Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysis
- Autores
- Carciochi, Walter; Reussi Calvo, Nahuel Ignacio; Wyngaard, Nicolás; Divito, Guillermo; Eyherabide, Mercedes; Echeverria, Hernan Eduardo
- Año de publicación
- 2019
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The analysis of sulfur concentration (SC) and nitrogen to S ratio (N/S) in plant tissue are some of the suggested tools to evaluate S deficiency in maize (Zea mays L.). However, the convenience of one over the other and the tissue that should be analyzed (upper leaf or shoot) is still questioned. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to: i) evaluate the stability of shoot and upper leaf N/S ratio with increasing shoot biomass (BM), ii) compare SC vs N/S in shoot or upper leaf as S prognosis tools, and iii) evaluate the use of SC simultaneously with grain N/S as a S diagnostic method in maize. Different S fertilization rates (0–32 kg S ha−1) were evaluated in nine field experiments where S and N concentration were determined in maize shoot, uppermost fully developed leaf, and grain samples. The main results of our study were: i) the N/S ratio in shoot and upper leaf was not stable with increasing BM; ii) the S prognosis capacity was similar when measuring SC or N/S on the shoot or upper leaf in vegetative growth stages, and iii) SC in grain allowed an adequate S diagnosis, which was not improved by including N/S in the prediction. In conclusion, based on its simplicity and reliability, we suggested the use of SC in the upper leaf at ≈V6 stage as a S prognosis tool (2.1 g kg−1 threshold). In addition, a 1.12 g S kg−1 threshold in grain was adequate for S diagnosis.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Carciochi, Walter D. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Wyngaard, Nicolás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.
Fil: Divito, Guillermo A. Asociación Argentina de Productores en Siembra Directa; Argentina
Fil: Eyherabide, Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.
Fil: .Echeverría, Hernán Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. - Fuente
- European Journal of Agronomy 108 : 1-10 (2019)
- Materia
-
Maíz
Análisis de Tejidos
Concentración
Azufre
Aplicación de Abonos
Maize
Tissue Analysis
Concentration
Sulphur
Fertilizer Application - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/8556
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
INTADig_2234184844b7b3c09c7bcf99f1c58f14 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/8556 |
| network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
| repository_id_str |
l |
| network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| spelling |
Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysisCarciochi, WalterReussi Calvo, Nahuel IgnacioWyngaard, NicolásDivito, GuillermoEyherabide, MercedesEcheverria, Hernan EduardoMaízAnálisis de TejidosConcentraciónAzufreAplicación de AbonosMaizeTissue AnalysisConcentrationSulphurFertilizer ApplicationThe analysis of sulfur concentration (SC) and nitrogen to S ratio (N/S) in plant tissue are some of the suggested tools to evaluate S deficiency in maize (Zea mays L.). However, the convenience of one over the other and the tissue that should be analyzed (upper leaf or shoot) is still questioned. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to: i) evaluate the stability of shoot and upper leaf N/S ratio with increasing shoot biomass (BM), ii) compare SC vs N/S in shoot or upper leaf as S prognosis tools, and iii) evaluate the use of SC simultaneously with grain N/S as a S diagnostic method in maize. Different S fertilization rates (0–32 kg S ha−1) were evaluated in nine field experiments where S and N concentration were determined in maize shoot, uppermost fully developed leaf, and grain samples. The main results of our study were: i) the N/S ratio in shoot and upper leaf was not stable with increasing BM; ii) the S prognosis capacity was similar when measuring SC or N/S on the shoot or upper leaf in vegetative growth stages, and iii) SC in grain allowed an adequate S diagnosis, which was not improved by including N/S in the prediction. In conclusion, based on its simplicity and reliability, we suggested the use of SC in the upper leaf at ≈V6 stage as a S prognosis tool (2.1 g kg−1 threshold). In addition, a 1.12 g S kg−1 threshold in grain was adequate for S diagnosis.EEA BalcarceFil: Carciochi, Walter D. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Wyngaard, Nicolás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Divito, Guillermo A. Asociación Argentina de Productores en Siembra Directa; ArgentinaFil: Eyherabide, Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: .Echeverría, Hernán Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Elsevier2021-01-06T10:55:02Z2021-01-06T10:55:02Z2019-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8556https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S11610301183070931161-0301https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.04.008European Journal of Agronomy 108 : 1-10 (2019)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:45:06Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/8556instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:06.991INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysis |
| title |
Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysis |
| spellingShingle |
Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysis Carciochi, Walter Maíz Análisis de Tejidos Concentración Azufre Aplicación de Abonos Maize Tissue Analysis Concentration Sulphur Fertilizer Application |
| title_short |
Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysis |
| title_full |
Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysis |
| title_fullStr |
Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysis |
| title_sort |
Prognosis and diagnosis of sulfur status in maize by plant analysis |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Carciochi, Walter Reussi Calvo, Nahuel Ignacio Wyngaard, Nicolás Divito, Guillermo Eyherabide, Mercedes Echeverria, Hernan Eduardo |
| author |
Carciochi, Walter |
| author_facet |
Carciochi, Walter Reussi Calvo, Nahuel Ignacio Wyngaard, Nicolás Divito, Guillermo Eyherabide, Mercedes Echeverria, Hernan Eduardo |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Reussi Calvo, Nahuel Ignacio Wyngaard, Nicolás Divito, Guillermo Eyherabide, Mercedes Echeverria, Hernan Eduardo |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Maíz Análisis de Tejidos Concentración Azufre Aplicación de Abonos Maize Tissue Analysis Concentration Sulphur Fertilizer Application |
| topic |
Maíz Análisis de Tejidos Concentración Azufre Aplicación de Abonos Maize Tissue Analysis Concentration Sulphur Fertilizer Application |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The analysis of sulfur concentration (SC) and nitrogen to S ratio (N/S) in plant tissue are some of the suggested tools to evaluate S deficiency in maize (Zea mays L.). However, the convenience of one over the other and the tissue that should be analyzed (upper leaf or shoot) is still questioned. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to: i) evaluate the stability of shoot and upper leaf N/S ratio with increasing shoot biomass (BM), ii) compare SC vs N/S in shoot or upper leaf as S prognosis tools, and iii) evaluate the use of SC simultaneously with grain N/S as a S diagnostic method in maize. Different S fertilization rates (0–32 kg S ha−1) were evaluated in nine field experiments where S and N concentration were determined in maize shoot, uppermost fully developed leaf, and grain samples. The main results of our study were: i) the N/S ratio in shoot and upper leaf was not stable with increasing BM; ii) the S prognosis capacity was similar when measuring SC or N/S on the shoot or upper leaf in vegetative growth stages, and iii) SC in grain allowed an adequate S diagnosis, which was not improved by including N/S in the prediction. In conclusion, based on its simplicity and reliability, we suggested the use of SC in the upper leaf at ≈V6 stage as a S prognosis tool (2.1 g kg−1 threshold). In addition, a 1.12 g S kg−1 threshold in grain was adequate for S diagnosis. EEA Balcarce Fil: Carciochi, Walter D. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Reussi Calvo, Nahuel I. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Wyngaard, Nicolás. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fil: Divito, Guillermo A. Asociación Argentina de Productores en Siembra Directa; Argentina Fil: Eyherabide, Mercedes. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. Fil: .Echeverría, Hernán Eduardo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina. |
| description |
The analysis of sulfur concentration (SC) and nitrogen to S ratio (N/S) in plant tissue are some of the suggested tools to evaluate S deficiency in maize (Zea mays L.). However, the convenience of one over the other and the tissue that should be analyzed (upper leaf or shoot) is still questioned. Therefore, the objectives of our study were to: i) evaluate the stability of shoot and upper leaf N/S ratio with increasing shoot biomass (BM), ii) compare SC vs N/S in shoot or upper leaf as S prognosis tools, and iii) evaluate the use of SC simultaneously with grain N/S as a S diagnostic method in maize. Different S fertilization rates (0–32 kg S ha−1) were evaluated in nine field experiments where S and N concentration were determined in maize shoot, uppermost fully developed leaf, and grain samples. The main results of our study were: i) the N/S ratio in shoot and upper leaf was not stable with increasing BM; ii) the S prognosis capacity was similar when measuring SC or N/S on the shoot or upper leaf in vegetative growth stages, and iii) SC in grain allowed an adequate S diagnosis, which was not improved by including N/S in the prediction. In conclusion, based on its simplicity and reliability, we suggested the use of SC in the upper leaf at ≈V6 stage as a S prognosis tool (2.1 g kg−1 threshold). In addition, a 1.12 g S kg−1 threshold in grain was adequate for S diagnosis. |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-05 2021-01-06T10:55:02Z 2021-01-06T10:55:02Z |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8556 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1161030118307093 1161-0301 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.04.008 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/8556 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1161030118307093 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.04.008 |
| identifier_str_mv |
1161-0301 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
European Journal of Agronomy 108 : 1-10 (2019) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
| instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
| _version_ |
1844619150299758592 |
| score |
12.559606 |