Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study

Autores
Liu, Nancy H.; Mazzoni, Agustina; Zamberlin, Nina; Colomar, Mercedes; Chang, Olivia H.; Arnaud, Lila; Althabe, Fernando; Belizan, Jose
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
BACKGROUND: Over the last three decades, cesarean section (CS) rates have been rising around the world despite no associated improvement in maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The role of women's preferences for mode of delivery in contributing to the high CS rate remains controversial; however these preferences are difficult to assess, as they are influenced by culture, knowledge of risk and benefits, and personal and social factors. In this qualitative study, our objective was to understand women's preferences and motivational factors for mode of delivery. This information will inform the development and design of an assessment aimed at understanding the role of the women's preferences for mode of delivery. METHODS: We conducted 4 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 12 in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 4 large non-public and public hospitals. Our sample included 29 nulliparous pregnant women aged 18-35 years old, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age, without pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, without known pre-existing medical illness or diseases diagnosed during pregnancy, without an indication of elective cesarean section, and who are not health professionals. FGDs and interviews followed a pre-designed guide based on the health belief model and social cognitive theory of health decisions and behaviors. RESULTS: Most of the women preferred vaginal delivery (VD) due to cultural, personal, and social factors. VD was viewed as normal, healthy, and a natural rite of passage from womanhood to motherhood. Pain associated with vaginal delivery was viewed positively. In contrast, women viewed CS as a medical decision and often deferred decisions to medical staff in the presence of medical indication. CONCLUSIONS: These findings converge with quantitative and qualitative studies showing that women prefer towards VD for various cultural, personal and social reasons. Actual CS rates appear to diverge from women's preferences and reasons are discussed.
Fil: Liu, Nancy H.. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mazzoni, Agustina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
Fil: Zamberlin, Nina. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad; Argentina
Fil: Colomar, Mercedes. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Chang, Olivia H.. University of Tulane; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arnaud, Lila. University of Tulane; Estados Unidos
Fil: Althabe, Fernando. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Mode of Delivery
Cesarean Section
Women'S Preferences
Qualitative
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/22084

id CONICETDig_fb40daec8923507157dcc4b3c08b05c7
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/22084
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative studyLiu, Nancy H.Mazzoni, AgustinaZamberlin, NinaColomar, MercedesChang, Olivia H.Arnaud, LilaAlthabe, FernandoBelizan, JoseMode of DeliveryCesarean SectionWomen'S PreferencesQualitativehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3BACKGROUND: Over the last three decades, cesarean section (CS) rates have been rising around the world despite no associated improvement in maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The role of women's preferences for mode of delivery in contributing to the high CS rate remains controversial; however these preferences are difficult to assess, as they are influenced by culture, knowledge of risk and benefits, and personal and social factors. In this qualitative study, our objective was to understand women's preferences and motivational factors for mode of delivery. This information will inform the development and design of an assessment aimed at understanding the role of the women's preferences for mode of delivery. METHODS: We conducted 4 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 12 in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 4 large non-public and public hospitals. Our sample included 29 nulliparous pregnant women aged 18-35 years old, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age, without pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, without known pre-existing medical illness or diseases diagnosed during pregnancy, without an indication of elective cesarean section, and who are not health professionals. FGDs and interviews followed a pre-designed guide based on the health belief model and social cognitive theory of health decisions and behaviors. RESULTS: Most of the women preferred vaginal delivery (VD) due to cultural, personal, and social factors. VD was viewed as normal, healthy, and a natural rite of passage from womanhood to motherhood. Pain associated with vaginal delivery was viewed positively. In contrast, women viewed CS as a medical decision and often deferred decisions to medical staff in the presence of medical indication. CONCLUSIONS: These findings converge with quantitative and qualitative studies showing that women prefer towards VD for various cultural, personal and social reasons. Actual CS rates appear to diverge from women's preferences and reasons are discussed.Fil: Liu, Nancy H.. University of California; Estados UnidosFil: Mazzoni, Agustina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; ArgentinaFil: Zamberlin, Nina. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad; ArgentinaFil: Colomar, Mercedes. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaFil: Chang, Olivia H.. University of Tulane; Estados UnidosFil: Arnaud, Lila. University of Tulane; Estados UnidosFil: Althabe, Fernando. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaBioMed Central2013-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/22084Liu, Nancy H.; Mazzoni, Agustina; Zamberlin, Nina; Colomar, Mercedes; Chang, Olivia H.; et al.; Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study; BioMed Central; Reproductive Health; 10; 2; 1-2013; 10-121742-4755CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561262/info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-10-2info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/1742-4755-10-2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:46:39Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/22084instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:46:39.706CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study
title Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study
spellingShingle Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study
Liu, Nancy H.
Mode of Delivery
Cesarean Section
Women'S Preferences
Qualitative
title_short Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study
title_full Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study
title_sort Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Liu, Nancy H.
Mazzoni, Agustina
Zamberlin, Nina
Colomar, Mercedes
Chang, Olivia H.
Arnaud, Lila
Althabe, Fernando
Belizan, Jose
author Liu, Nancy H.
author_facet Liu, Nancy H.
Mazzoni, Agustina
Zamberlin, Nina
Colomar, Mercedes
Chang, Olivia H.
Arnaud, Lila
Althabe, Fernando
Belizan, Jose
author_role author
author2 Mazzoni, Agustina
Zamberlin, Nina
Colomar, Mercedes
Chang, Olivia H.
Arnaud, Lila
Althabe, Fernando
Belizan, Jose
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Mode of Delivery
Cesarean Section
Women'S Preferences
Qualitative
topic Mode of Delivery
Cesarean Section
Women'S Preferences
Qualitative
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv BACKGROUND: Over the last three decades, cesarean section (CS) rates have been rising around the world despite no associated improvement in maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The role of women's preferences for mode of delivery in contributing to the high CS rate remains controversial; however these preferences are difficult to assess, as they are influenced by culture, knowledge of risk and benefits, and personal and social factors. In this qualitative study, our objective was to understand women's preferences and motivational factors for mode of delivery. This information will inform the development and design of an assessment aimed at understanding the role of the women's preferences for mode of delivery. METHODS: We conducted 4 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 12 in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 4 large non-public and public hospitals. Our sample included 29 nulliparous pregnant women aged 18-35 years old, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age, without pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, without known pre-existing medical illness or diseases diagnosed during pregnancy, without an indication of elective cesarean section, and who are not health professionals. FGDs and interviews followed a pre-designed guide based on the health belief model and social cognitive theory of health decisions and behaviors. RESULTS: Most of the women preferred vaginal delivery (VD) due to cultural, personal, and social factors. VD was viewed as normal, healthy, and a natural rite of passage from womanhood to motherhood. Pain associated with vaginal delivery was viewed positively. In contrast, women viewed CS as a medical decision and often deferred decisions to medical staff in the presence of medical indication. CONCLUSIONS: These findings converge with quantitative and qualitative studies showing that women prefer towards VD for various cultural, personal and social reasons. Actual CS rates appear to diverge from women's preferences and reasons are discussed.
Fil: Liu, Nancy H.. University of California; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mazzoni, Agustina. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina
Fil: Zamberlin, Nina. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad; Argentina
Fil: Colomar, Mercedes. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; Argentina
Fil: Chang, Olivia H.. University of Tulane; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arnaud, Lila. University of Tulane; Estados Unidos
Fil: Althabe, Fernando. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Belizan, Jose. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description BACKGROUND: Over the last three decades, cesarean section (CS) rates have been rising around the world despite no associated improvement in maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The role of women's preferences for mode of delivery in contributing to the high CS rate remains controversial; however these preferences are difficult to assess, as they are influenced by culture, knowledge of risk and benefits, and personal and social factors. In this qualitative study, our objective was to understand women's preferences and motivational factors for mode of delivery. This information will inform the development and design of an assessment aimed at understanding the role of the women's preferences for mode of delivery. METHODS: We conducted 4 focus group discussions (FGDs) and 12 in-depth interviews with pregnant women in Buenos Aires, Argentina in 4 large non-public and public hospitals. Our sample included 29 nulliparous pregnant women aged 18-35 years old, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age, without pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, without known pre-existing medical illness or diseases diagnosed during pregnancy, without an indication of elective cesarean section, and who are not health professionals. FGDs and interviews followed a pre-designed guide based on the health belief model and social cognitive theory of health decisions and behaviors. RESULTS: Most of the women preferred vaginal delivery (VD) due to cultural, personal, and social factors. VD was viewed as normal, healthy, and a natural rite of passage from womanhood to motherhood. Pain associated with vaginal delivery was viewed positively. In contrast, women viewed CS as a medical decision and often deferred decisions to medical staff in the presence of medical indication. CONCLUSIONS: These findings converge with quantitative and qualitative studies showing that women prefer towards VD for various cultural, personal and social reasons. Actual CS rates appear to diverge from women's preferences and reasons are discussed.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/22084
Liu, Nancy H.; Mazzoni, Agustina; Zamberlin, Nina; Colomar, Mercedes; Chang, Olivia H.; et al.; Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study; BioMed Central; Reproductive Health; 10; 2; 1-2013; 10-12
1742-4755
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/22084
identifier_str_mv Liu, Nancy H.; Mazzoni, Agustina; Zamberlin, Nina; Colomar, Mercedes; Chang, Olivia H.; et al.; Preferences for mode of delivery in nulliparous Argentinean women: a qualitative study; BioMed Central; Reproductive Health; 10; 2; 1-2013; 10-12
1742-4755
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561262/
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1742-4755-10-2
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/1742-4755-10-2
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed Central
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BioMed Central
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268809188081664
score 13.13397