecilia
Monterubbianesi, María Gloria
Andrade, Fernando Hector
Rizzalli, Roberto Héctor
author_role author
author2 Videla, Cecilia
Monterubbianesi, María Gloria
Andrade, Fernando Hector
Rizzalli, Roberto Héctor
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Óxido Nitroso
Cebada
Plantas de Cobertura
Factores Ambientales
Suelos Agrícolas
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Nitrous Oxide
Barley
Cover Plants
Evironmental Factors
Agricultural Soils
topic Emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Óxido Nitroso
Cebada
Plantas de Cobertura
Factores Ambientales
Suelos Agrícolas
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Nitrous Oxide
Barley
Cover Plants
Evironmental Factors
Agricultural Soils
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Nitrous oxide (N2O) is the most important greenhouse gas produced by agricultural soils and is a byproduct of microbial nitrification and denitrification processes. The N2O emission rates depend on soil, climatic and management factors. The objectives of this study were i) to evaluate N2O emissions during a barley crop period and its subsequent barley-maize interperiod, under two management systems, and ii) to relate the N2O flux rates with soil mineral N content, waterfilled pore space (WFPS) and soil temperature. These periods are part of threeyear crop sequence (barley - maize - soybean) of a long-term experiment under two management systems, ecological intensification (EI) and farmer current practices (FP). For the analyzed period, the EI system included a cover crop after barley and higher N rates, with split application, compared to FP. N2O emissions were monitored weekly using a static chambers method. Simultaneously, the mineral N content (NO3–N and NH4+- N), WFPS and soil temperature at 10 cm depth were determined. The flux of N2O-N ranged from 6 to 61 μg of N2O-N m2 h-1 during the barley crop and between 1.5 and 47 μg of N2O-N m2 h-1 during the barley-maize interperiod, without significant differences between management systems. N2O emissions were controlled by soil temperature and %WFPS according to a multiple regression analysis. NH4+-N and NO3–N soil content did not enter into any model as a regulator of N2O flux. During the barley period there was a significant effect of the WFPS×soil temperature interaction since N2O emissions increased with soil temperature only at WFPS > 40 %. During the barley-maize interperiod, there were significant positive effects of WFPS and temperature on N2O emissions with no significant WFPS x temperature interaction. The cumulative emissions of N2O-N were not different between management systems during the barley crop (IE=646 and FP=757 g N2O-N ha-1) or during barley-maize interperiod (IE=816 and FP=754 g N2O-N ha-1). Throughout the study period, the combination of management practices in EI increased barley yield and did not increase N2O emissions with respect to FP, despite higher N rates and the inclusion of cover crop in EI. The intensification of crops does not necessarily increase N2O emissions from agricultural soils as long as the crops are conducted with appropriate management practices.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Casanave Ponti, Sheila Mailén. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Videla, Cecilia C. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Monterubbianesi, María Gloria. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Andrade, Fernando Héctor. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: Rizzalli, Roberto Héctor. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
description Nitrous oxide (N2O) is the most important greenhouse gas produced by agricultural soils and is a byproduct of microbial nitrification and denitrification processes. The N2O emission rates depend on soil, climatic and management factors. The objectives of this study were i) to evaluate N2O emissions during a barley crop period and its subsequent barley-maize interperiod, under two management systems, and ii) to relate the N2O flux rates with soil mineral N content, waterfilled pore space (WFPS) and soil temperature. These periods are part of threeyear crop sequence (barley - maize - soybean) of a long-term experiment under two management systems, ecological intensification (EI) and farmer current practices (FP). For the analyzed period, the EI system included a cover crop after barley and higher N rates, with split application, compared to FP. N2O emissions were monitored weekly using a static chambers method. Simultaneously, the mineral N content (NO3–N and NH4+- N), WFPS and soil temperature at 10 cm depth were determined. The flux of N2O-N ranged from 6 to 61 μg of N2O-N m2 h-1 during the barley crop and between 1.5 and 47 μg of N2O-N m2 h-1 during the barley-maize interperiod, without significant differences between management systems. N2O emissions were controlled by soil temperature and %WFPS according to a multiple regression analysis. NH4+-N and NO3–N soil content did not enter into any model as a regulator of N2O flux. During the barley period there was a significant effect of the WFPS×soil temperature interaction since N2O emissions increased with soil temperature only at WFPS > 40 %. During the barley-maize interperiod, there were significant positive effects of WFPS and temperature on N2O emissions with no significant WFPS x temperature interaction. The cumulative emissions of N2O-N were not different between management systems during the barley crop (IE=646 and FP=757 g N2O-N ha-1) or during barley-maize interperiod (IE=816 and FP=754 g N2O-N ha-1). Throughout the study period, the combination of management practices in EI increased barley yield and did not increase N2O emissions with respect to FP, despite higher N rates and the inclusion of cover crop in EI. The intensification of crops does not necessarily increase N2O emissions from agricultural soils as long as the crops are conducted with appropriate management practices.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-08-28T18:39:14Z
2020-08-28T18:39:14Z
2020-04-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7788
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016788092030013X
0167-8809
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106828
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7788
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016788092030013X
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106828
identifier_str_mv 0167-8809
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 292 : 106828 (2020)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846143527623327744
score 12.712165