Extrapolation of a structural equation model for digital soil mapping
- Autores
- Angelini, Marcos Esteban; Kempen, Bas; Hauvelink, Gerard B.M.; Temme, Arnaud J.A.M.; Ransom, Michel D.
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In theory, two separate regions with the same soil-forming factors should develop similar soil conditions. This theoretical finding has been used in digital soil mapping (DSM) to extrapolate a model from one area to another, which usually does not work out well. One reason for failure could be that most of these studies used empirical methods. Structural equation modelling (SEM) is a semi-mechanistic technique, which can explicitly include expert knowledge. We therefore hypothesize that SEM models are more suitable for extrapolation than purely empirical models in DSM. The objective of this study was to investigate the extrapolation capability of SEM by comparing different model settings. We applied a SEM model from a previous study in Argentina to a similar soil-landscape in the Great Plains of the United States to predict clay, organic carbon, and cation exchange capacity for three major horizons: A, B, and C. We concluded that system relationships that were well supported by pedological knowledge showed consistent and equal behaviour in both study areas. In addition, a deeper understanding of indicators of soil-forming factors could strengthen conceptual models for extrapolating DSM models. We also found that for model extrapolation, knowledge-based links between system variables are more effective than data-driven links. In particular, model modifications can improve local prediction but harm the predictive power of extrapolation.
Instituto de Suelos
Fil: Angelini, Marcos Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján; Argentina
Fil: Kempen, B. ISRIC — World Soil Information; Holanda
Fil: Heuvelink, G.B.M. Wageningen University. Soil Geography and Landscape Group; Holanda. ISRIC — World Soil Information; Holanda
Fil: Temme, Arnaud J.A.M. Kansas State University. Geography Department; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ransom, Michel D. Kansas State University. Department of Agronomy; Estados Unidos - Fuente
- Geoderma Volume 367 : 114226 (May 2020)
- Materia
-
Suelo
Cartografía
Procesamiento Digital de Imágenes
Génesis del Suelo
Soil
Cartography
Digital Image Processing
Soil Genesis - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/7729
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_1f1d59a65b93e31a80a8d32e5328618f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/7729 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Extrapolation of a structural equation model for digital soil mappingAngelini, Marcos EstebanKempen, BasHauvelink, Gerard B.M.Temme, Arnaud J.A.M.Ransom, Michel D.SueloCartografíaProcesamiento Digital de ImágenesGénesis del SueloSoilCartographyDigital Image ProcessingSoil GenesisIn theory, two separate regions with the same soil-forming factors should develop similar soil conditions. This theoretical finding has been used in digital soil mapping (DSM) to extrapolate a model from one area to another, which usually does not work out well. One reason for failure could be that most of these studies used empirical methods. Structural equation modelling (SEM) is a semi-mechanistic technique, which can explicitly include expert knowledge. We therefore hypothesize that SEM models are more suitable for extrapolation than purely empirical models in DSM. The objective of this study was to investigate the extrapolation capability of SEM by comparing different model settings. We applied a SEM model from a previous study in Argentina to a similar soil-landscape in the Great Plains of the United States to predict clay, organic carbon, and cation exchange capacity for three major horizons: A, B, and C. We concluded that system relationships that were well supported by pedological knowledge showed consistent and equal behaviour in both study areas. In addition, a deeper understanding of indicators of soil-forming factors could strengthen conceptual models for extrapolating DSM models. We also found that for model extrapolation, knowledge-based links between system variables are more effective than data-driven links. In particular, model modifications can improve local prediction but harm the predictive power of extrapolation.Instituto de SuelosFil: Angelini, Marcos Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján; ArgentinaFil: Kempen, B. ISRIC — World Soil Information; HolandaFil: Heuvelink, G.B.M. Wageningen University. Soil Geography and Landscape Group; Holanda. ISRIC — World Soil Information; HolandaFil: Temme, Arnaud J.A.M. Kansas State University. Geography Department; Estados UnidosFil: Ransom, Michel D. Kansas State University. Department of Agronomy; Estados UnidosElsevier2020-08-18T12:12:16Z2020-08-18T12:12:16Z2020-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7729https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S00167061193253760016-70611872-6259https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114226Geoderma Volume 367 : 114226 (May 2020)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess2025-09-29T13:44:59Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/7729instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:45:00.294INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Extrapolation of a structural equation model for digital soil mapping |
title |
Extrapolation of a structural equation model for digital soil mapping |
spellingShingle |
Extrapolation of a structural equation model for digital soil mapping Angelini, Marcos Esteban Suelo Cartografía Procesamiento Digital de Imágenes Génesis del Suelo Soil Cartography Digital Image Processing Soil Genesis |
title_short |
Extrapolation of a structural equation model for digital soil mapping |
title_full |
Extrapolation of a structural equation model for digital soil mapping |
title_fullStr |
Extrapolation of a structural equation model for digital soil mapping |
title_full_unstemmed |
Extrapolation of a structural equation model for digital soil mapping |
title_sort |
Extrapolation of a structural equation model for digital soil mapping |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Angelini, Marcos Esteban Kempen, Bas Hauvelink, Gerard B.M. Temme, Arnaud J.A.M. Ransom, Michel D. |
author |
Angelini, Marcos Esteban |
author_facet |
Angelini, Marcos Esteban Kempen, Bas Hauvelink, Gerard B.M. Temme, Arnaud J.A.M. Ransom, Michel D. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kempen, Bas Hauvelink, Gerard B.M. Temme, Arnaud J.A.M. Ransom, Michel D. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Suelo Cartografía Procesamiento Digital de Imágenes Génesis del Suelo Soil Cartography Digital Image Processing Soil Genesis |
topic |
Suelo Cartografía Procesamiento Digital de Imágenes Génesis del Suelo Soil Cartography Digital Image Processing Soil Genesis |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In theory, two separate regions with the same soil-forming factors should develop similar soil conditions. This theoretical finding has been used in digital soil mapping (DSM) to extrapolate a model from one area to another, which usually does not work out well. One reason for failure could be that most of these studies used empirical methods. Structural equation modelling (SEM) is a semi-mechanistic technique, which can explicitly include expert knowledge. We therefore hypothesize that SEM models are more suitable for extrapolation than purely empirical models in DSM. The objective of this study was to investigate the extrapolation capability of SEM by comparing different model settings. We applied a SEM model from a previous study in Argentina to a similar soil-landscape in the Great Plains of the United States to predict clay, organic carbon, and cation exchange capacity for three major horizons: A, B, and C. We concluded that system relationships that were well supported by pedological knowledge showed consistent and equal behaviour in both study areas. In addition, a deeper understanding of indicators of soil-forming factors could strengthen conceptual models for extrapolating DSM models. We also found that for model extrapolation, knowledge-based links between system variables are more effective than data-driven links. In particular, model modifications can improve local prediction but harm the predictive power of extrapolation. Instituto de Suelos Fil: Angelini, Marcos Esteban. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Suelos; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Luján; Argentina Fil: Kempen, B. ISRIC — World Soil Information; Holanda Fil: Heuvelink, G.B.M. Wageningen University. Soil Geography and Landscape Group; Holanda. ISRIC — World Soil Information; Holanda Fil: Temme, Arnaud J.A.M. Kansas State University. Geography Department; Estados Unidos Fil: Ransom, Michel D. Kansas State University. Department of Agronomy; Estados Unidos |
description |
In theory, two separate regions with the same soil-forming factors should develop similar soil conditions. This theoretical finding has been used in digital soil mapping (DSM) to extrapolate a model from one area to another, which usually does not work out well. One reason for failure could be that most of these studies used empirical methods. Structural equation modelling (SEM) is a semi-mechanistic technique, which can explicitly include expert knowledge. We therefore hypothesize that SEM models are more suitable for extrapolation than purely empirical models in DSM. The objective of this study was to investigate the extrapolation capability of SEM by comparing different model settings. We applied a SEM model from a previous study in Argentina to a similar soil-landscape in the Great Plains of the United States to predict clay, organic carbon, and cation exchange capacity for three major horizons: A, B, and C. We concluded that system relationships that were well supported by pedological knowledge showed consistent and equal behaviour in both study areas. In addition, a deeper understanding of indicators of soil-forming factors could strengthen conceptual models for extrapolating DSM models. We also found that for model extrapolation, knowledge-based links between system variables are more effective than data-driven links. In particular, model modifications can improve local prediction but harm the predictive power of extrapolation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-18T12:12:16Z 2020-08-18T12:12:16Z 2020-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7729 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016706119325376 0016-7061 1872-6259 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114226 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/7729 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016706119325376 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114226 |
identifier_str_mv |
0016-7061 1872-6259 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Geoderma Volume 367 : 114226 (May 2020) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1844619146530127872 |
score |
12.559606 |