Response of soil microbial communities to agroecological versus conventional systems of extensive agriculture

Autores
Chavarria, Diego; Perez Brandan, Carolina; Serri, Dannae Lilia; Meriles, José M.; Restovich, Silvina Beatriz; Andriulo, Adrian Enrique; Jacquelin, Luis; Vargas Gil, Silvina
Año de publicación
2018
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
World population growth has led to a rise in resource demands imposed on agricultural systems, generating an increased global use of natural resources. However, agroecology proposes self-regulation in order to achieve a sustainable agricultural balance. Therefore, considering the rapid responses of microbial communities to small changes in soil use, the objective of this study was to assess the response of soil microbial communities to agroecological vs. conventional systems of extensive agriculture. Soil sampling was carried out in 2016 and 2017 with three different treatments using the sequence soybean/maize (Glycine max L./Zea mays L.) as the main crop: Agroecological (AE), conventional with cover crops (CC) and conventional without cover crops (control). Species used as cover crops were wheat (Triticum aestivum), vetch (Vicia sativa L.), oat (Avena sativa L.) and radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Agroecological treatment showed the lowest total nitrogen (0.18 mg N g−1) and organic carbon (1.99 mg C g−1) content of soil, and CC treatment showed the highest value of fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis, with values 63.2% and 12.1% higher than AE and the control, respectively. However, AE treatment also produced the highest F:B ratio (44.8) and the lowest metabolic quotient (1.14), which indicates an improvement in metabolic efficiency and soil quality. No significant differences were recorded in the abundance of fungal and bacterial communities between treatments. Our results suggest that agroecological management is characterised by fungal dominance in soil microbial communities and a higher microbial metabolic efficiency compared to conventional management. These results demonstrate more efficient use of carbon substrates in agroecological systems, which could counteract the negative effect of the lack of synthetic fertilisation and reduced-tillage in the long term. The findings demonstrate that sustainable agricultural tools with adequate management can be effectively used to preserve soil quality.
EEA Pergamino
Fil: Chavarria, Diego N. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Pérez Brandan, Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; Argentina.
Fil: Serri, Dannae Lilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina.
Fil: Meriles, José M. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV- CONICET); Argentina.
Fil: Restovich, Silvina Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Laboratorio Suelo; Argentina.
Fil: Andriulo, Adrian Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Laboratorio Suelo; Argentina.
Fil: Jacquelin, Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Laboratorio Suelo; Argentina.
Fil: Vargas Gil, Silvina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina.
Fuente
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 264 (1) : 1-8 (September 2018)
Materia
Agroecología
Recursos Naturales
Suelo
Agricultura Sostenible
Sistemas de Cultivo
Agroecology
Natural Resources
Soil
Sustainable Agriculture
Cropping Systems
Agricultura Extensiva
Cultivo de Cobertura
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso restringido
Condiciones de uso
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3437

id INTADig_5c7811ae3910cbf63cad286c64523557
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/3437
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Response of soil microbial communities to agroecological versus conventional systems of extensive agricultureChavarria, DiegoPerez Brandan, CarolinaSerri, Dannae LiliaMeriles, José M.Restovich, Silvina BeatrizAndriulo, Adrian EnriqueJacquelin, LuisVargas Gil, SilvinaAgroecologíaRecursos NaturalesSueloAgricultura SostenibleSistemas de CultivoAgroecologyNatural ResourcesSoilSustainable AgricultureCropping SystemsAgricultura ExtensivaCultivo de CoberturaWorld population growth has led to a rise in resource demands imposed on agricultural systems, generating an increased global use of natural resources. However, agroecology proposes self-regulation in order to achieve a sustainable agricultural balance. Therefore, considering the rapid responses of microbial communities to small changes in soil use, the objective of this study was to assess the response of soil microbial communities to agroecological vs. conventional systems of extensive agriculture. Soil sampling was carried out in 2016 and 2017 with three different treatments using the sequence soybean/maize (Glycine max L./Zea mays L.) as the main crop: Agroecological (AE), conventional with cover crops (CC) and conventional without cover crops (control). Species used as cover crops were wheat (Triticum aestivum), vetch (Vicia sativa L.), oat (Avena sativa L.) and radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Agroecological treatment showed the lowest total nitrogen (0.18 mg N g−1) and organic carbon (1.99 mg C g−1) content of soil, and CC treatment showed the highest value of fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis, with values 63.2% and 12.1% higher than AE and the control, respectively. However, AE treatment also produced the highest F:B ratio (44.8) and the lowest metabolic quotient (1.14), which indicates an improvement in metabolic efficiency and soil quality. No significant differences were recorded in the abundance of fungal and bacterial communities between treatments. Our results suggest that agroecological management is characterised by fungal dominance in soil microbial communities and a higher microbial metabolic efficiency compared to conventional management. These results demonstrate more efficient use of carbon substrates in agroecological systems, which could counteract the negative effect of the lack of synthetic fertilisation and reduced-tillage in the long term. The findings demonstrate that sustainable agricultural tools with adequate management can be effectively used to preserve soil quality.EEA PergaminoFil: Chavarria, Diego N. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Pérez Brandan, Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; Argentina.Fil: Serri, Dannae Lilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina.Fil: Meriles, José M. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV- CONICET); Argentina.Fil: Restovich, Silvina Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Laboratorio Suelo; Argentina.Fil: Andriulo, Adrian Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Laboratorio Suelo; Argentina.Fil: Jacquelin, Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Laboratorio Suelo; Argentina.Fil: Vargas Gil, Silvina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina.2018-09-21T11:05:27Z2018-09-21T11:05:27Z2018-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880918301981http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/34370167-8809https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.008Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 264 (1) : 1-8 (September 2018)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-23T11:16:40Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/3437instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-23 11:16:40.73INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Response of soil microbial communities to agroecological versus conventional systems of extensive agriculture
title Response of soil microbial communities to agroecological versus conventional systems of extensive agriculture
spellingShingle Response of soil microbial communities to agroecological versus conventional systems of extensive agriculture
Chavarria, Diego
Agroecología
Recursos Naturales
Suelo
Agricultura Sostenible
Sistemas de Cultivo
Agroecology
Natural Resources
Soil
Sustainable Agriculture
Cropping Systems
Agricultura Extensiva
Cultivo de Cobertura
title_short Response of soil microbial communities to agroecological versus conventional systems of extensive agriculture
title_full Response of soil microbial communities to agroecological versus conventional systems of extensive agriculture
title_fullStr Response of soil microbial communities to agroecological versus conventional systems of extensive agriculture
title_full_unstemmed Response of soil microbial communities to agroecological versus conventional systems of extensive agriculture
title_sort Response of soil microbial communities to agroecological versus conventional systems of extensive agriculture
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Chavarria, Diego
Perez Brandan, Carolina
Serri, Dannae Lilia
Meriles, José M.
Restovich, Silvina Beatriz
Andriulo, Adrian Enrique
Jacquelin, Luis
Vargas Gil, Silvina
author Chavarria, Diego
author_facet Chavarria, Diego
Perez Brandan, Carolina
Serri, Dannae Lilia
Meriles, José M.
Restovich, Silvina Beatriz
Andriulo, Adrian Enrique
Jacquelin, Luis
Vargas Gil, Silvina
author_role author
author2 Perez Brandan, Carolina
Serri, Dannae Lilia
Meriles, José M.
Restovich, Silvina Beatriz
Andriulo, Adrian Enrique
Jacquelin, Luis
Vargas Gil, Silvina
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Agroecología
Recursos Naturales
Suelo
Agricultura Sostenible
Sistemas de Cultivo
Agroecology
Natural Resources
Soil
Sustainable Agriculture
Cropping Systems
Agricultura Extensiva
Cultivo de Cobertura
topic Agroecología
Recursos Naturales
Suelo
Agricultura Sostenible
Sistemas de Cultivo
Agroecology
Natural Resources
Soil
Sustainable Agriculture
Cropping Systems
Agricultura Extensiva
Cultivo de Cobertura
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv World population growth has led to a rise in resource demands imposed on agricultural systems, generating an increased global use of natural resources. However, agroecology proposes self-regulation in order to achieve a sustainable agricultural balance. Therefore, considering the rapid responses of microbial communities to small changes in soil use, the objective of this study was to assess the response of soil microbial communities to agroecological vs. conventional systems of extensive agriculture. Soil sampling was carried out in 2016 and 2017 with three different treatments using the sequence soybean/maize (Glycine max L./Zea mays L.) as the main crop: Agroecological (AE), conventional with cover crops (CC) and conventional without cover crops (control). Species used as cover crops were wheat (Triticum aestivum), vetch (Vicia sativa L.), oat (Avena sativa L.) and radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Agroecological treatment showed the lowest total nitrogen (0.18 mg N g−1) and organic carbon (1.99 mg C g−1) content of soil, and CC treatment showed the highest value of fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis, with values 63.2% and 12.1% higher than AE and the control, respectively. However, AE treatment also produced the highest F:B ratio (44.8) and the lowest metabolic quotient (1.14), which indicates an improvement in metabolic efficiency and soil quality. No significant differences were recorded in the abundance of fungal and bacterial communities between treatments. Our results suggest that agroecological management is characterised by fungal dominance in soil microbial communities and a higher microbial metabolic efficiency compared to conventional management. These results demonstrate more efficient use of carbon substrates in agroecological systems, which could counteract the negative effect of the lack of synthetic fertilisation and reduced-tillage in the long term. The findings demonstrate that sustainable agricultural tools with adequate management can be effectively used to preserve soil quality.
EEA Pergamino
Fil: Chavarria, Diego N. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Pérez Brandan, Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Salta; Argentina.
Fil: Serri, Dannae Lilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina.
Fil: Meriles, José M. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV- CONICET); Argentina.
Fil: Restovich, Silvina Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Laboratorio Suelo; Argentina.
Fil: Andriulo, Adrian Enrique. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Laboratorio Suelo; Argentina.
Fil: Jacquelin, Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Laboratorio Suelo; Argentina.
Fil: Vargas Gil, Silvina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Patología Vegetal; Argentina.
description World population growth has led to a rise in resource demands imposed on agricultural systems, generating an increased global use of natural resources. However, agroecology proposes self-regulation in order to achieve a sustainable agricultural balance. Therefore, considering the rapid responses of microbial communities to small changes in soil use, the objective of this study was to assess the response of soil microbial communities to agroecological vs. conventional systems of extensive agriculture. Soil sampling was carried out in 2016 and 2017 with three different treatments using the sequence soybean/maize (Glycine max L./Zea mays L.) as the main crop: Agroecological (AE), conventional with cover crops (CC) and conventional without cover crops (control). Species used as cover crops were wheat (Triticum aestivum), vetch (Vicia sativa L.), oat (Avena sativa L.) and radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Agroecological treatment showed the lowest total nitrogen (0.18 mg N g−1) and organic carbon (1.99 mg C g−1) content of soil, and CC treatment showed the highest value of fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis, with values 63.2% and 12.1% higher than AE and the control, respectively. However, AE treatment also produced the highest F:B ratio (44.8) and the lowest metabolic quotient (1.14), which indicates an improvement in metabolic efficiency and soil quality. No significant differences were recorded in the abundance of fungal and bacterial communities between treatments. Our results suggest that agroecological management is characterised by fungal dominance in soil microbial communities and a higher microbial metabolic efficiency compared to conventional management. These results demonstrate more efficient use of carbon substrates in agroecological systems, which could counteract the negative effect of the lack of synthetic fertilisation and reduced-tillage in the long term. The findings demonstrate that sustainable agricultural tools with adequate management can be effectively used to preserve soil quality.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-21T11:05:27Z
2018-09-21T11:05:27Z
2018-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880918301981
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3437
0167-8809
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.008
url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880918301981
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/3437
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.05.008
identifier_str_mv 0167-8809
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv restrictedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 264 (1) : 1-8 (September 2018)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1846787512260886528
score 12.982451