Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study
- Autores
- Liu, Nancy H.; Mazzoni, Agustina; Zamberlin, Nina; Colomar, Mercedes; Chang, Olivia H.; Arnaud, Lila; Althabe, Fernando; Belizan, Jose
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- BACKGROUND: Over the last three decades, cesarean section (CS) rates have been rising around the world despite no associated improvement in maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The role of women's preferences for mode of delivery in contributing to the high CS rate remains controversial; however these preferences are difficult to assess, as they are influenced by culture, knowledge of risk and benefits, and personal and social factors. In this qualitative study, our objective was to understand women's preferences and motivational factors for mode of delivery. This information will inform the development and design of an assessment aimed at understanding the role of the women's preferences for mode of delivery. METHODS: We conducted 4 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 12 in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 4 large non-public and public hospitals. Our sample included 29 nulliparous pregnant women aged 18-35 years old, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age, without pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, without known pre-existing medical illness or diseases diagnosed during pregnancy, without an indication of elective cesarean section, and who are not health professionals. FGDs and interviews followed a pre-designed guide based on the health belief model and social cognitive theory of health decisions and behaviors. RESULTS: Most of the women preferred vaginal delivery (VD) due to cultural, personal, and social factors. VD was viewed as normal, healthy, and a natural rite of passage from womanhood to motherhood. Pain associated with vaginal delivery was viewed positively. In contrast, women viewed CS as a medical decision and often deferred decisions to medical staff in the presence of medical indication. CONCLUSIONS: These findings converge with quantitative and qualitative studies showing that women prefer towards VD for various cultural, personal and social reasons. Actual CS rates appear to diverge from women's preferences and reasons are discussed.
Fil: Liu, Nancy H.. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mazzoni, Agustina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
Fil: Zamberlin, Nina. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad; Argentina
Fil: Colomar, Mercedes. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Chang, Olivia H.. University of Tulane; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arnaud, Lila. University of Tulane; Estados Unidos
Fil: Althabe, Fernando. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
Mode of Delivery
Cesarean Section
Women'S Preferences
Qualitative - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/22084
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_fb40daec8923507157dcc4b3c08b05c7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/22084 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative studyLiu, Nancy H.Mazzoni, AgustinaZamberlin, NinaColomar, MercedesChang, Olivia H.Arnaud, LilaAlthabe, FernandoBelizan, JoseMode of DeliveryCesarean SectionWomen'S PreferencesQualitativehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3BACKGROUND: Over the last three decades, cesarean section (CS) rates have been rising around the world despite no associated improvement in maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The role of women's preferences for mode of delivery in contributing to the high CS rate remains controversial; however these preferences are difficult to assess, as they are influenced by culture, knowledge of risk and benefits, and personal and social factors. In this qualitative study, our objective was to understand women's preferences and motivational factors for mode of delivery. This information will inform the development and design of an assessment aimed at understanding the role of the women's preferences for mode of delivery. METHODS: We conducted 4 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 12 in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 4 large non-public and public hospitals. Our sample included 29 nulliparous pregnant women aged 18-35 years old, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age, without pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, without known pre-existing medical illness or diseases diagnosed during pregnancy, without an indication of elective cesarean section, and who are not health professionals. FGDs and interviews followed a pre-designed guide based on the health belief model and social cognitive theory of health decisions and behaviors. RESULTS: Most of the women preferred vaginal delivery (VD) due to cultural, personal, and social factors. VD was viewed as normal, healthy, and a natural rite of passage from womanhood to motherhood. Pain associated with vaginal delivery was viewed positively. In contrast, women viewed CS as a medical decision and often deferred decisions to medical staff in the presence of medical indication. CONCLUSIONS: These findings converge with quantitative and qualitative studies showing that women prefer towards VD for various cultural, personal and social reasons. Actual CS rates appear to diverge from women's preferences and reasons are discussed.Fil: Liu, Nancy H.. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Mazzoni, Agustina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; ArgentinaFil: Zamberlin, Nina. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad; ArgentinaFil: Colomar, Mercedes. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaFil: Chang, Olivia H.. University of Tulane; Estados UnidosFil: Arnaud, Lila. University of Tulane; Estados UnidosFil: Althabe, Fernando. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaBioMed Central2013-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/22084Liu, Nancy H.; Mazzoni, Agustina; Zamberlin, Nina; Colomar, Mercedes; Chang, Olivia H.; et al.; Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study; BioMed Central; Reproductive Health; 10; 2; 1-2013; 10-121742-4755CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561262/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-10-2info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/1742-4755-10-2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:46:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/22084instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:46:39.706CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study |
title |
Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study |
spellingShingle |
Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study Liu, Nancy H. Mode of Delivery Cesarean Section Women'S Preferences Qualitative |
title_short |
Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study |
title_full |
Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr |
Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study |
title_sort |
Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Liu, Nancy H. Mazzoni, Agustina Zamberlin, Nina Colomar, Mercedes Chang, Olivia H. Arnaud, Lila Althabe, Fernando Belizan, Jose |
author |
Liu, Nancy H. |
author_facet |
Liu, Nancy H. Mazzoni, Agustina Zamberlin, Nina Colomar, Mercedes Chang, Olivia H. Arnaud, Lila Althabe, Fernando Belizan, Jose |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mazzoni, Agustina Zamberlin, Nina Colomar, Mercedes Chang, Olivia H. Arnaud, Lila Althabe, Fernando Belizan, Jose |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Mode of Delivery Cesarean Section Women'S Preferences Qualitative |
topic |
Mode of Delivery Cesarean Section Women'S Preferences Qualitative |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
BACKGROUND: Over the last three decades, cesarean section (CS) rates have been rising around the world despite no associated improvement in maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The role of women's preferences for mode of delivery in contributing to the high CS rate remains controversial; however these preferences are difficult to assess, as they are influenced by culture, knowledge of risk and benefits, and personal and social factors. In this qualitative study, our objective was to understand women's preferences and motivational factors for mode of delivery. This information will inform the development and design of an assessment aimed at understanding the role of the women's preferences for mode of delivery. METHODS: We conducted 4 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 12 in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 4 large non-public and public hospitals. Our sample included 29 nulliparous pregnant women aged 18-35 years old, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age, without pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, without known pre-existing medical illness or diseases diagnosed during pregnancy, without an indication of elective cesarean section, and who are not health professionals. FGDs and interviews followed a pre-designed guide based on the health belief model and social cognitive theory of health decisions and behaviors. RESULTS: Most of the women preferred vaginal delivery (VD) due to cultural, personal, and social factors. VD was viewed as normal, healthy, and a natural rite of passage from womanhood to motherhood. Pain associated with vaginal delivery was viewed positively. In contrast, women viewed CS as a medical decision and often deferred decisions to medical staff in the presence of medical indication. CONCLUSIONS: These findings converge with quantitative and qualitative studies showing that women prefer towards VD for various cultural, personal and social reasons. Actual CS rates appear to diverge from women's preferences and reasons are discussed. Fil: Liu, Nancy H.. University of California; Estados Unidos Fil: Mazzoni, Agustina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina Fil: Zamberlin, Nina. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad; Argentina Fil: Colomar, Mercedes. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina Fil: Chang, Olivia H.. University of Tulane; Estados Unidos Fil: Arnaud, Lila. University of Tulane; Estados Unidos Fil: Althabe, Fernando. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
BACKGROUND: Over the last three decades, cesarean section (CS) rates have been rising around the world despite no associated improvement in maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The role of women's preferences for mode of delivery in contributing to the high CS rate remains controversial; however these preferences are difficult to assess, as they are influenced by culture, knowledge of risk and benefits, and personal and social factors. In this qualitative study, our objective was to understand women's preferences and motivational factors for mode of delivery. This information will inform the development and design of an assessment aimed at understanding the role of the women's preferences for mode of delivery. METHODS: We conducted 4 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 12 in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 4 large non-public and public hospitals. Our sample included 29 nulliparous pregnant women aged 18-35 years old, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age, without pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, without known pre-existing medical illness or diseases diagnosed during pregnancy, without an indication of elective cesarean section, and who are not health professionals. FGDs and interviews followed a pre-designed guide based on the health belief model and social cognitive theory of health decisions and behaviors. RESULTS: Most of the women preferred vaginal delivery (VD) due to cultural, personal, and social factors. VD was viewed as normal, healthy, and a natural rite of passage from womanhood to motherhood. Pain associated with vaginal delivery was viewed positively. In contrast, women viewed CS as a medical decision and often deferred decisions to medical staff in the presence of medical indication. CONCLUSIONS: These findings converge with quantitative and qualitative studies showing that women prefer towards VD for various cultural, personal and social reasons. Actual CS rates appear to diverge from women's preferences and reasons are discussed. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/22084 Liu, Nancy H.; Mazzoni, Agustina; Zamberlin, Nina; Colomar, Mercedes; Chang, Olivia H.; et al.; Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study; BioMed Central; Reproductive Health; 10; 2; 1-2013; 10-12 1742-4755 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/22084 |
identifier_str_mv |
Liu, Nancy H.; Mazzoni, Agustina; Zamberlin, Nina; Colomar, Mercedes; Chang, Olivia H.; et al.; Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study; BioMed Central; Reproductive Health; 10; 2; 1-2013; 10-12 1742-4755 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561262/ info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-10-2 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/1742-4755-10-2 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BioMed Central |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BioMed Central |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842268809188081664 |
score |
13.13397 |