Geographic distribution of sex chromosome polymorphism in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 from Argentina

Autores
Giardini, Maria Cecilia; Nieves, Mariela; Scannapieco, Alejandra Carla; Conte, Claudia Alejandra; Milla, Fabian Horacio; Schapovaloff, Maria Elena; Frissolo, Maria Soledad; Remis, Maria Isabel; Cladera, Jorge Luis; Lanzavecchia, Silvia Beatriz
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background Anastrepha fraterculus is recognized as a quarantine pest in several American countries. This fruit fly species is native to the American continent and distributed throughout tropical and subtropical regions. It has been reported as a complex of cryptic species, and at least eight morphotypes have been described. Only one entity of this complex, formerly named Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1, is present in Argentina. Previous cytogenetic studies on this morphotype described the presence of sex chromosome variation identified by chromosomal size and staining patterns. In this work, we expanded the cytological study of this morphotype by analyzing laboratory strains and wild populations to provide information about the frequency and geographic distribution of these sex chromosome variants. We analyzed the mitotic metaphases of individuals from four laboratory strains and five wild populations from the main fruit-producing areas of Argentina, including the northwest (Tucumán and La Rioja), northeast (Entre Ríos and Misiones), and center (Buenos Aires) of the country. Results In wild samples, we observed a high frequency of X1X1 (0.94) and X1Y5 (0.93) karyomorphs, whereas X1X2 and X1Y6 were exclusively found at a low frequency in Buenos Aires (0.07 and 0.13, respectively), Entre Ríos (0.16 and 0.14, respectively) and Tucumán (0.03 and 0.04, respectively). X2X2 and X2Y5 karyomorphs were not found in wild populations but were detected at a low frequency in laboratory strains. In fact, karyomorph frequencies differed between wild populations and laboratory strains. No significant differences among A. fraterculus wild populations were evidenced in either karyotypic or chromosomal frequencies. However, a significant correlation was observed between Y5 chromosomal frequency and latitude. Conclusions We discuss the importance of cytogenetics to understand the possible route of invasion and dispersion of this pest in Argentina and the evolutionary forces acting under laboratory conditions, possibly driving changes in the chromosomal frequencies. Our findings provide deep and integral genetic knowledge of this species, which has become of relevance to the characterization and selection of valuable A. fraterculus sp. 1 strains for mass rearing production and SIT implementation.
Fil: Giardini, Maria Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética "Ewald A. Favret"; Argentina.
Fil: Nieves, Mariela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología. Grupo de Investigación en Biología Evolutiva; Argentina.
Fil: Scannapieco, Alejandra Carla. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina.
Fil: Conte, Claudia Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética "Ewald A. Favret"; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.
Fil: Milla, Fabian Horacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.
Fil: Schapovaloff, Maria Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Montecarlo; Argentina.
Fil: Frissolo, Maria Soledad. Programa Nacional de Control y Erradicación de Moscas de los Frutos (PROCEM). Subprograma La Rioja; Argentina
Fil: Remis, Maria Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Cladera, Jorge Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Insectos de Importancia Agronómica; Argentina.
Fil: Lanzavecchia, Silvia Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.
Fil: Nieves, Mariela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Giardini, Maria Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Scannapieco, Alejandra Carla. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Conte, Claudia Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Milla, Fabian Horacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Schapovaloff, Maria Elena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Remis, Maria Isabel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina
Fil: Cladera, Jorge Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.
Fil: Cladera, Jorge Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Lanzavecchia, Silvia Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fuente
BMC Genetics 21 (Suppl 2) : 149. (Diciembre 2020)
Materia
Tephritidae
Distribución Geográfica
Cromosomas Sexuales
Polimorfismo
Anastrepha Fraterculus
Argentina
Citogenética
Geographical Distribution
Sex Chromosomes
Polymorphism
Cytogenetics
Sterile insect Technique
Dispersion
Técnica del Insecto Estéril
Dispersión
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/8623

id INTADig_41535a4240181c61476bb1474a26a384
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/8623
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Geographic distribution of sex chromosome polymorphism in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 from ArgentinaGiardini, Maria CeciliaNieves, MarielaScannapieco, Alejandra CarlaConte, Claudia AlejandraMilla, Fabian HoracioSchapovaloff, Maria ElenaFrissolo, Maria SoledadRemis, Maria IsabelCladera, Jorge LuisLanzavecchia, Silvia BeatrizTephritidaeDistribución GeográficaCromosomas SexualesPolimorfismoAnastrepha FraterculusArgentinaCitogenéticaGeographical DistributionSex ChromosomesPolymorphismCytogeneticsSterile insect TechniqueDispersionTécnica del Insecto EstérilDispersiónBackground Anastrepha fraterculus is recognized as a quarantine pest in several American countries. This fruit fly species is native to the American continent and distributed throughout tropical and subtropical regions. It has been reported as a complex of cryptic species, and at least eight morphotypes have been described. Only one entity of this complex, formerly named Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1, is present in Argentina. Previous cytogenetic studies on this morphotype described the presence of sex chromosome variation identified by chromosomal size and staining patterns. In this work, we expanded the cytological study of this morphotype by analyzing laboratory strains and wild populations to provide information about the frequency and geographic distribution of these sex chromosome variants. We analyzed the mitotic metaphases of individuals from four laboratory strains and five wild populations from the main fruit-producing areas of Argentina, including the northwest (Tucumán and La Rioja), northeast (Entre Ríos and Misiones), and center (Buenos Aires) of the country. Results In wild samples, we observed a high frequency of X1X1 (0.94) and X1Y5 (0.93) karyomorphs, whereas X1X2 and X1Y6 were exclusively found at a low frequency in Buenos Aires (0.07 and 0.13, respectively), Entre Ríos (0.16 and 0.14, respectively) and Tucumán (0.03 and 0.04, respectively). X2X2 and X2Y5 karyomorphs were not found in wild populations but were detected at a low frequency in laboratory strains. In fact, karyomorph frequencies differed between wild populations and laboratory strains. No significant differences among A. fraterculus wild populations were evidenced in either karyotypic or chromosomal frequencies. However, a significant correlation was observed between Y5 chromosomal frequency and latitude. Conclusions We discuss the importance of cytogenetics to understand the possible route of invasion and dispersion of this pest in Argentina and the evolutionary forces acting under laboratory conditions, possibly driving changes in the chromosomal frequencies. Our findings provide deep and integral genetic knowledge of this species, which has become of relevance to the characterization and selection of valuable A. fraterculus sp. 1 strains for mass rearing production and SIT implementation.Fil: Giardini, Maria Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética "Ewald A. Favret"; Argentina.Fil: Nieves, Mariela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología. Grupo de Investigación en Biología Evolutiva; Argentina.Fil: Scannapieco, Alejandra Carla. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina.Fil: Conte, Claudia Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética "Ewald A. Favret"; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.Fil: Milla, Fabian Horacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.Fil: Schapovaloff, Maria Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Montecarlo; Argentina.Fil: Frissolo, Maria Soledad. Programa Nacional de Control y Erradicación de Moscas de los Frutos (PROCEM). Subprograma La Rioja; ArgentinaFil: Remis, Maria Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Cladera, Jorge Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Insectos de Importancia Agronómica; Argentina.Fil: Lanzavecchia, Silvia Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.Fil: Nieves, Mariela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Giardini, Maria Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Scannapieco, Alejandra Carla. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Conte, Claudia Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Milla, Fabian Horacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Schapovaloff, Maria Elena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Remis, Maria Isabel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; ArgentinaFil: Cladera, Jorge Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.Fil: Cladera, Jorge Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Lanzavecchia, Silvia Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaBioMed Central2021-01-20T13:41:48Z2021-01-20T13:41:48Z2020-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8623https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-020-00944-1BMC Genetics 21 (Suppl 2) : 149. (Diciembre 2020)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNBIO-1131044/AR./Genómica aplicada a estudios de ecología molecular y diversidad genética.info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/AEBIO-242411/AR./Epidemiología molecular agropecuaria de patógenos y plagas de importancia económicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:45:07Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/8623instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:07.709INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Geographic distribution of sex chromosome polymorphism in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 from Argentina
title Geographic distribution of sex chromosome polymorphism in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 from Argentina
spellingShingle Geographic distribution of sex chromosome polymorphism in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 from Argentina
Giardini, Maria Cecilia
Tephritidae
Distribución Geográfica
Cromosomas Sexuales
Polimorfismo
Anastrepha Fraterculus
Argentina
Citogenética
Geographical Distribution
Sex Chromosomes
Polymorphism
Cytogenetics
Sterile insect Technique
Dispersion
Técnica del Insecto Estéril
Dispersión
title_short Geographic distribution of sex chromosome polymorphism in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 from Argentina
title_full Geographic distribution of sex chromosome polymorphism in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 from Argentina
title_fullStr Geographic distribution of sex chromosome polymorphism in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 from Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Geographic distribution of sex chromosome polymorphism in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 from Argentina
title_sort Geographic distribution of sex chromosome polymorphism in Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1 from Argentina
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Giardini, Maria Cecilia
Nieves, Mariela
Scannapieco, Alejandra Carla
Conte, Claudia Alejandra
Milla, Fabian Horacio
Schapovaloff, Maria Elena
Frissolo, Maria Soledad
Remis, Maria Isabel
Cladera, Jorge Luis
Lanzavecchia, Silvia Beatriz
author Giardini, Maria Cecilia
author_facet Giardini, Maria Cecilia
Nieves, Mariela
Scannapieco, Alejandra Carla
Conte, Claudia Alejandra
Milla, Fabian Horacio
Schapovaloff, Maria Elena
Frissolo, Maria Soledad
Remis, Maria Isabel
Cladera, Jorge Luis
Lanzavecchia, Silvia Beatriz
author_role author
author2 Nieves, Mariela
Scannapieco, Alejandra Carla
Conte, Claudia Alejandra
Milla, Fabian Horacio
Schapovaloff, Maria Elena
Frissolo, Maria Soledad
Remis, Maria Isabel
Cladera, Jorge Luis
Lanzavecchia, Silvia Beatriz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Tephritidae
Distribución Geográfica
Cromosomas Sexuales
Polimorfismo
Anastrepha Fraterculus
Argentina
Citogenética
Geographical Distribution
Sex Chromosomes
Polymorphism
Cytogenetics
Sterile insect Technique
Dispersion
Técnica del Insecto Estéril
Dispersión
topic Tephritidae
Distribución Geográfica
Cromosomas Sexuales
Polimorfismo
Anastrepha Fraterculus
Argentina
Citogenética
Geographical Distribution
Sex Chromosomes
Polymorphism
Cytogenetics
Sterile insect Technique
Dispersion
Técnica del Insecto Estéril
Dispersión
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background Anastrepha fraterculus is recognized as a quarantine pest in several American countries. This fruit fly species is native to the American continent and distributed throughout tropical and subtropical regions. It has been reported as a complex of cryptic species, and at least eight morphotypes have been described. Only one entity of this complex, formerly named Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1, is present in Argentina. Previous cytogenetic studies on this morphotype described the presence of sex chromosome variation identified by chromosomal size and staining patterns. In this work, we expanded the cytological study of this morphotype by analyzing laboratory strains and wild populations to provide information about the frequency and geographic distribution of these sex chromosome variants. We analyzed the mitotic metaphases of individuals from four laboratory strains and five wild populations from the main fruit-producing areas of Argentina, including the northwest (Tucumán and La Rioja), northeast (Entre Ríos and Misiones), and center (Buenos Aires) of the country. Results In wild samples, we observed a high frequency of X1X1 (0.94) and X1Y5 (0.93) karyomorphs, whereas X1X2 and X1Y6 were exclusively found at a low frequency in Buenos Aires (0.07 and 0.13, respectively), Entre Ríos (0.16 and 0.14, respectively) and Tucumán (0.03 and 0.04, respectively). X2X2 and X2Y5 karyomorphs were not found in wild populations but were detected at a low frequency in laboratory strains. In fact, karyomorph frequencies differed between wild populations and laboratory strains. No significant differences among A. fraterculus wild populations were evidenced in either karyotypic or chromosomal frequencies. However, a significant correlation was observed between Y5 chromosomal frequency and latitude. Conclusions We discuss the importance of cytogenetics to understand the possible route of invasion and dispersion of this pest in Argentina and the evolutionary forces acting under laboratory conditions, possibly driving changes in the chromosomal frequencies. Our findings provide deep and integral genetic knowledge of this species, which has become of relevance to the characterization and selection of valuable A. fraterculus sp. 1 strains for mass rearing production and SIT implementation.
Fil: Giardini, Maria Cecilia. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética "Ewald A. Favret"; Argentina.
Fil: Nieves, Mariela. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología. Grupo de Investigación en Biología Evolutiva; Argentina.
Fil: Scannapieco, Alejandra Carla. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina.
Fil: Conte, Claudia Alejandra. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética "Ewald A. Favret"; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.
Fil: Milla, Fabian Horacio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Genética de Insectos de Importancia Económica; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.
Fil: Schapovaloff, Maria Elena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Montecarlo; Argentina.
Fil: Frissolo, Maria Soledad. Programa Nacional de Control y Erradicación de Moscas de los Frutos (PROCEM). Subprograma La Rioja; Argentina
Fil: Remis, Maria Isabel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Cladera, Jorge Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética. Laboratorio de Insectos de Importancia Agronómica; Argentina.
Fil: Lanzavecchia, Silvia Beatriz. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Genética; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.
Fil: Nieves, Mariela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Giardini, Maria Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Scannapieco, Alejandra Carla. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Conte, Claudia Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Milla, Fabian Horacio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Schapovaloff, Maria Elena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Remis, Maria Isabel. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina
Fil: Cladera, Jorge Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Agrobiotecnología y Biología Molecular; Argentina.
Fil: Cladera, Jorge Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Lanzavecchia, Silvia Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Background Anastrepha fraterculus is recognized as a quarantine pest in several American countries. This fruit fly species is native to the American continent and distributed throughout tropical and subtropical regions. It has been reported as a complex of cryptic species, and at least eight morphotypes have been described. Only one entity of this complex, formerly named Anastrepha fraterculus sp. 1, is present in Argentina. Previous cytogenetic studies on this morphotype described the presence of sex chromosome variation identified by chromosomal size and staining patterns. In this work, we expanded the cytological study of this morphotype by analyzing laboratory strains and wild populations to provide information about the frequency and geographic distribution of these sex chromosome variants. We analyzed the mitotic metaphases of individuals from four laboratory strains and five wild populations from the main fruit-producing areas of Argentina, including the northwest (Tucumán and La Rioja), northeast (Entre Ríos and Misiones), and center (Buenos Aires) of the country. Results In wild samples, we observed a high frequency of X1X1 (0.94) and X1Y5 (0.93) karyomorphs, whereas X1X2 and X1Y6 were exclusively found at a low frequency in Buenos Aires (0.07 and 0.13, respectively), Entre Ríos (0.16 and 0.14, respectively) and Tucumán (0.03 and 0.04, respectively). X2X2 and X2Y5 karyomorphs were not found in wild populations but were detected at a low frequency in laboratory strains. In fact, karyomorph frequencies differed between wild populations and laboratory strains. No significant differences among A. fraterculus wild populations were evidenced in either karyotypic or chromosomal frequencies. However, a significant correlation was observed between Y5 chromosomal frequency and latitude. Conclusions We discuss the importance of cytogenetics to understand the possible route of invasion and dispersion of this pest in Argentina and the evolutionary forces acting under laboratory conditions, possibly driving changes in the chromosomal frequencies. Our findings provide deep and integral genetic knowledge of this species, which has become of relevance to the characterization and selection of valuable A. fraterculus sp. 1 strains for mass rearing production and SIT implementation.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12
2021-01-20T13:41:48Z
2021-01-20T13:41:48Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8623
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-020-00944-1
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8623
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-020-00944-1
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/PNBIO-1131044/AR./Genómica aplicada a estudios de ecología molecular y diversidad genética.
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/AEBIO-242411/AR./Epidemiología molecular agropecuaria de patógenos y plagas de importancia económica
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed Central
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed Central
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv BMC Genetics 21 (Suppl 2) : 149. (Diciembre 2020)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619150443413504
score 12.559606