Architecture
- Autores
- Vellinga, Marcel; Tomasi, Jorge Miguel Eduardo
- Año de publicación
- 2024
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Anthropologists have shown an interest in architecture since at least the end of the nineteenth century, though not to the extent that may be expected given the prominent position that architecture plays in all human societies. Notwithstanding their relatively marginal position within the discipline, anthropological studies of architecture have made some significant contributions to our understanding of the dynamic and mutually constitutive relationships between architecture, culture, and environment. These contributions include the practice of making and its central role in the development of architecture over time; processes of change and how to understand and deal with them; and anthropology’s contribution to the study of architecture as a professional discipline. The anthropological study of architecture, defined as a continuous process of designing, making, and dwelling, requires a holistic approach that considers the diverse material, social, and symbolic registers of architecture, as well as its various scales. Such an approach can pave the way for more collaborative projects between anthropologists and architects that can explore the characteristics and possibilities of both existing and new forms of designing, making, and dwelling. Thus, this entry looks at the history of anthropology’s relationship with architecture to contribute to current debates about how both disciplines can forge new practices through making.
Fil: Vellinga, Marcel. Oxford Brookes University (oxford Brookes University);
Fil: Tomasi, Jorge Miguel Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta; Argentina - Materia
-
Design
Dwelling
Materiality
Semiotics - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239351
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_fad776e10663e17c54d3e3de9259c045 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239351 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
ArchitectureVellinga, MarcelTomasi, Jorge Miguel EduardoDesignDwellingMaterialitySemioticshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Anthropologists have shown an interest in architecture since at least the end of the nineteenth century, though not to the extent that may be expected given the prominent position that architecture plays in all human societies. Notwithstanding their relatively marginal position within the discipline, anthropological studies of architecture have made some significant contributions to our understanding of the dynamic and mutually constitutive relationships between architecture, culture, and environment. These contributions include the practice of making and its central role in the development of architecture over time; processes of change and how to understand and deal with them; and anthropology’s contribution to the study of architecture as a professional discipline. The anthropological study of architecture, defined as a continuous process of designing, making, and dwelling, requires a holistic approach that considers the diverse material, social, and symbolic registers of architecture, as well as its various scales. Such an approach can pave the way for more collaborative projects between anthropologists and architects that can explore the characteristics and possibilities of both existing and new forms of designing, making, and dwelling. Thus, this entry looks at the history of anthropology’s relationship with architecture to contribute to current debates about how both disciplines can forge new practices through making.Fil: Vellinga, Marcel. Oxford Brookes University (oxford Brookes University);Fil: Tomasi, Jorge Miguel Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta; ArgentinaUniversity of Cambridge2024-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/239351Vellinga, Marcel; Tomasi, Jorge Miguel Eduardo; Architecture; University of Cambridge; The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology; 2024; 2-2024; 1-162398-516XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/architectureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.29164/24architectureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:11:09Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/239351instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:11:09.731CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Architecture |
title |
Architecture |
spellingShingle |
Architecture Vellinga, Marcel Design Dwelling Materiality Semiotics |
title_short |
Architecture |
title_full |
Architecture |
title_fullStr |
Architecture |
title_full_unstemmed |
Architecture |
title_sort |
Architecture |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Vellinga, Marcel Tomasi, Jorge Miguel Eduardo |
author |
Vellinga, Marcel |
author_facet |
Vellinga, Marcel Tomasi, Jorge Miguel Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Tomasi, Jorge Miguel Eduardo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Design Dwelling Materiality Semiotics |
topic |
Design Dwelling Materiality Semiotics |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.5 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Anthropologists have shown an interest in architecture since at least the end of the nineteenth century, though not to the extent that may be expected given the prominent position that architecture plays in all human societies. Notwithstanding their relatively marginal position within the discipline, anthropological studies of architecture have made some significant contributions to our understanding of the dynamic and mutually constitutive relationships between architecture, culture, and environment. These contributions include the practice of making and its central role in the development of architecture over time; processes of change and how to understand and deal with them; and anthropology’s contribution to the study of architecture as a professional discipline. The anthropological study of architecture, defined as a continuous process of designing, making, and dwelling, requires a holistic approach that considers the diverse material, social, and symbolic registers of architecture, as well as its various scales. Such an approach can pave the way for more collaborative projects between anthropologists and architects that can explore the characteristics and possibilities of both existing and new forms of designing, making, and dwelling. Thus, this entry looks at the history of anthropology’s relationship with architecture to contribute to current debates about how both disciplines can forge new practices through making. Fil: Vellinga, Marcel. Oxford Brookes University (oxford Brookes University); Fil: Tomasi, Jorge Miguel Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Salta; Argentina |
description |
Anthropologists have shown an interest in architecture since at least the end of the nineteenth century, though not to the extent that may be expected given the prominent position that architecture plays in all human societies. Notwithstanding their relatively marginal position within the discipline, anthropological studies of architecture have made some significant contributions to our understanding of the dynamic and mutually constitutive relationships between architecture, culture, and environment. These contributions include the practice of making and its central role in the development of architecture over time; processes of change and how to understand and deal with them; and anthropology’s contribution to the study of architecture as a professional discipline. The anthropological study of architecture, defined as a continuous process of designing, making, and dwelling, requires a holistic approach that considers the diverse material, social, and symbolic registers of architecture, as well as its various scales. Such an approach can pave the way for more collaborative projects between anthropologists and architects that can explore the characteristics and possibilities of both existing and new forms of designing, making, and dwelling. Thus, this entry looks at the history of anthropology’s relationship with architecture to contribute to current debates about how both disciplines can forge new practices through making. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/239351 Vellinga, Marcel; Tomasi, Jorge Miguel Eduardo; Architecture; University of Cambridge; The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology; 2024; 2-2024; 1-16 2398-516X CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/239351 |
identifier_str_mv |
Vellinga, Marcel; Tomasi, Jorge Miguel Eduardo; Architecture; University of Cambridge; The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology; 2024; 2-2024; 1-16 2398-516X CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/architecture info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.29164/24architecture |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
University of Cambridge |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
University of Cambridge |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614007689838592 |
score |
13.070432 |