The pest kill rate of thirteen natural enemies as aggregate evaluation criterion of their biological control potential of Tuta absoluta

Autores
van Lenteren, Joop C.; Lanzoni, Alberto; Hemerik, Lia; Bueno, Vanda H.P.; Bajonero Cuervo, Johanna G.; Biondi, Antonio; Burgio, Giovanni; Calvo, Francisco J.; de Jong, Peter W.; Lopez, Silvia Noemi; Luna, María Gabriela; Montes, Flavio C.; Nieves, Eliana L.; Aigbedion‑Atalor, Pascal Osa; Riquelme Virgala, Maria B.; Sánchez, Norma E.; Urbaneja, Alberto
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Ecologists study how populations are regulated, while scientists studying biological pest control apply population regulation processes to reduce numbers of harmful organisms: an organism (a natural enemy) is used to reduce the population density of another organism (a pest). Finding an efective biological control agent among the tens to hundreds of natural enemies of a pest is a daunting task. Evaluation criteria help in a frst selection to remove clearly inefective or risky species from the list of candidates. Next, we propose to use an aggregate evaluation criterion, the pest kill rate, to compare the pest population reduction capacity of species not eliminated during the frst selection. The pest kill rate is the average daily lifetime killing of the pest by the natural enemy under consideration. Pest kill rates of six species of predators and seven species of parasitoids of Tuta absoluta were calculated and compared. Several natural enemies had pest kill rates that were too low to be able to theoretically reduce the pest population below crop damaging densities. Other species showed a high pest reduction capacity and their potential for practical application can now be tested under commercial crop production conditions
Instituto de Microbiología y Zoología Agrícola (IMYZA)
Fil: van Lenteren, Joop C. Wageningen University. Laboratory of Entomology; Países Bajos
Fil: Lanzoni, Alberto. University of Bologna. Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences; Italia
Fil: Hemerik, Lia. Wageningen University. Biometris. Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Países Bajos
Fil: Bueno, Vanda H. P. Federal University of Lavras. Department of Entomology. Laboratory of Biological Control; Brasil
Fil: Bajonero Cuervo, Johanna G. Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (USP/ESALQ). Department of Entomology and Acarology; Brasil
Fil: Biondi, Antonio. University of Catania. Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment; Italia
Fil: Burgio, Giovanni. University of Bologna. Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences; Italia
Fil: Calvo, Francisco J. Koppert Spain S.L. Research and Development; España
Fil: de Jong, Peter W. Wageningen University. Laboratory of Entomology; Países Bajos
Fil: López, Silvia Noemí. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Microbiología y Zoología Agrícola; Argentina
Fil: Luna, M. Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina
Fil: Montes, Flavio C. Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (USP/ESALQ). Department of Entomology and Acarology; Brasil
Fil: Nieves, Eliana L. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina
Fil: Aigbedion‑Atalor, Pascal Osa. International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE); Kenia
Fil: Riquelme Virgala, Maria B. Universidad Nacional de Luján y Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Departamento de Tecnología; Argentina
Fil: Riquelme Virgala, Maria B. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas e Instituto de Ecología y Desarrollo Sustentable (INEDES). Programa de Ecología Terrestre; Argentina
Fil: Sánchez, Norma E. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina
Fil: Urbaneja, Alberto. Centro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA); España
Fuente
Scientific Reports 11 : 10756 (2021)
Materia
Tuta absoluta
Plagas de Plantas
Natural Enemies
Pest Control
Biological Control
Control de Plagas
Enemigos Naturales
Control Biológico
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Repositorio
INTA Digital (INTA)
Institución
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
OAI Identificador
oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11144
Acceder
id INTADig_012c03c4eee4b7b1a84181d587c10ca4
oai_identifier_str oai:localhost:20.500.12123/11144
network_acronym_str INTADig
repository_id_str l
network_name_str INTA Digital (INTA)
spelling The pest kill rate of thirteen natural enemies as aggregate evaluation criterion of their biological control potential of Tuta absolutavan Lenteren, Joop C.Lanzoni, AlbertoHemerik, LiaBueno, Vanda H.P.Bajonero Cuervo, Johanna G.Biondi, AntonioBurgio, GiovanniCalvo, Francisco J.de Jong, Peter W.Lopez, Silvia NoemiLuna, María GabrielaMontes, Flavio C.Nieves, Eliana L.Aigbedion‑Atalor, Pascal OsaRiquelme Virgala, Maria B.Sánchez, Norma E.Urbaneja, AlbertoTuta absolutaPlagas de PlantasNatural EnemiesPest ControlBiological ControlControl de PlagasEnemigos NaturalesControl BiológicoEcologists study how populations are regulated, while scientists studying biological pest control apply population regulation processes to reduce numbers of harmful organisms: an organism (a natural enemy) is used to reduce the population density of another organism (a pest). Finding an efective biological control agent among the tens to hundreds of natural enemies of a pest is a daunting task. Evaluation criteria help in a frst selection to remove clearly inefective or risky species from the list of candidates. Next, we propose to use an aggregate evaluation criterion, the pest kill rate, to compare the pest population reduction capacity of species not eliminated during the frst selection. The pest kill rate is the average daily lifetime killing of the pest by the natural enemy under consideration. Pest kill rates of six species of predators and seven species of parasitoids of Tuta absoluta were calculated and compared. Several natural enemies had pest kill rates that were too low to be able to theoretically reduce the pest population below crop damaging densities. Other species showed a high pest reduction capacity and their potential for practical application can now be tested under commercial crop production conditionsInstituto de Microbiología y Zoología Agrícola (IMYZA)Fil: van Lenteren, Joop C. Wageningen University. Laboratory of Entomology; Países BajosFil: Lanzoni, Alberto. University of Bologna. Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences; ItaliaFil: Hemerik, Lia. Wageningen University. Biometris. Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Países BajosFil: Bueno, Vanda H. P. Federal University of Lavras. Department of Entomology. Laboratory of Biological Control; BrasilFil: Bajonero Cuervo, Johanna G. Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (USP/ESALQ). Department of Entomology and Acarology; BrasilFil: Biondi, Antonio. University of Catania. Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment; ItaliaFil: Burgio, Giovanni. University of Bologna. Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences; ItaliaFil: Calvo, Francisco J. Koppert Spain S.L. Research and Development; EspañaFil: de Jong, Peter W. Wageningen University. Laboratory of Entomology; Países BajosFil: López, Silvia Noemí. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Microbiología y Zoología Agrícola; ArgentinaFil: Luna, M. Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; ArgentinaFil: Montes, Flavio C. Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (USP/ESALQ). Department of Entomology and Acarology; BrasilFil: Nieves, Eliana L. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; ArgentinaFil: Aigbedion‑Atalor, Pascal Osa. International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE); KeniaFil: Riquelme Virgala, Maria B. Universidad Nacional de Luján y Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Departamento de Tecnología; ArgentinaFil: Riquelme Virgala, Maria B. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas e Instituto de Ecología y Desarrollo Sustentable (INEDES). Programa de Ecología Terrestre; ArgentinaFil: Sánchez, Norma E. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; ArgentinaFil: Urbaneja, Alberto. Centro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA); EspañaSpringer2022-02-15T10:37:02Z2022-02-15T10:37:02Z2021-05-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11144https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-90034-82045-2322https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90034-8Scientific Reports 11 : 10756 (2021)reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariaenginfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E4-I074-001/2019-PE-E4-I074-001/AR./Manejo Integrado de Plagasinfo:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PpAT-2.4.1-PR.VEG-001/2019-PpAT-2.4.1-PR.VEG-001/AR./Programa por Área Temática Protección Vegetalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)2025-09-04T09:49:14Zoai:localhost:20.500.12123/11144instacron:INTAInstitucionalhttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://repositorio.inta.gob.ar/oai/requesttripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:l2025-09-04 09:49:15.328INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuariafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The pest kill rate of thirteen natural enemies as aggregate evaluation criterion of their biological control potential of Tuta absoluta
title The pest kill rate of thirteen natural enemies as aggregate evaluation criterion of their biological control potential of Tuta absoluta
spellingShingle The pest kill rate of thirteen natural enemies as aggregate evaluation criterion of their biological control potential of Tuta absoluta
van Lenteren, Joop C.
Tuta absoluta
Plagas de Plantas
Natural Enemies
Pest Control
Biological Control
Control de Plagas
Enemigos Naturales
Control Biológico
title_short The pest kill rate of thirteen natural enemies as aggregate evaluation criterion of their biological control potential of Tuta absoluta
title_full The pest kill rate of thirteen natural enemies as aggregate evaluation criterion of their biological control potential of Tuta absoluta
title_fullStr The pest kill rate of thirteen natural enemies as aggregate evaluation criterion of their biological control potential of Tuta absoluta
title_full_unstemmed The pest kill rate of thirteen natural enemies as aggregate evaluation criterion of their biological control potential of Tuta absoluta
title_sort The pest kill rate of thirteen natural enemies as aggregate evaluation criterion of their biological control potential of Tuta absoluta
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv van Lenteren, Joop C.
Lanzoni, Alberto
Hemerik, Lia
Bueno, Vanda H.P.
Bajonero Cuervo, Johanna G.
Biondi, Antonio
Burgio, Giovanni
Calvo, Francisco J.
de Jong, Peter W.
Lopez, Silvia Noemi
Luna, María Gabriela
Montes, Flavio C.
Nieves, Eliana L.
Aigbedion‑Atalor, Pascal Osa
Riquelme Virgala, Maria B.
Sánchez, Norma E.
Urbaneja, Alberto
author van Lenteren, Joop C.
author_facet van Lenteren, Joop C.
Lanzoni, Alberto
Hemerik, Lia
Bueno, Vanda H.P.
Bajonero Cuervo, Johanna G.
Biondi, Antonio
Burgio, Giovanni
Calvo, Francisco J.
de Jong, Peter W.
Lopez, Silvia Noemi
Luna, María Gabriela
Montes, Flavio C.
Nieves, Eliana L.
Aigbedion‑Atalor, Pascal Osa
Riquelme Virgala, Maria B.
Sánchez, Norma E.
Urbaneja, Alberto
author_role author
author2 Lanzoni, Alberto
Hemerik, Lia
Bueno, Vanda H.P.
Bajonero Cuervo, Johanna G.
Biondi, Antonio
Burgio, Giovanni
Calvo, Francisco J.
de Jong, Peter W.
Lopez, Silvia Noemi
Luna, María Gabriela
Montes, Flavio C.
Nieves, Eliana L.
Aigbedion‑Atalor, Pascal Osa
Riquelme Virgala, Maria B.
Sánchez, Norma E.
Urbaneja, Alberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Tuta absoluta
Plagas de Plantas
Natural Enemies
Pest Control
Biological Control
Control de Plagas
Enemigos Naturales
Control Biológico
topic Tuta absoluta
Plagas de Plantas
Natural Enemies
Pest Control
Biological Control
Control de Plagas
Enemigos Naturales
Control Biológico
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Ecologists study how populations are regulated, while scientists studying biological pest control apply population regulation processes to reduce numbers of harmful organisms: an organism (a natural enemy) is used to reduce the population density of another organism (a pest). Finding an efective biological control agent among the tens to hundreds of natural enemies of a pest is a daunting task. Evaluation criteria help in a frst selection to remove clearly inefective or risky species from the list of candidates. Next, we propose to use an aggregate evaluation criterion, the pest kill rate, to compare the pest population reduction capacity of species not eliminated during the frst selection. The pest kill rate is the average daily lifetime killing of the pest by the natural enemy under consideration. Pest kill rates of six species of predators and seven species of parasitoids of Tuta absoluta were calculated and compared. Several natural enemies had pest kill rates that were too low to be able to theoretically reduce the pest population below crop damaging densities. Other species showed a high pest reduction capacity and their potential for practical application can now be tested under commercial crop production conditions
Instituto de Microbiología y Zoología Agrícola (IMYZA)
Fil: van Lenteren, Joop C. Wageningen University. Laboratory of Entomology; Países Bajos
Fil: Lanzoni, Alberto. University of Bologna. Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences; Italia
Fil: Hemerik, Lia. Wageningen University. Biometris. Department of Mathematical and Statistical Methods; Países Bajos
Fil: Bueno, Vanda H. P. Federal University of Lavras. Department of Entomology. Laboratory of Biological Control; Brasil
Fil: Bajonero Cuervo, Johanna G. Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (USP/ESALQ). Department of Entomology and Acarology; Brasil
Fil: Biondi, Antonio. University of Catania. Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment; Italia
Fil: Burgio, Giovanni. University of Bologna. Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences; Italia
Fil: Calvo, Francisco J. Koppert Spain S.L. Research and Development; España
Fil: de Jong, Peter W. Wageningen University. Laboratory of Entomology; Países Bajos
Fil: López, Silvia Noemí. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Instituto de Microbiología y Zoología Agrícola; Argentina
Fil: Luna, M. Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina
Fil: Montes, Flavio C. Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (USP/ESALQ). Department of Entomology and Acarology; Brasil
Fil: Nieves, Eliana L. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina
Fil: Aigbedion‑Atalor, Pascal Osa. International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE); Kenia
Fil: Riquelme Virgala, Maria B. Universidad Nacional de Luján y Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Departamento de Tecnología; Argentina
Fil: Riquelme Virgala, Maria B. Universidad Nacional de Luján. Departamento de Ciencias Básicas e Instituto de Ecología y Desarrollo Sustentable (INEDES). Programa de Ecología Terrestre; Argentina
Fil: Sánchez, Norma E. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores; Argentina
Fil: Urbaneja, Alberto. Centro de Protección Vegetal y Biotecnología, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA); España
description Ecologists study how populations are regulated, while scientists studying biological pest control apply population regulation processes to reduce numbers of harmful organisms: an organism (a natural enemy) is used to reduce the population density of another organism (a pest). Finding an efective biological control agent among the tens to hundreds of natural enemies of a pest is a daunting task. Evaluation criteria help in a frst selection to remove clearly inefective or risky species from the list of candidates. Next, we propose to use an aggregate evaluation criterion, the pest kill rate, to compare the pest population reduction capacity of species not eliminated during the frst selection. The pest kill rate is the average daily lifetime killing of the pest by the natural enemy under consideration. Pest kill rates of six species of predators and seven species of parasitoids of Tuta absoluta were calculated and compared. Several natural enemies had pest kill rates that were too low to be able to theoretically reduce the pest population below crop damaging densities. Other species showed a high pest reduction capacity and their potential for practical application can now be tested under commercial crop production conditions
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-24
2022-02-15T10:37:02Z
2022-02-15T10:37:02Z
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11144
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-90034-8
2045-2322
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90034-8
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12123/11144
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-90034-8
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90034-8
identifier_str_mv 2045-2322
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PE-E4-I074-001/2019-PE-E4-I074-001/AR./Manejo Integrado de Plagas
info:eu-repograntAgreement/INTA/2019-PpAT-2.4.1-PR.VEG-001/2019-PpAT-2.4.1-PR.VEG-001/AR./Programa por Área Temática Protección Vegetal
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scientific Reports 11 : 10756 (2021)
reponame:INTA Digital (INTA)
instname:Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
reponame_str INTA Digital (INTA)
collection INTA Digital (INTA)
instname_str Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTA Digital (INTA) - Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tripaldi.nicolas@inta.gob.ar
_version_ 1842341393680302080
score 12.623145

Publicaciones similares