Unraveling the forage productivity puzzle: comparing fast and slow-growing grasses

Autores
Pittaro, Gabriela; Duchini, Paulo G.; Guzatti, Gabriela C.; Sbrissia, André F.
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Functional traits are powerful tools for distinguishing between plants with different resource acquisition strategies. Fast-growing plants normally dominate resource-rich habitats and present trait values associated with high productivity, such as high specific leaf area (SLA), short leaf lifespan, and rapid leaf elongation rate (LER). In contrast, slow-growing species have a higher leaf weight ratio (LWR), leaf lifespan (LLS), and phyllochron, which are useful traits for survival in stressful and unfertile environments, but are normally thought to be incompatible with high productivity, even under fertile conditions. We tested the hypothesis that slow-growing forage grasses have demographic parameters (tiller population density and canopy density) that offset their slow individual traits, making them as productive as fast-growing species when grown in fertile soil. Species with contrasting growth strategies (Arrhenatherum elatius L. and Festuca arundinacea Schreb cv. Quantum II, fast and slow-growing species, respectively) were cultivated in 45 m2 field plots and subjected to the same cutting regime and nitrogen supply level. Functional traits and canopy attributes were continuously measured during 8 growing cycles after the establishment of the swards. A. elatius had higher SLA, LER, leaf senescence, and leaf appearance rates, whereas F. arundinacea had higher LLS and LWR values. Conversely, there were no differences in relative growth rate or forage accumulation. F. arundinacea was able to offset their plant functional traits, typically associated with slow-growing grasses, with some demographic parameter like higher tiller population density, allowing it to be as productive as the fast-growing A. elatius when both were grown in fertile soil. Therefore, we suggest cautionary use of traditional plant functional traits to explain and predict the annual productivity of slow-growing grasses.
Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales
Fil: Pittaro, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina
Fil: Pittaro, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA); Argentina
Fil: Pittaro, Gabriela. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias (CAV); Brasil
Fil: Duchini, Paulo G. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias (CAV); Brasil
Fil: Guzatti, Gabriela C. Campus São Miguel do Oeste. Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina (IFSC); Brasil
Fil: Sbrissia, André F. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias (CAV); Brasil
Fuente
PLoS One 19 (7) : e0306692 (2024)
Materia
Forage
Grasses
Growth
Forrajes
Gramineas
Crecimiento
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21922

id INTADig_251359a7ec681d4d3e5e7fb05adfef73
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/21922
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Unraveling the forage productivity puzzle: comparing fast and slow-growing grassesPittaro, GabrielaDuchini, Paulo G.Guzatti, Gabriela C.Sbrissia, André F.ForageGrassesGrowthForrajesGramineasCrecimientoFunctional traits are powerful tools for distinguishing between plants with different resource acquisition strategies. Fast-growing plants normally dominate resource-rich habitats and present trait values associated with high productivity, such as high specific leaf area (SLA), short leaf lifespan, and rapid leaf elongation rate (LER). In contrast, slow-growing species have a higher leaf weight ratio (LWR), leaf lifespan (LLS), and phyllochron, which are useful traits for survival in stressful and unfertile environments, but are normally thought to be incompatible with high productivity, even under fertile conditions. We tested the hypothesis that slow-growing forage grasses have demographic parameters (tiller population density and canopy density) that offset their slow individual traits, making them as productive as fast-growing species when grown in fertile soil. Species with contrasting growth strategies (Arrhenatherum elatius L. and Festuca arundinacea Schreb cv. Quantum II, fast and slow-growing species, respectively) were cultivated in 45 m2 field plots and subjected to the same cutting regime and nitrogen supply level. Functional traits and canopy attributes were continuously measured during 8 growing cycles after the establishment of the swards. A. elatius had higher SLA, LER, leaf senescence, and leaf appearance rates, whereas F. arundinacea had higher LLS and LWR values. Conversely, there were no differences in relative growth rate or forage accumulation. F. arundinacea was able to offset their plant functional traits, typically associated with slow-growing grasses, with some demographic parameter like higher tiller population density, allowing it to be as productive as the fast-growing A. elatius when both were grown in fertile soil. Therefore, we suggest cautionary use of traditional plant functional traits to explain and predict the annual productivity of slow-growing grasses.Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos VegetalesFil: Pittaro, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; ArgentinaFil: Pittaro, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA); ArgentinaFil: Pittaro, Gabriela. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias (CAV); BrasilFil: Duchini, Paulo G. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias (CAV); BrasilFil: Guzatti, Gabriela C. Campus São Miguel do Oeste. Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina (IFSC); BrasilFil: Sbrissia, André F. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias (CAV); BrasilPLoS One2025-04-07T10:17:15Z2025-04-07T10:17:15Z2024-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21922https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.03066921932-6203https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306692PLoS One 19 (7) : e0306692 (2024)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:47:14Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/21922instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:47:14.528INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Unraveling the forage productivity puzzle: comparing fast and slow-growing grasses
title Unraveling the forage productivity puzzle: comparing fast and slow-growing grasses
spellingShingle Unraveling the forage productivity puzzle: comparing fast and slow-growing grasses
Pittaro, Gabriela
Forage
Grasses
Growth
Forrajes
Gramineas
Crecimiento
title_short Unraveling the forage productivity puzzle: comparing fast and slow-growing grasses
title_full Unraveling the forage productivity puzzle: comparing fast and slow-growing grasses
title_fullStr Unraveling the forage productivity puzzle: comparing fast and slow-growing grasses
title_full_unstemmed Unraveling the forage productivity puzzle: comparing fast and slow-growing grasses
title_sort Unraveling the forage productivity puzzle: comparing fast and slow-growing grasses
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pittaro, Gabriela
Duchini, Paulo G.
Guzatti, Gabriela C.
Sbrissia, André F.
author Pittaro, Gabriela
author_facet Pittaro, Gabriela
Duchini, Paulo G.
Guzatti, Gabriela C.
Sbrissia, André F.
author_role author
author2 Duchini, Paulo G.
Guzatti, Gabriela C.
Sbrissia, André F.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Forage
Grasses
Growth
Forrajes
Gramineas
Crecimiento
topic Forage
Grasses
Growth
Forrajes
Gramineas
Crecimiento
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Functional traits are powerful tools for distinguishing between plants with different resource acquisition strategies. Fast-growing plants normally dominate resource-rich habitats and present trait values associated with high productivity, such as high specific leaf area (SLA), short leaf lifespan, and rapid leaf elongation rate (LER). In contrast, slow-growing species have a higher leaf weight ratio (LWR), leaf lifespan (LLS), and phyllochron, which are useful traits for survival in stressful and unfertile environments, but are normally thought to be incompatible with high productivity, even under fertile conditions. We tested the hypothesis that slow-growing forage grasses have demographic parameters (tiller population density and canopy density) that offset their slow individual traits, making them as productive as fast-growing species when grown in fertile soil. Species with contrasting growth strategies (Arrhenatherum elatius L. and Festuca arundinacea Schreb cv. Quantum II, fast and slow-growing species, respectively) were cultivated in 45 m2 field plots and subjected to the same cutting regime and nitrogen supply level. Functional traits and canopy attributes were continuously measured during 8 growing cycles after the establishment of the swards. A. elatius had higher SLA, LER, leaf senescence, and leaf appearance rates, whereas F. arundinacea had higher LLS and LWR values. Conversely, there were no differences in relative growth rate or forage accumulation. F. arundinacea was able to offset their plant functional traits, typically associated with slow-growing grasses, with some demographic parameter like higher tiller population density, allowing it to be as productive as the fast-growing A. elatius when both were grown in fertile soil. Therefore, we suggest cautionary use of traditional plant functional traits to explain and predict the annual productivity of slow-growing grasses.
Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales
Fil: Pittaro, Gabriela. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Fisiología y Recursos Genéticos Vegetales; Argentina
Fil: Pittaro, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Unidad de Estudios Agropecuarios (UDEA); Argentina
Fil: Pittaro, Gabriela. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias (CAV); Brasil
Fil: Duchini, Paulo G. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias (CAV); Brasil
Fil: Guzatti, Gabriela C. Campus São Miguel do Oeste. Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina (IFSC); Brasil
Fil: Sbrissia, André F. Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina. Centro de Ciências Agroveterinárias (CAV); Brasil
description Functional traits are powerful tools for distinguishing between plants with different resource acquisition strategies. Fast-growing plants normally dominate resource-rich habitats and present trait values associated with high productivity, such as high specific leaf area (SLA), short leaf lifespan, and rapid leaf elongation rate (LER). In contrast, slow-growing species have a higher leaf weight ratio (LWR), leaf lifespan (LLS), and phyllochron, which are useful traits for survival in stressful and unfertile environments, but are normally thought to be incompatible with high productivity, even under fertile conditions. We tested the hypothesis that slow-growing forage grasses have demographic parameters (tiller population density and canopy density) that offset their slow individual traits, making them as productive as fast-growing species when grown in fertile soil. Species with contrasting growth strategies (Arrhenatherum elatius L. and Festuca arundinacea Schreb cv. Quantum II, fast and slow-growing species, respectively) were cultivated in 45 m2 field plots and subjected to the same cutting regime and nitrogen supply level. Functional traits and canopy attributes were continuously measured during 8 growing cycles after the establishment of the swards. A. elatius had higher SLA, LER, leaf senescence, and leaf appearance rates, whereas F. arundinacea had higher LLS and LWR values. Conversely, there were no differences in relative growth rate or forage accumulation. F. arundinacea was able to offset their plant functional traits, typically associated with slow-growing grasses, with some demographic parameter like higher tiller population density, allowing it to be as productive as the fast-growing A. elatius when both were grown in fertile soil. Therefore, we suggest cautionary use of traditional plant functional traits to explain and predict the annual productivity of slow-growing grasses.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-07-30
2025-04-07T10:17:15Z
2025-04-07T10:17:15Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21922
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306692
1932-6203
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306692
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/21922
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0306692
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306692
identifier_str_mv 1932-6203
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv PLoS One
publisher.none.fl_str_mv PLoS One
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv PLoS One 19 (7) : e0306692 (2024)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619202698149889
score 12.559606