Management effects on glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in the PM10 emitted by soils of the central semi-arid region of Argentina
- Autores
- Ramirez Haberkon, Nancy; Aimar, Silvia Beatriz; Aparicio, Virginia Carolina; Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo; De Geronimo, Eduardo; Costa, Jose Luis; Mendez, Mariano
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In soils of semi-arid regions, different amounts of glyphosate are applied, and this substance tends to be absorbed on the topsoil exposed to erosion. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of land management on the concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in the respirable dust emitted by soils in the central semi-arid region of Argentina. Soil samples were collected from nine agricultural soils under no-tillage with genetically modified Annual crops (AG), five agricultural soils under conventional tillage with annual crops (non-glyphosate-resistant) (AFG), and two permanent grasses (PG) with no-tillage and no glyphosate application in the last 30 years. The particulate matter finer than 10 µm in diameter (PM10) was generated and collected from each soil by means of an electrostatic dust sampler. Glyphosate and AMPA were analyzed in the soils and PM10. The percentage of detection (number of samples with glyphosate/AMPA over the total number of samples analyzed) was calculated. AG had the highest glyphosate and AMPA percentage of detection, in both, soil and PM10 (100% in all cases). Similar results were found for AFG, except for glyphosate in soil, where the percentage of detection was 80%. In PG, no glyphosate was detected in soil but it was detected in 83% of the PM10 samples. AMPA was detected in 67% and 100% of soil and PM10 samples, respectively. The detection in PG suggests the entry of glyphosate and AMPA from other sites. The contents of glyphosate and AMPA in soil and PM10 were greater in AG than in AFG and PG. In soil, the content of glyphosate was 69 µg kg−1 in AG and 5 µg kg−1 in AFG. In PM10, the content of glyphosate was 224 µg kg−1 in AG, 25 µg kg−1 in AFG, and 35 µg kg−1 in PG. AMPA showed a similar behavior to glyphosate in both soil and PM10. The greater use of glyphosate in AG increases the concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in soil and PM10. It determines an increase in environmental risk when wind erosion events occur in AG. In all management systems analyzed, AMPA content was greater than glyphosate content, and glyphosate and AMPA contents in PM10 were higher than those in soil. This result shows the potential risk posed by PM10 emitted from agricultural soil to human health and the environment. To our knowledge, this is the first study that shows how land management affects the occurrence and concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in PM10.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Ramirez Haberkon, Nancy . Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Aimar, Silvia. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: Aparicio, Virginia Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina
Fil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina
Fil: De Gerónimo, Eduardo Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina
Fil: Costa, José Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina
Fil: Mendez, Mariano. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina - Fuente
- Aeolian Research 49 : 100658 (2021)
- Materia
-
Manejo del Suelo
Glifosato
Ordenación de Tierras
Polvo (contaminante)
Argentina
Soil Management
Glyphosate
Land Management - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/8452
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_2c77578340e4930a84472b42688c5266 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/8452 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Management effects on glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in the PM10 emitted by soils of the central semi-arid region of ArgentinaRamirez Haberkon, NancyAimar, Silvia BeatrizAparicio, Virginia CarolinaBuschiazzo, Daniel EduardoDe Geronimo, EduardoCosta, Jose LuisMendez, MarianoManejo del SueloGlifosatoOrdenación de TierrasPolvo (contaminante)ArgentinaSoil ManagementGlyphosateLand ManagementIn soils of semi-arid regions, different amounts of glyphosate are applied, and this substance tends to be absorbed on the topsoil exposed to erosion. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of land management on the concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in the respirable dust emitted by soils in the central semi-arid region of Argentina. Soil samples were collected from nine agricultural soils under no-tillage with genetically modified Annual crops (AG), five agricultural soils under conventional tillage with annual crops (non-glyphosate-resistant) (AFG), and two permanent grasses (PG) with no-tillage and no glyphosate application in the last 30 years. The particulate matter finer than 10 µm in diameter (PM10) was generated and collected from each soil by means of an electrostatic dust sampler. Glyphosate and AMPA were analyzed in the soils and PM10. The percentage of detection (number of samples with glyphosate/AMPA over the total number of samples analyzed) was calculated. AG had the highest glyphosate and AMPA percentage of detection, in both, soil and PM10 (100% in all cases). Similar results were found for AFG, except for glyphosate in soil, where the percentage of detection was 80%. In PG, no glyphosate was detected in soil but it was detected in 83% of the PM10 samples. AMPA was detected in 67% and 100% of soil and PM10 samples, respectively. The detection in PG suggests the entry of glyphosate and AMPA from other sites. The contents of glyphosate and AMPA in soil and PM10 were greater in AG than in AFG and PG. In soil, the content of glyphosate was 69 µg kg−1 in AG and 5 µg kg−1 in AFG. In PM10, the content of glyphosate was 224 µg kg−1 in AG, 25 µg kg−1 in AFG, and 35 µg kg−1 in PG. AMPA showed a similar behavior to glyphosate in both soil and PM10. The greater use of glyphosate in AG increases the concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in soil and PM10. It determines an increase in environmental risk when wind erosion events occur in AG. In all management systems analyzed, AMPA content was greater than glyphosate content, and glyphosate and AMPA contents in PM10 were higher than those in soil. This result shows the potential risk posed by PM10 emitted from agricultural soil to human health and the environment. To our knowledge, this is the first study that shows how land management affects the occurrence and concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in PM10.EEA BalcarceFil: Ramirez Haberkon, Nancy . Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Aimar, Silvia. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; ArgentinaFil: Aparicio, Virginia Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; ArgentinaFil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; ArgentinaFil: De Gerónimo, Eduardo Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; ArgentinaFil: Costa, José Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; ArgentinaFil: Mendez, Mariano. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; ArgentinaElsevier2020-12-17T13:45:14Z2020-12-17T13:45:14Z2020-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8452https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S18759637203011051875-9637https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2020.100658Aeolian Research 49 : 100658 (2021)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-10-16T09:29:58Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/8452instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:29:58.59INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Management effects on glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in the PM10 emitted by soils of the central semi-arid region of Argentina |
title |
Management effects on glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in the PM10 emitted by soils of the central semi-arid region of Argentina |
spellingShingle |
Management effects on glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in the PM10 emitted by soils of the central semi-arid region of Argentina Ramirez Haberkon, Nancy Manejo del Suelo Glifosato Ordenación de Tierras Polvo (contaminante) Argentina Soil Management Glyphosate Land Management |
title_short |
Management effects on glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in the PM10 emitted by soils of the central semi-arid region of Argentina |
title_full |
Management effects on glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in the PM10 emitted by soils of the central semi-arid region of Argentina |
title_fullStr |
Management effects on glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in the PM10 emitted by soils of the central semi-arid region of Argentina |
title_full_unstemmed |
Management effects on glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in the PM10 emitted by soils of the central semi-arid region of Argentina |
title_sort |
Management effects on glyphosate and AMPA concentrations in the PM10 emitted by soils of the central semi-arid region of Argentina |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ramirez Haberkon, Nancy Aimar, Silvia Beatriz Aparicio, Virginia Carolina Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo De Geronimo, Eduardo Costa, Jose Luis Mendez, Mariano |
author |
Ramirez Haberkon, Nancy |
author_facet |
Ramirez Haberkon, Nancy Aimar, Silvia Beatriz Aparicio, Virginia Carolina Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo De Geronimo, Eduardo Costa, Jose Luis Mendez, Mariano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Aimar, Silvia Beatriz Aparicio, Virginia Carolina Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo De Geronimo, Eduardo Costa, Jose Luis Mendez, Mariano |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Manejo del Suelo Glifosato Ordenación de Tierras Polvo (contaminante) Argentina Soil Management Glyphosate Land Management |
topic |
Manejo del Suelo Glifosato Ordenación de Tierras Polvo (contaminante) Argentina Soil Management Glyphosate Land Management |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In soils of semi-arid regions, different amounts of glyphosate are applied, and this substance tends to be absorbed on the topsoil exposed to erosion. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of land management on the concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in the respirable dust emitted by soils in the central semi-arid region of Argentina. Soil samples were collected from nine agricultural soils under no-tillage with genetically modified Annual crops (AG), five agricultural soils under conventional tillage with annual crops (non-glyphosate-resistant) (AFG), and two permanent grasses (PG) with no-tillage and no glyphosate application in the last 30 years. The particulate matter finer than 10 µm in diameter (PM10) was generated and collected from each soil by means of an electrostatic dust sampler. Glyphosate and AMPA were analyzed in the soils and PM10. The percentage of detection (number of samples with glyphosate/AMPA over the total number of samples analyzed) was calculated. AG had the highest glyphosate and AMPA percentage of detection, in both, soil and PM10 (100% in all cases). Similar results were found for AFG, except for glyphosate in soil, where the percentage of detection was 80%. In PG, no glyphosate was detected in soil but it was detected in 83% of the PM10 samples. AMPA was detected in 67% and 100% of soil and PM10 samples, respectively. The detection in PG suggests the entry of glyphosate and AMPA from other sites. The contents of glyphosate and AMPA in soil and PM10 were greater in AG than in AFG and PG. In soil, the content of glyphosate was 69 µg kg−1 in AG and 5 µg kg−1 in AFG. In PM10, the content of glyphosate was 224 µg kg−1 in AG, 25 µg kg−1 in AFG, and 35 µg kg−1 in PG. AMPA showed a similar behavior to glyphosate in both soil and PM10. The greater use of glyphosate in AG increases the concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in soil and PM10. It determines an increase in environmental risk when wind erosion events occur in AG. In all management systems analyzed, AMPA content was greater than glyphosate content, and glyphosate and AMPA contents in PM10 were higher than those in soil. This result shows the potential risk posed by PM10 emitted from agricultural soil to human health and the environment. To our knowledge, this is the first study that shows how land management affects the occurrence and concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in PM10. EEA Balcarce Fil: Ramirez Haberkon, Nancy . Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Aimar, Silvia. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina Fil: Aparicio, Virginia Carolina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina Fil: Buschiazzo, Daniel Eduardo. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina Fil: De Gerónimo, Eduardo Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina Fil: Costa, José Luis. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina Fil: Mendez, Mariano. Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra y Ambientales de La Pampa; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina |
description |
In soils of semi-arid regions, different amounts of glyphosate are applied, and this substance tends to be absorbed on the topsoil exposed to erosion. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of land management on the concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in the respirable dust emitted by soils in the central semi-arid region of Argentina. Soil samples were collected from nine agricultural soils under no-tillage with genetically modified Annual crops (AG), five agricultural soils under conventional tillage with annual crops (non-glyphosate-resistant) (AFG), and two permanent grasses (PG) with no-tillage and no glyphosate application in the last 30 years. The particulate matter finer than 10 µm in diameter (PM10) was generated and collected from each soil by means of an electrostatic dust sampler. Glyphosate and AMPA were analyzed in the soils and PM10. The percentage of detection (number of samples with glyphosate/AMPA over the total number of samples analyzed) was calculated. AG had the highest glyphosate and AMPA percentage of detection, in both, soil and PM10 (100% in all cases). Similar results were found for AFG, except for glyphosate in soil, where the percentage of detection was 80%. In PG, no glyphosate was detected in soil but it was detected in 83% of the PM10 samples. AMPA was detected in 67% and 100% of soil and PM10 samples, respectively. The detection in PG suggests the entry of glyphosate and AMPA from other sites. The contents of glyphosate and AMPA in soil and PM10 were greater in AG than in AFG and PG. In soil, the content of glyphosate was 69 µg kg−1 in AG and 5 µg kg−1 in AFG. In PM10, the content of glyphosate was 224 µg kg−1 in AG, 25 µg kg−1 in AFG, and 35 µg kg−1 in PG. AMPA showed a similar behavior to glyphosate in both soil and PM10. The greater use of glyphosate in AG increases the concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in soil and PM10. It determines an increase in environmental risk when wind erosion events occur in AG. In all management systems analyzed, AMPA content was greater than glyphosate content, and glyphosate and AMPA contents in PM10 were higher than those in soil. This result shows the potential risk posed by PM10 emitted from agricultural soil to human health and the environment. To our knowledge, this is the first study that shows how land management affects the occurrence and concentration of glyphosate and AMPA in PM10. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-17T13:45:14Z 2020-12-17T13:45:14Z 2020-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8452 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1875963720301105 1875-9637 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2020.100658 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8452 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1875963720301105 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2020.100658 |
identifier_str_mv |
1875-9637 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Aeolian Research 49 : 100658 (2021) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1846143530765910016 |
score |
12.712165 |