What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities
- Autores
- Legarre, Santiago
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- There has been great confusion around the use of the term ‘natural law.’ Leading authorities avoid using it altogether and the main proponent of natural law theory in English, John Mitchell Finnis, hardly uses it in his writings. ‘Natural law’ in this paper does not mean what it means in three different contexts in which the expression sometimes is used. These contexts are as follows. First, “natural law” as one of the several “natural laws” formerly called “eternal law”. Second, “natural law” as a religious idea, related to the teachings of the Catholic Church. Third, “natural law” as a certain mode of American jurisprudence, which has fallen into great discredit. This paper shall indicate in what respects the meaning that the author holds to be focal has something in common with, and how it differentiates from, the other meanings that prevail in those other contexts. In so doing, this paper will inevitably start to define natural law.
Fil: Legarre, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires"; Argentina - Materia
-
Natural Law
Contexts - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239203
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_fcfbc8bcbab59c9f0c0518d951bfe4a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239203 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related NormativitiesLegarre, SantiagoNatural LawContextshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5There has been great confusion around the use of the term ‘natural law.’ Leading authorities avoid using it altogether and the main proponent of natural law theory in English, John Mitchell Finnis, hardly uses it in his writings. ‘Natural law’ in this paper does not mean what it means in three different contexts in which the expression sometimes is used. These contexts are as follows. First, “natural law” as one of the several “natural laws” formerly called “eternal law”. Second, “natural law” as a religious idea, related to the teachings of the Catholic Church. Third, “natural law” as a certain mode of American jurisprudence, which has fallen into great discredit. This paper shall indicate in what respects the meaning that the author holds to be focal has something in common with, and how it differentiates from, the other meanings that prevail in those other contexts. In so doing, this paper will inevitably start to define natural law.Fil: Legarre, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires"; ArgentinaStrathmore University2023-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/239203Legarre, Santiago; What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities; Strathmore University; Strathmore Law Journal; 7; 1; 10-2023; 15-232411-59752413-7162CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journal.strathmore.edu/index.php/law/article/view/243info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.52907/slj.v7i1.243info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:20:28Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239203instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:20:28.449CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities |
title |
What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities |
spellingShingle |
What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities Legarre, Santiago Natural Law Contexts |
title_short |
What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities |
title_full |
What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities |
title_fullStr |
What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities |
title_sort |
What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Legarre, Santiago |
author |
Legarre, Santiago |
author_facet |
Legarre, Santiago |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Natural Law Contexts |
topic |
Natural Law Contexts |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
There has been great confusion around the use of the term ‘natural law.’ Leading authorities avoid using it altogether and the main proponent of natural law theory in English, John Mitchell Finnis, hardly uses it in his writings. ‘Natural law’ in this paper does not mean what it means in three different contexts in which the expression sometimes is used. These contexts are as follows. First, “natural law” as one of the several “natural laws” formerly called “eternal law”. Second, “natural law” as a religious idea, related to the teachings of the Catholic Church. Third, “natural law” as a certain mode of American jurisprudence, which has fallen into great discredit. This paper shall indicate in what respects the meaning that the author holds to be focal has something in common with, and how it differentiates from, the other meanings that prevail in those other contexts. In so doing, this paper will inevitably start to define natural law. Fil: Legarre, Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires"; Argentina |
description |
There has been great confusion around the use of the term ‘natural law.’ Leading authorities avoid using it altogether and the main proponent of natural law theory in English, John Mitchell Finnis, hardly uses it in his writings. ‘Natural law’ in this paper does not mean what it means in three different contexts in which the expression sometimes is used. These contexts are as follows. First, “natural law” as one of the several “natural laws” formerly called “eternal law”. Second, “natural law” as a religious idea, related to the teachings of the Catholic Church. Third, “natural law” as a certain mode of American jurisprudence, which has fallen into great discredit. This paper shall indicate in what respects the meaning that the author holds to be focal has something in common with, and how it differentiates from, the other meanings that prevail in those other contexts. In so doing, this paper will inevitably start to define natural law. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/239203 Legarre, Santiago; What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities; Strathmore University; Strathmore Law Journal; 7; 1; 10-2023; 15-23 2411-5975 2413-7162 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/239203 |
identifier_str_mv |
Legarre, Santiago; What Natural Law Is Not: Distinguishing Natural Law from Other, Related Normativities; Strathmore University; Strathmore Law Journal; 7; 1; 10-2023; 15-23 2411-5975 2413-7162 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journal.strathmore.edu/index.php/law/article/view/243 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.52907/slj.v7i1.243 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Strathmore University |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Strathmore University |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1846083353405554688 |
score |
13.22299 |