Defining soybean maturity group options for contrasting weather scenarios in the American Southern Cone
- Autores
- Di Mauro, Guido; Parra, Gonzalo; Santos, Diego Jose; Enrico, Juan Martin; Zuil, Sebastian; Murgio, Marcos; Zbinden, Facundo; Costanzi, Jerónimo; Arias, Norma Monica; Carrio, Alejandro Javier; Vissani, Cristian Angel; Fuentes, Francisco Horacio; Salvagiotti, Fernando
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Soybean genotypes are grouped in maturity groups (MG) based on the response to photoperiod, and a genotype belonging to a particular MG is recommended according to latitude and planting date. From an agronomic viewpoint, an “optimum maturity group” (MGopt) can be defined as the one that maximizes soybean yield in a particular environment, and not necessarily corresponds with the recommended MG based on thermo-photoperiod response. Our objectives were to (i) delineate spatial pattern of MGopt across contrasting environmental conditions for full-season soybean using geostatistics, and (ii) test whether the weather scenario change the spatial distribution of the MGopt. We hypothesized that, for the same region, the MGopt in dry years (i.e. La Niña phase) is larger than in humid years (i.e. El Niño phase). We analyzed multi-environment trials of full-season soybean (1675 site-years) using recent soybean genotypes and management practices across the Southern Cone of America. The MGopt ranged between 3.8 and 7.8 across regions and ENSO phases. The geostatistics approach indicated a spatial MGopt auto-correlation. The map for each ENSO phase indicates zones with contrasting MGopt and independently of ENSO phase, MGopt increased as latitude decreased. Also, for a particular latitude range, MGopt also varied according to longitude, suggesting that its variation can be associated with rainfall pattern and soil types in the region. Our approach delineated the distribution of MGopt for the American Southern Cone and highlighted that the inclusion of ENSO phase is important for guiding farmers MG options at regional scale.
EEA Paraná
Fil: Di Mauro, Guido. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); Argentina
Fil: Parra, Gonzalo. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); Argentina
Fil: Santos, Diego Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina
Fil: Enrico, Juan Martin. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros. Grupo Manejo de Cultivos, Suelos y Agua. Argentina
Fil: Zuil, Sebastian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina
Fil: Murgio, Marcos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi; Argentina
Fil: Zbinden, Facundo. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); Argentina
Fil: Costanzi, Jerónimo. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); Argentina
Fil: Arias, Norma Monica. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina
Fil: Carrio, Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Vissani, Cristian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Fuentes, Francisco Horacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina
Fil: Salvagiotti, Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; Argentina
Fil: Salvagiotti, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Fuente
- Field Crops Research 287 : 108676 (October 2022)
- Materia
-
Soja
Tiempo Meteorológico
Madurez
Manejo del Cultivo
América del Sur
Soybeans
Weather
Maturity
Crop Management
South America - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/12851
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_6202a34c1becd6e7fb4c41b782a35b2d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/12851 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Defining soybean maturity group options for contrasting weather scenarios in the American Southern ConeDi Mauro, GuidoParra, GonzaloSantos, Diego JoseEnrico, Juan MartinZuil, SebastianMurgio, MarcosZbinden, FacundoCostanzi, JerónimoArias, Norma MonicaCarrio, Alejandro JavierVissani, Cristian AngelFuentes, Francisco HoracioSalvagiotti, FernandoSojaTiempo MeteorológicoMadurezManejo del CultivoAmérica del SurSoybeansWeatherMaturityCrop ManagementSouth AmericaSoybean genotypes are grouped in maturity groups (MG) based on the response to photoperiod, and a genotype belonging to a particular MG is recommended according to latitude and planting date. From an agronomic viewpoint, an “optimum maturity group” (MGopt) can be defined as the one that maximizes soybean yield in a particular environment, and not necessarily corresponds with the recommended MG based on thermo-photoperiod response. Our objectives were to (i) delineate spatial pattern of MGopt across contrasting environmental conditions for full-season soybean using geostatistics, and (ii) test whether the weather scenario change the spatial distribution of the MGopt. We hypothesized that, for the same region, the MGopt in dry years (i.e. La Niña phase) is larger than in humid years (i.e. El Niño phase). We analyzed multi-environment trials of full-season soybean (1675 site-years) using recent soybean genotypes and management practices across the Southern Cone of America. The MGopt ranged between 3.8 and 7.8 across regions and ENSO phases. The geostatistics approach indicated a spatial MGopt auto-correlation. The map for each ENSO phase indicates zones with contrasting MGopt and independently of ENSO phase, MGopt increased as latitude decreased. Also, for a particular latitude range, MGopt also varied according to longitude, suggesting that its variation can be associated with rainfall pattern and soil types in the region. Our approach delineated the distribution of MGopt for the American Southern Cone and highlighted that the inclusion of ENSO phase is important for guiding farmers MG options at regional scale.EEA ParanáFil: Di Mauro, Guido. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); ArgentinaFil: Parra, Gonzalo. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); ArgentinaFil: Santos, Diego Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; ArgentinaFil: Enrico, Juan Martin. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros. Grupo Manejo de Cultivos, Suelos y Agua. ArgentinaFil: Zuil, Sebastian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; ArgentinaFil: Murgio, Marcos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi; ArgentinaFil: Zbinden, Facundo. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); ArgentinaFil: Costanzi, Jerónimo. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); ArgentinaFil: Arias, Norma Monica. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; ArgentinaFil: Carrio, Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; ArgentinaFil: Vissani, Cristian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; ArgentinaFil: Fuentes, Francisco Horacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; ArgentinaFil: Salvagiotti, Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; ArgentinaFil: Salvagiotti, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaElsevier2022-09-12T12:22:14Z2022-09-12T12:22:14Z2022-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12851https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S03784290220024770378-4290https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108676Field Crops Research 287 : 108676 (October 2022)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-RIST-E6-I226-001/2019-RIST-E6-I226-001/AR./Red de evaluación de cultivaresSouth America .......... (continent) (World)1000002info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:45:42Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/12851instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:43.157INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Defining soybean maturity group options for contrasting weather scenarios in the American Southern Cone |
title |
Defining soybean maturity group options for contrasting weather scenarios in the American Southern Cone |
spellingShingle |
Defining soybean maturity group options for contrasting weather scenarios in the American Southern Cone Di Mauro, Guido Soja Tiempo Meteorológico Madurez Manejo del Cultivo América del Sur Soybeans Weather Maturity Crop Management South America |
title_short |
Defining soybean maturity group options for contrasting weather scenarios in the American Southern Cone |
title_full |
Defining soybean maturity group options for contrasting weather scenarios in the American Southern Cone |
title_fullStr |
Defining soybean maturity group options for contrasting weather scenarios in the American Southern Cone |
title_full_unstemmed |
Defining soybean maturity group options for contrasting weather scenarios in the American Southern Cone |
title_sort |
Defining soybean maturity group options for contrasting weather scenarios in the American Southern Cone |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Di Mauro, Guido Parra, Gonzalo Santos, Diego Jose Enrico, Juan Martin Zuil, Sebastian Murgio, Marcos Zbinden, Facundo Costanzi, Jerónimo Arias, Norma Monica Carrio, Alejandro Javier Vissani, Cristian Angel Fuentes, Francisco Horacio Salvagiotti, Fernando |
author |
Di Mauro, Guido |
author_facet |
Di Mauro, Guido Parra, Gonzalo Santos, Diego Jose Enrico, Juan Martin Zuil, Sebastian Murgio, Marcos Zbinden, Facundo Costanzi, Jerónimo Arias, Norma Monica Carrio, Alejandro Javier Vissani, Cristian Angel Fuentes, Francisco Horacio Salvagiotti, Fernando |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Parra, Gonzalo Santos, Diego Jose Enrico, Juan Martin Zuil, Sebastian Murgio, Marcos Zbinden, Facundo Costanzi, Jerónimo Arias, Norma Monica Carrio, Alejandro Javier Vissani, Cristian Angel Fuentes, Francisco Horacio Salvagiotti, Fernando |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Soja Tiempo Meteorológico Madurez Manejo del Cultivo América del Sur Soybeans Weather Maturity Crop Management South America |
topic |
Soja Tiempo Meteorológico Madurez Manejo del Cultivo América del Sur Soybeans Weather Maturity Crop Management South America |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Soybean genotypes are grouped in maturity groups (MG) based on the response to photoperiod, and a genotype belonging to a particular MG is recommended according to latitude and planting date. From an agronomic viewpoint, an “optimum maturity group” (MGopt) can be defined as the one that maximizes soybean yield in a particular environment, and not necessarily corresponds with the recommended MG based on thermo-photoperiod response. Our objectives were to (i) delineate spatial pattern of MGopt across contrasting environmental conditions for full-season soybean using geostatistics, and (ii) test whether the weather scenario change the spatial distribution of the MGopt. We hypothesized that, for the same region, the MGopt in dry years (i.e. La Niña phase) is larger than in humid years (i.e. El Niño phase). We analyzed multi-environment trials of full-season soybean (1675 site-years) using recent soybean genotypes and management practices across the Southern Cone of America. The MGopt ranged between 3.8 and 7.8 across regions and ENSO phases. The geostatistics approach indicated a spatial MGopt auto-correlation. The map for each ENSO phase indicates zones with contrasting MGopt and independently of ENSO phase, MGopt increased as latitude decreased. Also, for a particular latitude range, MGopt also varied according to longitude, suggesting that its variation can be associated with rainfall pattern and soil types in the region. Our approach delineated the distribution of MGopt for the American Southern Cone and highlighted that the inclusion of ENSO phase is important for guiding farmers MG options at regional scale. EEA Paraná Fil: Di Mauro, Guido. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); Argentina Fil: Parra, Gonzalo. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); Argentina Fil: Santos, Diego Jose. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina Fil: Enrico, Juan Martin. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros. Grupo Manejo de Cultivos, Suelos y Agua. Argentina Fil: Zuil, Sebastian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela; Argentina Fil: Murgio, Marcos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Manfredi; Argentina Fil: Zbinden, Facundo. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); Argentina Fil: Costanzi, Jerónimo. Grupo Don Mario (Buenos Aires); Argentina Fil: Arias, Norma Monica. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay; Argentina Fil: Carrio, Alejandro. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina Fil: Vissani, Cristian. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina Fil: Fuentes, Francisco Horacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina Fil: Salvagiotti, Fernando. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; Argentina Fil: Salvagiotti, Fernando. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
Soybean genotypes are grouped in maturity groups (MG) based on the response to photoperiod, and a genotype belonging to a particular MG is recommended according to latitude and planting date. From an agronomic viewpoint, an “optimum maturity group” (MGopt) can be defined as the one that maximizes soybean yield in a particular environment, and not necessarily corresponds with the recommended MG based on thermo-photoperiod response. Our objectives were to (i) delineate spatial pattern of MGopt across contrasting environmental conditions for full-season soybean using geostatistics, and (ii) test whether the weather scenario change the spatial distribution of the MGopt. We hypothesized that, for the same region, the MGopt in dry years (i.e. La Niña phase) is larger than in humid years (i.e. El Niño phase). We analyzed multi-environment trials of full-season soybean (1675 site-years) using recent soybean genotypes and management practices across the Southern Cone of America. The MGopt ranged between 3.8 and 7.8 across regions and ENSO phases. The geostatistics approach indicated a spatial MGopt auto-correlation. The map for each ENSO phase indicates zones with contrasting MGopt and independently of ENSO phase, MGopt increased as latitude decreased. Also, for a particular latitude range, MGopt also varied according to longitude, suggesting that its variation can be associated with rainfall pattern and soil types in the region. Our approach delineated the distribution of MGopt for the American Southern Cone and highlighted that the inclusion of ENSO phase is important for guiding farmers MG options at regional scale. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-12T12:22:14Z 2022-09-12T12:22:14Z 2022-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12851 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429022002477 0378-4290 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108676 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/12851 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378429022002477 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108676 |
identifier_str_mv |
0378-4290 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-RIST-E6-I226-001/2019-RIST-E6-I226-001/AR./Red de evaluación de cultivares |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
South America .......... (continent) (World) 1000002 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Field Crops Research 287 : 108676 (October 2022) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1844619169160495104 |
score |
12.559606 |