Farmers’ perceptions of wildlife in agroecosystems: Insights from a highly modified area of the Pampas region, Argentina
- Autores
- Gorosabel, Antonella; von Below, Jonathan; Bernad, Lucía; Pedrana, Julieta
- Año de publicación
- 2024
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- People’s perceptions of wildlife are influenced by various factors. Studying these factors is a valuable tool to help conserve agro-biodiversity. The objective of this study was to analyze farmers’ perception of birds and mammals in a highly modified area of the Pampas region in Argentina, and to understand the factors that influence their decisions to apply methods that promote or control wildlife. An online survey was conducted to examine farmers’ perception of different animal groups, considering their economic activities and the factors influencing their decision to favor or control certain species. We received 65 responses, which revealed a negative perception toward two groups of birds and five groups of mammals, a neutral perception for one group of birds and four groups of mammals, and a positive for five groups of birds. Preserving natural vegetation along roadsides and field margins was the primary method to promote birds while reducing agrochemical use to promote mammals. Shooting was the main method employed to control all animals. The farmers’ positive perception, their main economic activity, and whether they resided on the farm significantly influenced their decisions to implement methods to promote species. The farmers’ negative perception, their main economic activity, their residence on the rural property, and their age affected their decisions to implement methods for controlling species. Understanding farmers’ perceptions and the drivers behind their decisions to promote or control species represent the initial step toward achieving sustainable management of agroecosystems.
EEA Balcarce
Fil: Gorosábel, Antonella. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina
Fil: von Below, Jonathan. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales; Argentina
Fil: von Below, Jonathan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Fundación Bariloche; Argentina
Fil: Bernad, Lucía. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina
Fil: Pedrana, Julieta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Pedrana, Julieta. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Mar del Plata. Departamento de Medio Ambiente; Argentina - Fuente
- Journal for Nature Conservation 82 : 126722 (December 2024)
- Materia
-
Servicios de los Ecosistemas
Relación Hombre- Naturaleza
Actitud del Agricultor
Ordenación de la Vida Silvestre
Comportamiento Humano
Argentina
Ecosystem Services
Humam- Wildlife Relations
Farmers' Attitudes
Wildlife Management
Human Behaviour
Agroecosystems
Agroecosistemas
Región Pampeana - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso restringido
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/19513
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_07de4c22598c8539482c503e4c5f46b4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/19513 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Farmers’ perceptions of wildlife in agroecosystems: Insights from a highly modified area of the Pampas region, ArgentinaGorosabel, Antonellavon Below, JonathanBernad, LucíaPedrana, JulietaServicios de los EcosistemasRelación Hombre- NaturalezaActitud del AgricultorOrdenación de la Vida SilvestreComportamiento HumanoArgentinaEcosystem ServicesHumam- Wildlife RelationsFarmers' AttitudesWildlife ManagementHuman BehaviourAgroecosystemsAgroecosistemasRegión PampeanaPeople’s perceptions of wildlife are influenced by various factors. Studying these factors is a valuable tool to help conserve agro-biodiversity. The objective of this study was to analyze farmers’ perception of birds and mammals in a highly modified area of the Pampas region in Argentina, and to understand the factors that influence their decisions to apply methods that promote or control wildlife. An online survey was conducted to examine farmers’ perception of different animal groups, considering their economic activities and the factors influencing their decision to favor or control certain species. We received 65 responses, which revealed a negative perception toward two groups of birds and five groups of mammals, a neutral perception for one group of birds and four groups of mammals, and a positive for five groups of birds. Preserving natural vegetation along roadsides and field margins was the primary method to promote birds while reducing agrochemical use to promote mammals. Shooting was the main method employed to control all animals. The farmers’ positive perception, their main economic activity, and whether they resided on the farm significantly influenced their decisions to implement methods to promote species. The farmers’ negative perception, their main economic activity, their residence on the rural property, and their age affected their decisions to implement methods for controlling species. Understanding farmers’ perceptions and the drivers behind their decisions to promote or control species represent the initial step toward achieving sustainable management of agroecosystems.EEA BalcarceFil: Gorosábel, Antonella. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; ArgentinaFil: von Below, Jonathan. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales; ArgentinaFil: von Below, Jonathan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Fundación Bariloche; ArgentinaFil: Bernad, Lucía. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; ArgentinaFil: Pedrana, Julieta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Pedrana, Julieta. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Mar del Plata. Departamento de Medio Ambiente; ArgentinaElsevier2024-09-24T11:31:36Z2024-09-24T11:31:36Z2024-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/19513https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S16171381240017171618-1093 (Online)1617-1381 (Print)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126722Journal for Nature Conservation 82 : 126722 (December 2024)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E2-I038-002, Evaluación, monitoreo y manejo de la biodiversidad en sistemas agropecuarios y forestalesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-10-16T09:31:54Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/19513instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-10-16 09:31:54.904INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Farmers’ perceptions of wildlife in agroecosystems: Insights from a highly modified area of the Pampas region, Argentina |
title |
Farmers’ perceptions of wildlife in agroecosystems: Insights from a highly modified area of the Pampas region, Argentina |
spellingShingle |
Farmers’ perceptions of wildlife in agroecosystems: Insights from a highly modified area of the Pampas region, Argentina Gorosabel, Antonella Servicios de los Ecosistemas Relación Hombre- Naturaleza Actitud del Agricultor Ordenación de la Vida Silvestre Comportamiento Humano Argentina Ecosystem Services Humam- Wildlife Relations Farmers' Attitudes Wildlife Management Human Behaviour Agroecosystems Agroecosistemas Región Pampeana |
title_short |
Farmers’ perceptions of wildlife in agroecosystems: Insights from a highly modified area of the Pampas region, Argentina |
title_full |
Farmers’ perceptions of wildlife in agroecosystems: Insights from a highly modified area of the Pampas region, Argentina |
title_fullStr |
Farmers’ perceptions of wildlife in agroecosystems: Insights from a highly modified area of the Pampas region, Argentina |
title_full_unstemmed |
Farmers’ perceptions of wildlife in agroecosystems: Insights from a highly modified area of the Pampas region, Argentina |
title_sort |
Farmers’ perceptions of wildlife in agroecosystems: Insights from a highly modified area of the Pampas region, Argentina |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Gorosabel, Antonella von Below, Jonathan Bernad, Lucía Pedrana, Julieta |
author |
Gorosabel, Antonella |
author_facet |
Gorosabel, Antonella von Below, Jonathan Bernad, Lucía Pedrana, Julieta |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
von Below, Jonathan Bernad, Lucía Pedrana, Julieta |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Servicios de los Ecosistemas Relación Hombre- Naturaleza Actitud del Agricultor Ordenación de la Vida Silvestre Comportamiento Humano Argentina Ecosystem Services Humam- Wildlife Relations Farmers' Attitudes Wildlife Management Human Behaviour Agroecosystems Agroecosistemas Región Pampeana |
topic |
Servicios de los Ecosistemas Relación Hombre- Naturaleza Actitud del Agricultor Ordenación de la Vida Silvestre Comportamiento Humano Argentina Ecosystem Services Humam- Wildlife Relations Farmers' Attitudes Wildlife Management Human Behaviour Agroecosystems Agroecosistemas Región Pampeana |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
People’s perceptions of wildlife are influenced by various factors. Studying these factors is a valuable tool to help conserve agro-biodiversity. The objective of this study was to analyze farmers’ perception of birds and mammals in a highly modified area of the Pampas region in Argentina, and to understand the factors that influence their decisions to apply methods that promote or control wildlife. An online survey was conducted to examine farmers’ perception of different animal groups, considering their economic activities and the factors influencing their decision to favor or control certain species. We received 65 responses, which revealed a negative perception toward two groups of birds and five groups of mammals, a neutral perception for one group of birds and four groups of mammals, and a positive for five groups of birds. Preserving natural vegetation along roadsides and field margins was the primary method to promote birds while reducing agrochemical use to promote mammals. Shooting was the main method employed to control all animals. The farmers’ positive perception, their main economic activity, and whether they resided on the farm significantly influenced their decisions to implement methods to promote species. The farmers’ negative perception, their main economic activity, their residence on the rural property, and their age affected their decisions to implement methods for controlling species. Understanding farmers’ perceptions and the drivers behind their decisions to promote or control species represent the initial step toward achieving sustainable management of agroecosystems. EEA Balcarce Fil: Gorosábel, Antonella. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina Fil: von Below, Jonathan. Universidad Nacional de Misiones. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales; Argentina Fil: von Below, Jonathan. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Fundación Bariloche; Argentina Fil: Bernad, Lucía. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Instituto de Innovación para la Producción Agropecuaria y el Desarrollo Sostenible; Argentina Fil: Pedrana, Julieta. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Pedrana, Julieta. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Mar del Plata. Departamento de Medio Ambiente; Argentina |
description |
People’s perceptions of wildlife are influenced by various factors. Studying these factors is a valuable tool to help conserve agro-biodiversity. The objective of this study was to analyze farmers’ perception of birds and mammals in a highly modified area of the Pampas region in Argentina, and to understand the factors that influence their decisions to apply methods that promote or control wildlife. An online survey was conducted to examine farmers’ perception of different animal groups, considering their economic activities and the factors influencing their decision to favor or control certain species. We received 65 responses, which revealed a negative perception toward two groups of birds and five groups of mammals, a neutral perception for one group of birds and four groups of mammals, and a positive for five groups of birds. Preserving natural vegetation along roadsides and field margins was the primary method to promote birds while reducing agrochemical use to promote mammals. Shooting was the main method employed to control all animals. The farmers’ positive perception, their main economic activity, and whether they resided on the farm significantly influenced their decisions to implement methods to promote species. The farmers’ negative perception, their main economic activity, their residence on the rural property, and their age affected their decisions to implement methods for controlling species. Understanding farmers’ perceptions and the drivers behind their decisions to promote or control species represent the initial step toward achieving sustainable management of agroecosystems. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-09-24T11:31:36Z 2024-09-24T11:31:36Z 2024-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/19513 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1617138124001717 1618-1093 (Online) 1617-1381 (Print) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126722 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/19513 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1617138124001717 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126722 |
identifier_str_mv |
1618-1093 (Online) 1617-1381 (Print) |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PD-E2-I038-002, Evaluación, monitoreo y manejo de la biodiversidad en sistemas agropecuarios y forestales |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
restrictedAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal for Nature Conservation 82 : 126722 (December 2024) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1846143579538325504 |
score |
12.712165 |