Ecological effects and management of invasive alien Vespidae
- Autores
- Beggs, Jacqueline R.; Brockerhoff, Eckehard G.; Corley, Juan Carlos; Kenis, Marc; Masciocchi, Maite; Muller, Franck; Rome, Quentin; Villemant, Claire
- Año de publicación
- 2011
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Insect species associated with human goods continue to be accidentally introduced into new locations. A small proportion of these introduced species become invasive, causing a range of impacts in the receiving community. It is therefore important to evaluate the patterns of which species become invasive and which strategies are most successful in managing them. This review assesses the distribution, abundance, impact and management of the invasive Vespidae worldwide. We identified 34 vespid species known to be introduced around the world, but the seven most invasive species are all eusocial. Most introduced Vespidae only occur in one or two countries, but some areas have become geographic hotspots of invasion: Hawaii (15 species), North America (eight species), New Zealand (five species), Australia (four species) and South America (four species). Two invasive species, Vespula vulgaris and V. germanica have become particularly widespread and abundant with a range of impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem function. Other successful invasive species include several Polistes spp., which affect local biodiversity through direct predation or competition for food or space. Toxic baiting has been the most successful control strategy against invasive vespids to date, although this has mostly been small scale experimental management as it has proved difficult to develop commercial control products. Development of shelf-stable lures or baits combined with suitable toxins or pathogens could overcome some of the commercial impediments. Several attempts at biological control using parasitoids have not successfully reduced invasive wasp populations, although the biocontrol agent has only established in one case. The social structure of colonies and their high reproductive efficiency have facilitated invasion by these species, but it also means management at the population level will be difficult. This emphasises the need to prevent such invasions from occurring in the first place.
EEA Bariloche
Fil: Beggs, Jacqueline R. University of Auckland. School of Biological Sciences. Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Brockerhoff, Eckehard G. Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute); Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Corley, Juan Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Kenis, Marc. CABI Europe-Switzerland; Suiza
Fil: Masciocchi, Maite. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Muller, Franck. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Département Systématique et Evolution; Francia
Fil: Rome, Quentin. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Département Systématique et Evolution; Francia
Fil: Villemant, Claire. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Département Systématique et Evolution; Francia - Fuente
- BioControl 56 (4) : 505–526 (August 2011)
- Materia
-
Vespidae
Vespula germanica
Ecología
Plagas de Plantas
Control de Plagas
Especie Invasiva
Ecology
Pests of Plants
Pest Control
Invasive Species
Avispas - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5277
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
INTADig_496ddfee9095122473e33a9fb56ebeb9 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/5277 |
| network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
| repository_id_str |
l |
| network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| spelling |
Ecological effects and management of invasive alien VespidaeBeggs, Jacqueline R.Brockerhoff, Eckehard G.Corley, Juan CarlosKenis, MarcMasciocchi, MaiteMuller, FranckRome, QuentinVillemant, ClaireVespidaeVespula germanicaEcologíaPlagas de PlantasControl de PlagasEspecie InvasivaEcologyPests of PlantsPest ControlInvasive SpeciesAvispasInsect species associated with human goods continue to be accidentally introduced into new locations. A small proportion of these introduced species become invasive, causing a range of impacts in the receiving community. It is therefore important to evaluate the patterns of which species become invasive and which strategies are most successful in managing them. This review assesses the distribution, abundance, impact and management of the invasive Vespidae worldwide. We identified 34 vespid species known to be introduced around the world, but the seven most invasive species are all eusocial. Most introduced Vespidae only occur in one or two countries, but some areas have become geographic hotspots of invasion: Hawaii (15 species), North America (eight species), New Zealand (five species), Australia (four species) and South America (four species). Two invasive species, Vespula vulgaris and V. germanica have become particularly widespread and abundant with a range of impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem function. Other successful invasive species include several Polistes spp., which affect local biodiversity through direct predation or competition for food or space. Toxic baiting has been the most successful control strategy against invasive vespids to date, although this has mostly been small scale experimental management as it has proved difficult to develop commercial control products. Development of shelf-stable lures or baits combined with suitable toxins or pathogens could overcome some of the commercial impediments. Several attempts at biological control using parasitoids have not successfully reduced invasive wasp populations, although the biocontrol agent has only established in one case. The social structure of colonies and their high reproductive efficiency have facilitated invasion by these species, but it also means management at the population level will be difficult. This emphasises the need to prevent such invasions from occurring in the first place.EEA BarilocheFil: Beggs, Jacqueline R. University of Auckland. School of Biological Sciences. Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity; Nueva ZelandaFil: Brockerhoff, Eckehard G. Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute); Nueva ZelandaFil: Corley, Juan Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Kenis, Marc. CABI Europe-Switzerland; SuizaFil: Masciocchi, Maite. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Muller, Franck. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Département Systématique et Evolution; FranciaFil: Rome, Quentin. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Département Systématique et Evolution; FranciaFil: Villemant, Claire. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Département Systématique et Evolution; FranciaSpringer2019-06-07T15:00:26Z2019-06-07T15:00:26Z2011-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10526-011-9389-zhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/52771386-61411573-8248https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-011-9389-zBioControl 56 (4) : 505–526 (August 2011)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-23T11:16:58Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/5277instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-23 11:16:58.935INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ecological effects and management of invasive alien Vespidae |
| title |
Ecological effects and management of invasive alien Vespidae |
| spellingShingle |
Ecological effects and management of invasive alien Vespidae Beggs, Jacqueline R. Vespidae Vespula germanica Ecología Plagas de Plantas Control de Plagas Especie Invasiva Ecology Pests of Plants Pest Control Invasive Species Avispas |
| title_short |
Ecological effects and management of invasive alien Vespidae |
| title_full |
Ecological effects and management of invasive alien Vespidae |
| title_fullStr |
Ecological effects and management of invasive alien Vespidae |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Ecological effects and management of invasive alien Vespidae |
| title_sort |
Ecological effects and management of invasive alien Vespidae |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Beggs, Jacqueline R. Brockerhoff, Eckehard G. Corley, Juan Carlos Kenis, Marc Masciocchi, Maite Muller, Franck Rome, Quentin Villemant, Claire |
| author |
Beggs, Jacqueline R. |
| author_facet |
Beggs, Jacqueline R. Brockerhoff, Eckehard G. Corley, Juan Carlos Kenis, Marc Masciocchi, Maite Muller, Franck Rome, Quentin Villemant, Claire |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Brockerhoff, Eckehard G. Corley, Juan Carlos Kenis, Marc Masciocchi, Maite Muller, Franck Rome, Quentin Villemant, Claire |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Vespidae Vespula germanica Ecología Plagas de Plantas Control de Plagas Especie Invasiva Ecology Pests of Plants Pest Control Invasive Species Avispas |
| topic |
Vespidae Vespula germanica Ecología Plagas de Plantas Control de Plagas Especie Invasiva Ecology Pests of Plants Pest Control Invasive Species Avispas |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Insect species associated with human goods continue to be accidentally introduced into new locations. A small proportion of these introduced species become invasive, causing a range of impacts in the receiving community. It is therefore important to evaluate the patterns of which species become invasive and which strategies are most successful in managing them. This review assesses the distribution, abundance, impact and management of the invasive Vespidae worldwide. We identified 34 vespid species known to be introduced around the world, but the seven most invasive species are all eusocial. Most introduced Vespidae only occur in one or two countries, but some areas have become geographic hotspots of invasion: Hawaii (15 species), North America (eight species), New Zealand (five species), Australia (four species) and South America (four species). Two invasive species, Vespula vulgaris and V. germanica have become particularly widespread and abundant with a range of impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem function. Other successful invasive species include several Polistes spp., which affect local biodiversity through direct predation or competition for food or space. Toxic baiting has been the most successful control strategy against invasive vespids to date, although this has mostly been small scale experimental management as it has proved difficult to develop commercial control products. Development of shelf-stable lures or baits combined with suitable toxins or pathogens could overcome some of the commercial impediments. Several attempts at biological control using parasitoids have not successfully reduced invasive wasp populations, although the biocontrol agent has only established in one case. The social structure of colonies and their high reproductive efficiency have facilitated invasion by these species, but it also means management at the population level will be difficult. This emphasises the need to prevent such invasions from occurring in the first place. EEA Bariloche Fil: Beggs, Jacqueline R. University of Auckland. School of Biological Sciences. Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity; Nueva Zelanda Fil: Brockerhoff, Eckehard G. Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute); Nueva Zelanda Fil: Corley, Juan Carlos. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Kenis, Marc. CABI Europe-Switzerland; Suiza Fil: Masciocchi, Maite. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Bariloche. Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de Insectos; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Muller, Franck. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Département Systématique et Evolution; Francia Fil: Rome, Quentin. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Département Systématique et Evolution; Francia Fil: Villemant, Claire. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle. Département Systématique et Evolution; Francia |
| description |
Insect species associated with human goods continue to be accidentally introduced into new locations. A small proportion of these introduced species become invasive, causing a range of impacts in the receiving community. It is therefore important to evaluate the patterns of which species become invasive and which strategies are most successful in managing them. This review assesses the distribution, abundance, impact and management of the invasive Vespidae worldwide. We identified 34 vespid species known to be introduced around the world, but the seven most invasive species are all eusocial. Most introduced Vespidae only occur in one or two countries, but some areas have become geographic hotspots of invasion: Hawaii (15 species), North America (eight species), New Zealand (five species), Australia (four species) and South America (four species). Two invasive species, Vespula vulgaris and V. germanica have become particularly widespread and abundant with a range of impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem function. Other successful invasive species include several Polistes spp., which affect local biodiversity through direct predation or competition for food or space. Toxic baiting has been the most successful control strategy against invasive vespids to date, although this has mostly been small scale experimental management as it has proved difficult to develop commercial control products. Development of shelf-stable lures or baits combined with suitable toxins or pathogens could overcome some of the commercial impediments. Several attempts at biological control using parasitoids have not successfully reduced invasive wasp populations, although the biocontrol agent has only established in one case. The social structure of colonies and their high reproductive efficiency have facilitated invasion by these species, but it also means management at the population level will be difficult. This emphasises the need to prevent such invasions from occurring in the first place. |
| publishDate |
2011 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-08 2019-06-07T15:00:26Z 2019-06-07T15:00:26Z |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10526-011-9389-z http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5277 1386-6141 1573-8248 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-011-9389-z |
| url |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10526-011-9389-z http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/5277 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-011-9389-z |
| identifier_str_mv |
1386-6141 1573-8248 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
BioControl 56 (4) : 505–526 (August 2011) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
| _version_ |
1846787522670100480 |
| score |
12.982451 |