Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum
- Autores
- Velazco, Julio Gabriel; Malosetti, Marcos; Hunt, Colleen H.; Mace, Emma S.; Jordan, David R.; Van Eeuwijk, Fred A.
- Año de publicación
- 2019
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Selection based on genome-wide markers has become an active breeding strategy in crops. Genomic prediction models can make use of pedigree information to account for the residual polygenic effects not captured by markers. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of using pedigree and genomic information on prediction quality of breeding values for different traits in sorghum. We explored BLUP models that use weighted combinations of pedigree and genomic relationship matrices. The optimal weighting factor was empirically determined in order to maximize predictive ability after evaluating a range of candidate weights. The phenotypic data consisted of testcross evaluations of sorghum parental lines across multiple environments. All lines were genotyped, and full pedigree information was available. The performance of the best predictive combined matrix was compared to that of models fitting the component matrices independently. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation technique. Fitting a combined pedigree–genomic matrix with the optimal weight always yielded the largest increases in predictive ability and the largest reductions in prediction bias relative to the simple G-BLUP. However, the weight that optimized prediction varied across traits. The benefits of including pedigree information in the genomic model were more relevant for traits with lower heritability, such as grain yield and stay-green. Our results suggest that the combination of pedigree and genomic relatedness can be used to optimize predictions of complex traits in crops when the additive variation is not fully explained by markers.
EEA Pergamino
Fil: Velazco, Julio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda
Fil: Malosetti, Marcos. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda
Fil: Hunt, Colleen H. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Australia
Fil: Mace, Emma S. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Australia
Fil: Jordan, David R. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia
Fil: Eeuwijk, Fred A. van. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda - Fuente
- Theoretical and Applied Genetics 132 (7) : 2055–2067. (July 2019)
- Materia
-
Sorghum almum
Sorgos
Valor Genético
Genómica
Pedigrí
Pedigree livestock
Rendimiento
Evaluación
Breeding Value
Genomics
Yields
Evaluation - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
- OAI Identificador
- oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6325
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
INTADig_03175e6ef70e5d087f2dd7bfd023a83e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6325 |
network_acronym_str |
INTADig |
repository_id_str |
l |
network_name_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
spelling |
Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghumVelazco, Julio GabrielMalosetti, MarcosHunt, Colleen H.Mace, Emma S.Jordan, David R.Van Eeuwijk, Fred A.Sorghum almumSorgosValor GenéticoGenómicaPedigríPedigree livestockRendimientoEvaluaciónBreeding ValueGenomicsYieldsEvaluationSelection based on genome-wide markers has become an active breeding strategy in crops. Genomic prediction models can make use of pedigree information to account for the residual polygenic effects not captured by markers. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of using pedigree and genomic information on prediction quality of breeding values for different traits in sorghum. We explored BLUP models that use weighted combinations of pedigree and genomic relationship matrices. The optimal weighting factor was empirically determined in order to maximize predictive ability after evaluating a range of candidate weights. The phenotypic data consisted of testcross evaluations of sorghum parental lines across multiple environments. All lines were genotyped, and full pedigree information was available. The performance of the best predictive combined matrix was compared to that of models fitting the component matrices independently. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation technique. Fitting a combined pedigree–genomic matrix with the optimal weight always yielded the largest increases in predictive ability and the largest reductions in prediction bias relative to the simple G-BLUP. However, the weight that optimized prediction varied across traits. The benefits of including pedigree information in the genomic model were more relevant for traits with lower heritability, such as grain yield and stay-green. Our results suggest that the combination of pedigree and genomic relatedness can be used to optimize predictions of complex traits in crops when the additive variation is not fully explained by markers.EEA PergaminoFil: Velazco, Julio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; HolandaFil: Malosetti, Marcos. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; HolandaFil: Hunt, Colleen H. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; AustraliaFil: Mace, Emma S. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; AustraliaFil: Jordan, David R. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; AustraliaFil: Eeuwijk, Fred A. van. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; HolandaSpringer2019-11-19T12:57:00Z2019-11-19T12:57:00Z2019-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-whttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/63250040-57521432-2242https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-wTheoretical and Applied Genetics 132 (7) : 2055–2067. (July 2019)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:44:49Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/6325instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:49.985INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum |
title |
Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum |
spellingShingle |
Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum Velazco, Julio Gabriel Sorghum almum Sorgos Valor Genético Genómica Pedigrí Pedigree livestock Rendimiento Evaluación Breeding Value Genomics Yields Evaluation |
title_short |
Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum |
title_full |
Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum |
title_fullStr |
Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum |
title_full_unstemmed |
Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum |
title_sort |
Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Velazco, Julio Gabriel Malosetti, Marcos Hunt, Colleen H. Mace, Emma S. Jordan, David R. Van Eeuwijk, Fred A. |
author |
Velazco, Julio Gabriel |
author_facet |
Velazco, Julio Gabriel Malosetti, Marcos Hunt, Colleen H. Mace, Emma S. Jordan, David R. Van Eeuwijk, Fred A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Malosetti, Marcos Hunt, Colleen H. Mace, Emma S. Jordan, David R. Van Eeuwijk, Fred A. |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Sorghum almum Sorgos Valor Genético Genómica Pedigrí Pedigree livestock Rendimiento Evaluación Breeding Value Genomics Yields Evaluation |
topic |
Sorghum almum Sorgos Valor Genético Genómica Pedigrí Pedigree livestock Rendimiento Evaluación Breeding Value Genomics Yields Evaluation |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Selection based on genome-wide markers has become an active breeding strategy in crops. Genomic prediction models can make use of pedigree information to account for the residual polygenic effects not captured by markers. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of using pedigree and genomic information on prediction quality of breeding values for different traits in sorghum. We explored BLUP models that use weighted combinations of pedigree and genomic relationship matrices. The optimal weighting factor was empirically determined in order to maximize predictive ability after evaluating a range of candidate weights. The phenotypic data consisted of testcross evaluations of sorghum parental lines across multiple environments. All lines were genotyped, and full pedigree information was available. The performance of the best predictive combined matrix was compared to that of models fitting the component matrices independently. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation technique. Fitting a combined pedigree–genomic matrix with the optimal weight always yielded the largest increases in predictive ability and the largest reductions in prediction bias relative to the simple G-BLUP. However, the weight that optimized prediction varied across traits. The benefits of including pedigree information in the genomic model were more relevant for traits with lower heritability, such as grain yield and stay-green. Our results suggest that the combination of pedigree and genomic relatedness can be used to optimize predictions of complex traits in crops when the additive variation is not fully explained by markers. EEA Pergamino Fil: Velazco, Julio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda Fil: Malosetti, Marcos. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda Fil: Hunt, Colleen H. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Australia Fil: Mace, Emma S. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Australia Fil: Jordan, David R. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia Fil: Eeuwijk, Fred A. van. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda |
description |
Selection based on genome-wide markers has become an active breeding strategy in crops. Genomic prediction models can make use of pedigree information to account for the residual polygenic effects not captured by markers. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of using pedigree and genomic information on prediction quality of breeding values for different traits in sorghum. We explored BLUP models that use weighted combinations of pedigree and genomic relationship matrices. The optimal weighting factor was empirically determined in order to maximize predictive ability after evaluating a range of candidate weights. The phenotypic data consisted of testcross evaluations of sorghum parental lines across multiple environments. All lines were genotyped, and full pedigree information was available. The performance of the best predictive combined matrix was compared to that of models fitting the component matrices independently. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation technique. Fitting a combined pedigree–genomic matrix with the optimal weight always yielded the largest increases in predictive ability and the largest reductions in prediction bias relative to the simple G-BLUP. However, the weight that optimized prediction varied across traits. The benefits of including pedigree information in the genomic model were more relevant for traits with lower heritability, such as grain yield and stay-green. Our results suggest that the combination of pedigree and genomic relatedness can be used to optimize predictions of complex traits in crops when the additive variation is not fully explained by markers. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-11-19T12:57:00Z 2019-11-19T12:57:00Z 2019-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-w http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6325 0040-5752 1432-2242 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-w |
url |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-w http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6325 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-w |
identifier_str_mv |
0040-5752 1432-2242 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics 132 (7) : 2055–2067. (July 2019) reponame:INTA Digital (INTA) instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
reponame_str |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
collection |
INTA Digital (INTA) |
instname_str |
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar |
_version_ |
1844619139711238144 |
score |
12.559606 |