Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate

Autores
Palermo, Vicente Antonio
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The debate about the operation of Brazilian political institutions is far from conclusive. It could hardly be different, since current Brazilian democratic regime is only 30 years-old. This article updates a previous one, published in 2000, in which I discuss different and rival interpretations on the functioning of the Brazilian democracy. Some new works argue that a 'dialectic synthesis' of those strands has been recently produced. This article demonstrates this argument is not accurate. Instead, my main argument is that, in spite of rich analyses, new evidences and some displacements, the interpretations and paradigms guiding that debate remain the same. On the other hand, in spite of the solid position of the interpretation sustaining how the Brazilian political system ensures governability, the current institutional debate goes far beyond this paradigm by setting new themes and approaches. To demonstrate this argument, the article presents the evolution of such debate.
Fil: Palermo, Vicente Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones "Gino Germani"; Argentina
Materia
Brazil
political institutions
Brazilian politics
governability.
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/106724
Acceder
id CONICETDig_fafe2815710204921f107bd250228a11
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/106724
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive DebatePalermo, Vicente AntonioBrazilpolitical institutionsBrazilian politicsgovernability.https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The debate about the operation of Brazilian political institutions is far from conclusive. It could hardly be different, since current Brazilian democratic regime is only 30 years-old. This article updates a previous one, published in 2000, in which I discuss different and rival interpretations on the functioning of the Brazilian democracy. Some new works argue that a 'dialectic synthesis' of those strands has been recently produced. This article demonstrates this argument is not accurate. Instead, my main argument is that, in spite of rich analyses, new evidences and some displacements, the interpretations and paradigms guiding that debate remain the same. On the other hand, in spite of the solid position of the interpretation sustaining how the Brazilian political system ensures governability, the current institutional debate goes far beyond this paradigm by setting new themes and approaches. To demonstrate this argument, the article presents the evolution of such debate.Fil: Palermo, Vicente Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones "Gino Germani"; ArgentinaAssociação Brasileira de Ciência Política2016-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/106724Palermo, Vicente Antonio; Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate; Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política; Brazilian Political Science Review; 10; 2; 6-2016; 1-291981-3821CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1590/1981-38212016000200003info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/article/brazilian-political-institutions-an-inconclusive-debate/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-11-12T09:48:23Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/106724instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-11-12 09:48:23.43CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate
title Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate
spellingShingle Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate
Palermo, Vicente Antonio
Brazil
political institutions
Brazilian politics
governability.
title_short Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate
title_full Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate
title_fullStr Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate
title_sort Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Palermo, Vicente Antonio
author Palermo, Vicente Antonio
author_facet Palermo, Vicente Antonio
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Brazil
political institutions
Brazilian politics
governability.
topic Brazil
political institutions
Brazilian politics
governability.
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The debate about the operation of Brazilian political institutions is far from conclusive. It could hardly be different, since current Brazilian democratic regime is only 30 years-old. This article updates a previous one, published in 2000, in which I discuss different and rival interpretations on the functioning of the Brazilian democracy. Some new works argue that a 'dialectic synthesis' of those strands has been recently produced. This article demonstrates this argument is not accurate. Instead, my main argument is that, in spite of rich analyses, new evidences and some displacements, the interpretations and paradigms guiding that debate remain the same. On the other hand, in spite of the solid position of the interpretation sustaining how the Brazilian political system ensures governability, the current institutional debate goes far beyond this paradigm by setting new themes and approaches. To demonstrate this argument, the article presents the evolution of such debate.
Fil: Palermo, Vicente Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Investigaciones "Gino Germani"; Argentina
description The debate about the operation of Brazilian political institutions is far from conclusive. It could hardly be different, since current Brazilian democratic regime is only 30 years-old. This article updates a previous one, published in 2000, in which I discuss different and rival interpretations on the functioning of the Brazilian democracy. Some new works argue that a 'dialectic synthesis' of those strands has been recently produced. This article demonstrates this argument is not accurate. Instead, my main argument is that, in spite of rich analyses, new evidences and some displacements, the interpretations and paradigms guiding that debate remain the same. On the other hand, in spite of the solid position of the interpretation sustaining how the Brazilian political system ensures governability, the current institutional debate goes far beyond this paradigm by setting new themes and approaches. To demonstrate this argument, the article presents the evolution of such debate.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/106724
Palermo, Vicente Antonio; Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate; Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política; Brazilian Political Science Review; 10; 2; 6-2016; 1-29
1981-3821
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/106724
identifier_str_mv Palermo, Vicente Antonio; Brazilian Political Institutions: an Inconclusive Debate; Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política; Brazilian Political Science Review; 10; 2; 6-2016; 1-29
1981-3821
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1590/1981-38212016000200003
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/article/brazilian-political-institutions-an-inconclusive-debate/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1848598005959098368
score 12.976206

Publicaciones similares