Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum

Autores
Velazco, Julio Gabriel; Malosetti, Marcos; Hunt, Colleen H.; Mace, Emma S.; Jordan, David R.; Van Eeuwijk, Fred A.
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Selection based on genome-wide markers has become an active breeding strategy in crops. Genomic prediction models can make use of pedigree information to account for the residual polygenic effects not captured by markers. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of using pedigree and genomic information on prediction quality of breeding values for different traits in sorghum. We explored BLUP models that use weighted combinations of pedigree and genomic relationship matrices. The optimal weighting factor was empirically determined in order to maximize predictive ability after evaluating a range of candidate weights. The phenotypic data consisted of testcross evaluations of sorghum parental lines across multiple environments. All lines were genotyped, and full pedigree information was available. The performance of the best predictive combined matrix was compared to that of models fitting the component matrices independently. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation technique. Fitting a combined pedigree–genomic matrix with the optimal weight always yielded the largest increases in predictive ability and the largest reductions in prediction bias relative to the simple G-BLUP. However, the weight that optimized prediction varied across traits. The benefits of including pedigree information in the genomic model were more relevant for traits with lower heritability, such as grain yield and stay-green. Our results suggest that the combination of pedigree and genomic relatedness can be used to optimize predictions of complex traits in crops when the additive variation is not fully explained by markers.
EEA Pergamino
Fil: Velazco, Julio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda
Fil: Malosetti, Marcos. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda
Fil: Hunt, Colleen H. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Australia
Fil: Mace, Emma S. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Australia
Fil: Jordan, David R. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia
Fil: Eeuwijk, Fred A. van. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda
Fuente
Theoretical and Applied Genetics 132 (7) : 2055–2067. (July 2019)
Materia
Sorghum almum
Sorgos
Valor Genético
Genómica
Pedigrí
Pedigree livestock
Rendimiento
Evaluación
Breeding Value
Genomics
Yields
Evaluation
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6325

id INTADig_03175e6ef70e5d087f2dd7bfd023a83e
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/6325
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghumVelazco, Julio GabrielMalosetti, MarcosHunt, Colleen H.Mace, Emma S.Jordan, David R.Van Eeuwijk, Fred A.Sorghum almumSorgosValor GenéticoGenómicaPedigríPedigree livestockRendimientoEvaluaciónBreeding ValueGenomicsYieldsEvaluationSelection based on genome-wide markers has become an active breeding strategy in crops. Genomic prediction models can make use of pedigree information to account for the residual polygenic effects not captured by markers. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of using pedigree and genomic information on prediction quality of breeding values for different traits in sorghum. We explored BLUP models that use weighted combinations of pedigree and genomic relationship matrices. The optimal weighting factor was empirically determined in order to maximize predictive ability after evaluating a range of candidate weights. The phenotypic data consisted of testcross evaluations of sorghum parental lines across multiple environments. All lines were genotyped, and full pedigree information was available. The performance of the best predictive combined matrix was compared to that of models fitting the component matrices independently. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation technique. Fitting a combined pedigree–genomic matrix with the optimal weight always yielded the largest increases in predictive ability and the largest reductions in prediction bias relative to the simple G-BLUP. However, the weight that optimized prediction varied across traits. The benefits of including pedigree information in the genomic model were more relevant for traits with lower heritability, such as grain yield and stay-green. Our results suggest that the combination of pedigree and genomic relatedness can be used to optimize predictions of complex traits in crops when the additive variation is not fully explained by markers.EEA PergaminoFil: Velazco, Julio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; HolandaFil: Malosetti, Marcos. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; HolandaFil: Hunt, Colleen H. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; AustraliaFil: Mace, Emma S. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; AustraliaFil: Jordan, David R. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; AustraliaFil: Eeuwijk, Fred A. van. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; HolandaSpringer2019-11-19T12:57:00Z2019-11-19T12:57:00Z2019-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-whttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/63250040-57521432-2242https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-wTheoretical and Applied Genetics 132 (7) : 2055–2067. (July 2019)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-29T13:44:49Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/6325instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-29 13:44:49.985INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum
title Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum
spellingShingle Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum
Velazco, Julio Gabriel
Sorghum almum
Sorgos
Valor Genético
Genómica
Pedigrí
Pedigree livestock
Rendimiento
Evaluación
Breeding Value
Genomics
Yields
Evaluation
title_short Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum
title_full Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum
title_fullStr Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum
title_full_unstemmed Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum
title_sort Combining pedigree and genomic information to improve prediction quality : an example in sorghum
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Velazco, Julio Gabriel
Malosetti, Marcos
Hunt, Colleen H.
Mace, Emma S.
Jordan, David R.
Van Eeuwijk, Fred A.
author Velazco, Julio Gabriel
author_facet Velazco, Julio Gabriel
Malosetti, Marcos
Hunt, Colleen H.
Mace, Emma S.
Jordan, David R.
Van Eeuwijk, Fred A.
author_role author
author2 Malosetti, Marcos
Hunt, Colleen H.
Mace, Emma S.
Jordan, David R.
Van Eeuwijk, Fred A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Sorghum almum
Sorgos
Valor Genético
Genómica
Pedigrí
Pedigree livestock
Rendimiento
Evaluación
Breeding Value
Genomics
Yields
Evaluation
topic Sorghum almum
Sorgos
Valor Genético
Genómica
Pedigrí
Pedigree livestock
Rendimiento
Evaluación
Breeding Value
Genomics
Yields
Evaluation
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Selection based on genome-wide markers has become an active breeding strategy in crops. Genomic prediction models can make use of pedigree information to account for the residual polygenic effects not captured by markers. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of using pedigree and genomic information on prediction quality of breeding values for different traits in sorghum. We explored BLUP models that use weighted combinations of pedigree and genomic relationship matrices. The optimal weighting factor was empirically determined in order to maximize predictive ability after evaluating a range of candidate weights. The phenotypic data consisted of testcross evaluations of sorghum parental lines across multiple environments. All lines were genotyped, and full pedigree information was available. The performance of the best predictive combined matrix was compared to that of models fitting the component matrices independently. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation technique. Fitting a combined pedigree–genomic matrix with the optimal weight always yielded the largest increases in predictive ability and the largest reductions in prediction bias relative to the simple G-BLUP. However, the weight that optimized prediction varied across traits. The benefits of including pedigree information in the genomic model were more relevant for traits with lower heritability, such as grain yield and stay-green. Our results suggest that the combination of pedigree and genomic relatedness can be used to optimize predictions of complex traits in crops when the additive variation is not fully explained by markers.
EEA Pergamino
Fil: Velazco, Julio. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Forrajeras; Argentina. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda
Fil: Malosetti, Marcos. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda
Fil: Hunt, Colleen H. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Australia
Fil: Mace, Emma S. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia. Hermitage Research Facility. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries; Australia
Fil: Jordan, David R. The University of Queensland. Hermitage Research Facility. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation; Australia
Fil: Eeuwijk, Fred A. van. Wageningen University and Research . Biometris – Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Holanda
description Selection based on genome-wide markers has become an active breeding strategy in crops. Genomic prediction models can make use of pedigree information to account for the residual polygenic effects not captured by markers. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of using pedigree and genomic information on prediction quality of breeding values for different traits in sorghum. We explored BLUP models that use weighted combinations of pedigree and genomic relationship matrices. The optimal weighting factor was empirically determined in order to maximize predictive ability after evaluating a range of candidate weights. The phenotypic data consisted of testcross evaluations of sorghum parental lines across multiple environments. All lines were genotyped, and full pedigree information was available. The performance of the best predictive combined matrix was compared to that of models fitting the component matrices independently. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation technique. Fitting a combined pedigree–genomic matrix with the optimal weight always yielded the largest increases in predictive ability and the largest reductions in prediction bias relative to the simple G-BLUP. However, the weight that optimized prediction varied across traits. The benefits of including pedigree information in the genomic model were more relevant for traits with lower heritability, such as grain yield and stay-green. Our results suggest that the combination of pedigree and genomic relatedness can be used to optimize predictions of complex traits in crops when the additive variation is not fully explained by markers.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-11-19T12:57:00Z
2019-11-19T12:57:00Z
2019-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-w
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6325
0040-5752
1432-2242
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-w
url https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-w
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/6325
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03337-w
identifier_str_mv 0040-5752
1432-2242
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Theoretical and Applied Genetics 132 (7) : 2055–2067. (July 2019)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1844619139711238144
score 12.559606