Population genetics structure of glyphosate‐resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of the resistance
- Autores
- Fernandez, Luis German; De Haro, Luis Alejandro; Distefano, Ana Julia; Martinez, Maria Carolina; Lia, Veronica Viviana; Papa, Juan Carlos; Olea, Ignacio; Tosto, Daniela Sandra; Hopp, Horacio Esteban
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Single sequence repeats (SSR) developed for Sorghum bicolor were used to characterize the genetic distance of 46 different Sorghum halepense (Johnsongrass) accessions from Argentina some of which have evolved toward glyphosate resistance. Since Johnsongrass is an allotetraploid and only one subgenome is homologous to cultivated sorghum, some SSR loci amplified up to two alleles while others (presumably more conserved loci) amplified up to four alleles. Twelve SSR providing information of 24 loci representative of Johnsongrass genome were selected for genetic distance characterization. All of them were highly polymorphic, which was evidenced by the number of different alleles found in the samples studied, in some of them up to 20. UPGMA and Mantel analysis showed that Johnsongrass glyphosate‐resistant accessions that belong to different geographic regions do not share similar genetic backgrounds. In contrast, they show closer similarity to their neighboring susceptible counterparts. Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components using the clusters identified by K‐means support the lack of a clear pattern of association among samples and resistance status or province of origin. Consequently, these results do not support a single genetic origin of glyphosate resistance. Nucleotide sequencing of the 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS) encoding gene from glyphosate‐resistant and susceptible accessions collected from different geographic origins showed that none presented expected mutations in aminoacid positions 101 and 106 which are diagnostic of target‐site resistance mechanism.
Instituto de Biotecnología
Fil: Fernandez, Luis German. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina
Fil: De Haro, Luis Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina
Fil: Distefano, Ana Julia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Martinez, Maria Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Lia, Veronica Viviana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Papa, Juan Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; Argentina
Fil: Olea, Ignacio. Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres. Sección Malezas; Argentina
Fil: Tosto, Daniela Sandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina
Fil: Hopp, Horacio Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina - Fuente
- Ecology and Evolution 3 (10) : 3388-3400 (September 2013)
- Materia
-
Sorghum halepense
Genética
Resistencia a los Herbicidas
Glifosato
Malezas
Genetics
Resistance to Herbicides
Glyphosate
Weeds
Sorgo de Alepo
Johnsongrass - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/4266
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_7721ef6677af1c741d922d59d144649a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/4266 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Population genetics structure of glyphosate‐resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of the resistanceFernandez, Luis GermanDe Haro, Luis AlejandroDistefano, Ana JuliaMartinez, Maria CarolinaLia, Veronica VivianaPapa, Juan CarlosOlea, IgnacioTosto, Daniela SandraHopp, Horacio EstebanSorghum halepenseGenéticaResistencia a los HerbicidasGlifosatoMalezasGeneticsResistance to HerbicidesGlyphosateWeedsSorgo de AlepoJohnsongrassSingle sequence repeats (SSR) developed for Sorghum bicolor were used to characterize the genetic distance of 46 different Sorghum halepense (Johnsongrass) accessions from Argentina some of which have evolved toward glyphosate resistance. Since Johnsongrass is an allotetraploid and only one subgenome is homologous to cultivated sorghum, some SSR loci amplified up to two alleles while others (presumably more conserved loci) amplified up to four alleles. Twelve SSR providing information of 24 loci representative of Johnsongrass genome were selected for genetic distance characterization. All of them were highly polymorphic, which was evidenced by the number of different alleles found in the samples studied, in some of them up to 20. UPGMA and Mantel analysis showed that Johnsongrass glyphosate‐resistant accessions that belong to different geographic regions do not share similar genetic backgrounds. In contrast, they show closer similarity to their neighboring susceptible counterparts. Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components using the clusters identified by K‐means support the lack of a clear pattern of association among samples and resistance status or province of origin. Consequently, these results do not support a single genetic origin of glyphosate resistance. Nucleotide sequencing of the 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS) encoding gene from glyphosate‐resistant and susceptible accessions collected from different geographic origins showed that none presented expected mutations in aminoacid positions 101 and 106 which are diagnostic of target‐site resistance mechanism.Instituto de BiotecnologíaFil: Fernandez, Luis German. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; ArgentinaFil: De Haro, Luis Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; ArgentinaFil: Distefano, Ana Julia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Martinez, Maria Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Lia, Veronica Viviana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Papa, Juan Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; ArgentinaFil: Olea, Ignacio. Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres. Sección Malezas; ArgentinaFil: Tosto, Daniela Sandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaFil: Hopp, Horacio Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaWiley2019-01-15T13:24:37Z2019-01-15T13:24:37Z2013-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.671http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/42662045-7758https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.671Ecology and Evolution 3 (10) : 3388-3400 (September 2013)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-04T09:47:46Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/4266instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:47:46.753INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Population genetics structure of glyphosate‐resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of the resistance |
title |
Population genetics structure of glyphosate‐resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of the resistance |
spellingShingle |
Population genetics structure of glyphosate‐resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of the resistance Fernandez, Luis German Sorghum halepense Genética Resistencia a los Herbicidas Glifosato Malezas Genetics Resistance to Herbicides Glyphosate Weeds Sorgo de Alepo Johnsongrass |
title_short |
Population genetics structure of glyphosate‐resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of the resistance |
title_full |
Population genetics structure of glyphosate‐resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of the resistance |
title_fullStr |
Population genetics structure of glyphosate‐resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of the resistance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Population genetics structure of glyphosate‐resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of the resistance |
title_sort |
Population genetics structure of glyphosate‐resistant Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers) does not support a single origin of the resistance |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Fernandez, Luis German De Haro, Luis Alejandro Distefano, Ana Julia Martinez, Maria Carolina Lia, Veronica Viviana Papa, Juan Carlos Olea, Ignacio Tosto, Daniela Sandra Hopp, Horacio Esteban |
author |
Fernandez, Luis German |
author_facet |
Fernandez, Luis German De Haro, Luis Alejandro Distefano, Ana Julia Martinez, Maria Carolina Lia, Veronica Viviana Papa, Juan Carlos Olea, Ignacio Tosto, Daniela Sandra Hopp, Horacio Esteban |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
De Haro, Luis Alejandro Distefano, Ana Julia Martinez, Maria Carolina Lia, Veronica Viviana Papa, Juan Carlos Olea, Ignacio Tosto, Daniela Sandra Hopp, Horacio Esteban |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Sorghum halepense Genética Resistencia a los Herbicidas Glifosato Malezas Genetics Resistance to Herbicides Glyphosate Weeds Sorgo de Alepo Johnsongrass |
topic |
Sorghum halepense Genética Resistencia a los Herbicidas Glifosato Malezas Genetics Resistance to Herbicides Glyphosate Weeds Sorgo de Alepo Johnsongrass |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Single sequence repeats (SSR) developed for Sorghum bicolor were used to characterize the genetic distance of 46 different Sorghum halepense (Johnsongrass) accessions from Argentina some of which have evolved toward glyphosate resistance. Since Johnsongrass is an allotetraploid and only one subgenome is homologous to cultivated sorghum, some SSR loci amplified up to two alleles while others (presumably more conserved loci) amplified up to four alleles. Twelve SSR providing information of 24 loci representative of Johnsongrass genome were selected for genetic distance characterization. All of them were highly polymorphic, which was evidenced by the number of different alleles found in the samples studied, in some of them up to 20. UPGMA and Mantel analysis showed that Johnsongrass glyphosate‐resistant accessions that belong to different geographic regions do not share similar genetic backgrounds. In contrast, they show closer similarity to their neighboring susceptible counterparts. Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components using the clusters identified by K‐means support the lack of a clear pattern of association among samples and resistance status or province of origin. Consequently, these results do not support a single genetic origin of glyphosate resistance. Nucleotide sequencing of the 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS) encoding gene from glyphosate‐resistant and susceptible accessions collected from different geographic origins showed that none presented expected mutations in aminoacid positions 101 and 106 which are diagnostic of target‐site resistance mechanism. Instituto de Biotecnología Fil: Fernandez, Luis German. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina Fil: De Haro, Luis Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina Fil: Distefano, Ana Julia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina Fil: Martinez, Maria Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina Fil: Lia, Veronica Viviana. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina Fil: Papa, Juan Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; Argentina Fil: Olea, Ignacio. Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres. Sección Malezas; Argentina Fil: Tosto, Daniela Sandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina Fil: Hopp, Horacio Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Biotecnología; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina |
description |
Single sequence repeats (SSR) developed for Sorghum bicolor were used to characterize the genetic distance of 46 different Sorghum halepense (Johnsongrass) accessions from Argentina some of which have evolved toward glyphosate resistance. Since Johnsongrass is an allotetraploid and only one subgenome is homologous to cultivated sorghum, some SSR loci amplified up to two alleles while others (presumably more conserved loci) amplified up to four alleles. Twelve SSR providing information of 24 loci representative of Johnsongrass genome were selected for genetic distance characterization. All of them were highly polymorphic, which was evidenced by the number of different alleles found in the samples studied, in some of them up to 20. UPGMA and Mantel analysis showed that Johnsongrass glyphosate‐resistant accessions that belong to different geographic regions do not share similar genetic backgrounds. In contrast, they show closer similarity to their neighboring susceptible counterparts. Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components using the clusters identified by K‐means support the lack of a clear pattern of association among samples and resistance status or province of origin. Consequently, these results do not support a single genetic origin of glyphosate resistance. Nucleotide sequencing of the 5‐enolpyruvylshikimate‐3‐phosphate synthase (EPSPS) encoding gene from glyphosate‐resistant and susceptible accessions collected from different geographic origins showed that none presented expected mutations in aminoacid positions 101 and 106 which are diagnostic of target‐site resistance mechanism. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-09 2019-01-15T13:24:37Z 2019-01-15T13:24:37Z |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.671 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4266 2045-7758 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.671 |
url |
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ece3.671 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/4266 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.671 |
identifier_str_mv |
2045-7758 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecology and Evolution 3 (10) : 3388-3400 (September 2013) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1842341362574295040 |
score |
12.623145 |